Quick dumb question about chains

[not2slow]

Hi, its time to replace the chain on my Hyobag (2008 GT250R). Stock chain is 520 pitch x 112 links.

I have been looking at EK, RK and Regina (or is it vagina?) chains and aiming for an O-ring or X-ring which ever is cheapest. So which chain do you get best bang for buck? I have seen, on trademe, EK (O-ring) and RK (O-ring) chains for ~$100. Is one better than another?

Cheers

[Taz]

Probably very similar. Check your sprockets because if your chains stuffed your sprockets probably are too and a new chain on worn sprockets wont last very long.

[DrunkenMistake]

Chain differences like X rings and O rings etc etc dont make that much of a dramatic difference in a low powered bike like a 250, they make alot of difference on for example a thou and yah, a good idea is to change your sprockets when you change the chain as well

[sinfull]

Just trade up !

[DEATH_INC.]

Chain differences like X rings and O rings etc etc dont make that much of a dramatic difference in a low powered bike like a 250, they make alot of difference on for example a thou and yah, a good idea is to change your sprockets when you change the chain as well
Not quite true. On a thou a couple of hp more drag is barely noticeable, where as on a high hp machine like a hyobung it'll nearly halve the available power! :laugh:
Go with an x-ring, less drag. In fact, on something like that I'd seriously consider a non-o ring chain, even less drag, and they still last quite well if ya keep 'em lubed up properly. And they're cheaper to buy.

[DrunkenMistake]

Not quite true. On a thou a couple of hp more drag is barely noticeable, where as on a high hp machine like a hyobung it'll nearly halve the available power! :laugh:
Go with an x-ring, less drag. In fact, on something like that I'd seriously consider a non-o ring chain, even less drag, and they still last quite well if ya keep 'em lubed up properly. And they're cheaper to buy.
I had it explained to me before, but I must have for my wires crossed,
Yah I have an xring on my 400 just have to remember to keep lubing it up haha

[Quasievil]

Quick and Dum..........KB is a perfect medium for such a question

[not2slow]

Sprockets are on the "to buy list" as well.

So EK and RK are basically the same when applied to low powered bikes.
I was told O-ring chains will last longer than non O-ring

[nodrog]

Just go into your local bank and get one of the chains they use to secure their pens to the desks.

[george formby]

Sprockets are on the "to buy list" as well.

So EK and RK are basically the same when applied to low powered bikes.
I was told O-ring chains will last longer than non O-ring

That boils down to how you ride & how well you maintain the chain.

[GrayWolf]

Sprockets are on the "to buy list" as well.

So EK and RK are basically the same when applied to low powered bikes.
I was told O-ring chains will last longer than non O-ring


replace the chain with worn out sprockets? you'll simply ruin the chain... which will then screw up the new sprockets quickly....

[DEATH_INC.]

Sprockets are on the "to buy list" as well.

So EK and RK are basically the same when applied to low powered bikes.
I was told O-ring chains will last longer than non O-ring
Do them all at the same time or you're chucking money down the drain.
O-rings and X-rings will last longer if you are slack with maintenance, not much difference between them.
Non o-ring chains are generally lighter and drag less, followed by x-rings and o-rings last.
Non o-rings are the cheapest, followed by o-rings and x-rings generally being dearer.
For all the smartasses, this is a generalisation, of course there are variables.

On a smaller bike if it were mine I'd save a couple of bucks and free up a couple of hp by fitting a fairly light non o-ring and new sprockets. :shifty: