Anyone English see this?

[Ride Fast Live Long]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3222753/Sick-protesters-torch-poppy.html

Pure disgusting, How could they even be allowed to live in the country. Makes me so angry to see or hear about.

[MisterD]

With you 100%. Kick them back to wherever their parents came from...at least my taxes no longer pay their benefits.

[nudemetalz]

The only thing that would fix those "protestors" would be a couple of belts of 7.62mm........

[BoristheBiter]

Should be lined up and shot, dirty fucking sand eaters.

[Mom]

I think it is called freedom of speech, one of the things that we hold dear in our society. Best thing to do with that sort of protest is to ignore it completely, dont give it any publicity. The more attention it gets the more they will do it.

For the record I am totally apalled by this, but defend the rights of the protestors to say their piece. Ignore it.

[BoristheBiter]

I think it is called freedom of speech, one of the things that we hold dear in our society. Best thing to do with that sort of protest is to ignore it completely, dont give it any publicity. The more attention it gets the more they will do it.

For the record I am totally apalled by this, but defend the rights of the protestors to say their piece. Ignore it.

Did you see the reaction when that guy in the states went to burn the Koran??

[avgas]

People treat these situations wrong.

It's attention they want. If everyone walked away and said "what ever". The press left them alone. No one paid them any attention.....

Then it would just look like a bunch of geeks, round a fire, at a ninja turtle convention.

[EJK]

Poppy? Oh I thought it said "puppy"

Nevermind then, carry on.

[firefighter]

Did you see the reaction when that guy in the states went to burn the Koran??

Exactly. I'm fucken sick of the double standards.....

They have NO right to freedom of speech and to protest during such a sacred ceremony in my eyes.

That's the problem with this world, fucks like this are given the 'right' to turn a great event of rememberence into something inciting hatred and anger.

What possible social gain is there from this?! None.

If they want to live in the country they can fucken well respect the customs of that country, just like you, MOM, would have to if you went to theirs. You would have to walk behind me and always put me first because i'm a man.

[mashman]

Fookin 'ell i'm glad i don't live there anymore. They probably have no idea of what WW I or II was about. Hardly surprising they'd be so ignorant. Shame those towels never caught on fire (directed at the individual, not the religion)...

[firefighter]

People treat these situations wrong.

It's attention they want. If everyone walked away and said "what ever". The press left them alone. No one paid them any attention.....

Then it would just look like a bunch of geeks, round a fire, at a ninja turtle convention.

Actually, the right thing to do would be for the crowds of pissed onlookers to stomp them all to death, like would happen to them in muslim countries if infidel tried the same bullshit.

[Banditbandit]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3222753/Sick-protesters-torch-poppy.html

Pure disgusting, How could they even be allowed to live in the country. Makes me so angry to see or hear about.


Exactly. I'm fucken sick of the double standards.....

They have NO right to freedom of speech and to protest during such a sacred ceremony in my eyes.

That's the problem with this world, fucks like this are given the 'right' to turn a great event of rememberence into something inciting hatred and anger.

What possible social gain is there from this?! None.

If they want to live in the country they can fucken well respect the customs of that country, just like you, MOM, would have to if you went to theirs. You would have to walk behind me and always put me first because i'm a man.


First of all ... the story is pretty clear that these are homegrown protestors - so they were born there ....

While I might agree with their sentiments ... wrong time and wrong place to stage such a protest ...

[BoristheBiter]

First of all ... the story is pretty clear that these are homegrown protestors - so they were born there ....

While I might agree with their sentiments ... wrong time and wrong place to stage such a protest ...

They don't care where they were born they say they are muslim first.
They go on about how bad the west is but they all want to live in it.

[Ride Fast Live Long]

Exactly. I'm fucken sick of the double standards.....

They have NO right to freedom of speech and to protest during such a sacred ceremony in my eyes.

That's the problem with this world, fucks like this are given the 'right' to turn a great event of rememberence into something inciting hatred and anger.

What possible social gain is there from this?! None.

If they want to live in the country they can fucken well respect the customs of that country, just like you, MOM, would have to if you went to theirs. You would have to walk behind me and always put me first because i'm a man.

Agreed 100% even in our own country if we say somthing about then were in trouble. But they can stand there a do that and get away with it, even worse that it was the 2 minutes silence. They should all be deported in my eyes. I admit though there are some who follow the customs and arnt a problem, but its the people like this that shouldnt even be allowed off the desert they came from.

