I tend to agree with the exception of David Bain being the most sane. He's the only one still alive so comparisons are difficult to make. He may be the smartest but that too is in doubt for the same reasons.
Given that so many make the excuse of sexual molestation for 'going off the rails' for want a better phase I can not help but pause to consider that this was Laneit's excuse for working as a prostitute. Of course the money and the 'laid back' life style had nothing to do with her decision??
I too am a bit suspiciouse of what she has 'alledgedly' said in respect of 'her' baby that any utterences that she has made to her friends has to be suspect.
So far I have not come to the conclusion that the defence has cast reasonable doubt on Bains guilt.
Skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
Bain there....
done that.....
Opinions are like arseholes: Everybody has got one, but that doesn't mean you got to air it in public all the time....
David Bain hasn't "got away with it." In case anybody has forgotten he has spent a considerable number of years at Her Majesty's Pleasure. His conviction was quashed on appeal. I suspect that the only reason he's being retried is so that the Crown doesn't have to pay compensation for wrongful conviction.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
Not really. Five people were coldly murdered. The police, the Crown, the ordinary public can't just shrug their shoulders and say "too hard". The evidence against Bain is very strong. To let him walk away would not be just or right.
As for compensation - he'd need to be exonerated, like David Doherty, to have a good chance. But.......yes he could very well get something if acquitted on the basis of being wrongly imprisoned in the first place. Neverthless "Not Guilty" is a long long way from being innocent.
There is another guy, Rex Haig who was released on appeal but has been refused compensation. Same sort of case.
Bain killed the father....Explains the difficulty with the rifle, other inconsistencies and his weird (fake) behaviour - fitting and tone during emergency call.....
After he discovers the father had killed the rest of them
Whaddaya reckon?
Sounds like his sister could have done with a can of this...
Yes, I am pedantic about spelling and grammar so get used to it!
David Bain will be found not guilty if just one of the jury members share the views of some of the posters on the last few pages of this thread.
Reality,the evidence against David is overwhelming(Stephens blood on him,scratches on his face,his bloody palm print on the washing machine,hearing gurgling from his sister while Robin is dead on the floor yet she died instantly from a final gunshot to the head,etc etc).While the evidence against Robin is very weak(No blood on him other than his own,a full bladder,accusations of incest from a daughter who was probably the most disturbed member of the family(next to David)and by many accounts was known to tell different versions of stories that may not even be true.
Clearly the defense case is all about reasonable doubt because all scientific evidence goes against David.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Yes and that is the very reason I think he will be found guilty. As I have said in another post of mine the defence has not produced any credible evidence of 'reasonable doubt.' It's all based on what Laneit has said about her father and the additional evidence of her having a baby has got to be supect so this makes anything she is supposed to have said unreliable.
David Bain has never given an explanation for his injuries..........oh but he's had blackouts etc. Funny how that only started after the deaths of the family. There is no history of him having blackout..............or for that matter forgetting his lines.
Skyryder
Free Scott Watson.
It's interesting how this case divides people into two camps (well, of course). Most of the law enforcement people and ESR people I know are in the guilty as hell camp, reasons outlined earlier. Enough physical evidence to hang him.
Then you get the other side, Joe Karam is smart, he believes, plus the goofy jumpers and big ears...
The case was possibly badly handled, but the view I've heard expressed a few times is that it gave the police and ESR the determination to get much better at collecting evidence, protecting crime scenes etc.
I think the guy is as guilty as sin. Too much evidence... Will he get off. More than likely.
It’s diametrically opposed to the sanitised existence of the Lemmings around me in the Dilbert Cartoon hell I live in; it’s life at full volume, perfect colour with high resolution and 10,000 watts of amplification.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks