Log in

View Full Version : 91-98-avgas



kiwi cowboy
7th June 2009, 21:41
Ok you guys before anyone says look in search i have but my question is for my bike.
86 gsxr400 in pre 89 i have been running it on 98 but have just aquired some avgas:lol:.It seems to run ok down the drive [only just put it in ].
The manual says 85-95 octain or higher and unleaded or low lead recomended.
From whot i understand avgas is low lead now is this true?
So question: will it run ok on pure avgas or a mix without detrimental effects on the motor?.
Question 2: does avgas run richer or leaner than petrol?
Cheers for any advice im a noobe to racing and want as much performance without risking blowing the motor up through lack of knowledge so am here to ask the experts.:2thumbsup;)

Pussy
7th June 2009, 21:44
Avgas definitely ISN'T low lead. It has higher levels of TEL (tetra ethyl lead) than the old leaded road gas used to have

Flip
7th June 2009, 21:53
It will run ok, the lead might fowl the plugs, but your motor wasn't really designed to run on leaded race gas. Avgas or race gas is actually high in lead. You might consider cutting it back 50% with pump gas.
It needs the same ammount of air as the other petrols but might burn a bit better because the lead promotes combustion after the spark has started. The only down side is Avgas is a narrow cut fuel and needs a really good hot spark to get the fuel to ignite, it can miss and backfire a bit in std motors.

Peter Smith
7th June 2009, 22:00
From my understanding the different octane rating have different burning speeds, so in some cases if you run a high octane AVgas you can actual loose power unless you alter the spark timing.
E.g. I was dynoing my 851 duke (back in the 90's) and was trying different chips for the fuel injection, runing on the old 96 super it had 96 RWHP. I drained the tank, put in some AVgas, ran the bike for a few minutes then back on the dyno and only got 94RWHP.
If your running stock ignition etc I'd stick with the 98 pump gas.:2thumbsup
I'm running a GSXR1100 in pre'89s on BP 98 ultimate.

Jantar
7th June 2009, 22:12
Ok you guys before anyone says look in search i have but my question is for my bike.
86 gsxr400 in pre 89 i have been running it on 98 but have just aquired some avgas:lol:.It seems to run ok down the drive [only just put it in ].
The manual says 85-95 octain or higher and unleaded or low lead recomended.
From whot i understand avgas is low lead now is this true?
So question: will it run ok on pure avgas or a mix without detrimental effects on the motor?.
Question 2: does avgas run richer or leaner than petrol?
Cheers for any advice im a noobe to racing and want as much performance without risking blowing the motor up through lack of knowledge so am here to ask the experts.:2thumbsup;)
Avgas is a higher octane, so is capable of delivering more oomph from each drop. But Avgas is designed to run in large capacity low reving engines. (eg a Lycoming engine runs best at 2400 rpm.) So avgas is unlikely to give you any real boost at other than low RPM.

As a real life example the Rotax 912 aircraft engine runs at 5500 RPM and the recommended fuel is 96 mogas. When run on this fuel the service interval is 100 hrs. It can run on avgas, but the service interval drops to 50 hrs.

Pussy
7th June 2009, 22:17
The "octane" figure is it's resistance to detonation (anti knock value)
I've had access to avgas for the last 18 years.... and wont touch the shit to run in my road vehicles

CHOPPA
7th June 2009, 22:22
The "octane" figure is it's resistance to detonation (anti knock value)
I've had access to avgas for the last 18 years.... and wont touch the shit to run in my road vehicles

Its good for turbo vehicles running high boost....

It makes your bike run cleaner but ive never noticed performance. Dont think your supposed to run it though, someone had me up about running it at a club day at puke cause my exhaust was white

wharfy
7th June 2009, 22:34
MY understanding is that the octane rating is simply a measure of the resistance to "knock" that a particular blend of fuel has. The higher the rating the more difficult it is to get it to burn. "Knock" is more likely in high compression engines and many "race" engines fall into this category and require fuel with a higher octane rating. I don't believe that higher octane fuel by itself will provide any performance benefit.

