Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: New helmet technology

  1. #1
    Join Date
    26th March 2015 - 09:12
    Bike
    a Blue one
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    121

    New helmet technology


  2. #2
    Join Date
    24th June 2004 - 17:27
    Bike
    So old you won't care
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    7,879
    Seems a good idea...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    1st October 2013 - 15:29
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,372
    Interesting stuff for sure. Got to keep on looking at new options.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    14th June 2007 - 22:39
    Bike
    Obsolete ones.
    Location
    Pigs back.
    Posts
    5,393
    I like. But.
    How well do they perform on pointy impacts? Good shock absorption but I would like to see how they hold together if the outer shell is compromised.
    Not bean a nay sayer, just that at the mo it's for off road hemlets. As somebody said, moving forward.
    Manopausal.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    1st October 2013 - 15:29
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,372
    Quote Originally Posted by george formby View Post
    I like. But.
    How well do they perform on pointy impacts? Good shock absorption but I would like to see how they hold together if the outer shell is compromised.
    Not bean a nay sayer, just that at the mo it's for off road hemlets. As somebody said, moving forward.
    Last line of the article sums that up:

    "Can you tell me how you're going to crash your bike? If so, I'll tell you exactly what kind of helmet to buy."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    9th October 2008 - 15:52
    Bike
    RSV4RR, M109R, ZX10R
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    6,165
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by george formby View Post
    I like. But.
    How well do they perform on pointy impacts? Good shock absorption but I would like to see how they hold together if the outer shell is compromised.
    Not bean a nay sayer, just that at the mo it's for off road hemlets. As somebody said, moving forward.
    I think they implied a high energy impact would force both shells together and the combination was the equivalent of a normal thickness helmet. Sharp rock penetrating may cause issues but I guess that's could be the same with a single shell helmet.
    I have evolved as a KB member.Now nothing I say should be taken seriously.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    17th July 2003 - 23:37
    Bike
    CB1300
    Location
    Tuakau
    Posts
    4,796
    Quote Originally Posted by george formby View Post
    I like. But.
    How well do they perform on pointy impacts? Good shock absorption but I would like to see how they hold together if the outer shell is compromised.
    Not bean a nay sayer, just that at the mo it's for off road hemlets. As somebody said, moving forward.
    If by pointy impacts you mean things like car arials, curbs etc this is normally mananged by the exterior shell rather than the internal shell.
    In Polycarb shells the load is spread semi evenly by a material that deforms reasonably uniformly. This great at lower speeds such as 0-150kmph.
    In Fibre type shells the energy is dissipated as much as possible by the destuction of the exterior shell. This is great at higher speeds where there is only a single impact. Not so joyous at lower speeds or where you contact multiple sharp objects during your journey.

    You are doing well if you can open a polycarb shell up without an abrasive tool. On the other hand a golf clup with make chips out of even an expensive helmet with minimal effort.
    I used an abrasive tool to open up an HJC helmet that looked intact because I knew I had hit my head, sure enough the eps was about half the thickness where I thought I hit the traffic island.
    I dropped a more expensive fibreglass helmet about 1m and unfortunatly it landed 3/4 on a hard surface. Huge crack.

    http://video.nationalgeographic.com/...helmet-testing

    If you know how you are going to crash you can buy for that crash but there is not yet a one size fits all.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    14th June 2007 - 22:39
    Bike
    Obsolete ones.
    Location
    Pigs back.
    Posts
    5,393
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dog View Post
    If by pointy impacts you mean things like car arials, curbs etc this is normally mananged by the exterior shell rather than the internal shell.
    In Polycarb shells the load is spread semi evenly by a material that deforms reasonably uniformly. This great at lower speeds such as 0-150kmph.
    In Fibre type shells the energy is dissipated as much as possible by the destuction of the exterior shell. This is great at higher speeds where there is only a single impact. Not so joyous at lower speeds or where you contact multiple sharp objects during your journey.

