View Full Version : Domed piston in a flat piston bike?
noobi
27th January 2010, 21:20
Bought a new piston for my bike from Wossner, the piston kit is made for my bike, and the piston i got is a domed piston, my bike has only ever had flat top pistons in it.
The parts manual specifies a flat top piston,
The wossner parts catalogue specifies that its for my bike and its a domed piston...
left is a piston that was in the bike, right is the new wossner
http://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv10/endless_125/pistoncomparison.jpg
barty5
27th January 2010, 21:51
thats going to up the compression and put some extra load on the bottom end hope its all good
pete376403
27th January 2010, 21:52
Then you're going to have a bit more compression. Check piston/head clearances carefully. Also pist /spark plug clearance (if it uses extended nose plug). Additional base gasket could be used to bring compression back, but that would marginally alter port timing.
Is the rest of the motor pretty stock or does it run right on the ragged edge?
noobi
27th January 2010, 22:04
Then you're going to have a bit more compression. Check piston/head clearances carefully. Also pist /spark plug clearance (if it uses extended nose plug). Additional base gasket could be used to bring compression back, but that would marginally alter port timing.
Is the rest of the motor pretty stock or does it run right on the ragged edge?
As far as i know the motor is bone stock, ill check all the clearances with the solder squish test before starting the bike, and i have extra base gaskets to raise the cylinder a bit,
but im thinking with the compression higher, that ill have to run 98 or higher, which is just a pain really.
flyingcr250
27th January 2010, 22:20
cut the top off with a hacksaw
Reckless
28th January 2010, 07:57
It may increase the compression Noobi but it depends if it decreases the Cc's of the engine at tdc. Their pin could be set a fraction higher (closer to the top edge) to compensate for the crown??? They may have decided a crowned piston gives better flow and back pressure response, which makes sense.
The only way to check is to get hold of a buret (spelling??) and cc the engine with both pistons at tdc. Not a big job but you need the right gear. Your dad might know, he seems pretty clued up about engines. It looks like it will from the pic, but who knows, the critical measurement is from the pin to the top edge, but that will only give you and indication its the volume change at tdc that will tell you for sure. Providing its the correct one for your bike.
cheese
28th January 2010, 08:00
It looks like the wrong piston. Id say that you've always been either running the wrong piston before hand, or they have sent you the wrong piston. I'd say that wossner fucked up.
barty5
28th January 2010, 08:18
should a just stuck with the wiseco
barty5
28th January 2010, 08:23
tend to disagree if you look real close the gaps between the port hole and the pin hole are about the same as with the gap to the skirt given the height difference over all there should be a noticeable visual difference in the spacing between the section i would have thought.
IIIRII
28th January 2010, 08:46
You 100% sure the factory piston if flat ? or are you assuming that because the first piston we took out was?
Is it an OEM piston ?
Everything said here so far is bang on, but you could actually calculate the volume difference in the head.
There would be nothing wrong with machining the new one flat, after some quick tghickness checks etc:
Measure the pin height first in case it is .2 0r .3mm higher, but...
You can calculate the volume in the new crown and we already know the squish clearance and bore, so we can work out head volume and work back from that.
EZ
Or is this going to turn into a discussion like how to work out piston the head clearance again ?
What happened last time ...
Dad was right ..
:P
Reckless
28th January 2010, 08:49
tend to disagree if you look real close the gaps between the port hole and the pin hole are about the same as with the gap to the skirt given the height difference over all there should be a noticeable visual difference in the spacing between the section i would have thought.
Yep certainly looks that way, but you know you can never make that judgement from a photo on the internet.
I was assumng nobbi had already done the standard piston bore clearance measurments and was indicating the next step so he can be sure of the changes that might occur to his engine and tuning, if he fits that piston.
Starky307
28th January 2010, 08:55
It may increase the compression Noobi but it depends if it decreases the Cc's of the engine at tdc. Their pin could be set a fraction higher (closer to the top edge) to compensate for the crown??? They may have decided a crowned piston gives better flow and back pressure response, which makes sense.
The only way to check is to get hold of a buret (spelling??) and cc the engine with both pistons at tdc. Not a big job but you need the right gear. Your dad might know, he seems pretty clued up about engines. It looks like it will from the pic, but who knows, the critical measurement is from the pin to the top edge, but that will only give you and indication its the volume change at tdc that will tell you for sure. Providing its the correct one for your bike.
Listen to what this guy has to say.
You 100% sure the factory piston if flat ? or are you assuming that because the first piston we took out was?
Is it an OEM piston ?
Everything said here so far is bang on, but you could actually calculate the volume difference in the head.
There would be nothing wrong with machining the new one flat, after some quick tghickness checks etc:
Measure the pin height first in case it is .2 0r .3mm higher, but...
You can calculate the volume in the new crown and we already know the squish clearance and bore, so we can work out head volume and work back from that.
EZ
Or is this going to turn into a discussion like how to work out piston the head clearance again ?
What happened last time ...
Dad was right ..
:P
I wouldn't recommend machining a new part to make it "fit".
I don't know the history of your bike but why don't you buy an original part for it?
Reckless
28th January 2010, 08:56
Dad was right ..
:P
Ah shit you posted while I was answering calls and typing mine up. I thought you'd be onto it!
Your dad might know, he seems pretty clued up about engines. Good point too, we where assuming it was an OEM piston because noobi never said it wasn't or what it was. He did say it was "bone stock" though. Maybe Noobi should come see you instead of posting and getting all these opinions LOL!!
Btw I have a glass Buret (Somewhere???) and dial gauge if you need it or decide to go down that track. Cheers.