My $1.78c a litre worth :)

Pussy
7th June 2009, 22:42
MY understanding is that the octane rating is simply a measure of the resistance to "knock" that a particular blend of fuel has. The higher the rating the more difficult it is to get it to burn. "Knock" is more likely in high compression engines and many "race" engines fall into this category and require fuel with a higher octane rating. I don't believe that higher octane fuel by itself will provide any performance benefit.

My $1.78c a litre worth :)
You're quite correct.
Avgas is a crude fuel designed for crude engines.
An Avco Lycoming IO 720(horizontally opposed 720 cubic inch 8 cylinder) is only pulling 400hp at 2650rpm (redline)
Continental IO 520 (horizontally opposed 520 cubic inch 6 cylinder), 300hp at 2850rpm(which is relatively high speed for an aircraft engine).
Avgas burns slower to prevent detonation.
It's loaded with lead

mossy1200
7th June 2009, 22:59
General rule is higher the octaine the longer the flash period of ignition.
91 will have intense short burn
av gas will have less intense cooler longer burn
98 will be half way between.
The longer burn is great for higher compression motors that have advanced timing but 100av gas not great blending would be better.Generally about 2degrees advanced from stock.Originally designed for slower rev motors to give extended combustion at lower temp so on you high rev motor combustion could still be occuring at bottom of piston stroke causing wasted power.
My post classic has fixed timing with no advance options and dyno has indicated my horses decline after 95 octaine getting lower and lower.av gas was less powerfull than 91octaine.
If you have adjustable timing plate then you could start to play around with fuels and mixtures etc.
Would suggest you trial the av gas and take 91 in tin to blend it down if you notice loss of power in straights or hesitance coming onto throttle.

Trial and error or dyno runs.Your call.I think your 25year old bike will repond best to 95/96

Mark Pav
8th June 2009, 08:46
Just verifying that avgas IS NOT low lead. It is higher in lead content than the old 96 pump gas that is no longer available. There is an advantage to avgas that no one has mentioned. Because you cannot get out and push if an aircraft engine stops because the fuel has water in it, it must be guaranteed not to have water in it. If you get it from a certified supply source at an airfield you can be reasonably sure that it has been stored in good conditions. Likewise it is more likely to be of consistent quality than pump gas stored in the local "dodgy brothers "gas station. In an ideal world all the above is true but YMMV...... I found some old dyno figures to prove the case for NOT using avgas. These were on my old 1989 FZR1000W modified engine. On a Dynojet 150 acceleration dynamometer the figures were 155 bhp on avgas, 156 bhp on 95 octane, and 160.5 bhp on 91 octane pump gas. Bearing in mind that at the time I did not have the facility to easily alter ignition timing to suit the fuel, I was doing the reverse, I was adjusting the fuel to suit the ignition timing !!! Yes avgas has a higher anti knock value for sure. If your problem is related to fuel knock and you have no other way of addressing it, it might solve your problem. Unless you raise the compression ratio to exploit the anti knock advantage that avgas offers, you will see less power , not more.

marty
8th June 2009, 08:54
I used to run my old school W351 powered ski boat exlusively on Avgas. It never really saw much more than 3000rpm, and had the timing sorted (we were apprentice aircraft engineers at the time), so I had no issues with it. My turbo Skyline however, burned exhaust valves out with monotonous frequency.......

Even the 110-130LL avgas now has high lead level - I wouldn't run a high revving 400 gixxer engine on it unless you absolutley knew what you were doing.

GSVR
8th June 2009, 09:52
Ok you guys before anyone says look in search i have but my question is for my bike.
86 gsxr400 in pre 89 i have been running it on 98 but have just aquired some avgas:lol:.It seems to run ok down the drive [only just put it in ].
The manual says 85-95 octain or higher and unleaded or low lead recomended.
From whot i understand avgas is low lead now is this true?
So question: will it run ok on pure avgas or a mix without detrimental effects on the motor?.
Question 2: does avgas run richer or leaner than petrol?
Cheers for any advice im a noobe to racing and want as much performance without risking blowing the motor up through lack of knowledge so am here to ask the experts.:2thumbsup;)

Avgas can be useful as an additive if you have pinking problems. Blending 91 and avgas seems to work well starting at 50/50. I've also heard alot of conflicting views on percentages and how it effects detonation. A blend of 91 and avgas should make more power than 98 alone.

