Rise of the Machines

[jonbuoy]

That's as awful lot of signatures to collect... are they also going to collect signatures of living vs dead for said risk analysis?

Three larger the data set you give the system to sort add assess the longer or will take to get a result.

Sent from Tapatalk. DYAC

It doesn't need to collect an exact signature just to know swerve or not swerve one thing we aren't short of is memory. A human body should give a very different return- what variations would there be- pram, small child crawling, toddler, young child small adult, adult, old man. They make a few versions of marine radar that are optimised for picking up flocks of birds.

The child in a box argument is a bit extreme but depending on the strength and sensitivity of the system it should see the box and the child as too different objects - albeit very close together.


http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu...na25762enn.pdf

[Akzle]

It doesn't need to collect an exact signature just to know swerve or not swerve one thing we aren't short of is memory. A human body should give a very different return- what variations would there be- pram, small child crawling, toddler, young child small adult, adult, old man. They make a few versions of marine radar that are optimised for picking up flocks of birds.

The child in a box argument is a bit extreme but depending on the strength and sensitivity of the system it should see the box and the child as too different objects - albeit very close together.


http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu...na25762enn.pdf

here's where we can exclude swaths of data quite comfortably... anything circlar (due to the absence of circles in nature) warrants closer inspection (bikes, cars, prams etc) every duoped with a temperature of ,say, 34 -42 degrees, the same. probably add in cows and mooses and shit. checks for cellphone/bluetooth/gps emitters_... but everything else just gets preliminaried and discarded.

cardboard would hardly show up on radar.

[jonbuoy]

here's where we can exclude swaths of data quite comfortably... anything circlar (due to the absence of circles in nature) warrants closer inspection (bikes, cars, prams etc) every duoped with a temperature of ,say, 34 -42 degrees, the same. probably add in cows and mooses and shit. checks for cellphone/bluetooth/gps emitters_... but everything else just gets preliminaried and discarded.

cardboard would hardly show up on radar.

Exactly - no worse than a thick winter jacket. Or smart clothing with built in tags that respond to a cars sensor query.