SS90
28th January 2010, 09:15
As far as i know the motor is bone stock, ill check all the clearances with the solder squish test before starting the bike, and i have extra base gaskets to raise the cylinder a bit,
but im thinking with the compression higher, that ill have to run 98 or higher, which is just a pain really.
There has been some good advise from a few guys here so far mate, and let's just concentrate on the important things.
A "solder squish test" is simply nothing more than a "piston to head clearance test"
You bike is likely to have a "squish head", but there is a difference in measuring a "squish clearance", and "head clearance".
Yes, putting a piece of solder through the plug hole will give you an acceptable indication of how much clearance there is between the piston and the head (in a non dynamic state....i.e "not revving", because, at say 8,000 RPM, the piston comes somewhat closer to the head than what you measure with this test.
Measuring "the squish" is slightly more involved, but what you are measuring is the WIDTH of the compressed piece if solder (as well as the compressed thickness), as the width, and compressed thickness, will give you an indication of the "squish angle" you are running.
I assure you that what squish angle you had before with the flat top piston (which, incidentally, no matter what some people may say, is actually better than a domed piston....) will now be totally different, and, if the cylinder and head where designed for one (or the other), mixing the two, even if you alter the compression ratios to suit, will lose power.
The shape of the top of your piston does more than control the amount of compression you have. It also controls the angle the compressed sir/fuel mixture enters the cylinder at BDC (crankcase scavenging), and this has an overall effect on your scavenge pattern, which, in a bike like this, is a well thought out thing.
Back to the compression.
If you don't know which piston is OEM, then I would go to the effort of finding out what the factory fitted.
Sure, you can cc the head, and with base gaskets alter the compression ratios (by ratio's, I mean the static (TDC volume, and the "corrected", or "trapped" compression, which is measured from the point of exhaust opening.
This is a far more accepted method than the TDC method alone, as cylinder compression on a two stroke is "dynamic" (i.e, they get more efficient as RPM increases, and the TDC only method does not take this into account)
Doing all this work sounds complicated, but I assure you it is worth the effort.
The important thing to note is that the "squish" test does NOT give you any idea of the actual compression ratio, only the distance between the head and piston when at a standstill.....if you start playing with piston heights, please cc the head and calculate the "corrected compression ratio"
You won't regret it!
SS90
28th January 2010, 09:19
There would be nothing wrong with machining the new one flat,
:P
Erm, I wouldn't recommend ever machining the top of a performance two stroke piston flat.... since the early eighties Japanese pistons have been as light as they can get (competition ones that is), and there is sweet FA material on the crown.
Remove any material from there and the chances of burning a hole in your piston go through the roof!
cheese
28th January 2010, 11:18
I'm pretty sure its the wrong piston, get another one.
noobi
28th January 2010, 14:28
Iv emailed wossner asking for a please explain,
the box says 8097DB for 03'-06' EC125, wheras the 2009 wossner catalogue says 8097DB for 03'-09' EC125
which makes sense as the engines havent changed much/at all since ~2001 ish
theblacksmith
29th January 2010, 15:51
Ive just put a flat headed piston in a kx 125 motor that used to have a domed piston and she goes sweet! Starts 1st kick.
I have noticed that it runs a bit rich in the higher rev range(but this could be down to a mixture issue maybe). Power is the about the same Id say.
SS90
29th January 2010, 22:40
Ive just put a flat headed piston in a kx 125 motor that used to have a domed piston and she goes sweet! Starts 1st kick.
I have noticed that it runs a bit rich in the higher rev range(but this could be down to a mixture issue maybe). Power is the about the same Id say.
A bit rich, or a bit "flat"....... lower compression that the engine is designed for will lower the MSV (maximum squish velocity), and, at higher RPM slow the combustion rate down.
also, depending on the "compression height" of the piston, alter your port timing as well, which is why in some cases people say "wow, it improved bottom end"...simply, because a taller piston lowered the trapped compression (and exhaust port opening time)
If, for some reason you wanted/needed to run this set up, you would need to alter your ignition curve to compensate (in this case less retard in the top end.....remember two strokes retard the ignition in the high rpm, unlike a 4 stroke)
all in all, false economy....if the engine set up (head, ignition, pipe)is designed to run a certain design of piston, and unless you know better than a Japanese manufacturer (in all likely hood you don't), it would make sense to stick with what is meant to be.
Reckless
30th January 2010, 14:42
Agreed, SS90 makes a lot of sense in the things he says!
Just to add when increasing our compressions in our race karts (ie machining the head).
My good karting buddy used to do it when blue printing our engines. When re machining the correct squish back in, we always reproduced the angle/shape and width of the squish band as close to factory as possible. I'm know he experimented with this on his own karts (125cc watercooled 2smokers) and never got better reading on the dyno or track than with the factory internal head/bowl/squish shapes/angles.
Bearing in mind in that environment a 1/10th on the track or a very slight drop in performance is much more obvious than on our Enduro bikes.
So my preference would the to replace domed or flat topped pistons with the same and not to mix them.
I remember putting one of my race engines back into its 125 MX bike chassis as I was changing to a Cagiva engine. The bloody thing was lethal and now that I have ridden trail for the last 3 years pretty much unridable in a dirt bike except for maybe beach racing. LOL!!!
theblacksmith
30th January 2010, 16:19
[QUOTE=SS90;1129628889]A bit rich, or a bit "flat"
Rich Id say - as if choke was still on. And she actually starts first time with no choke, which might suggest its a wee bit rich. I dont know what the previous owner had done with the carb-but judging by the amount of air the motor sucked in(both crank seals were rooted and leaking air) I would say that they d most probably chose to give it more than standard just to get it to run lol!
Im off to Thunder X tomorrow and that will be the first decent run for the newly built motor - I will have a shot at tweaking it then I think.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.