If moneys no option you could also run ELF race fuel but I'm not sure about the legallity of the stuff with MTBE in it.

Now I will brace myself for someone to attack this post!

roogazza
8th June 2009, 09:52
The Bandit when stock (with pipe and jetting) at 9.5 to 1 comp was at its best on 91.
But after a few tins on compression I now run 95/98. There is a noticable difference giving it 98. Gaz.

kiwi cowboy
8th June 2009, 14:52
Avgas can be useful as an additive if you have pinking problems. Blending 91 and avgas seems to work well starting at 50/50. I've also heard alot of conflicting views on percentages and how it effects detonation. A blend of 91 and avgas should make more power than 98 alone.

If moneys no option you could also run ELF race fuel but I'm not sure about the legallity of the stuff with MTBE in it.

Now I will brace myself for someone to attack this post!

not sure on the ELF as dont know the octain rating but might play with a 50-50 blend and see how it goes:hug:

neil_cb125t
8th June 2009, 17:04
hey i run and always have run 50/50 mix. I only got real gains once i raised the compression ( and bored it out and blah blah blah ) in my ZXR400.

I also know a bit bout avy ( as im in the Airforce ) All the post pre this are correct - its designed for LOW Rpm and high altitude. Both of whcih we dont use!!

But Simply put if your bike is standard then you wont really gain alot from the xtra $$ your spending.

Mossey will agree that my "little bumble bee" has enought go... if its standard run it on 96-98. Save up then bore it out its the best EASIEST mod to do if you want power. 65hp straight to 75hp.

mossy1200
8th June 2009, 17:12
hey i run and always have run 50/50 mix. I only got real gains once i raised the compression ( and bored it out and blah blah blah ) in my ZXR400.

I also know a bit bout avy ( as im in the Airforce ) All the post pre this are correct - its designed for LOW Rpm and high altitude. Both of whcih we dont use!!

But Simply put if your bike is standard then you wont really gain alot from the xtra $$ your spending.

Mossey will agree that my "little bumble bee" has enought go... if its standard run it on 96-98. Save up then bore it out its the best EASIEST mod to do if you want power. 65hp straight to 75hp.
You might need more Neil.Nitro maybe.Carved 9kg off my fat boy and added 5hp and more torque.If that doesnt work im going to the gym.
I tried the av gas last year and found more grunt going back to pump gas.

SARGE
8th June 2009, 17:13
Ok you guys before anyone says look in search i have but my question is for my bike.
86 gsxr400 in pre 89 i have been running it on 98 but have just aquired some avgas:lol:.It seems to run ok down the drive [only just put it in ].
The manual says 85-95 octain or higher and unleaded or low lead recomended.
From whot i understand avgas is low lead now is this true?
So question: will it run ok on pure avgas or a mix without detrimental effects on the motor?.
Question 2: does avgas run richer or leaner than petrol?
Cheers for any advice im a noobe to racing and want as much performance without risking blowing the motor up through lack of knowledge so am here to ask the experts.:2thumbsup;)

i dont race but i run Av (from the airport) in my street bike .


saying that though.. it is slightly higher compression than standard :whistle:


it IS a 'slow burn' fuel though .. low temp flame fronts .. i mix in some Acetone to boost the flames fronts within the chambers

sugilite
8th June 2009, 18:23
You lose low end power with 100% av gas due to that pre mentioned long burn time. 91 has very short burn time. Running a 70% av gas 30% 91 remedies this.

kiwi cowboy
8th June 2009, 18:43
hey i run and always have run 50/50 mix. I only got real gains once i raised the compression ( and bored it out and blah blah blah ) in my ZXR400.

I also know a bit bout avy ( as im in the Airforce ) All the post pre this are correct - its designed for LOW Rpm and high altitude. Both of whcih we dont use!!

But Simply put if your bike is standard then you wont really gain alot from the xtra $$ your spending.