[ducatilover]

Why......... what have they proven by doing that? Arrogance? It's just asking for trouble. :facepalm:

[nudemetalz]

Reminds me of the ignorant couple of protestors that made noises at the last Anzac Dawn Parade here in Welly. So wanted to go and deal to them :angry2::bash:

[avgas]

Actually, the right thing to do would be for the crowds of pissed onlookers to stomp them all to death, like would happen to them in muslim countries if infidel tried the same bullshit.
True......but then what would the difference be.

People DONT move to the middle east as it DOES NOT tolerate anything outside their thoughts.

People DO move to the UK for the opposite.

I personally like the idea that if you don't serve society - you should be shot. However if I were to implement this - people would compare me to Hitler.

Likewise if Muslims were stomped on in the UK.....while it would improve things....people would compare it to the iron age.

[MSTRS]

Likewise if Muslims were stomped on in the UK.....while it would improve things....people would compare it to the iron age.

The Wicker Man wasn't ALL bad...

[SMOKEU]

I'm surprised that the sand niggers didn't let off any suicide bombs.

[mashman]

if you don't serve society - you should be shot. However if I were to implement this - people would compare me to Hitler.


+1 I'm kinda with you on that... Although i'd compare you to Charlie Chaplin instead :lol:

[Oscar]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3222753/Sick-protesters-torch-poppy.html

Pure disgusting, How could they even be allowed to live in the country. Makes me so angry to see or hear about.

I'm English, and as far as I'm concerned my father and grandfather fought in those wars to preserve the rights of people like that.

I don't like it, but the alternative is worse.

[BoristheBiter]

I'm English, and as far as I'm concerned my father and grandfather fought in those wars to preserve the rights of people like that.

I don't like it, but the alternative is worse.

The crusades???

[Oscar]

They don't care where they were born they say they are muslim first.


So what?
German Soldiers in both wars had Gott mit uns on their belt buckles, and Allied troops were told to fight for "God & Country".

Religion comes right alongside patrotism in the list of best ways to get a man to die in battle.

[Oscar]

The crusades???

WTF has that to do with the price of fish?
We're talking about the rights of man.

[BoristheBiter]

So what?
German Soldiers in both wars had Gott mit uns on their belt buckles, and Allied troops were told to fight for "God & Country".

Religion comes right alongside patrotism in the list of best ways to get a man to die in battle.

But they die in the name of islam.
And I think you mean "King and country".

[Oscar]

But they die in the name of islam.
And I think you mean "King and country".

Englishmen have fought for God since Alfred.
What do you think the red cross on the flag is all about?
Anyway, since Henry nationalised the local church, dying for God and King became much the same thing.

Christianity is far more aggressive from the outside (particularly when idiots like Bush use the word "Crusade" in a speech about the Middle East).

[Banditbandit]

I'm English, and as far as I'm concerned my father and grandfather fought in those wars to preserve the rights of people like that.

I don't like it, but the alternative is worse.


The crusades???

No .. the alternative is an authoritarian state like many truely Islamic countries ....

Mind you ... many of the facists here would love that ... as long as it conformed to their views ... the rest of us would be in armed rebellion ...

[BoristheBiter]

No .. the alternative is an authoritarian state like many truely Islamic countries ....

Mind you ... many of the facists here would love that ... as long as it conformed to their views ... the rest of us would be in armed rebellion ...

When do we start??

[BoristheBiter]

Englishmen have fought for God since Alfred.
What do you think the red cross on the flag is all about?
Anyway, since Henry nationalised the local church, dying for God and King became much the same thing.

Christianity is far more aggressive from the outside (particularly when idiots like Bush use the word "Crusade" in a speech about the Middle East).

I guess he is trying to finish what we started.

[Brian d marge]

I think it is called freedom of speech, one of the things that we hold dear in our society. Best thing to do with that sort of protest is to ignore it completely, dont give it any publicity. The more attention it gets the more they will do it.

For the record I am totally appalled by this, but defend the rights of the protesters to say their piece. Ignore it.
+1
and its not like the west have been trampling upon Muslim images recently ...

:innocent:

but ,,as for in paradise ,,, Daryl tell him hes dreamin

Stephen

[Oscar]

I've already said that I don't actually agree with what those cretins are doing, but will some explain this to me?

When 2,000 people are killed in the WTC, and more in Spain and London, the west raves about "Radical Islam".

