View Full Version : XJ High speed stability
Warr
19th July 2005, 08:02
As one gets up in speed on twisty stuff I've noticed.
The bike has a certain flex to it. Nothing uncontrollable
But just wondering if people could share experiences on where I should start
looking to reduce / eliminate it.
Be it wheel bearings or the swing arm??
My steering head bearings have been replaced in the last 12 months and that
made an amazing difference.
I posted this question up on the Yamaha XJ owners discussion Forum
Got one reply ... anyone else have any thoughts
The XJ frames are reasonably rigid. The flex is most likely from the forks
or swingarm.
You can really stiffen the bike. Assuming wheel bearings, tires and
suspension are in order...
- All bearings adjusted/preloaded correctly (steering stem and swingarm).
- Fork brace.
- Braced swingarm.
- Frame braces or anchor plate (anchor plate ties the top of the engine to
the spine of the frame under the tank).
Michael Oberle - XJ Nobody
FROSTY
19th July 2005, 08:16
Sorry to tell ya this bud--XJ's flex --they aint like a modern bike
a definite part of the problem with your bike is the shocks. they make the flexing worse.
Next time ya feel her flexing try easing on a bit of back brake and keeping the throttle on.
The othe3r stuff-braced swingarm,extra plates up around the steering head
all help but its gonna cost a fair biit to get there.
Do all that work and you still have a $1500 bike when for example $1500 wouild buy you a 88 cbr600 on trade me.
Mines a 89 but basicly same bike as yours and on manfeild I was useing a shit load of body english and hangin onto the back brake to keep her in line.
pritch
19th July 2005, 14:06
It was always my understanding that the nickname applied to the XJ series was "The HInge". This from the feeling that there was a hinge in the middle.
riffer
19th July 2005, 14:36
Really? I thought that was the H1 - aka "the triple with the ripple"
Pwalo
19th July 2005, 14:39
Like Frosty and Pritch have said the XJ isn't a modern bike. Most Japanese bikes from the early eighties era were known to have slightly suspect handling and suspension. Lots of aftermarket frames available for bikes of this era.
You can upgrade your suspension, and improve the ride quality, but you're just going to have to put up with a bit of frame flex if you want to push things.
I have a sneaky suspicion that Yamaha didn't really see the XJ as a full on sportsbike.
Paul in NZ
19th July 2005, 14:53
Judged from where we stand now... All 80's bikes had handling issues. The bar has been raised somewhat!
However, most 80's bikes can be improved a lot by decent shocks (usually the main culprit) and a bit of tweaking all around.
Cheers
Warr
19th July 2005, 15:02
It was always my understanding that the nickname applied to the XJ series was "The Hinge". This from the feeling that there was a hinge in the middle.
:motu: Well I'll add it to my list of endearments for the beast!!
What about the FJ1200 then ~'88 ?
skidz
19th July 2005, 15:06
I always thought they made the bikes that way to test the riders skills out.
Motu
19th July 2005, 15:09
The pinacle of Yamaha handling was the XS1,and they never went beyond those heady heights.You don't know about ''the hinge'' until you've ridden the XS1.Wheel bearings,steering head,swingarm,shocks and tyres,get them all right and you got a nice handling bike...get one out of phase and you'll swing from one ''solution'' to the next,totaly lost on how to get it right.
F5 Dave
19th July 2005, 15:36
Damn, I get up too late & miss an opportunity to shitcane an old bike.
Took an XJ750 (not too far removed from the 900 of a friends) on a brass trip & grew mildly fond of it. I now recant that memory.
As I used to say with my GS11, nothing another 20 years of chassis development wouldn’t fix.
Some Progressive fork springs (fronts on Yams are generically too soft), some new oil. Some cheap aftermarket shocks, (Progressive/Ikon/Hagon etc). Check the bearing float in the swingarm. Run matched tyres in stk sizes. Oversize or worn rears cause problems.
Any more is total over capitalisation. FJs weren’t much better.
Motu, on a similar tangent I once test rode a TX500 (I think) with the rubber mounted handlebars & seemingly everything else. The TT500 I ended up with was a better roadbike. Even on the trials universals. & that was scary. A friend then bought an 8valve 500 which had a square tank but a totally different bike. Head didn’t crack while he owned it. Really.
