There's some complete wanker of a parking warden down on Grey St who's just ticketed about 40 bikes and he's sitting there ticketing every new one that comes in too. When I pointed out how ridiculous this was sicne all the bike parks around town are chocka, he said it'd encourage us to take public transport. Something seriously needs to be done about this now before it gets way out of hand.
I totally agree (about something needing to be done). I have been parking in the same spot for more than 2 years and got taxed $60 today. Where was the warning?
And no, I don't think it's "cheeky" to park on the footpath. Take a look where I park and see if I am blocking anyone. There's not even a kerb for crikeys sake. And how come the blue Suzi didn't get a ticket? He's on the red bricks too.
I have a search in at the council to find out the legal status of those bricks and where the road reserve is. You got a fight on your hands you useless council wankers (present company excluded of course!).
I don't believe there is any point in making a public display about this, as we won't get any sympathy from the car driving public. We need to get our point across to the council beurocrats.
Last edited by Drum; 20th November 2007 at 12:55.
Reason: Thanks Nudez
For every moment of triumph, for every instance of beauty, many souls must be trampled. Hunter S. Thompson
What other option do we have if we can't park on the footpath near the bike parks. I doubt they're going to put enough new bike parks in to accommodate the excess bikes.
Motorcycles are allowed to park on pay and display parks.
You must however display the ticket clearly.
I just got a ticket for parking on a footpath and will challange it. I suggest everybody does, although I'm sure we'll all get court costs as well.
Oh, and it looks like they'll be a metered parking as soon as the goombas figure out how to charge.
No they're not. The parking bylaws expressly forbid us from using them.
That came to light the last time they did a parking on footpaths crusade.
Originally Posted by nzspokes:
"My 86 Honda forks take ATF. So when I drain a tranny the bike gets some new/used fluid."
Kiwibiker: celebrating diversity since ages ago.
Originally Posted by nzspokes:
"My 86 Honda forks take ATF. So when I drain a tranny the bike gets some new/used fluid."
Kiwibiker: celebrating diversity since ages ago.
**so confused** Can't park on the footpath if all the parks are full, can't use pay and display if all the parks are full......only alternative is to go home it would seem!
Well, you can probably find a park closer than Upper Hutt. But it's probably better to take the train in the first place.
I really don't see why we as bikers should have more rights to park than cars - if the carparks are all full, tough for them too.
And the 'bikes reduce traffic congestion' argument - do they really? The 2 seconds gap (ok, tui) between vehicles is much bigger (at speed, anyway) than the length difference between a car and a bike. Ok you can filter - but when you stop filtering and pull back into line - assuming heavy traffic - all you've actually achieved is queue jumping, not an overall efficiency improvement.
For a real improvement in efficiency of transporting commuters, mass transport is the only way.
And the 'bikes reduce traffic congestion' argument - do they really? The 2 seconds gap (ok, tui) between vehicles is much bigger (at speed, anyway) than the length difference between a car and a bike. Ok you can filter - but when you stop filtering and pull back into line - assuming heavy traffic - all you've actually achieved is queue jumping, not an overall efficiency improvement.
When you've got multiple bikes together, they take up less space, particularly riding in the staggered formation (2 or more bikes).
Bikes dont block intersections or lanes. They are significantly shorter than most vehicles etc.
Well, you can probably find a park closer than Upper Hutt. But it's probably better to take the train in the first place.
I really don't see why we as bikers should have more rights to park than cars - if the carparks are all full, tough for them too.
And the 'bikes reduce traffic congestion' argument - do they really? The 2 seconds gap (ok, tui) between vehicles is much bigger (at speed, anyway) than the length difference between a car and a bike. Ok you can filter - but when you stop filtering and pull back into line - assuming heavy traffic - all you've actually achieved is queue jumping, not an overall efficiency improvement.
For a real improvement in efficiency of transporting commuters, mass transport is the only way.
Pity I hate it.
Richard
Congestion also includes parking. Conservative estimates give 6 bikes per carpark which in most Western countries equals the number of carparks saved due to each car only having one occupant.
Sometimes I wonder why you took up motorcycles. Riding in line with traffic on the motorway in peak hour traffic is asking to get hurt. Motorcycles do not do well in nose to tail accidents, and there are a few enlightened bureaucracies such as California that actively encourage motorcycles to lane-split, both for safety's sake and reducing congestion.
The moment traffic slows to nose to tail accident speeds, 50km/hr and below, I get out of the queue.
Trains are less energy efficient per passenger than motor vehicles.
Originally Posted by nzspokes:
"My 86 Honda forks take ATF. So when I drain a tranny the bike gets some new/used fluid."
Kiwibiker: celebrating diversity since ages ago.
Bookmarks