PDA

View Full Version : RF900 write up, with world record stats



Drew
8th December 2010, 21:30
The write up is by an owner in the states, but the stats are very interesting.

Suzuki RF900R - Perfection Is Not An Objective But An Obstacle.


Which is why as often as we pay homage to the idea of ‘perfect” defined as flawless, the machines that usually get under our skin are the ones that are anything but flawless. In fact, so imperfect they are almost human. You like a given motorcycle because of what it is - you love it in spite of what it is… y’know? It often begins with a determination as to whether you are attracted to a particular machine as it is, or because you see the potential in it. If the aggregate of attributes outweighs any niggles of imperfection – it’s on!
If you research the brief history of the Suzuki RF900 you have to ask yourself "What were they thinking”?
The RF900 is a very sharp looking bike, (to my eye anyway) although no one thought it was sharp looking as new, because the styling was (too?) advanced for the time. Certainly, it was as technologically as advanced as any contemporary offerings. However, when Suzuki introduced it they failed to follow through with a cohesive marketing plan. It was more capable, performance-wise than the classic Katana series, but not a full-on race bike like the GSX-R. So Suzuki was left wondering how exactly to market this baby... and they dropped the ball. Suzuki stopped importing them to the US after the 1997 model year, due to poor sales. Between the Katana's history, and the GSX-R's racing look and performance - the poor RF9 was stuck without an easily defined niche.
When I was looking for a bike during the summer of $4.50 a gallon gas a couple years back, I had a budget but no preconceptions. I looked (for several weeks) at a hell of lot of worn out junk, sellers were trying to pass off on “newbies” during the crisis. As the saying goes: “You kiss a lot of frogs…”
I had worked for a Suzuki dealership when I was young, and owned plenty of them previously. I am a fan. But, having not been near them in decades, I knew nothing about what was out there. So… (by accident more than by design)... the first time I saw “my” RF900R, I was blown away. Wow! I knew what I was going to buy. (Didn’t hurt that this bike was so much cleaner than anything else I had looked at! Like the previous owner actually gave a damn about it.) This bike gets positive comments from everybody, and even non-riders seem to be drawn to it… though surprisingly few motorcycle freaks have ever heard of one. Did I mention it really looks good?
There are advantages and disadvantages in buying a bike that was not a huge seller. Prices are reasonable and it's nice having something relatively rare, but this makes them hard to buy, not many are for sale. People that own them seem to not want to let them go, I got lucky with mine.
The RF900 uses the crankcases and gearbox from the water-cooled version of the GSX-1100R, which introduced the term "bulletproof" to motorcycling. When matched up with a unique cylinder head and small-ish carbs (that had their origin on the RF600) and bored out to 937cc, the resulting engine is light, powerful and virtually indestructible. The 4-inline cylinders are angled forward quite dramatically, which allows the four downdraft carburetors to feed straight intake ports. This helps better fill the cylinders and improve gas flow, contributing to the RF's awesome low and midrange performance. The bike makes 80% of peak torque at 3,500 rpm, which means never having to downshift on the freeway. Just roll open the throttle and you take off! To improve weight distribution and handling, the radiator had to be curved to clear the front wheel, since the engine sits so close. The 5-speed gearbox is more than adequate, and I have never found myself hunting through the gears for more power. (Top speed is about 165mph - completely academic these days - so who's complaining?)
Handling is great, it is lighter than the Honda VFR 750 and even the Katana 600, and has a nice sense of balance that makes it a joy to ride. However, this is not a full on race bike, and throwing it around on a tight windy road will wear you out. It can do it - you just have to work harder. It really comes into it's own on fast sweepers, and higher speeds are what it lives for. The twin spar steel frame is lighter, stiffer and less expensive than one made of aluminum, (how’d they do that?) - but Suzuki was criticized by the motorcycle press who looked down on steel as being "old-fashioned". What? Take the plastic off a Katana and an RF and you can see which is the more advanced. The Katana frame is still made the way it was in the 80's.
The rider's stance is not as radical as a race-replica but is more leaned forward than most, yet I do not find it to be that bad. The seat is plenty firm for long rides, but I can stay on board in reasonable comfort at least until I need fuel - so it doesn't really matter. There are a couple more minor inconveniences. First, there is no center stand. Second, there is no fuel gauge, only an "idiot-light" and of course a reserve valve on the petcock. Sorta old-school - and I can live with it.
Turns out, the RF900 R is a powerful, well-balanced motorcycle that is easy to fall in love with. It is strikingly good-looking, unlike anything else on the market. It cannot be easily categorized, it has a sporty look, but it is not a race-bike. (The best label is probably – “Sport-Tourer” - but I hate labels. To me it's just a damn good overall "motorcycle.") Mechanically, this bike will take just about any abuse, so you can buy low mileage examples secure in the knowledge that the engine is going to be fine. I sure like the fact that of my entire fleet of two-wheelers it’s the one I know would get me from LA to Denver (or anywhere else) with the least hassle in the least amount of time. It also holds the distinction of being the only motorcycle I’ve ever owned that I had no desire (or need) to modify. It works better than good – as is - and holds it own even now… in every performance category! Even Land Speed Records…
What is kinda cool about this is that these records are ENDURANCE records. Look at how fast this RF900R went - for how long - and it becomes really impressive... for a 16-year old motorcycle.
(Information thanks to Metzeler Tyres)
The facts:
Date: June 4/5th, 1994
Team: Suzuki Germany, Metzeler, German motorcycle magazine Motorrad
Bikes: 2 RF900R, red and black prepared from the Suzuki mechanics Michael Schellig and Klaus Schimo
Power: 146hp at 10900rpm
Tyres: Metzeler, serial carcass and tread design but modified tread compound, 120/70 ZR17 ME Z1, 180/55 ZR17 ME Z2, 2.5/2.9 bar
Fuel: leaded super 98 octane
Oil: Castrol RS
Modifications: No main and sidestand, longer windshield, red battery-supplied emergency lamp, fast tankclosing, LCD speedometer, 2 infrared sensors for rear tyre temperature, 100W headlight, positioning lights, carbs adjusted rich due to overheating, 1 muffler-plate (baffles) removed.
Riders: 18: Salvatore Pennisi, Waldemar Schwarz, Walter Villa, Rainer Jänisch, Yves Briguet, Andreas Bronnen, Rainer Bäumel, Helmut Faidt, Hartmut Skora, Dorothea Späth, etc.
Commission: FIM (Federation Internationale Motocycliste)
World Records:
Time Distance Average Speed
1hr 256 km (159m) 260.491 km/h (161.896mp/h)
6hrs 1514 km (941m) 252.341 km/h (156.831mp/h)
12hr 3022 km (1878m) 251.835 km/h (156.516mp/h)
24hr 5904 km (3669m) 246.000 km/h (152.890mp/h)



