Winston001
20th November 2009, 13:35
This has been mentioned by various posters here and there but I thought a specific thread could help.
A steady stream of letters to the editor in each of our regions is a good way to keep this issue alive.
Attacking the media itself is pointless. We need their interest and support.
Letters should be short and sweet. Pick one, or at the most two strong points. You can always write a second letter or another biker will jump in.
Do not get into political abuse. If you criticise National, half the readers will switch off immediately and your good points will be completely lost.
There are various excellent letters on other threads but IMHO the writers let themselves down by descending into anger. Try not to do that because anger distracts from the issue.
Justifiable Outrage is different to anger. Ixion conveys this very well. :Punk: Bikers need to appear as normal members of the community who are bewildered at being picked on. We need public sympathy and support.
Do not simply state that ACC and Nick Smith are wrong. Explain why. If its too technical just refer to Professor Charles Lamb's findings.
I'm sure others have helpful ideas too. :D
A steady stream of letters to the editor in each of our regions is a good way to keep this issue alive.
Attacking the media itself is pointless. We need their interest and support.
Letters should be short and sweet. Pick one, or at the most two strong points. You can always write a second letter or another biker will jump in.
Do not get into political abuse. If you criticise National, half the readers will switch off immediately and your good points will be completely lost.
There are various excellent letters on other threads but IMHO the writers let themselves down by descending into anger. Try not to do that because anger distracts from the issue.
Justifiable Outrage is different to anger. Ixion conveys this very well. :Punk: Bikers need to appear as normal members of the community who are bewildered at being picked on. We need public sympathy and support.
Do not simply state that ACC and Nick Smith are wrong. Explain why. If its too technical just refer to Professor Charles Lamb's findings.
I'm sure others have helpful ideas too. :D