So on Campbell Live tonight a motorcycle was watiing to turn right into a side street but was giving way to stream of cars turning left.
The truck turning right out of the street went, and the reporter said they were in the wrong because it didn't give way to the bike, even though the bike couldn't turn due to all the cars he was giving way to.
Either she's useless and should learn about what she's reporting on before making judgement, or I have got this wrong. Any one?
I reckon that the reporter was wrong.
Went for my full licence today (which I passed!!) and I think that the examiner took me through every intersection in town. Maan if I didn't know the new rules before I sure as hell know them now.
Probably a good time to do it as everyone was cautious and the eye contact - sheit it was everywhere. Reckon in a couple of weeks when all get lax it could be completely different
you gots it wrong, unlike the old rule where the left turner got advantage by having someone going straight through blocking the right turner. The same isn't true with the new law, both vehicles are legally stuck until the right turner finally gets a gap, which at some intersections could be 1 long wait
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
You got it wrong. The truck could turn right because all the cars were turning left. The bike couldn't turn right because he had to give way to the cars turning left.
Just as in previous times, a left turning vehicle (opposite a right turning car) could turn left because the right turning car had to give way to straight thru traffic.
All clear now ???
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
If the bike can't turn into the street then the truck doesn't have to give way to it. I say you two are wrong, as is the reporter.
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
Based on your interpretation or actual law? If the latter can you reference (seriously, not being a c****)
My interpretation is you give way to the person turning into the street. The biker wasn't turning.
I've just tried googling for the actual legal description of the law but can only find glossy pamphlets. Which like the road code aren't a legal document.
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
Law is all about interpretation, keeps the lawyers paid.
But you can be about to do something for quite some while (years in some peoples cases), you'd have to argue that altho he was waiting to turn right he wasn't "about" to turn right for quite some while. I don't like your chances.
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks