View Full Version : Vote for bike shots taken by bikers: part two
MotoGirl
28th May 2009, 19:41
The Photography social group (http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/group.php?groupid=95) set an assignment for its members to take photos of bikes. We want your help to decide which photo is the coolest. The member with the coolest shot doesn’t just get crowned “Awesome” and have bragging rights, but he or she also gets to pick the topic for next month’s assignment.
There are too many shots to put in one pole so also vote here (http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/showthread.php?t=100212).
Help us decide and cast your vote NOW…
PICTURE NINE
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/picture.php?albumid=1584&pictureid=25045
PICTURE TEN
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/picture.php?albumid=1584&pictureid=25046
PICTURE ELEVEN
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/picture.php?albumid=1584&pictureid=25047
PICTURE TWELVE
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/picture.php?albumid=1584&pictureid=25048
PICTURE THIRTEEN
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/picture.php?albumid=1584&pictureid=25049
PICTURE FOURTEEN
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/picture.php?albumid=1584&pictureid=25050
PICTURE FIFTEEN
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/picture.php?albumid=1584&pictureid=25051
Conquiztador
28th May 2009, 20:33
#11. The only thing that could have made it better is some smoke from the tyres and an indication that the bike had come through that hole in the fence...
oldguy
28th May 2009, 22:33
15 for me, can't fault it, sharp bright colors, no distractions in the background/foreground
mikeey01
28th May 2009, 22:58
11 and 13 are the best shots. mmm hard choice
Skyryder
28th May 2009, 22:59
Picture 13 by far.
Skyryder
Pic 11...Silent yet menacing.
#11 is good too. But I like the black and white of #13.
98tls
28th May 2009, 23:12
:doh:Bugger,forgot to submit mine,been having puter problems,anyways great pics.
Kiwi Graham
29th May 2009, 08:33
Mmmm moody, nice. No 11 for me
Marknz
29th May 2009, 08:41
11 for me too. Is it just me, or should images that have been altered in someway with software not be up for judging? Maybe I'm just a bit old fashioned...
MotoGirl
29th May 2009, 16:43
11 for me too. Is it just me, or should images that have been altered in someway with software not be up for judging? Maybe I'm just a bit old fashioned...
Are you referring specifically to pic 11? I know there's a pic in the other voting thread that's obviously been modified.
discotex
29th May 2009, 20:53
Pic 11 - Great angle for the bike. Good use of natural lighting. Nice diagonals in the composition
Pic 13 - The best shot. Would make a great product shot. Just needs a little tweaking with levels to make the shot pop but it's by far the best IMO. Tells a story.
Pic 15 - Great action shot. Great having the other rumble strip in the background so you get a feel of where the rider has come from. Technically speaking is the best shot in the bunch. Could use a wider aperture to reduce the DoF to make the rider pop.
Trudes
29th May 2009, 21:07
Pic 15 - Great action shot. Great having the other rumble strip in the background so you get a feel of where the rider has come from. Technically speaking is the best shot in the bunch. Could use a wider aperture to reduce the DoF to make the rider pop.
I agree (but I would being married to the photographer) take a look at a higher resolution version. http://www.flickr.com/photos/31744525@N07/3556487102/sizes/l/
YellowDog
29th May 2009, 21:16
The question says coolest photo, not best shot.
IMO - Coolest photo is No.11. There are many better shots.
MidnightMike
29th May 2009, 23:25
Pic 11 - Great angle for the bike. Good use of natural lighting. Nice diagonals in the composition.
I wouldnt say natural lighting :shifty:
Floodlight high up on the left behind me.
SV with the lights on high beam to my right to bring out more detail in the front of the RSV.
Improvisation. :eek:
Theres another one using the SV for secondary lighting as my profile pic.
discotex
30th May 2009, 10:07
I wouldnt say natural lighting :shifty:
Haha totally. I meant to say available light rather than natural (as in the sun). The point being it didn't look like someone spend 4 hours in photoshop playing with the colours to get that shot.
discotex
30th May 2009, 10:20
I agree (but I would being married to the photographer) take a look at a higher resolution version. http://www.flickr.com/photos/31744525@N07/3556487102/sizes/l/
Love it :) Still crystal sharp. Interesting taking a look at the exif data. Must have been a bloody bright day so he wouldn't have been able to get a wider aperture without using a neutral density filter (http://www.adidap.com/2008/02/15/neutral-density-filters-what-are-they-when-to-use-them/). That's assuming the lens can go lower anyway.
martybabe
30th May 2009, 18:45
Don't know anything about photography's finer details so I'll just go with what I like.....and that would be No 15 and 13 as runner up, a bit more light from the front and it would be my winner but well done all, a pleasure to peruse.:clap:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.