Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Appeal Court decision leads to extra responsibility for farmers

  1. #1
    Join Date
    23rd June 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2008 Suzuki GSX650F
    Location
    Just over there
    Posts
    2,708

    Appeal Court decision leads to extra responsibility for farmers

    A landmark case, in which a motorcyclist will receive damages following a collision with a bull calf, will have far-reaching consequences for road users and farmers across the country.

    Peter Donaldson from Middlesbrough rode into a bull calf roaming across the road after a rambler had failed to shut a gate. The farmer, Alec Wilson, was found guilty of carelessness but the National Farmers Union took the case to appeal.

    At the appeal hearing, Lord Justice Potter upheld the earlier decision and said that it was established law that farmers whose land was crossed by public footpaths had to take "all reasonable precautions" to ensure their animals did not stray onto public roads and that it was not an overbearing duty for a farmer to pay for extra precautions, such as a self closing mechanism or a kissing type gate to be installed.
    http://www.motobke.co.uk

  2. #2
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    sounds like a load of bull to me :spudbooge :spudbooge
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  3. #3
    For many,many years in NZ the law was that wandering stock on the roads were exempt from the damage they caused,I dunno what the real law was,some pedantic geek can look that up for me - but what it boiled down to was that if you hit and killed his prize bull you paid for it,oh,and your bike or car too.You couldn't touch him for letting his stock wander on public roads,it was some law passed at the dawn of time and was only dropped about 10 yrs ago.
    In and out of jobs, running free
    Waging war with society

  4. #4
    Join Date
    14th February 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    GSXR600K3 - Alstare
    Location
    Wgtn, Chch, or Blenheim
    Posts
    721
    That is a really bad law really. I mean if the farmer is unintentive enough to leave a gate open and someone hits it he should pay for vehicle damages and his animal well it shouldnt have been on a public road. If ya had to pay for an animal that u couldnt miss it would suck, i no id b highly pistd

  5. #5
    Join Date
    24th June 2003 - 11:00
    Bike
    gone
    Location
    Souf London
    Posts
    311
    Read it again... A 'rambler' left it open, not the farmer.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    30th May 2004 - 14:22
    Bike
    Cali 111 Guzzi
    Location
    Motueka
    Posts
    858
    SOME farmers around here need that sort of reminder. There are lots of circumstances where the cocky does nt know his stock is out but there are other cockies who ALWAYS have stock out on the road causing another obsticle for bikers/drivers.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    9th October 2003 - 11:00
    Bike
    None
    Location
    yes
    Posts
    14,591
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Motu
    For many,many years in NZ the law was that wandering stock on the roads were exempt from the damage they caused,I dunno what the real law was,some pedantic geek can look that up for me - but what it boiled down to was that if you hit and killed his prize bull you paid for it,oh,and your bike or car too.You couldn't touch him for letting his stock wander on public roads,it was some law passed at the dawn of time and was only dropped about 10 yrs ago.
    Wrote off a company car on a Cow in about 1986 and had to pay for the cow and the excess on the vehicle insurance.
    If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?



  8. #8
    Join Date
    4th June 2004 - 14:13
    Bike
    Not sure, havent ridden many
    Location
    Taranaki
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2
    Wrote off a company car on a Cow in about 1986 and had to pay for the cow and the excess on the vehicle insurance.
    The accident was entirely ur fault so why shouldnt you?

    Just a dig no need to get upset.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    9th October 2003 - 11:00
    Bike
    None
    Location
    yes
    Posts
    14,591
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Funkyfly
    The accident was entirely ur fault so why shouldnt you?

    Just a dig no need to get upset.
    I was expecting a faster reply than that. Must try harder.
    If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •