View Poll Results: Has a CBTA assessor checked your bike's LAMS compliance? Or has a cop checked?

Voters
57. You may not vote on this poll
  • I've never been pulled over while on my learner's or restricted

    34 59.65%
  • No

    12 21.05%
  • Yes

    15 26.32%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 47

Thread: Do cops ever check your bike's LAMS compliance?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    13th December 2008 - 18:22
    Bike
    Your mom
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    3,901
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike.Gayner View Post
    Is this correct? Doesn't seem right to me - bikes hardly ever seem to get stopped. I've never been stopped on my bike, and been stopped many times in my cars.
    You're MUCH more likely to get stopped by police late at night, in the early hours of the morning, or riding a bike on a popular road for bikers in the summer when the cops are out on a mission to bust heaps of riders for shit, like SH75.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    14th June 2011 - 01:46
    Bike
    Between bikes
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    1,013
    Never been checked over to my knowledge and I've never been pulled over.

    If my bike WAS modded I would put it back to standard for any tests, though. Would be dumb to fail a licence test without leaving the gate, just cos of a slipon. Though I believe a workmate recently did his L>R test with a slipon on his 08+ Ninja 250.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    2nd July 2012 - 10:04
    Bike
    A black one
    Location
    Manukau
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by Erelyes View Post
    Never been checked over to my knowledge and I've never been pulled over.

    If my bike WAS modded I would put it back to standard for any tests, though. Would be dumb to fail a licence test without leaving the gate, just cos of a slipon. Though I believe a workmate recently did his L>R test with a slipon on his 08+ Ninja 250.
    As far as I know, a slip on exhaust is fine on a 250 as it wouldn't drastically change the power/weight ratio enough. You can't modify anything higher than a 250 at all though for it to be legal.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    1st October 2013 - 15:29
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,372
    Quote Originally Posted by f2dz View Post
    As far as I know, a slip on exhaust is fine on a 250 as it wouldn't drastically change the power/weight ratio enough. You can't modify anything higher than a 250 at all though for it to be legal.
    The NO performance mods part of the rules was pretty clear I thought, and includes tufiddys. Unless I missed some fine print.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    2nd July 2012 - 10:04
    Bike
    A black one
    Location
    Manukau
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by Tazz View Post
    The NO performance mods part of the rules was pretty clear I thought, and includes tufiddys. Unless I missed some fine print.
    From the NZTA website:

    The following list of motorcycles with engine capacities between 251cc and 660cc - these motorcycles must be in standard form as produced by the manufacturer. They cannot be modified in any way to increase the power-to-weight ratio.
    They don't specifically mention 250s having to be in standard form. I remember emailing the NZTA about it before the LAMS list came out and they told me it was fine to add a slip on exhaust to a 250 so long as it didn't increase the power/weight above the legal limit. None of the 250s come close to that as far as I'm aware except for the ones already on the prohibited list.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    1st October 2013 - 15:29
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,372
    Quote Originally Posted by f2dz View Post
    From the NZTA website:



    They don't specifically mention 250s having to be in standard form. I remember emailing the NZTA about it before the LAMS list came out and they told me it was fine to add a slip on exhaust to a 250 so long as it didn't increase the power/weight above the legal limit. None of the 250s come close to that as far as I'm aware except for the ones already on the prohibited list.
    "Any motorcycle modified in a way that increases its power-to-weight ratio is no longer LAMS-compliant, regardless of whether it appears on the list."

    http://www.nzta.govt.nz/licence/gett...torcycles.html

    250's aren't on the list (unless they're banned), so that last bit is directed at them I would have thought.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    2nd July 2012 - 10:04
    Bike
    A black one
    Location
    Manukau
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by Tazz View Post
    "Any motorcycle modified in a way that increases its power-to-weight ratio is no longer LAMS-compliant, regardless of whether it appears on the list."

    http://www.nzta.govt.nz/licence/gett...torcycles.html

    250's aren't on the list (unless they're banned), so that last bit is directed at them I would have thought.
    You're right. That's pretty clear cut.

    I just dug out my email from when I asked about my old 250 and the person from NZTA told me it had to remain standard to be legal also. Dunno why I thought it said the opposite..