When several hundred thousand innocent civillians are killed in Iraq over the last decade, where are the ravers about "Radical Westeners" or "Crazy Christians"?

And which is worse - an Islamic fighter that is prepared to die for his way of life, whilst taking the lives of innocents,or a guy at a computer moniter in Langley who kills a muslim terrorist or two (and twenty innocent wedding guests) by remote control?

Actually the second is a trick one - they are both murdering scum bags.

[Edbear]

With you 100%. Kick them back to wherever their parents came from...at least my taxes no longer pay their benefits.


I think it is called freedom of speech, one of the things that we hold dear in our society. Best thing to do with that sort of protest is to ignore it completely, dont give it any publicity. The more attention it gets the more they will do it.

For the record I am totally apalled by this, but defend the rights of the protestors to say their piece. Ignore it.


First of all ... the story is pretty clear that these are homegrown protestors - so they were born there ....

While I might agree with their sentiments ... wrong time and wrong place to stage such a protest ...


They don't care where they were born they say they are muslim first.
They go on about how bad the west is but they all want to live in it.

As one who is politically neutral, the irony of the fact that these people would probably not want to live in a Moslem country does not escape me...

[Oscar]

As one who is politically neutral, the irony of the fact that these people would probably not want to live in a Moslem country does not escape me...

What shouldn't escape you is that they were all probably born in England, or if they weren't, they came from a country that was part of the Empire.

Religion aside, the British have obligations to people they subjected.

[Edbear]

What shouldn't escape you is that they were all probably born in England, or if they weren't, they came from a country that was part of the Empire.

Religion aside, the British have obligations to people they subjected.

Can't argue with that at all. My point is that having grown up in and enjoyed the freedom afforded them by the country, they were free also to choose for themselves who and what they want to be - as we are here. So to choose to turn on the British people and nation with hatred and to foment unrest and violence against their fellowman, in effect their "brothers", one would expect them to want to go and live in the Moslem country who's radicals they have chosen to identify with.

I have the same view of so-called Maori radicals who refuse to recognise the laws of this country while happily accepting the welfare of same.

I have the same view of those who live/ride/drive in defiance of the law, refusing to accept they should abide by the laws of this country, but happily accept the benefits of living here such as expecting the Police, courts, Paramedics and public health system to come to their aid in times of need. People who rip off the system are very quick to hold their hands out when they want something.

[NONONO]

What's truly amazin is that no one here has taken into account that it was in The Sun....:lol::lol::lol:
For Fcks Sake,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Gospel.

[Berries]

My biggest concern was what had happened to Page 3. Lucky I found it in the end before dissing completely everything about Blair's Britain.

[oldrider]

Words fail me ...... too old for action now, damn it! :weird:

[NONONO]

Page 3, slow news day, Blair's tits. :gob:

Another classic from The Sun;
After George Michael had a car crash – The Sun headline :

“George Michael Shunts Trucker In Rear”

[pzkpfw]

When several hundred thousand innocent civillians are killed in Iraq over the last decade, where are the ravers about "Radical Westeners" or "Crazy Christians"?

In general, yes, this is bad. No question. Civilian deaths are awful. I repeat, I agree they are bad.

But there are some real differences.

When a bunch a hijackers fly planes into big buildings they are specifically aiming to kill civilians. It's their direct aim, regardles of their wider motives. And these are civilians that either can only vaguely be linked to the target of these hiajckers; or the target of these hijackers really is just "the people".

On the other hand, the deaths of civilians in Iraq come from a different kind of action.

The U.S. (in general*1) does not aim to simply kill civilians. For example, they did not use B52's to carpet bomb downtown Baghdad, World War II style; they used precision bombing*2. (I recall an event (first gulf war) where a precision bomb was sent down an air vent and blew up a bunker - killing a whole lot of Women and Children. That was certainly a cynical ploy by the Iraqi's; those civilians would have been safer at home - houses in general were not the American target; bunkers were (because that's where the leaders were expected to be - not random civilians).

The civilian deaths that have continued in Iraq are also not the sole "blame" of the U.S. (and Western allies). It's not like the U.S.(*1) just goes out and bombs a house for no particular reason. The thing is, they are fighting an enemy that hides within the civilian population. Why ask 'where are the ravers about "Radical Westeners" or "Crazy Christians"?' - why not ask 'where are the ravers about "insurgents" or "non-Iraqi foreign anti-American fighters"?'