The early TX goes down as easily the worst handling bike I’ve ridden.
Though the CX500 custom gets an dishonourable mention & the XZ400 was eating turkey with a wooden spoon award.
Artifice
19th July 2005, 16:03
funny thing. i think it was an old xj 900 or maybe an old rf900 in the video they showed us when i did my basic training course a few years back. at a constant 80miles or something the bike built up a weave and just moving your weight forward and pushing on the bars solved it. funny thing it was specific to that speed range, must have had to do with a built up harmonic frequency in the frame and wheelsize.
off the top of my head:
seems to be caused by a lot of things.
1) geometry (rake trail & wheelsize)
2) flex in the bike
3) loose headstock bearings and worn swing arm bearings
and is made worse by
4) worn tyres
5) wrong profile tryes.
the thing is, as it gets up on on side of the tyre. the wheel is starting to push back towards the centre. then it keeps going over onto the other sidewall and starts to push back the other way. a worn out tyre puts the pressure on the outside of the tyre sooner so make the problem build up a lot faster.
F5 Dave
19th July 2005, 16:07
Doubt it was an RF, that comes from another generation & mine is quite stable, even with a bunch of rear ride height added.
Otherwise prognosis is sound. However decent(ish) suspension helps quell the problem. Worn out saggy suspension makes it worse.
On the XJ I could let go of the bars slowing at 60kph & it would set off an oscillation that would look quite frightening but seemingly was ok to freak your mates out by sitting back & pointing at while entering town limits.
Artifice
19th July 2005, 16:33
mr friend mr-Google was helpfull in under standing (sort of) some of the issues.
"In general, the effects of structural flexibility on weave mode depend on the vehicle speed. At high speeds, lateral bending flexibility of the front fork and torsional flexibility of the rear swing arm more significantly affect weave mode, primarily because of the change of the external force due to yaw rate in lateral motion."
"a rider's vibration characteristics affect the motorcycle weave mode. Weave mode at high speed is stabilized when a rider's vibration characteristics are considered. The external force generated by a rider's upper body acceleration stabilizes rolling motion. Stabilization of rolling motion advances the phase of the front tire side force via the external force generated by rolling acceleration in the steering motion. This phase lead stabilizes lateral motion due to the external force generated by the yaw rate, which ,in turn, stabilizes the weave mode."
talks on and on this guy does (http://www.atnet.it/lista/casperen.htm)
of course you could just put a sticker on your bike "Weavers R Us"
F5 Dave
19th July 2005, 16:47
Oh yeah forgot to mention the bikini fairings that were on early 80s bikes were responsible for initiating a lot of this malarkey as well.
FROSTY
19th July 2005, 16:59
Ok I was trying to KISS it .
Yep the early XJ900 handle bar fairing was well known for causing a weave at high speed-180km/h+
Cured by an after market frame mounting kit.
In all xj900's 3psi too low in the front tyre and she will wobble into a full on tank slapper at high speed or funnily enough 60km/h
Ive already told warr about rear shocks and one day He'll pick up the progeressive springs I've got sitting here for him.
The old M48 michellen tyre on the rear used to cause a weave once it was 3/4 worn -dunno why.
Ive raced an XJ many moons ago and it wobbled -nothing ya could do about it-ya just accepted it and rode around it.
I actually won a race at Bay park against guys on faster bikes --because I'd hit the dip coming out of turn 1 and the damb thing would tank slap half way down the back straight. -theyd all back off -waiting for me to crash
F5 Dave
19th July 2005, 17:06
Have a friend with a fork brace for the XJ750. Might fit a 900. Bit dubious whether they help or not. A friend had an XJ550 with a home made one. Gee the forks are bent or something sez I idly pushing down on the front. I never noticed sez he.
Hmm, pass me those allen keys will ya. [F5 undoes forkbrace] front end now moves with aplomb. Nice engineering. :no:
Bonez
19th July 2005, 17:13
It was always my understanding that the nickname applied to the XJ series was "The HInge". This from the feeling that there was a hinge in the middle.Nup wrong bike try Z900s... Xj 550,600s and the 650 handle quite well.
Kickaha
19th July 2005, 19:07
How old are the rear shocks?
I've seen a heap of "frame flex" cured on older bikes just by replacing the rear shocks after being told
"they all did that, nothing you can do about it"
Warr
19th July 2005, 19:18
How old are the rear shocks?
I've seen a heap of "frame flex" cured on older bikes just by replacing the rear shocks after being told
"they all did that, nothing you can do about it"
Pretty old.. There is someone local that I can take them to and guys down Levin way that do it too.
Could be the next best place to spend some $'s
DingDong
19th July 2005, 19:26
XJ's, old drive-shaft bikes flex under power and de-cel... its in their nature because they're not ballanced right... this is most likely why you've just replaced the swing-arm bushes, you maybe able to reduce it but it'll always be there, you shouldnt notice it flex going around corners too much (unless your try'n to power slide out?) if it does have a look at front-rear wheel alignment if you get my drift or even trebble clamp alignment and/or front and rear shocks.
For sports XJ:
Lower the front and put on clip-ons, then thrash the hell out of it.
for cruiser XJ
Lower the front and put on clip-ons, then thrash the hell out of it.
... you'll forget all about the flex :devil2:
edit: didnt read properlly... forget the swing-arm comment :yes:
Warr
19th July 2005, 19:39
XJ's, old drive-shaft bikes flex under power and de-cel... its in their nature because they're not ballanced right... this is most likely why you've just replaced the swing-arm bushes, you maybe able to reduce it but it'll always be there, you shouldnt notice it flex going around corners too much (unless your try'n to power slide out?) if it does have a look at front-rear wheel alignment if you get my drift or even trebble clamp alignment and/or front and rear shocks.
For sports XJ:
Lower the front and put on clip-ons, then thrash the hell out of it.
for cruiser XJ
Lower the front and put on clip-ons, then thrash the hell out of it.
... you'll forget all about the flex :devil2:
edit: didnt read properlly... forget the swing-arm comment :yes:
Arr so many people dissing my bike.
Seemed to hold its own in the last couple of KB outings for all its short comings. :yes:
DingDong
19th July 2005, 19:46
Arr so many people dissing my bike.
Seemed to hold its own in the last couple of KB outings for all its short comings. :yes:
shit... I was't dissing ya bike... in fact, I love the XJ's :yes: , no shit I've raced two, heres a pic...
Warr
19th July 2005, 19:54
shit... I was't dissing ya bike... in fact, I love the XJ's :yes: , no shit I've raced two, heres a pic...
Oh NP :)
... Wow that looks like some fun stuff. Where & when was the beach racing?
Moving along tho what do you think about the FJ's. Seen an '89 for $4k5. I know not shaft drive :( .. but could be a replacement ??
DingDong
19th July 2005, 20:09
Oh NP :)
... Wow that looks like some fun stuff. Where & when was the beach racing?
Moving along tho what do you think about the FJ's. Seen an '89 for $4k5. I know not shaft drive :( .. but could be a replacement ??
Those pics were taken at Gizzy 2002, they still race there now...
I like the FJ1200 (almost stacked one when I was 16 and stupid) plenty of power and comfy... but I think $4000 is too much for a 16 year old tourer, 3k would be better... If ye seek, ye will find. :wait:
DEATH_INC.
19th July 2005, 20:27
Not had much to do with the 900,but my mates 750 had lotsa flex somewhere,it'd wobble like a bitch at 180k,in fact so much it threw him off on day....
Have you checked the forks,frame,arm etc for alignment? You'll never cure it if it's bent.
I'd try the forkbrace/armbrace/framebracing if you're serious and it's straight.
F5 Dave
20th July 2005, 09:27
. . . I'd try the forkbrace/armbrace/framebracing if you're serious and it's straight.
Try welding it to the side of the harbour bridge. That oughta cure it flexing.
Paul in NZ
20th July 2005, 10:16
If they are the original factory shocks they were probably stuffed 10 mins after leaving the shop and are of the unrebuildable type.
Slap a set of Kagons or Ikons (the old Konis) on it and all will be well... Ok, better...
Ikon
http://www.ikonsuspension.com/
Hagon
http://www.ikonsuspension.com/
I'd seriously think about replacing the fork springs as well.
Progressive Suspension
http://progressivesuspension.com/appview.asp?AppsNumber=899
Cheers
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.