Log in

View Full Version : Kate's breasts?



george formby
16th September 2012, 12:00
Anybody seen them yet? Does she have any? Should we care & chip in for implants?

mashman
16th September 2012, 12:06
funny, I had a quick look for them about 5 mins ago... and in answer to your question, meh.

tigertim20
16th September 2012, 12:10
they are about a mouthful, but dont appear to be particularly shapely. as mashman said, meh.

george formby
16th September 2012, 12:10
Did they look like bee stings?

duckonin
16th September 2012, 12:14
Anybody seen them yet? Does she have any? Should we care & chip in for implants?

Answer to your three questions above.. NO/NO/NO.:rolleyes: The world is full of fucked up persons who should mind their own business.. Who really cares ????? :nono:

george formby
16th September 2012, 12:22
Answer to your three questions above.. NO/NO/NO.:rolleyes: The world is full of fucked up persons who should mind their own business.. Who really cares ????? :nono:

I can think of two people...

This saga will add a whole new dimension to Royal walkabouts, though. Guaranteed that working class chestnut will be aired soon. "Tit's Oot!"

jellywrestler
16th September 2012, 12:27
Answer to your three questions above.. NO/NO/NO.:rolleyes: The world is full of fucked up persons who should mind their own business.. Who really cares ????? :nono:

wonder what else people expected under her clothes?

mashman
16th September 2012, 12:28
I can think of two people...

This saga will add a whole new dimension to Royal walkabouts, though. Guaranteed that working class chestnut will be aired soon. "Tit's Oot!"

I figured, just in case it came up in conversation then I'd be prepared... and waddaya know, a thread appears on KB... and they'll not be making it into the wank bank.

Asher
16th September 2012, 12:46
This thread is udderly useless without pics.

george formby
16th September 2012, 12:51
I figured, just in case it came up in conversation then I'd be prepared... and waddaya know, a thread appears on KB... and they'll not be making it into the wank bank.

Yup, I've seen more meat on a butchers pencil.

Ooh, hark at me, next thing I will have a subscription to Womans Day.

george formby
16th September 2012, 12:57
This thread is udderly useless without pics.

Here ya go. Definitely not fit for work, family, vicars etc. First thing that popped out of google, small breasts. Don't look if your gonna get all sanctimonious.

http://theittybittytittycommittee.tumblr.com/

duckonin
16th September 2012, 13:09
I can think of two people...

This saga will add a whole new dimension to Royal walkabouts, though. Guaranteed that working class chestnut will be aired soon. "Tit's Oot!"

Yes correct you are. like us all, Kate and Will are only trying to enjoy their lives... New's media/ Paparazzi, if that is how it is spelt make $ millions out of others discomfort. Bloody money.:oi-grr:

awa355
16th September 2012, 16:20
Here ya go. Definitely not fit for work, family, vicars etc. First thing that popped out of google, small breasts. Don't look if your gonna get all sanctimonious.

http://theittybittytittycommittee.tumblr.com/


Scrolled thru the lot, :2thumbsup,, Found Pippa's, Found Camilla's, Found Charles, Found the little girl next door's, cant pick out Kates at all. Any clues? :lol:

Nova.
16th September 2012, 17:03
http://boobiesof.tumblr.com/

george formby
16th September 2012, 17:08
http://boobiesof.tumblr.com/

I did not look!!!! :rolleyes:

Berries
16th September 2012, 20:39
Katie who?

Pumba
17th September 2012, 09:18
Although all the other links in this thread where rather informative, it still did not satisfy my curiosity, so http://www.showbizspy.com/article/251578/kate-middleton-topless-pictures-from-french-closer-magazine-see-all-the-photos-right-now.html?pid=4810

Not bad, but personally I like my ladies a bit more cuddly.

Paul in NZ
17th September 2012, 09:27
Look I couldn't give a shit about Kates knockers... Well maybe tinklers rather than knockers. AND I fully recognize that Royalty, British or not are not my mates or popping around for a barbie any time soon... But... I really object to the media doing this shit. Because they seem to expect that the 'freedom of the press' gives them license to do whatever they want they do this shit just to make money and its wrong.

When our institutions and commercial parties act without regard to taste and decency it seems to give everyone else the idea that they too can do whatever they like when ever they like... Its a slippery slope....

imdying
17th September 2012, 09:30
Yeah, Google image search, take you 20 seconds.

Gremlin
17th September 2012, 12:51
The only way to stop it, is for people not to buy the magazines...

pzkpfw
17th September 2012, 12:55
Look I couldn't give a shit about Kates knockers... Well maybe tinklers rather than knockers. AND I fully recognize that Royalty, British or not are not my mates or popping around for a barbie any time soon... But... I really object to the media doing this shit. Because they seem to expect that the 'freedom of the press' gives them license to do whatever they want they do this shit just to make money and its wrong.

When our institutions and commercial parties act without regard to taste and decency it seems to give everyone else the idea that they too can do whatever they like when ever they like... Its a slippery slope....

I do think it's an interesting thing to be happening at the same time as the riots over that video.

Banditbandit
17th September 2012, 14:04
Look I couldn't give a shit about Kates knockers... Well maybe tinklers rather than knockers. AND I fully recognize that Royalty, British or not are not my mates or popping around for a barbie any time soon... But... I really object to the media doing this shit. Because they seem to expect that the 'freedom of the press' gives them license to do whatever they want they do this shit just to make money and its wrong.

When our institutions and commercial parties act without regard to taste and decency it seems to give everyone else the idea that they too can do whatever they like when ever they like... Its a slippery slope....


And our institutions and commercial parties hit the bottom of that slope a very long time ago ...

Paul in NZ
17th September 2012, 14:33
I do think it's an interesting thing to be happening at the same time as the riots over that video.

Same thought occurred to me....

Banditbandit
17th September 2012, 15:29
Although all the other links in this thread where rather informative, it still did not satisfy my curiosity, so http://www.showbizspy.com/article/251578/kate-middleton-topless-pictures-from-french-closer-magazine-see-all-the-photos-right-now.html?pid=4810

Not bad, but personally I like my ladies a bit more cuddly.

Yeah .. nice face but the rest is a bit of a racing sardine ... be like sleeping with a bike frame (pushbike, that is ...)

Kickaha
17th September 2012, 18:17
The only way to stop it, is for people not to buy the magazines...

They could hunt down and kill anyone who took and published the photos, I reckon after the first 2-3 dead the photographers would get the idea

mashman
17th September 2012, 18:24
She should get it over with in one hit. Go talk to HH and get herself a Playboy cover shoot... be pointless the taliboids following her around to get a sneak peak of something that just about every woman has and nearly all men see throughout their lives at some pint of another. If she donates the proceeds to a good cause too, t'would be awesome PR.

EJK
17th September 2012, 18:25
There are better ones on the Internet.

Berries
17th September 2012, 20:36
They could hunt down and kill anyone who took and published the photos, I reckon after the first 2-3 dead the photographers would get the idea
I reckon they should, what is the point of being the royal family if you can't waste a few people? Especially the French.

nallac
17th September 2012, 20:52
There are better ones on the Internet.


yes, yes there are.....

AllanB
17th September 2012, 21:39
They could hunt down and kill anyone who took and published the photos, I reckon after the first 2-3 dead the photographers would get the idea

Pretty sure there are still treason laws they could apply in England. Hang a few heads off the towers like they did back in the day.

Paul in NZ
18th September 2012, 09:02
They could hunt down and kill anyone who took and published the photos, I reckon after the first 2-3 dead the photographers would get the idea

Pretty sure the rest of the photographers would be swarming over each other to sell pictures of the dead photographers...

Then the media would get in on the act and it would be the end of the world. Ever noticed how if a soldier gets killed doing something heroic he gets a few lines. If a media guy dies in a war zone, even if he was humping a dead dog during a firefight, hes lauded as some kind of iconic 'investigative' journalist and he get his entire life history blah blah blah for weeks... Usually said journalist is a stroppy war mongering fuckwit desperately trying to incite acts of violence so he could get a picture... There is a reason why the oscars etc are always getting top timeslots as it the media reporting on the media and building themselves up and up (along with their paypackets...

Banditbandit
18th September 2012, 10:04
They could hunt down and kill anyone who took and published the photos, I reckon after the first 2-3 dead the photographers would get the idea

Naa .. that would just put up the price of the pix .. add a risk element as well as reducing the supply ...

GrayWolf
18th September 2012, 10:06
This is almost a repeat of what happened to Prince Charles in the late 1980's. These pics of Kate were taken from 700 meters away. A tabloid numbnuts climbed a tree a good distance away from a secluded house and got 'naked pictures'? of Charles walking past a window dressed in a towel.
What was hilarious was another photographer treated said paparazzi tosser to exactly the same treatment, long distance with a huge lens, took some 'snapshots' of said tosser through his home windows... oh the bleating of privacy invasion, etc, etc.... maybe we need to start to do similar, or have some form of control put in place by the 'press themselves'?

imdying
18th September 2012, 10:15
HRH should use the SAS to have the publisher, photographer and editor disappear.

"Nup, no idea where they've gone, nothing to do with us." If they can raid embassies, making a couple of smut peddlers disappear on the sly should be trivial.

Me, I'm going to keep spitting on French people.

Akzle
18th September 2012, 18:33
kate middleton, anagramatical for "naked tit model"

trust me tom. i've done the research...

mashman
18th September 2012, 18:40
kate middleton, anagramatical for "naked tit model"

trust me tom. i've done the research...

ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaa...

tigertim20
18th September 2012, 19:16
The only way to stop it, is for people not to buy the magazines...
even those who dont approve of the peeping tom aspect will have their curiosity get the better of them. For some reason people cant help themselves

kate middleton, anagramatical for "naked tit model"

trust me tom. i've done the research...
haha very clever!

Tigadee
18th September 2012, 23:25
Why are the Royals making a mountain out of two mole hills?

Paul in NZ
19th September 2012, 07:40
Why are the Royals making a mountain out of two mole hills?

Funny.... Shame I'm all outa rep.....

Kiwi Graham
19th September 2012, 08:11
Good on the royals for damming the actions of the scum bag paparazzi.
If they dont nip it in the bud now we could see this poor women persecuted like her husbands mother was and we all know what happened to her.

I'm just a normal bloke and I would get pissed off if some perv was snapping pics of my wife for 'personel gain' let alone if I was important or represented anything that demanded respect.

I hope they track down the scum and hang his ass out to dry.

HenryDorsetCase
19th September 2012, 08:30
I heard it described yesterday a s a "storm in a B-cup"

Actually, and against my baser instincts, I have refrained from looking on the interwebs for pictures of said boobies. I just dont want to encourage this sort of shitty behaviour. Poor bitch was on holiday FFS: her life would be shit enough without this.

oneofsix
19th September 2012, 08:51
I heard it described yesterday a s a "storm in a B-cup"

Actually, and against my baser instincts, I have refrained from looking on the interwebs for pictures of said boobies. I just dont want to encourage this sort of shitty behaviour. Poor bitch was on holiday FFS: her life would be shit enough without this.

You are a better man than me, I followed a link in this thread, however after viewing a Stuff artical on long distance photography (over 1.5 k away FFS), I wanted to see the quality of said pictures to see if this was what had happened. I can now say two, make that three things;

my titties are bigger :facepalm:
the prick(s) was taking pictures from kilometers away and they deserve to be enuchs
the pictures aren't worth buying the magazine for and you shouldn't on principal but plenty of woman will just to compare

Big Dave
19th September 2012, 08:59
Arse biscuit.

Brett
19th September 2012, 09:13
I don't get the whole big deal...those pictures look like they are made out of maybe 10 pixels. The photographer either was shooting with one of the first cell phone camera's or with a zoom lense from several km's away.

Big Dave
19th September 2012, 10:08
Yep. Me too. I did a search to see what the fuss was all about and stopped at the preview thumbnails.

http://static.fjcdn.com/gifs/giveafuckometer_fe78e3_239287.gif

SMOKEU
19th September 2012, 10:09
I'd hit it.

Tigadee
19th September 2012, 11:26
Mass media today...
http://d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net/photo/5387383_460s.jpg

Oakie
19th September 2012, 21:19
The photographer either was shooting with one of the first cell phone camera's or with a zoom lense from several km's away.
800 metres I believe.

NighthawkNZ
19th September 2012, 22:19
meh they are boobies...

Brett
20th September 2012, 15:23
800 metres I believe.

Shithouse lense and camera it would seem. I can get a better picture from the scope on my .270 remington. (Not that I have ever tried to take a photo from 800m away - so take my comments with a big grain of salt :P

Maki
28th September 2012, 14:04
wonder what else people expected under her clothes?

Royal orbs.

Banditbandit
28th September 2012, 16:13
I'd hit it.

Yeah ... 19-year-old South African refugees with rampant testosterone would hit anything ..

Jantar
28th September 2012, 16:46
Shithouse lense and camera it would seem. I can get a better picture from the scope on my .270 remington. (Not that I have ever tried to take a photo from 800m away - so take my comments with a big grain of salt :P

From 600 m with a Canon SX20 at 20x optical zoom.
270746
So I somehow think that grainy image taken by a professional paprazzi must be considerably further away than a mere 800m

SMOKEU
28th September 2012, 18:00
Yeah ... 19-year-old South African refugees with rampant testosterone would hit anything ..

Who are we talking about here?

Oakie
28th September 2012, 22:10
From 600 m with a Canon SX20 at 20x optical zoom.

So I somehow think that grainy image taken by a professional paprazzi must be considerably further away than a mere 800m

You have an SX20? Me too! You must be a man of outstanding taste and insight. Now did the subject know she was being photographed?

Jantar
28th September 2012, 22:23
You have an SX20? Me too! You must be a man of outstanding taste and insight. Now did the subject know she was being photographed?

At that distance and over water I would say not. However that image I have posted is only part of the frame. I have already cropped it down to around 1/3 of the original size and removed the other board riders from the pic.

I posted up this part of the pic to show the quality that is obtainable from a camera that is just a tad better than a Point and Shoot, so a proffessional photographer with good gear would have no trouble getting quality shots at long range instead of the grainy pixilated images that were published.

Oakie
28th September 2012, 22:56
At that distance and over water I would say not. However that image I have posted is only part of the frame. I have already cropped it down to around 1/3 of the original size and removed the other board riders from the pic.

I posted up this part of the pic to show the quality that is obtainable from a camera that is just a tad better than a Point and Shoot, so a proffessional photographer with good gear would have no trouble getting quality shots at long range instead of the grainy pixilated images that were published.

Yes. I was quite surprised with what I could pull into view with the SX20 (which for the benefit of those who don't know lies in between a 'point and shoot' and a DSLR). The limiting factor was my own shaking hands. Of course the more 'interesting' the subject, the more the hands shake. I reckon if I was the lowlife taking those photos of Kate I would have been shaking so much you'd have mistaken me for an epileptic.