Also, plenty of the civilian deaths are not caused by the U.S. as such, but by the general carnage dealt by the people there. They bomb police recruits. They bomb markets. They bomb muslims of the "wrong kind". They bomb each other.

The U.S. armed forces have actually operated under some pretty strict guidelines ("rules of engagement"). Even Vietnam was affected. The "linebacker" operations served their purpose by making the North go to the negotiation table, but the U.S. never really unleashed World War II style "total war" on the North Vietnamese. World opinion would not stand for it. Today, military units often need to go through a few steps of approval gathering before they can start the shooting.

They do not aim to kill civilians, and they should not shoulder the full burden.

Then, to simply say "go home, then" is a simplistic answer. The place is a mess, and abandoning it won't help.

(
*1 you'll note that as some soldiers are found to have "done bad" they have been exposed and put on trial. Sure, not all, but it's something. The "free press" eventually exposes the "bad stuff" and things "happen".

*2 I think this is one of the lessons they need to learn. The Iraqi army was smashed in weeks. So what was the point of bombing all the water treatment plants and power stations? The U.S. then had to spend all that time and money fixing those things when they took over the country. If their strikes had been aimed more at direct military targets and less on general infrastructure, they'd still have "won" the military battle but had less trouble making the civilians happy afterwards. (Even in WWII, the Germans were able to increase production of certain things even while the bombing of cities (which, again, didn't happen this way in Iraq) increased. At the end, fields of aircraft were found - they had the planes, but no fuel or trained pilots. This should have been a lesson.)
)

[rapid van cleef]

well. they should fuck off back to their own country if they have so little regard for the people born n bred there and the people that are alive now that have family ties such such horrendous events.

kenny everitt said it in the 80's round em up, put em in a field, and bomb the bastards!

im no rascist. but you cant go live in another country then show such contempt for the history of that country and its citizens.

if they relly wanna protest they shoud set themselves on fire!

that' ll teach us aye!

the soft arsed policies of uk immigration breed rascisim(spelling......der)

uk has muslim only swimming poools for fucks sake. i dont care what colour your skin is

would we find pakeha only facilities in nz and expect everyone to be sweet with it? bollocks!

[mashman]

Page 3, slow news day, Blair's tits. :gob:

Another classic from The Sun;
After George Michael had a car crash – The Sun headline :

“George Michael Shunts Trucker In Rear”

:killingme, stop iiiiitttt

[avgas]

+1 I'm kinda with you on that... Although i'd compare you to Charlie Chaplin instead :lol:
Jews probably wouldn't feel so bad if Charlie Chaplin killed them.

[mashman]

Jews probably wouldn't feel so bad if Charlie Chaplin killed them.

Neither would I to be fair, i'm sure it'd be silent :)

[98tls]

Very sad but expect the same here in the not to distant future.One has to wonder if those that gave all would have ever left home if they could have seen how things would turn out.

[Dave Lobster]

The crusades???

The crusades were a response to the the saracens' onslaught.

[mashman]

Very sad but expect the same here in the not to distant future.One has to wonder if those that gave all would have ever left home if they could have seen how things would turn out.


So i've seen, it's just not Islam here. One of our reasons for coming out here was so that the kids could be a little safer. Naive maybe, bet hey, we'll see what happens :)

[98tls]

Personally i look forward to when Tongans jump on the fanatical bandwagon:woohoo:Most of them have no idea how to turn a fridge on so fucking about with explosives should prove interesting.

[98tls]

So i've seen, it's just not Islam here. One of our reasons for coming out here was so that the kids could be a little safer. Naive maybe, bet hey, we'll see what happens :)

Fella this isnt called "little England " without reason,disgruntled so called natives combined with flotsam from surrounding Islands with no intention of just getting on with life as we know it are already filling up both our prisons and newspapers daily,just like up there theres to many do gooders defending there so called rights long before they have earned any.

[Fatt Max]

That protest is just plain and simple bullshit and it should NOT be allowed. Fuck, I hate to see the UK going down like this.

You cant even fly a george cross on your house without some fucking PC ridden council inspector accusing you of racism and fining you if you dont remove it. Imagine if that happened in NZ...

The UK panders to these people because they are so fucking afraid of consequence.

At the same tim, the far right are a bunch of arseholes as well, hooligans, plain and simple.