Mossey will agree that my "little bumble bee" has enought go... if its standard run it on 96-98. Save up then bore it out its the best EASIEST mod to do if you want power. 65hp straight to 75hp.

ok seems the avgas aint fer me so back ta 98 it it after all im out fer fun fun fun till i get somit bigger lol cheers all you guys that posted:hug:that was a man:hug:not a gay:hug:by the way:2thumbsup

I14
8th June 2009, 20:23
What about running 10% toluene (used to be called methyl benzene in the old ads) in 98? It lifts the octane number and has no lead of course but again I assume unless the compression is raised and/or the timing is advanced then no benefit will occur? If you google its use in petrol you will find plenty of posts (mostly in the US) on its effectiveness.

neil_cb125t
8th June 2009, 20:57
9KG OMG!! i wish i could find that in mine - im getting maybe 800 grams out of my rear sprocket - got a kilo from my carbon pipe.... just getting my Airbox sorted - hmmm maybe i should try Sp cams that should be another 3-4hp.

Long track sounds like a good testing ground for us ....... less straights.....

see you there dude!!



You might need more Neil.Nitro maybe.Carved 9kg off my fat boy and added 5hp and more torque.If that doesnt work im going to the gym.
I tried the av gas last year and found more grunt going back to pump gas.

mossy1200
8th June 2009, 21:59
9KG OMG!! i wish i could find that in mine - im getting maybe 800 grams out of my rear sprocket - got a kilo from my carbon pipe.... just getting my Airbox sorted - hmmm maybe i should try Sp cams that should be another 3-4hp.

Long track sounds like a good testing ground for us ....... less straights.....

see you there dude!!
Neil my stock exup header pipes were 9.2kg now yoshi under 3 and airbox fell of bike while on dyno 3kg.Sounds like more little straights just shorter each one.LOL .If i ever learn to ride there will be trouble......
Just 12 more sleeps..See you there.

Peter Smith
9th June 2009, 11:48
Carved 9kg off my fat boy

Oh, sorry Mossy, I thought you meant you lost 9kg, not your bike.:lol:
It might be worth coming down to Manfield just to watch you and Neil.:girlfight:
Ya gotta keep them little bikes behind ya. Mojo at stake and all.:lol:

GSVR
9th June 2009, 12:32
hey i run and always have run 50/50 mix. I only got real gains once i raised the compression ( and bored it out and blah blah blah ) in my ZXR400.

I also know a bit bout avy ( as im in the Airforce ) All the post pre this are correct - its designed for LOW Rpm and high altitude. Both of whcih we dont use!!

But Simply put if your bike is standard then you wont really gain alot from the xtra $$ your spending.

Mossey will agree that my "little bumble bee" has enought go... if its standard run it on 96-98. Save up then bore it out its the best EASIEST mod to do if you want power. 65hp straight to 75hp.

If its standard it will probably run on 91 if the mixture and timing are right. The addition of the avgas is mainly to get the antiknock properties.

The biofuels may make a bit more power too but you have to run a little richer.

As you say getting a 450 bore and fresh well tuned motor will make massive gains compared to the little you will get from running the best fuel. That and good handling, tyres, and weight savings. Oh and good riding skills is always a help too.

mossy1200
9th June 2009, 16:22
Oh, sorry Mossy, I thought you meant you lost 9kg, not your bike.:lol:
It might be worth coming down to Manfield just to watch you and Neil.:girlfight:
Ya gotta keep them little bikes behind ya. Mojo at stake and all.:lol:

If your coming to watch bring your bike you girls blouse.You still got couple days to post your entry.Im sure i found 0.07 of a second:second:
If Neil keeps beating me ill start buying him hotdogs to weigh him down a little.

quickbuck
9th June 2009, 17:39
I also know a bit bout avy ( as im in the Airforce ) All the post pre this are correct - its designed for LOW Rpm and high altitude. Both of whcih we dont use!!


So what exactly do you do int he Air Force??? ;)


The posts that are correct are the ones that say AvGas has a very high lead content. 4 Times that of the old 96.
AvGas also Burns slower.
The 100 means Octane rating (Research Octane Number).
There is another test called Motor Octane Number.
This is when they blend Iso Octane with Normal Heptane in a proportion to work out the knock value of a fuel. Ie 91 was 91% Iso Octane and 9% Normal Heptane.... etc etc ...Blah Blah.....

The posts that are slightly misguided are the ones that confuse Octane Rating to Calorific Value.