    You are doing well if you can open a polycarb shell up without an abrasive tool. On the other hand a golf clup with make chips out of even an expensive helmet with minimal effort.
    I used an abrasive tool to open up an HJC helmet that looked intact because I knew I had hit my head, sure enough the eps was about half the thickness where I thought I hit the traffic island.
    I dropped a more expensive fibreglass helmet about 1m and unfortunatly it landed 3/4 on a hard surface. Huge crack.

    http://video.nationalgeographic.com/...helmet-testing

    If you know how you are going to crash you can buy for that crash but there is not yet a one size fits all.
    Pretty much covered the bases there. I was thinking that this technology could be combined with current technology to give impact absorption and penetration protection. A tough outer shell which has the ability to move around the inner shell and contain/deflect sharp impacts would be very good indeed. The movement between the shells reducing energy before it hits your neck is a biggie.
    By the time I can afford it, it will be the new benchmark.
    Manopausal.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,126
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ View Post
    Seems a good idea...
    A BETTER idea is not to crash.

    Motorcycle safety equipment is designed to limiit damage to the wearer. Not remove the damage prospect of the wearer ....

    Safety equipment will not prevent ALL injuries. Intelligent riding might limit them ...


    But thats not why we ride ... right .. ???
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    15th February 2010 - 13:17
    Bike
    uKTM Tiger 800xc
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    2,036
    The inner and outer EPS layers would also have to deal with the imprint of the 27 dampers that lie between them in the event of a biff. At each of these points it follows that there will be (slightly?) less EPS compression/energy absorption protection for ya nut. In the worst case you might end up with 27 round bruises on ya noggin
    ....wherezz that track go

  11. #11
    Join Date
    14th June 2007 - 22:39
    Bike
    Obsolete ones.
    Location
    Pigs back.
    Posts
    5,393
    Quote Originally Posted by FJRider View Post
    A BETTER idea is not to crash.

    Motorcycle safety equipment is designed to limiit damage to the wearer. Not remove the damage prospect of the wearer ....

    Safety equipment will not prevent ALL injuries. Intelligent riding might limit them ...


    But thats not why we ride ... right .. ???
    Yeah but....

    Your right, our riding, me & the missus, is a far, far bigger consideration than our riding gear when it comes to safety awareness.
    Nevertheless I've come to the conclusion that everything you can do to make your self safer has value. Even, dare I say it....... hi jiz..

    I must admit that this thread has caused me to think about exactly why and how helmets offer us protection.
    Bit of research required on my part before I gob off anymore.
    Manopausal.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,126
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by george formby View Post
    Yeah but....

    Your right, our riding, me & the missus, is a far, far bigger consideration than our riding gear when it comes to safety awareness.
    Nevertheless I've come to the conclusion that everything you can do to make your self safer has value. Even, dare I say it....... hi jiz..

    I must admit that this thread has caused me to think about exactly why and how helmets offer us protection.
    Bit of research required on my part before I gob off anymore.
    I know a few riders that (seem to) believe the strapping on of the helmet makes them bullit proof and NO injury will befall them ...

    The wise know that their own safety is (literally) in their hands. More specifically ... their right hand.


    It is staying as safe as you want to be ... not ... staying as safe as you CAN be ...
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    14th June 2007 - 22:39
    Bike
    Obsolete ones.
    Location
    Pigs back.
    Posts
    5,393
    Hemlets man, hemlets! What you do with your right hand is your own business,
    Oh, crash hemlets, I mean.
    Manopausal.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    1st September 2007 - 21:01
    Bike
    1993 Yamaha FJ 1200
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    14,126
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by george formby View Post
    Hemlets man, hemlets! What you do with your right hand is your own business,
    Oh, crash hemlets, I mean.
    Over the 40 years I've been riding motorcycles ... the ground (or other objects) have only made contact with my helmet twice.



    Why the fixation with HEAD protection .. ?? or do you just have a big one .. ?? (a bigger target etc)
    When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    17th July 2003 - 23:37
    Bike
    CB1300
    Location
    Tuakau
    Posts
    4,796

    New helmet technology

    Quote Originally Posted by FJRider View Post
    Over the 40 years I've been riding motorcycles ... the ground (or other objects) have only made contact with my helmet twice.



    Why the fixation with HEAD protection .. ?? or do you just have a big one .. ?? (a bigger target etc)
    Because you are unlikely to die just because your hand received a 55kmph impact.

    Gloves are another biggie for me. Never totalled gloves before but I make a living driving a keyboard. I am in no rush to have a first time doing that either.
    I am quite find of riding, walking etc so other protection comes along.


    But: I agree, what is inside the helmet has far more to do with your survival than the helmet, just I know I am not perfect and neither are the other road users here or around the world.

    We are all a single mistake away from a wooden box.
    That mistake may not be ours.

    Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •