
Originally Posted by
Winston001
....and those responses show that at least 60% of accidents are acknowledged to be the fault of the rider. Not helpful for your cause.
60% is quite good. What percentage of car accidents do you suppose are caused by the driver?
Also, fault is only attributable to one person if you're a laywer and you mean "blame". ANY unplanned incident has many many variables that must line up in order to form nescessary contributing steps.

Originally Posted by
Winston001
Or.......you could conclude from the low participation rate that rights, ACC levies etc are low priority concerns for motorcyclists. Which I'm sorry to say is the most likely answer.
D
I disagree. I strenuously object to being shafted re recent huge levy increases. I object mostly because the bastards couldn't even be bothered to lie properly. David's right, the numbers upon which the sale of the policy changes were based are meaningless. The spin job itself was pitifully transparent, utter bilge.
The reason I didn't complete David's poll is that, possibly like many I found my data didn't fit the poll options.

Originally Posted by
Winston001
Sometimes I really do think its ok to stop and smell the roses.

Yup, ACC as a strategic initiative is a bloody good idea. Our health system, for all it's faults is right up there amongst the best in the world. I reckon it's the best in terms of bang for yer buck.
That won't last long if they continue with the divide and bleed white thing. You simply can't ethically charge people more for their share of ACC costs based on statistical likelihood of their user costs. What's the logical conclusion? Any history of mental health issues in your familyu sir/madam? Is it true that your mother once fell off a horse?
Nah, I'm all for telling them to fuck off, but only if there's a chance we can back it up with a bit of hurty stuff.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Bookmarks