Fuck, it's terrible that people are allowed to do this kind of stuff, free speech or not....and these bastards are UK born as well

Has me upset this has, bastards..

[Kickaha]

That protest is just plain and simple bullshit and it should NOT be allowed.

If you don't allow their protest then you can not allow any protest

[Swoop]

kenny everitt said it in the 80's round em up, put em in a field, and bomb the bastards!
He said "Round up your commies, pinko's and your fags..."

Then his epaulets opened to fire small howitzers. Brilliant comedy!

[Fatt Max]

If you don't allow their protest then you can not allow any protest

Bollocks,

Fuck them

[pritch]

I think it is called freedom of speech, one of the things that we hold dear in our society. Best thing to do with that sort of protest is to ignore it completely, dont give it any publicity. The more attention it gets the more they will do it.

For the record I am totally apalled by this, but defend the rights of the protestors to say their piece. Ignore it.

Normally I would agree but these people don't regard themselves as British and have no respect for rights such as freedom of speech. They have signs about "our dead" and "our affairs". Their British nationality should be withdrawn and they should be shipped back to the muslim nation of their choice.
If they won't make a choice, Bangladesh would do just fine.

[Dave Lobster]

If you don't allow their protest then you can not allow any protest

Why? Of course you can. Any protest that is tantamount to treason, open the machine guns on them.



If they won't make a choice, Bangladesh would do just fine.

The desert is closer, and you don't even need to land a plane there to drop them off. Their false god will save them, if they're lucky.

[Kickaha]

Bollocks,

Fuck them

So you'd be happy for the Govt to say the same next time Motorcyclists want to do an ACC protest then?


Why? Of course you can. Any protest that is tantamount to treason, open the machine guns on them.

Tantamount to treason? :lol: you should do stand up comedy

[Oscar]

In general, yes, this is bad. No question. Civilian deaths are awful. I repeat, I agree they are bad.

But there are some real differences.

When a bunch a hijackers fly planes into big buildings they are specifically aiming to kill civilians. It's their direct aim, regardles of their wider motives. And these are civilians that either can only vaguely be linked to the target of these hiajckers; or the target of these hijackers really is just "the people".

On the other hand, the deaths of civilians in Iraq come from a different kind of action.

The U.S. (in general*1) does not aim to simply kill civilians. For example, they did not use B52's to carpet bomb downtown Baghdad, World War II style; they used precision bombing*2. (I recall an event (first gulf war) where a precision bomb was sent down an air vent and blew up a bunker - killing a whole lot of Women and Children. That was certainly a cynical ploy by the Iraqi's; those civilians would have been safer at home - houses in general were not the American target; bunkers were (because that's where the leaders were expected to be - not random civilians).

The civilian deaths that have continued in Iraq are also not the sole "blame" of the U.S. (and Western allies). It's not like the U.S.(*1) just goes out and bombs a house for no particular reason. The thing is, they are fighting an enemy that hides within the civilian population. Why ask 'where are the ravers about "Radical Westeners" or "Crazy Christians"?' - why not ask 'where are the ravers about "insurgents" or "non-Iraqi foreign anti-American fighters"?'

Also, plenty of the civilian deaths are not caused by the U.S. as such, but by the general carnage dealt by the people there. They bomb police recruits. They bomb markets. They bomb muslims of the "wrong kind". They bomb each other.

The U.S. armed forces have actually operated under some pretty strict guidelines ("rules of engagement"). Even Vietnam was affected. The "linebacker" operations served their purpose by making the North go to the negotiation table, but the U.S. never really unleashed World War II style "total war" on the North Vietnamese. World opinion would not stand for it. Today, military units often need to go through a few steps of approval gathering before they can start the shooting.

They do not aim to kill civilians, and they should not shoulder the full burden.

Then, to simply say "go home, then" is a simplistic answer. The place is a mess, and abandoning it won't help.

(
*1 you'll note that as some soldiers are found to have "done bad" they have been exposed and put on trial. Sure, not all, but it's something. The "free press" eventually exposes the "bad stuff" and things "happen".

