M109R riders?

[sunupgo]

I took an M109R for a test ride yesterday. The hefty torque on tap gave the bike real character. The handling was fine for my cruisy style of riding and both brakes seemed sharp. First impressions were very favourable.

I have been used to riding a Harley Dyna (which which is good essential Harley): but I found the M109R a more exciting bike to ride and seems to offer good value for money.


I used to ride with the Auckland HOG group, who, because of the number of members, could put together a regular Saturday ride. This is a great feature of Auckland HOG. As I don't expect to be HOGGING it for a while I am keen to find out about non HOG cruiser riders in Auckland.

I am thinking about buying a M109R. I have a couple questions.


What are advantages/disadvantages of the M109R?

Are there any M109R (or similar ) riders about in Auckland who are interested in getting out 2 or 3 times a month for weekend rides-say 2-4 hours?

Any feedback welcome.

Thanks

[MotoKuzzi]

......Are there any M109R (or similar ) riders about in Auckland who are interested in getting out 2 or 3 times a month for weekend rides-say 2-4 hours?

Any feedback welcome.

Thanks


Try Googling "New Zealand Cruiser Group" , a few M109's, there and rides most weekends with a good bunch of people.

[YellowDog]

There's a few on the bike type Community search:

240
L-Plate Rider 8th October 2006 24 2008 Suzuki M109r Welly
9er
L-Plate Rider 18th August 2008 0 2008 M109R Melbourne AUS
b.racing@bigpond.net
L-Plate Rider 24th September 2008 0 06 ZUK M109R Aussie
Big Pete
L-Plate Rider 15th November 2008 3 2007 Suzuki Boulevard M109R Kaiapoi
BigBadBaz
L-Plate Rider 18th September 2008 2 2008 Suzuki M109R Australia
bmz2
evil one 10th January 2007 865 2007 m109r west auckland
Boulevard 109 rider
L-Plate Rider 1st October 2006 3 Vs1400 and a m109r Auckland
chucky19
L-Plate Rider 12th May 2007 13 2007 Suzuki M109r Christchurch
chydan
L-Plate Rider 28th December 2007 8 2008 M109RN, Te Puke
CORIMAN
L-Plate Rider 12th September 2008 1 2006 Suzuki Boulevard M109R Whangamata
davesh
L-Plate Rider 25th August 2007 22 Suzuki M109R,96 Daytona 900 Rotorua
Don2703
L-Plate Rider 29th March 2009 0 2009 Suzuki M109 Rotorua
edster
L-Plate Rider 16th December 2007 0 suzuki m109r invercargill
fawnycat
L-Plate Rider 29th October 2008 0 2008 Suzuki Boulavard M109r South Africa
greybeard
L-Plate Rider 19th August 2009 0 2009 Suzuki M109R West AUckland
haydos_109
L-Plate Rider 11th June 2009 0 2007 Suzuki M109r Brisbane
hesim1800r
L-Plate Rider 17th October 2007 2 m109 germany
Hog
L-Plate Rider 29th March 2008 0 2007 M109R Boulevard Auckland
IainMac
L-Plate Rider 16th July 2009 0 2009 m109rn Otorohanga
Liam Early
L-Plate Rider 19th September 2008 0 Suzuki M109R - 2006 Western Australia
PegLeg
L-Plate Rider 23rd June 2008 0 2006 Suzuki M109R Hamilton
PHAT240
L-Plate Rider 23rd February 2007 13 07 M109R WHITE Rotovegas
reg-man
L-Plate Rider 21st January 2008 0 06 M109R usa
rickm109r
L-Plate Rider 13th January 2009 0 07 m109r cristchurch
Robin
L-Plate Rider 4th June 2008 2 2006 suzuki m109r Ashburton
Rolly
L-Plate Rider 28th March 2009 0 2006 M109R Suzuki Tauranga
skoog321
L-Plate Rider 26th March 2009 0 2007 suzuki m109r MN
somerled
L-Plate Rider 23rd March 2007 2 2006,Susuki,m109r South Canterbury
sugar bear
L-Plate Rider 30th July 2009 0 2007, Suzuki, M109R US
Trojan
L-Plate Rider 22nd July 2009 3 M109 le 2009 Auckland

[Rockbuddy]

cruiser group link in my sig

[Edbear]

Advantages?

Awesome engine! Sublime brakes! Handles exceptionally well within it's cornering limits! Awesome engine! Sublime brakes... Oh, I'm repeating myself...

After riding one I was hooked and wrote a ride report for KB on it.

Disadvantages?

Watch your licence...

[Wingnut]

Had one a year or so ago. Was ok till you felt like going round corners at any decent speed. Guess you would be used to that though - from riding the Dyna.

Loved the torque.

[YellowDog]

You don't need to use the brakes for cornering because that back wheel is an automatic braking system in itself.

Dissadvantage I have heard is that thr standard tyres don't handle too well in the wet .

[Big Dave]

You don't need to use the brakes for cornering because that back wheel is an automatic braking system in itself.

Dissadvantage I have heard is that thr standard tyres don't handle too well in the wet .


The 240 section rear effects low speed maneuverability only.

They handle fine normal wet - but do easily aquaplane on any surface water.

[johnnyflash]

You don't need to use the brakes for cornering because that back wheel is an automatic braking system in itself.

Dissadvantage I have heard is that thr standard tyres don't handle too well in the wet .

Tyre/handling in wet is only an issue with stock Dunlop tyres, change to METZLER and they stick like Glue. stick to original 240 size and they corner great,

[sunupgo]

Thanks guys for the comments and pointing me in the right direction to find other M 109ers

The bike made a good first impression. I didn't have any slow speed problems or issues with the fat rear tyre.The bike carries its weight low. The weather was fine-dry road-all in all very pleasant. I can imagine care would be required on the throttle in the wet.

[Big Dave]

I didn't have any slow speed problems or issues with the fat rear tyre.

Wait till you've ridden it long enough to want to start pinning the throttle on take off.

Not major - but you have to get it facing the right direction first.

On a normal rear end you can pin - then point it - a lot easier.

It's due to the square profile.

[Devil]

I moaned about the M109 plenty of times so I wont repeat myself hehe, but I will say I think the M90 is a better package. Go try that before you commit.

[TL1000R]

I moaned about the M109 plenty of times so I wont repeat myself hehe, but I will say I think the M90 is a better package. Go try that before you commit.

No way... i rode the M90 and brought the 109, the 90 is bearly half the bike a 9 is.

109 is where its at.

[Devil]

Except one of them goes round corners properly and the other doesn't.
One of them sounds like it's going to shit itself from low revs on a wide throttle, the other doesn't.
M90 all the way.

Edit: And this is why I didn't re-iterate my opinion in my first post! :jerry: