Advertise with Kiwi Biker
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 87

Thread: V-twin vs inline 4?

  1. #61
    Join Date
    26th March 2008 - 09:32
    Bike
    2005 XRJ1300S
    Location
    Auckland - Farm Cove
    Posts
    173
    I havn't read the thread but I do cuurently own an in-line 4(XJR1300), v-twin (XV1000) and a Parallel twin (XS650)....all I can say is they are different...I'm sure that comes as a huge surprise..


    Advertise with Kiwi Biker
    As my wife says...it is all about me...and we both know she is always right.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    15th January 2008 - 08:51
    Bike
    2006 suzuki SV650s
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    147

    90 degree twins hard!

    Ive owned many 4cyl sportbikes, loved the way the power just builds and builds like a turbine. Great If you wana go trackday racing or really fast in a strait line, but i then bought an SV650s twin...Oh the glorious sound of 90degree DOHC vtwin with full, 2bros exhaust system Fair to say it was slower in outright speed than my cbr600 (Bout 45hp less) But in the real world, ie twistie new zealand roads, and traffic, the SV is much more responsive and willing to pull hard even from low rpm. My mate who has a dynod 140hp gsxr 750 always comments how exiting out of tight corners I (and my other mate on a buell xb12r) just pull away, untill he gets a strait to reel us in. I find it easier to get the power down sooner with the twins. And as someone else stated in the thread, the narrow engine configuration keeps the bike very slim. So you can tell ive swaped camps to vtwins, but i havent ridden a busa...
    lets flip a coin... HEADS i get TAIL, TAILS i get HEAD

  3. #63
    Join Date
    6th June 2008 - 17:24
    Bike
    The Vixen - K8 GSXR600
    Location
    Behind keybd in The Tron
    Posts
    5,364
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty69 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Ive owned many 4cyl sportbikes, loved the way the power just builds and builds like a turbine. Great If you wana go trackday racing or really fast in a strait line, but i then bought an SV650s twin...Oh the glorious sound of 90degree DOHC vtwin with full, 2bros exhaust system Fair to say it was slower in outright speed than my cbr600 (Bout 45hp less) But in the real world, ie twistie new zealand roads, and traffic, the SV is much more responsive and willing to pull hard even from low rpm. My mate who has a dynod 140hp gsxr 750 always comments how exiting out of tight corners I (and my other mate on a buell xb12r) just pull away, untill he gets a strait to reel us in. I find it easier to get the power down sooner with the twins. And as someone else stated in the thread, the narrow engine configuration keeps the bike very slim. So you can tell ive swaped camps to vtwins, but i havent ridden a busa...
    Opposite experience for me. Had an SV650S then was seduced by a GSX-R600.

    Not because of the engine config. but because of the superior handling of the gixxer. Still love the V2 engine note. But also love the hysterical banshee scream of the IL4 revving to 16k.

    A Ducati 848 is on my bucket list.
    Now that I'm older, I thought it was great that I seemed to have more patience. Turns out I just don't give a shit...

  4. #64
    Join Date
    15th January 2008 - 08:51
    Bike
    2006 suzuki SV650s
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    147
    Quote Originally Posted by slofox View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Opposite experience for me. Had an SV650S then was seduced by a GSX-R600.

    Not because of the engine config. but because of the superior handling of the gixxer. Still love the V2 engine note. But also love the hysterical banshee scream of the IL4 revving to 16k.

    A Ducati 848 is on my bucket list.
    Yeah id love some USD forks and bigger brakes for sure!
    lets flip a coin... HEADS i get TAIL, TAILS i get HEAD

  5. #65
    Join Date
    16th September 2004 - 16:48
    Bike
    Bike? I came here for the porn!
    Location
    AKL
    Posts
    5,928
    Blog Entries
    1
    the best engine configuration is.............................................


















































































































































    assembled and running.
    Look at the world and decide. Are you going to laugh, or cry today?
    www.farrst.blogspot.com

  6. #66
    Join Date
    19th April 2009 - 18:52
    Bike
    ZX6R
    Location
    Hamiltron
    Posts
    1,711
    Quote Originally Posted by slofox View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    A Ducati 848 is on my bucket list.


