View Full Version : OECD MAIDS Report
GTRMAN
17th January 2013, 09:13
In-depth investigations of accidents involving powered two wheelers
Makes for very interesting reading.
Zedder
17th January 2013, 09:50
Thanks for that. It's heavy on info at 179 pages but one of the better ones judging by the inital scan I did.
I'll get stuck into it later.
Ixion
17th January 2013, 10:53
From the executive summary of this report most thorough and excellent
Travelling and impact speeds for all PTW categories were found to be quite low,
most often below 50 km/h. There were relatively few cases in which excess speed was an issue related to accident causation.
The cause of the majority of PTW accidents collected in this study was found to be
human error. The most frequent human error was a failure to see the PTW within the traffic environment, due to lack of driver attention, temporary view obstructions or the low conspicuity of the PTW.
Which seems very much a different position to that adopted by New Zealand authorities.
Gianz
17th January 2013, 10:54
very very interesting.
gave it a quick glance.
Alcohol was found in 3.3% of motorcycle riders. That's pretty low and it doesn't mean it's the reason for the crash.
For comparison: "Approximately 30% of car crash injuries in this
population (auckland 1998-99)were attributable to alcohol" http://202.68.89.83/NR/rdonlyres/DEB92DA3-BDA2-4412-BE51-68B8349DE5D6/165594/49SCTIR_EVI_00DBHOH_BILL10329_1_A144412_ProfessorJ .pdf
and 62.9 % of crashes were due to traffic-scanning error by the OV (other vehicle) TAB 4.5
ok i'm off to the post to pay my 528$ so somebody can kill me.
HenryDorsetCase
17th January 2013, 11:04
Maids? I like French Maids. Well the uniform (OK, "costume").... oooh errrr
Pcn-_QLGXOk
when you see it....................
Gianz
17th January 2013, 11:09
4376 posts of bullshit?
cheshirecat
17th January 2013, 17:42
Its the only official PTW document I've seen that makes reference to a control group. Without this stat evidence is not really evidence in the sense of a workable document.
caspernz
17th January 2013, 19:15
Quick glance thru the tables...about 40% look like bike only accidents, no other vehicles involved. Then about 35% listed as insufficient time to perform evasive maneuvre. Yep, as a novice with only 25 years on the road...my limited experience agrees with this.
chasio
17th January 2013, 20:00
From the executive summary of this report most thorough and excellent
The most frequent human error was a failure to see the PTW within the traffic environment, due to lack of driver attention, temporary view obstructions or the low conspicuity of the PTW.
Which seems very much a different position to that adopted by New Zealand authorities.
Not yet read it, but no doubt the most conspicuous item in the report to certain bureaucrats will be that it supports the mandating of high conspicuity apparel... Or perhaps I have become too cynical.
GTRMAN
17th January 2013, 21:39
Actually, not so much. Interesting stats on frontal visibility.
Gianz
18th January 2013, 08:17
Actually, not so much. Interesting stats on frontal visibility.
yes.
this report really deserves to be read thoroughly
SuperMac
19th January 2013, 07:08
If you want more to read :)
Comparative analysis of motorcycle accident data from OTS and MAIDS
The Department for Transport commissioned TRL to compare the findings of two motorcycle accident studies: The European Motorcycle Accident In-Depth Study (MAIDS) and the UK On The Spot (OTS) study. Both studies involved the collection of ‘on-the-spot’ accident data, visiting the scene of an accident soon after it had happened to retrieve unstable scene factors (e.g. temporary highway factors, weather) and witness statements. The MAIDS study involved collection of data from five European countries: France, Spain, Germany, Italy and The Netherlands. The data were collected using the OECD common methodology designed for two-wheeled motor vehicle accident investigation. The OTS data were collected from two areas of England: the Thames Valley and South Nottinghamshire. OTS and MAIDS protocols and databases were compared against one another. In general, the data collected for MAIDS have a greater level of detail. Some similarities were discovered in the accident populations of OTS and MAIDS data including major collision partner and some causation factors. There are also considerable differences in the databases including the wearing of protective equipment, engine sizes and motorcyclist injuries.
Author M G McCarthy, L K Walter, R Hutchins, R Tong et al Pages 97
Date 08/10/2008 Reference PPR168
http://www.trl.co.uk/online_store/reports_publications/trl_reports/cat_road_user_safety/report_Comparative_analysis_of_motorcycle_accident _data_from_OTS_and_MAIDS.htm
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.