Originally Posted by
ldcroberts
Bike was brand new so he is claiming it's gone way down in value over 4 months (e.g. over $1000) by using some vague criteria based on what the occasional person who is forced to sell a brand new bike second hand can get - but that doesn't fit right with the "willing seller" part of the clause I'm sure.
Like HELL!
The bike was new and only 4 months old. If insured I would not accept anything less than the full value of a NEW replacement (even if the price has gone up). If not insured I would settle for no less from the guilty party.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Bookmarks