    So legally you're not allowed one but I've seen plenty of learners/restricted riders with em and have heard of cops not knowing about this rule either though. Especially strange that a guy can do his Ls to Restricted test with an aftermarket zorst.

    Seeing as it's illegal, I'd be mainly concerned about the insurance company not paying out if they find out you have an illegal mod if you happen to bin your bike.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    20th March 2008 - 09:55
    Bike
    The Conscience
    Location
    Wainuiomata
    Posts
    363
    A cbta assessor will check for any obvious signs the bike has been modified in a way that would make it non LAMS compliant.
    "It is by will alone I set my mind in motion"



  9. #24
    Join Date
    20th December 2013 - 23:56
    Bike
    2009 CBR1000RR
    Location
    Auckland, Waitakare
    Posts
    367
    So does this mean I can't ride around on a 636 on my Ls?

  10. #25
    Join Date
    1st October 2013 - 15:29
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,372
    Quote Originally Posted by f2dz View Post
    You're right. That's pretty clear cut.

    I just dug out my email from when I asked about my old 250 and the person from NZTA told me it had to remain standard to be legal also. Dunno why I thought it said the opposite..

    So legally you're not allowed one but I've seen plenty of learners/restricted riders with em and have heard of cops not knowing about this rule either though. Especially strange that a guy can do his Ls to Restricted test with an aftermarket zorst.

    Seeing as it's illegal, I'd be mainly concerned about the insurance company not paying out if they find out you have an illegal mod if you happen to bin your bike.
    They just were either lazy, didn't care or (I'd like to think) were just not paper pushing, power tripping bureaucratic Nazis as some people can be.
    At the end of the day you crashing and not getting insurance isn't going to make a difference to them, and they can just say you had a standard exhaust when you took the test if for some real random reason it ever came up.

    However if you rocked up with a turbo bolted on.....

    At the end of the day a lot of the law is interpretive and only a guideline. You just have to pick and choose your battles/risks.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pound View Post
    So does this mean I can't ride around on a 636 on my Ls?
    It's not on the list but a 659 is

  11. #26
    Join Date
    14th June 2011 - 01:46
    Bike
    Between bikes
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    1,013
    Quote Originally Posted by Tazz View Post
    They just were either lazy, didn't care or (I'd like to think) were just not paper pushing, power tripping bureaucratic Nazis as some people can be.
    AFAIK they were correct. Before the LAMS rules there was just straight up '250s and under' and I don't think there were any restrictions on mods. Could be wrong there though.

    The Pre-LAMS legislation only talks about it being 250cc and under, doesn't talk about mods.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    1st January 2007 - 19:48
    Bike
    Suzuki RG400 Yamaha ST125 Yamaha TDR250
    Location
    Singapura/Banks Peninsula
    Posts
    1,474
    Blog Entries
    1
    Apparently the police commissioner sent an email to all police stations nationwide advising them not to talk about it

    the email subject was
    The silence of the LAMS
    "more than two strokes is masturbation"
    www.motoparts-online.com

  13. #28
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,126
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by haydes55 View Post
    Not licensed to operate the vehicle, therefore no insurance. Try get insured to drive a truck and trailer without a truck licence.
    I think it's actually "Riding outside the conditions of License" ...

    You can buy a non-LAM's legal motorcycle ... register/WOF in your name. You can even insure it in your name (choose policy options carefully)... but they may not pay out if you are/were in breach of your license conditions ...
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  14. #29
    Join Date
    22nd March 2013 - 13:21
    Bike
    Scorpio, 2008
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    27
    Thanks for all the replies guys. When taking insurance into account, I think I'll wait for my full until upgrading to something a bit more powerful.
    Quote Originally Posted by gammaguy View Post
    Apparently the police commissioner sent an email to all police stations nationwide advising them not to talk about it

    the email subject was
    The silence of the LAMS
    Fuckin lol.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,371
    Waaaaaaaay back in the day, any modification resulting in something like 15% increase in power above standard required a low volume engineers certificate. These days, it's pretty much any modification to a vehicle needs it.

    Bikes not mentioned specifically in the LAM list that are under 250cc, are subject to the rules before the list existed.

    Whether a cop can be fucked looking over a bike, is luck of the draw. Anyone who cannot figure this shit out themselves, shouldn't be allowed on the fucken road!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •