There is no reason why the rules need to remain the same as they are now, even agreeing that the current structure is working well.
If you have good reason for changing a rule(s), prepare a proposal with good research and good writing and submit it to MNZ for consideration.
I think that the fuel thing is a good example, though it is unlikely that MNZ would consider making fuel 'open' but would be open to at least Avgas or FIM100, I would think.
In reality though, does anyone need anything more exotic than that?
I think that there might now also be a case for allowing 250GP bikes into the class, perhaps with an model year limit of 2000?
I know that the boys who built/run the class leading Kawasaki 450 are thinking about putting the engine into a modern chassis. So development is being thought about and maybe planned.
There are so many ways to skin a cat in Formula racing, that it always makes sense to keep massaging rule structures to allow new ideas a place to take hold.
I personally have not always been an advocate for F3 at the national level, but I am happy to be proven wrong and to support innovation (after all that is what I do for a living). While 250GP bikes might not be all that innovative, there are a few around sort of looking for a place to run and this could be it. In support of the argument, I know that if I race my bike at National level in F3, I am not going to be anywhere near Zane or Av or Gav and that lot. Another rider on it, maybe. But that is why one would think about a model year limit.
Anyway, good stuff.
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." John Ono Lennon.
"If you have never stared off into the distance then your life is a shame." Counting Crows
"The girls were in tight dresses, just like sweets in cellophane" Joe Jackson
Bookmarks