http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_z_JxwVLqtow/S_s28gCO25I/AAAAAAAAABM/fMZhIMf9AGU/s320/P1000273-.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_z_JxwVLqtow/S_s28gCO25I/AAAAAAAAABM/fMZhIMf9AGU/s1600/P1000273-.jpg)
But nobody cares about 900's anymore (passé class) so that record, will p'robly stand for a few more years – at least until the 1300's go faster than the 900's did "back in the day". Then - it will be shouted from the rooftops! Along those lines however, people are far more interested in (for instance) the "new" record, set by a Hayabusa, for the 24-hour LSR just a few months ago. Everybody is proud of that one - you betcha! Trouble is, it is slower than the 16-year old record set by the RF900R. Look it up!

JimO
9th December 2010, 05:39
petrol $4.50 a gallon, i wish

pzkpfw
9th December 2010, 06:33
Nice write-up.

And I like this: "Perfection Is Not An Objective But An Obstacle".

Sums up a lot of what I do. (I'm a programmer - but I don't do medical equipment or rockets...)

Hans
9th December 2010, 06:47
Aaah yes, the mighty RF. When the time comes to retire mine, I'm afraid I'll have to buy two different bikes to do touring and sports.

F5 Dave
9th December 2010, 10:04
Yeah it's probably a year since I sold mine. I always knew I'd own one as they were an underated bike sold incredibly cheap in the inimitable Suzuki way. There were many things that could be improved, chipped away at to improve the bike.
Ultimately now that it is gone & with each passing day my hatred of it gently increases.

