I'm more concerned about the message criminals committing what their country's law says constitutes assault and invariably getting away scot free gives to other criminals.
And now that you know what the law has to say about it you won't have to tax your intelligence when and if you find yourself deciding whether to defend yourself or not.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
That is more than evident. You carry on believing that, but the existence of the black market would beg to differ.
Many parents do. Many parents kids use their own discernment for better or worse. The upbringing guarantees nothing.
Aha, I'm surprised that they're not harder to spot if they're walking around the street like
You can't catch 'em all... and I doubt that's because there is no want to catch the bad guys. I wish I could say the same of your impenetrable ignorance, but, well, yeah.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
this post here it was in the media report as well but in the video
he was asked along the lines of was he sure he killed her/if she was dead.
"He said I Shot her twice she best be dead" I think I was meaning to say more I shot her twice she better be dead.
In America everyone is armed the criminals, the honest citizen's and the police, ergo people get shot.
I say the old American coot was, shit scared, had a gun and protected himself as best as he could, given the situation.
Shit a few weeks a go a report into a police shooting in NZ suggested that, even though the person pointed a shotgun at a policemen, he shouldn't have shot him....... because the car should have pulled up behind him or something.
Which is pc horseshit...... the policeman would likely, not have shot him if he had not pointed a shotgun at him, the rest is irrelevant.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Mmmm, interesting to read how many KBers seem intent on defending the "rights" of the offenders in this instance.
First off, do we know all the facts of this case? Doubt it.
Has the media cherry picked the juicy sound bites and lines to give it their own sensationalist slant? Of course.
Does it seem like the old fella shooting the intruder (her being pregnant means squat to me) appear tantamount to an execution? Yep. Do I care? Nope. If you break in and assault the home occupant whatever comes your way is part of the deal.
My home, my castle. Storm the walls and (if I'm able to) you won't be walking out. If that's an issue with anyone...
On the Fox news this morning. Looks like the cops are having another look at the shooting. Appears the woman may not have been pregnant. Not that that makes any difference to the legality of the shooting.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/07/25...-was-pregnant/
" Rule books are for the Guidance of the Wise, and the Obedience of Fools"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks