Log in

View Full Version : Now I've seen it all.



onearmedbandit
6th November 2010, 08:54
I was going to put this in the jokes and humour section, but I'm sure someone will be along to defend individuality. Fair enough too, no problem with people doing what they want with their money. But to me, this is just plain ugly. And I bet it handles like the titanic. After it sunk...

<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/goWclE_s0BE&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/goWclE_s0BE&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>

James Deuce
6th November 2010, 09:00
The two chains are a clever idea but think of the drive line power loss.

The iPod speakers look silly.

Botany Honda
6th November 2010, 09:39
Batman For-Never ? :shutup:

Laava
6th November 2010, 09:45
Lol at the YT comments!

imdying
6th November 2010, 09:49
I watched the bit past the triples a few times thinking it was odd... let the video continue... blimey, a 300 front tyre too :blink:

hellokitty
6th November 2010, 09:54
the airbrushed tank is cool but as for the rest........ :sick:

ellipsis
6th November 2010, 09:57
.....hmmmm......fairly indefensible....

baptist
6th November 2010, 11:04
two questions

Is he taking it racing on a beach?

Does he need a side stand with tyres that fat?

:puke:

Big Dave
6th November 2010, 12:15
Burt Munro Challenge special! Would kill the beach racing.

MarkH
6th November 2010, 12:30
And I bet it handles like the titanic. After it sunk...

I think that it is both stupid and dangerous - the rider would be in danger of Darwining himself! I have heard of a death due to messed up handling after changing a rear tyre for something different to what the bike is designed to use - that makes me think it is a really bad idea.

Big Dave
6th November 2010, 13:06
sharing that around thanks.

jellywrestler
6th November 2010, 13:15
why didn't they just get an RV90 or 125?

slofox
6th November 2010, 13:32
FFS...I bet Mr Suzuki forbids all dealerships worldwide to sell that owner another of his bikes...

If beauty lies in the eye of the beholder, that bugger needs a retinal transplant.

scumdog
6th November 2010, 13:33
I think that it is both stupid and dangerous - the rider would be in danger of Darwining himself! I have heard of a death due to messed up handling after changing a rear tyre for something different to what the bike is designed to use - that makes me think it is a really bad idea.


S'oright, he's designed the rest of the bike too!:gob:

Ocean1
7th November 2010, 16:47
The two chains are a clever idea but think of the drive line power loss.

I built a minibike a few years ago, (wellallright, was a few decades ago) with exactly that drive detail. Avoided the usual minibike rear sprocket size 1/2" smaller than the tyre.

If a 4hp B&S can handle the double-wrap I reckon most road bikes would manage OK.

kiwifruit
7th November 2010, 16:58
mean !

owner
7th November 2010, 17:12
Why cant I see it? have I been feeding the chickens to much? How bout a link or a clue so I can search

onearmedbandit
7th November 2010, 17:15
Why cant I see it? have I been feeding the chickens to much? How bout a link or a clue so I can search

Huh? Whadyaonabout?

Dodgy
7th November 2010, 17:26
Isnt that the secret Dukic garage with his 'blessed by the touch of Dukic' magic for this seasons 600 class?