*2 I think this is one of the lessons they need to learn. The Iraqi army was smashed in weeks. So what was the point of bombing all the water treatment plants and power stations? The U.S. then had to spend all that time and money fixing those things when they took over the country. If their strikes had been aimed more at direct military targets and less on general infrastructure, they'd still have "won" the military battle but had less trouble making the civilians happy afterwards. (Even in WWII, the Germans were able to increase production of certain things even while the bombing of cities (which, again, didn't happen this way in Iraq) increased. At the end, fields of aircraft were found - they had the planes, but no fuel or trained pilots. This should have been a lesson.)
)


You can waffle about intent all you like, but as far as I'm concerned a dead child is a dead child.
The Americans use of drones makes verification of casualties problematic, but there is no doubt that the US is prepared to kill innocents to get the terrorists. That, by definition, is a terrorist act.

[Fatt Max]

So you'd be happy for the Govt to say the same next time Motorcyclists want to do an ACC protest then?

No. of course I wouldnt, but I have double standards and all the other things you will accuse me of having because you may or may not like to do that sort of thing, I couldnt give a flying fuck what you think of my opinion on this anyway.

I simply cannot get my head around why these bastards are permitted to do this sort of thing on the streets of England when other people are not allowed to even allowed to fly a George Cross in their own home. Imagine if this happened on ANZAC day in this great country.

This has got fuck all to do with bikes, motorcycles, ACC or anything elee....I think the Taleban have Hummers anyway, the yanks gave them those back in the 80's....

[Kickaha]

when other people are not allowed to even allowed to fly a George Cross in their own home

Really? yet Government buildings can if they have more than one flagpole

[PrincessBandit]

The kicker to any campaign (good or bad) is to "hit people where it has maximum effect". Unfortunately while ignoring them would be the best treatment - they've chosen a forum and focal point which simply can't be ignored by the people.

As for the one with the placard about "dead islam soldiers are in paradise, yours are rotting in hell" (or very similar) - gee, I wonder why he kept his face hidden? No such thing as manning up and letting people see you for who and what you are eh.

Guess only time will tell who ends up rotting or burning in hell and who wont.

[Berries]

Has me upset this has, bastards..

Maybe Sam can calm you down.

223481

[Fatt Max]

Maybe Sam can calm you down.

Thank you so much for that,

Gawd bless 'er, Sammy Fox, one of our very own, not a shy gal at the best of times and got 'em out for the lads at the drop of a hat (or a G string, either way)

I am happy now

Protest all you like, I really dont mind,

I'm off to the toilet.......

[admenk]

Protest all you like, I really dont mind,

I'm off to the toilet.......

Can I protest about the thought of you in the toilet ? And was that trip to the loo with Sammy's picture? Remember what they say, any more than 2 shakes is a ...... !!

[mashman]

Can I protest about the thought of you in the toilet ? And was that trip to the loo with Sammy's picture? Remember what they say, any more than 2 shakes is a ...... !!

"... a great way to start the day" :)

[admenk]

"... a great way to start the day" :)

Mind you, I wonder what she looks like now ? She must be as old as us ! :gob:

[mashman]

Mind you, I wonder what she looks like now ? She must be as old as us ! :gob:

Last time I saw here she didn't look too bad, completely feckin bonkers (anyone else see The Club?) absolutely potty. Anyway, Linda Lusardi always held her age better :shifty: anyway, slightly OT :lol:

The whole "The Sun" thing is more than likely a truer reflection of what happened (at least I hope it is). As soon as it was pointed out my first thoughts ran to Damien Day from Drop The Dead Donkey... that man had style

[MSTRS]

The Americans use of drones makes verification of casualties problematic, but there is no doubt that the US is prepared to kill innocents to get the terrorists. That, by definition, is a terrorist act.

When the terrorists stop hiding themselves in amongst the general populace, then the killing of innocents will stop.

[Oscar]

When the terrorists stop hiding themselves in amongst the general populace, then the killing of innocents will stop.

They wouldn't be terrorists then, would they?
Besides, yesterdays terrorist is tomorrow's freedom fighter.

[Fatt Max]

Mind you, I wonder what she looks like now ? She must be as old as us ! :gob:

Oi Sam, take yer boots off and show us yer tits will ya luv.....

[Laava]

http://www.msmagazine.com/oct00/images/no_lady_rose.jpg

[Laava]

51!!! http://thumbsnap.com/s/H99eJ21p.jpg

[Fatt Max]

51!!!

Oh, so thats how many shags she had in one night,

Well done Linda....

[mashman]

51!!! http://thumbsnap.com/s/H99eJ21p.jpg

aaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrghhhhhhhhh hh yes. Very well :love:

[admenk]

I'm sure Linda Lusardi could stop terrorism and bring world peace....:gob: