Log in

View Full Version : Biker caught doing 156mph (251 kph)



parsley
3rd March 2012, 16:47
Check out the video:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-17201667 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-17201667)

SMOKEU
3rd March 2012, 17:05
What a good cunt.

Big Dave
3rd March 2012, 17:13
Really 'dangerous road' hey.

Jay GTI
3rd March 2012, 17:26
I used to live about 5 minutes from that stretch of road, it's open, clear, there is excellent visibility and you are well away from any residential areas.

Of course the bike cop was also doing 154mph along the same road, but yet he's being "safe"...:angry:

slofox
3rd March 2012, 17:27
251km/hr? Pfffft! Must've been having a bad day...:whistle:

schrodingers cat
3rd March 2012, 17:52
What a cunt.

Fixed that for you:clap:

Its all good fun til you're on the losing side of physics...

SMOKEU
3rd March 2012, 18:00
Fixed that for you:clap:

Its all good fun til you're on the losing side of physics...

Going fast isn't dangerous. Stopping too quickly is, however.

yod
3rd March 2012, 18:01
what could possibly go wrong.....:pinch:

Muppet
3rd March 2012, 18:17
Going fast isn't dangerous. Stopping too quickly is, however.

That's like a car driver saying "I always pull out in front of bikers. It's not the pulling out that's dangerous, it's the biker hitting me", isn't it????

scumdog
3rd March 2012, 18:19
Going fast isn't dangerous. Stopping too quickly is, however.

'Speshly if stopping quickly was not your own doing...

DMNTD
3rd March 2012, 18:39
A nice wee pootle!

SMOKEU
3rd March 2012, 18:43
'Speshly if stopping quickly was not your own doing...

Yeah that's what I was trying to say.

onearmedbandit
3rd March 2012, 18:53
That's like a car driver saying "I always pull out in front of bikers. It's not the pulling out that's dangerous, it's the biker hitting me", isn't it????

Not really. Does speed kill? Not by itself it doesn't. but the sudden stop does. In your scenario pulling out in front of bikers (the equivalent of speeding in your example) will almost always result in an accident, regardless of the environment (ie a congested street or an open airfield). Speeding down a congested street may quite well end in an accident, but speeding along an empty airstrip will most certainly not (excluding mechanical failure).

scumdog
3rd March 2012, 19:10
I guess soon the Police comments regarding crashes will go along the lines of: 'It is believed that stopping excessively quickly was a factor in the death of the motorist':lol:

quickbuck
3rd March 2012, 19:17
I guess soon the Police comments regarding crashes will go along the lines of: 'It is believed that stopping excessively quickly was a factor in the death of the motorist':lol:

Well.... YES!
It always annoys me when they say "Speed was a factor".
OF COURSE it was! Unless the motorist was sat there doing ZERO, there was definatly a factor of speed.

DMNTD
3rd March 2012, 19:28
Well.... YES!
It always annoys me when they say "Speed was a factor".
OF COURSE it was! Unless the motorist was sat there doing ZERO, there was definatly a factor of speed.

"Thanks for adding reputation....etc"

Zedder
3rd March 2012, 19:30
I used to live about 5 minutes from that stretch of road, it's open, clear, there is excellent visibility and you are well away from any residential areas.

Of course the bike cop was also doing 154mph along the same road, but yet he's being "safe"...:angry:

The biker was also undertaking. Not on!

Gremlin
3rd March 2012, 19:34
I guess soon the Police comments regarding crashes will go along the lines of: 'It is believed that stopping excessively quickly was a factor in the death of the motorist':lol:
Well, more technically, it was most likely the brain being asked to suddenly stop against the side of the skull in a lot of the deaths... :lol:

OF COURSE it was! Unless the motorist was sat there doing ZERO, there was definatly a factor of speed.
Zero can still be a factor, ie, they had stopped and someone behind them didn't...

quickbuck
3rd March 2012, 19:38
Zero can still be a factor, ie, they had stopped and someone behind them didn't...
ZERO Can not be a factor in the mathmatical sense....
Also, if they were stopped and hit, then the other vehicle must have been moving... So their speed was also a factor.

DMNTD
3rd March 2012, 20:32
ZERO Can not be a factor in the mathmatical sense....
Also, if they were stopped and hit, then the other vehicle must have been moving... So their speed was also a factor.

Must spread...

98tls
3rd March 2012, 20:51
Albeit in the wrong place i guess at least he was attempting to use the bike for its intended purpose,talking to a bloke today at the March Hare about his just purchased new GSXR1000 i said "betcha cant wait to get it on a track" he replied "na fuck that".:scratch:

scumdog
3rd March 2012, 20:57
Albeit in the wrong place i guess at least he was attempting to use the bike for its intended purpose,talking to a bloke today at the March Hare about his just purchased new GSXR1000 i said "betcha cant wait to get it on a track" he replied "na fuck that".:scratch:

Bikes ALWAYS go faster on the street.

Cos there's no other bikes to compare them to and nobody there to see how slow they really are....

quickbuck
3rd March 2012, 20:57
Albeit in the wrong place i guess at least he was attempting to use the bike for its intended purpose,talking to a bloke today at the March Hare about his just purchased new GSXR1000 i said "betcha cant wait to get it on a track" he replied "na fuck that".:scratch:

And that is the very point that amazes mr about many riders of large sports bikes on the road....
I guess they really are unaware of the risk they face every time they ride..... Or completely unsure of their own ability.....

98tls
3rd March 2012, 21:07
And that is the very point that amazes mr about many riders of large sports bikes on the road....
I guess they really are unaware of the risk they face every time they ride..... Or completely unsure of their own ability.....

Concur on the 1st bit fella but lets face it on the second its not about risk or ability its about being naive enough to actually shell out all that hard earned and actually believe that anyone else believes you can ride the thing to its ability on the road.:wacko:Actually SD summed it up better than me.

98tls
3rd March 2012, 21:10
Bikes ALWAYS go faster on the street.

Cos there's no other bikes to compare them to and nobody there to see how slow they really are....

Nail... head.Though no doubt wont be well received by many.:2thumbsup

quickbuck
3rd March 2012, 21:15
Concur on the 1st bit fella but lets face it on the second its not about risk or ability its about being naive enough to actually shell out all that hard earned and actually believe that anyone else believes you can ride the thing to its ability on the road.:wacko:Actually SD summed it up better than me.

Well, I too agree with that.
I for one can see from somebody leaving a car park if they can actually ride or not. Shame those that buy a big bike think they can actually fool me (or anybody else)..... sad really...

speedpro
3rd March 2012, 21:30
156mph on a motorway :yawn:

He slowed down approaching cars. Also don't forget that they have a "keep left" law I think and even passing someone in a clear lane to the left of another vehicle is called undertaking, not the same as here.

It's pathetic how over a certain speed it's automatically "dangerous". Cruising down the Bombay hills on a deserted weekday night at 180kmh would probably get you an automatic "dangerous driving" ticket. Utterly pathetic.

The Nazis knew something about propoganda - say something often enough and people will start believing it. e.g. - "Speed Kills".

speedpro
3rd March 2012, 21:35
About the guys who ride big sports bikes. When I worked in a bike shop you'd always get the odd one who came in and reckoned he thrashed his R1/ZX10/GSXR1000 or whatever to the Coromandel or wherever. Utter crap. Thrashed? I don't think so. Probably lucky to hold 1/2 throttle for more than 30 seconds in most places.

jaffaonajappa
3rd March 2012, 21:52
So, the cop followed him for 8 minutes. Bet he/she was just enjoying the ride..."hoping" the poor bugger he was about to Book did something even worse than he already was.
Sounds like pommy pigs are worse than ours? At least ours pull you over asap, and don't keep following you hoping you will go faster yet.

Jay GTI
3rd March 2012, 21:54
Also don't forget that they have a "keep left" law I think and even passing someone in a clear lane to the left of another vehicle is called undertaking, not the same as here.



Correct, passing must be done on the right on UK motorways, passing in a clear lane to the left of the vehicle ahead is classed as undertaking and really quite ridiculously dangerous. I'm pretty sure several people died when I did it when I lived over there. I'm also convinced it was the true cause of global warming... sorry, I mean climate change. What was I thinking...

quickbuck
3rd March 2012, 22:00
Correct, passing must be done on the right on UK motorways, passing in a clear lane to the left of the vehicle ahead is classed as undertaking and really quite ridiculously dangerous. I'm pretty sure several people died when I did it when I lived over there. I'm also convinced it was the true cause of global warming... sorry, I mean climate change. What was I thinking...

Hell, you were one bad A$$

RDJ
4th March 2012, 01:09
156mph on a motorway :yawn:

He slowed down approaching cars. Also don't forget that they have a "keep left" law I think and even passing someone in a clear lane to the left of another vehicle is called undertaking, not the same as here.

It's pathetic how over a certain speed it's automatically "dangerous". Cruising down the Bombay hills on a deserted weekday night at 180kmh would probably get you an automatic "dangerous driving" ticket. Utterly pathetic.

True. And at the risk of wandering off topic, it is fascinating to note how during debates about speeding and getting fined even if only 5 k's or so over the limit, many people are very quick to judge / opine along the lines that "you decide to speed, you pay for it, don't whine etc"; yet many of these same people say during debates about funding pregnancies on benefits, dole bludger lifestyles, and so forth "don't you dare judge me, you should pay more taxes to fund my choices, my problems are not my fault".... the cognitive dissidence is strong in these ones...

EJK
4th March 2012, 01:20
Name that bike which is described "...that it was built for speed."

Old Steve
4th March 2012, 20:42
That cop was definitely one of us! He followed for 8 minutes. 8 glorius minutes of being legitimately able to ride at 150 mph down a relatively clear motorway. Pure heaven, and he got paid for doing it. I just wonder why he didn't follow for longer?

jrandom
4th March 2012, 20:47
I for one can see from somebody leaving a car park if they can actually ride or not.

Well, shit. I'm going to be horribly self conscious if I ever find myself riding out of a carpark in front of you, now.

Berries
4th March 2012, 22:50
It's the A1. The best thing you can do is get off it as quickly as possible.