Mully
9th December 2010, 10:36
That's a great write-up.

Riffer will be along shortly to provide some more data, I'm sure.

I've really enjoyed the RF - stupid ACC is the main reason I'm having to sell it.

But the lack of a centre stand and fuel gauge always puzzled me.

riffer
9th December 2010, 10:53
Riffer will be along shortly to provide some more data, I'm sure.

Nah, I'm over that. People can search the site for everything I've written about them. I'm going to start running them down now, in the hope that I can get another one even cheaper.

Suffice to say, I bought mine June 1995 with 43,000 MILES on the clocks.

It's now done 96,000 MILES, and the only thing wrong with it, apart from some cosmetic scraping and cracks in the rear fairing, is that the second gear dogs need undercutting because they have worn a bit much.

I'll be buying another bike in June 2011, but I won't be getting rid of the RF. It will get the gearbox fixed, and fairings replaced and a repaint. That's all it will need.

AllanB
9th December 2010, 11:50
Funny thing - you only hear positive comments about them but they had a short sales period in NZ.

Try a new Bandit 1250 - see what you think as a comparison. I have typically found that stepping off a 'excellent' 16 year old bike onto a modern equivalent is something of a eye opener and suddenly 16 years seams like a loooong time.

FROSTY
9th December 2010, 12:12
Funny thing - you only hear positive comments about them but they had a short sales period in NZ.
94-99 with only paint changes

riffer
9th December 2010, 13:34
Not quite Frosty.

In late 1996 (RS2 model onwards) they changed three things:

Forks - Cartridge forks got an upgrade. Prior to RS2 model (mines an RS1) they had preload adjustment. With RS2 they added damping adjustment through a small screw inside the preload adjuster.

Rear brake - Prior to the RS2 model the rear brake sat on a hanger that had the torque arm as a flange that sat inside the swingarm. With RS2 they changed that and the rear brake had a torque arm rod that bolted on to the underside of the motor.

Alternator - Prior to the RS2 model the alternator drive was a solid shaft. In some US models this sheared and caused catastrophic damage to the motor, so they changed it to prevent this by adding a cush to the shaft. Dumb idea. It lasts about 25000kms, then you need to replace it. Luckily it's not too hard to do - see here. (http://andreas.warby.org/photos/2003/0728.html)

onearmedbandit
9th December 2010, 15:39
I remember when they came out, they were rated by some testers as a better bike than the 'blade of the same year (performance, handling, comfort etc etc). I loved the end of them, well ahead of it's time imo.

Drew
9th December 2010, 15:57
Seems I'm on the same page as a few Kiwibikers at the moment. Will be listing my bike for sale without delay methinks.

Hans
9th December 2010, 16:17
Funny thing - you only hear positive comments about them but they had a short sales period in NZ.

Try a new Bandit 1250 - see what you think as a comparison. I have typically found that stepping off a 'excellent' 16 year old bike onto a modern equivalent is something of a eye opener and suddenly 16 years seams like a loooong time.

Or try putting on better brakes and suspension and some very light engine work and you get something that is utterly reliable (20k in one year-one failed o-ring), goes like snot, handles well, is comfortable, uses NO oil between changes and cost 4k with all mods included in price. What other bike will do that?

Mully
9th December 2010, 17:28
Seems I'm on the same page as a few Kiwibikers at the moment. Will be listing my bike for sale without delay methinks.

And if you can't wait, mine's here:
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/Listing.aspx?id=336045947

Drew
9th December 2010, 22:08
Took the beast on the Thursday night ride, put on the leathers this time and cant believe it! It's better again when you really start hanging off without fear of burning holes in your knees!

I like it more every time I thrash it, AND it does mean wheelies.

gale_wolf
9th December 2010, 23:52
Great review. You can tell that he's passionate about his bike.

I was often tempted to get an RF900, test rode a few during the 90s, but stuck with my old reliable bullet proof GSXR1100K. I had a friend with an RF600, but it didn't have an easy life with him as its owner. Maintenance? He'd never heard of such a thing.

crazybigal
10th December 2010, 07:49
here is my one for sale
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/Listing.aspx?id=339273438