To Add to the list of Aircraft engines...
TVO435 (Turbo Charged Vertically Mounted 435 CuIn 6 Cylinder) pokes out 280BHP Max. 220 BHP cruse @3200 RPM.
Yes, each pot is over ONE LITRE!
Also the lead will fowl your little plugs.....

My advise is mix it with 91.
Get used to servicing your plugs.
BTW the plugs on Aircraft engines are cleaned every 100 hours.
That would be approx 6000km on your bike....
Also the plugs are HUGE and allow a bit of deposit on them.....

Peter Smith
9th June 2009, 19:32
If your coming to watch bring your bike you girls blouse.You still got couple days to post your entry.Im sure i found 0.07 of a second:second:
If Neil keeps beating me ill start buying him hotdogs to weigh him down a little.

Ya don't really want to come 3rd, do ya, behind me and Neil.:laugh:
Seriously though, I need to save some money for next season, I might sell the Katana as well.
I'll be checking the results, SO YA BETTER WIN.

dangerous
9th June 2009, 19:49
The "octane" figure is it's resistance to detonation (anti knock value)
I've had access to avgas for the last 18 years.... and wont touch the shit to run in my road vehicles interesting and a guy in your situation of relying on good gas would know...
I have noticed a mid power increase in some of my engines, older Japers slower reving higher compresion, cept for the CX500 Turbo... but that certinly prefered it.
To answer 'the' question in a high reving muilty... no advatage acept for the below.



There is an advantage to avgas that no one has mentioned. Because you cannot get out and push if an aircraft engine stops because the fuel has water in it, it must be guaranteed not to have water in it. If you get it from a certified supply source at an airfield you can be reasonably sure that it has been stored in good conditions.
and this also with the fact it is +/- 5% compeared to +/- 15% acurate octain means you can tune a engine much beter due to the MUCH higher quality. I never had carbon issues, Lead as you know is a natural coolent/lube and oct booster.


This being the reason I run avgas in my race bikes, I doubt it very much that I have any performance advantage with HP, but I do know that when using it in my strokers it means a far more relible BOOM, same reason I use a fully syn oil.

neil_cb125t
9th June 2009, 21:23
Cheers - i still cant keep with your 'missing' thing thou!! I have noticed with the addition of my flat slide even thou i gain nearly 5 hp i didnt really get anymore straight line speed - but my roll on drive out of the corners is SO MUCH better!!! I dont quite understand that//.....

As you say getting a 450 bore and fresh well tuned motor will make massive gains compared to the little you will get from running the best fuel. That and good handling, tyres, and weight savings. Oh and good riding skills is always a help too.[/QUOTE]

roogazza
10th June 2009, 10:06
If your coming to watch bring your bike you girls blouse.You still got couple days to post your entry.Im sure i found 0.07 of a second:second:
If Neil keeps beating me ill start buying him hotdogs to weigh him down a little.

Just as a matter of interest, what times are the front post classic blokes doing ? (pre 82 and 89 ) Gaz.

mossy1200
10th June 2009, 14:26
Just as a matter of interest, what times are the front post classic blokes doing ? (pre 82 and 89 ) Gaz.
good weather conditions 1.16 with ocassional 1.15 at the top end of both pre 89 and 82 senior(couple seconds faster than me at moment).
I think Martin Cox got a 1.15point2 quickest lap last year on 1070 kitted fzr1000.I would expect Paul Wootens gsxr1100 bored out will break into 1.14 at some stage.

Pre 89 junior would be 1.17-1.18 ,maybe Neil will be quicker now his bikes moded out a bit.1.20 would be still in top 6.
1.20-1.21 wet for both classes(rain makes the bikes even out for times alot).

quickbuck
10th June 2009, 17:44
I have noticed with the addition of my flat slide even thou i gain nearly 5 hp i didnt really get anymore straight line speed - but my roll on drive out of the corners is SO MUCH better!!! I dont quite understand that//.....


It comes down to Aerodynamics Neil....
Drag increases at the square of speed, so you will need a little more than 5 hp to push the bike through the air any appreciable amount faster when you are doing 200k.....
The trick (and the good bit) is you will be getting there faster...