Just a scrape from the net so take it with a pinch of salt ........... interesting though.
The carburation of a disk-valve engine is less sensitive to inlet resonances than that of a reed-valver. And it is far less sensitive to exhaust resonances. I have seen that on the Cagiva 500-4. First it had piston induction, then it got disk valves, and finally reed valves. The disk-valve engine was fairly rideable but its successor was not a pleasant bike, especially in the wet.
On a reed-valve engine the reeds are opened by the suction from the exhaust pipe. When you close the throttle, the energy flow to the exhaust stops, and thus the suction stops.
When you open the throttle again, nothing happens because the exhaust suction is absent; the reeds stay closed and there is nothing in the cylinder to combust. So the rider opens the throttle a bit more, and a bit more, and a bit... and then there is enough mixture in the cylinder to start combustion again. But now the throttle is wide open: Whamm, high-sider!
In a disk-valve engine the disk always opens, combustion or no combustion. So, contrary to popular belief, it is much easier to ride than a reed-valver.
(The Cagiva was cured by inserting 1 mm strips between the reed casing and the reeds, so the reeds did not really close anymore. It cost more than 10 hp, but the laptimes improved...
Because of those 'leaking' reeds setting the carburation was a nightmare. So Cagiva concentrated on injection, and got fairly good results.)
Frits Overmars.
Bookmarks