    Quote Originally Posted by avgas View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    the best engine configuration is.............................................
    V4

  7. #67
    Join Date
    13th December 2008 - 19:22
    Bike
    Your mom
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    2,610
    Quote Originally Posted by avgas View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    the best engine configuration is.............................................
    Wank wank wank wank wankel.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    16th September 2004 - 16:48
    Bike
    Bike? I came here for the porn!
    Location
    AKL
    Posts
    5,928
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by steve_t View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    V4
    V12 is 3 times better than that.
    Look at the world and decide. Are you going to laugh, or cry today?
    www.farrst.blogspot.com

  9. #69
    Join Date
    16th September 2004 - 16:48
    Bike
    Bike? I came here for the porn!
    Location
    AKL
    Posts
    5,928
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by SMOKEU View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Wank wank wank wank wankel.
    You might be right. If it didn't break down the wankel is a fantastic configuration.
    Look at the world and decide. Are you going to laugh, or cry today?
    www.farrst.blogspot.com

  10. #70
    Join Date
    17th July 2005 - 22:28
    Bike
    Over polished wreck.
    Location
    Te Puke-ish
    Posts
    6,112
    Quote Originally Posted by avgas View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    You might be right. If it didn't break down the wankel is a fantastic configuration.
    Or use so much petrol.
    Life does not give you lemons, lemon trees do.



  11. #71
    Join Date
    2nd February 2008 - 16:59
    Bike
    an Empty one
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    745
    Quote Originally Posted by ducatilover View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The biggest reason people thing the V's are torque monsters is the power delivery.
    More cylinders = more toque and better breathing = more torque. V-twin = less of everything, but will feel torquey due to the pulsing it makes from the firing order in comparison to a smooth six or four.
    Sooo My MT-01 which produces MORE torque than an r1 (110ft lbs) and only 88bhp....... ???
    Weight of reciprocating parts, level of tune and length of stroke will have a profound effect on the type of power delivery of any engine.

    Usually the big difference today is the high state of tune (BHP for MPH) compared to older bikes. If comparing my old FJ1200 to the MT? It probably does outhaul it for low down grunt, but they built their reputation on being Torque monsters in their day. The MT is much nicer coming out of a bend than my ZZR, unless I have the Zed in a low gear. Really a twin generally has a more 'relaxed' or usable power delivery untill you get into Duck territory.
    I said it in my 'review' of the MT, I dont miss the extra 50 bhp in the slightest and I dont miss the extra 70-80kph either!
    If the road to hell is paved with good intentions; and a man is judged by his deeds and his actions, why say it's the thought that counts? -GrayWolf

  12. #72
    Join Date
    2nd February 2008 - 16:59
    Bike
    an Empty one
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    745
    Quote Originally Posted by SMOKEU View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Wank wank wank wank wankel.
    We already worked out your favourite hobby sonny
    If the road to hell is paved with good intentions; and a man is judged by his deeds and his actions, why say it's the thought that counts? -GrayWolf

  13. #73
    Join Date
    17th July 2005 - 22:28
    Bike
    Over polished wreck.
    Location
    Te Puke-ish
    Posts
    6,112
    Quote Originally Posted by GrayWolf View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Sooo My MT-01 which produces MORE torque than an r1 (110ft lbs) and only 88bhp....... ???
    Weight of reciprocating parts, level of tune and length of stroke will have a profound effect on the type of power delivery of any engine.
    Your MT-01 has a huge engine... (Giz us a go on it?)

    Quote Originally Posted by GrayWolf View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Usually the big difference today is the high state of tune (BHP for MPH) compared to older bikes. If comparing my old FJ1200 to the MT? It probably does outhaul it for low down grunt, but they built their reputation on being Torque monsters in their day. The MT is much nicer coming out of a bend than my ZZR, unless I have the Zed in a low gear. Really a twin generally has a more 'relaxed' or usable power delivery untill you get into Duck territory.
    I said it in my 'review' of the MT, I dont miss the extra 50 bhp in the slightest and I dont miss the extra 70-80kph either!
    Higher state of tune gives more torque.
    But, most think an engine with torquey feeling low end (like Twins tend to be) have more torque...they don't.
    I'm all for something that feels like it has gobs of torque though.
    MT-01 vs ZZR11 is a bit of a big change though, I can see why you did it.
    Life does not give you lemons, lemon trees do.



  14. #74
    Join Date
    22nd January 2009 - 16:38
    Bike
    Bandito
    Location
    Hawera
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by GrayWolf View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Sooo My MT-01 which produces MORE torque than an r1 (110ft lbs) and only 88bhp....... ???
    Queue the "No replacement for displacement" comment, Actually remarkably accurate in this instance.
    Laziness is nothing more than the habit of resting before you get tired.
    Trying is the first step to sucking.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    19th April 2009 - 18:52
    Bike
    ZX6R
    Location
    Hamiltron
    Posts
    1,711
    Quote Originally Posted by raziel1983 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Queue the "No replacement for displacement" comment, Actually remarkably accurate in this instance.
    Not sure if that saying is worth waiting in line for

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •