PDA

View Full Version : MNZ voting results - where, who, how many?



codgyoleracer
6th June 2013, 08:09
Have been trying to find the recent results for MNZ voting after agm, cant see it in the news section of MNZ site - and wanted to know who won what and how many people voted.

Last time for President position etc, i think there was around 10% of members voting,,,,,,,,, and this was a real concern at the time. Have the % numbers changed ?, where are the results advertised ?

jellywrestler
6th June 2013, 08:25
Have been trying to find the recent results for MNZ voting after agm, cant see it in the news section of MNZ site - and wanted to know who won what and how many people voted.

Last time for President position etc, i think there was around 10% of members voting,,,,,,,,, and this was a real concern at the time. Have the % numbers changed ?, where are the results advertised ?

votes were up on last time and given that there's less members the percentage was higher, can't quote figures though.

Billy
6th June 2013, 09:18
Have been trying to find the recent results for MNZ voting after agm, cant see it in the news section of MNZ site - and wanted to know who won what and how many people voted.

Last time for President position etc, i think there was around 10% of members voting,,,,,,,,, and this was a real concern at the time. Have the % numbers changed ?, where are the results advertised ?

Less than 550 voted out of 3800

codgyoleracer
6th June 2013, 09:31
Less than 550 voted out of 3800

14.5% turnout then, there's a vote of confidence........ (and yes i voted)

OK, i will state the obvious again......... why not realign voting with licensing, cant have one without the other being cast blah blah blah.......

Billy
6th June 2013, 09:56
14.5% turnout then, there's a vote of confidence........ (and yes i voted)

OK, i will state the obvious again......... why not realign voting with licensing, cant have one without the other being cast blah blah blah.......

Sounds like a plan,Talk to the office

scrivy
6th June 2013, 09:57
votes were up on last time and given that there's less members the percentage was higher, can't quote figures though.

Two years ago:
Jim 291
Chris 275
Total 566 votes.

So this year was less than 2 years ago.

Shorty_925
6th June 2013, 10:33
Two years ago:
Jim 291
Chris 275
Total 566 votes.

So this year was less than 2 years ago.

556 votes from how many members?

Stirts
6th June 2013, 11:02
556 votes from how many members?

At a guess ... 3800 ?? :shifty:

Shorty_925
6th June 2013, 12:17
At a guess ... 3800 ?? :shifty:

Luckily its only a guess.

Mental Trousers
6th June 2013, 12:36
14.5% turnout then, there's a vote of confidence........

Wonder if that apathy due to being typical bloody Kiwis or being motorcyclists? Guess there's no way to tell.

slowpoke
6th June 2013, 14:31
Wonder if that apathy due to being typical bloody Kiwis or being motorcyclists? Guess there's no way to tell.

Apathy? More like not knowing a thing about the candidates. A couple of paragrahs isn't much to go on and says more about writing skills than vision or attitude.

jellywrestler
6th June 2013, 18:20
309-206 was the vote, apolgies I was told there were more

CHOPPA
6th June 2013, 20:11
I voted. Wasnt going to bother though cause I figured Jim was going to win regardless. The only other guy didnt exactly put much on the table. I think more people would vote if there was more competition, the people that didnt want to vote for Jim didnt have much information to place the vote anywhere else so they prob didnt bother

neil_cb125t
6th June 2013, 21:08
so the result was?

neil_cb125t
6th June 2013, 21:08
yes i voted

Racey Rider
7th June 2013, 08:01
.....why not realign voting with licensing, cant have one without the other being cast blah blah blah.......

Wouldn't it be easier just to flip a coin? Couse you'd get the same result as forcing people to vote.

I didn't vote this year, as after 5 or 6 years with a licence, I still wouldn't know the face of Jim or others. (Ok I know Billy's face, - but I try and Block that out as much as I can...)

I don't know what they've done. I don't know what they stand for in the future.
Maybe not their fault, as I don't/can't get to high profile events. (Just a club racer).
Can't get to AGM's (tho I'd like to be a part of that - would certainly watch if they were streamed online.)

In the past, I had voted for somebody because someone I Did know, said the were good.

So to force me to vote - would just be a random click of a button. And over the entire process it would be a result of, - how many Random clicks for This guy, over That guy.

My thoughts are, if only 10% of all licence hold really know what's going on in the sport, then maybe a vote by just that 10% would be better for All, than 100% of members just clicking random buttons.

(This post is meant to be Helpful, - and give food for thought)

Racey

scrivy
7th June 2013, 08:56
I'm still perplexed that the Presidents, Commissioners and Board members aren't paid (or part subsidised) positions.
They get to change our sport for us, without always asking us what we want, making good and bad decisions that affect us all.

Why is it that no one wants to put their hand up to do these jobs? Because they are working obscene amounts of hours for nothing. That'll be why there isn't hoards of people fighting over the positions up for grabs.
Imagine if the positions were partly paid. There would be hands up by more people, and we would have a greater choice when voting.

I still cant understand that we once had a person paid a 6 figure income, and now the person doing his job is paid nothing..... Got me fucked.
We certainly get what we pay for.

Billy
7th June 2013, 11:06
I'm still perplexed that the Presidents, Commissioners and Board members aren't paid (or part subsidised) positions.
They get to change our sport for us, without always asking us what we want, making good and bad decisions that affect us all.

Why is it that no one wants to put their hand up to do these jobs? Because they are working obscene amounts of hours for nothing. That'll be why there isn't hoards of people fighting over the positions up for grabs.
Imagine if the positions were partly paid. There would be hands up by more people, and we would have a greater choice when voting.

I still cant understand that we once had a person paid a 6 figure income, and now the person doing his job is paid nothing..... Got me fucked.
We certainly get what we pay for.

Yip,

Alot of the above is true,However,I don't see how paying the commissioners and board is going to fix any of the problems we face at present,Firstly for us to be paying officials on a similar level to other countries,Our licence/membership fee would be horrendous(I would estimate somewhere around $1000.00 plus),Remembering other countries have a huge number more members than we do,Take for example Australia where their licence fee is $500 AUD per year and they probably have twice the membership we do.

Also,I think the system we have CAN work,If its properly implemented,IE the Sidecar racing association,If all the other classes had a similar system to them,Things would be a lot easier to organise,I have started forming sub commissions for the different National level classes to try and allow myself more time to concentrate on moving the discipline forward,However even that has been a challenge,Also(Hear comes the broken record) If everybody read the rulebook and followed the correct procedures,It would definitely make the commissioners jobs easier,IE,Recently I spent countless hours trying to work with the guys at Shoutout Events to get their Supermoto class series up and running,As did the folks at Motorcycling Canterbury,However they thought they could just flout the rules and do whatever,Whenever,Partly because they hadn't bothered to read the rules properly in the first place,When it came to a head and MCI withdrew the permit application they had put forward on Shoutout's behalf,They read the rules and realised where they went wrong,Unfortunately by then it was too late as they had lost the confidence of MCI and had no club to apply for their permits,Leaving them to run "black" and meaning any series they run will mean nothing.Wasting a whole bunch of my time that could have been spent elsewhere moving us forward.

Another problem facing officials is the complete lack of agreement amongst the members as to what it is they actually want,Most of the time a majority is around 25-30% on any one subject leaving the commissioners and board to sort the rest out,In any event the decisions we make are never going to please as many as we would like,Yip we get what we pay for but we can make things alot better just by taking a bit more notice of whats happening in our sport other than just rubbishing the decisions made by those that are stupid enough to stand in the firing line.

scrivy
7th June 2013, 11:20
Yip,

Alot of the above is true,However,I don't see how paying the commissioners and board is going to fix any of the problems we face at present,Firstly for us to be paying officials on a similar level to other countries,Our licence/membership fee would be horrendous(I would estimate somewhere around $1000.00 plus),Remembering other countries have a huge number more members than we do,Take for example Australia where their licence fee is $500 AUD per year and they probably have twice the membership we do.
Yeah, but even $50 more per member is $150,000 plus. Easily enough to pay $10,000 plus to each main person currently doing a job now for love. (More like for the love of working your ass off for nothing)

Another problem facing officials is the complete lack of agreement amongst the members as to what it is they actually want,Most of the time a majority is around 25-30% on any one subject leaving the commissioners and board to sort the rest out,In any event the decisions we make are never going to please as many as we would like,Yip we get what we pay for but we can make things alot better just by taking a bit more notice of whats happening in our sport other than just rubbishing the decisions made by those that are stupid enough to stand in the firing line.

I certainly wasn't digging at you Billy. You've done a great deal of good for our sport lately, and I've told you that.
I wish all classes had their own association as per the sidecars. Majority decisions get made for the betterment of all class members, communication is better/faster/relevant, and basically everyone in the class can have their say - then have it directed to MNZ. Also, it's only one voice that MNZ has to listen to. Rather than ramblings from lots in different directions....

My last post was merely explaining why there isn't more people going for a position. As the pinnicle of our niche sport, I feel that the position should be represented professionally, and hence a semi-paid position. Prorata payment for effort put in.

Scrivy

Billy
7th June 2013, 11:58
I certainly wasn't digging at you Billy. You've done a great deal of good for our sport lately, and I've told you that.
I wish all classes had their own association as per the sidecars. Majority decisions get made for the betterment of all class members, communication is better/faster/relevant, and basically everyone in the class can have their say - then have it directed to MNZ. Also, it's only one voice that MNZ has to listen to. Rather than ramblings from lots in different directions....

My last post was merely explaining why there isn't more people going for a position. As the pinnicle of our niche sport, I feel that the position should be represented professionally, and hence a semi-paid position. Prorata payment for effort put in.

Scrivy



Yip,

I didnt take at as a dig at me or anybody else,I was just trying to point out that what we have can be made to work to a more acceptable level,If more people other than those already working behind the scenes,Took a bit more interest in the sport and studied the rules a bit more carefully when applying for permits etc or requiring info on their class.


I do understand where your coming from,But I know of atleast 2 people that have made queries about my job in the past and walked away when they discovered it was unpaid and quite frankly I shudder to think where we would be if either got the position,Really the people running the individual disciplines need to be doing it for the sport and not for self interest.

scrivy
7th June 2013, 12:53
Yip,

I didnt take at as a dig at me or anybody else,I was just trying to point out that what we have can be made to work to a more acceptable level,If more people other than those already working behind the scenes,Took a bit more interest in the sport and studied the rules a bit more carefully when applying for permits etc or requiring info on their class.


I do understand where your coming from,But I know of atleast 2 people that have made queries about my job in the past and walked away when they discovered it was unpaid and quite frankly I shudder to think where we would be if either got the position,Really the people running the individual disciplines need to be doing it for the sport and not for self interest.

100% agree with you.
So...... how do we make other classes belong to an association?

budda
7th June 2013, 12:56
Yip,

I didnt take at as a dig at me or anybody else,I was just trying to point out that what we have can be made to work to a more acceptable level,If more people other than those already working behind the scenes,Took a bit more interest in the sport and studied the rules a bit more carefully when applying for permits etc or requiring info on their class.


I do understand where your coming from,But I know of atleast 2 people that have made queries about my job in the past and walked away when they discovered it was unpaid and quite frankly I shudder to think where we would be if either got the position,Really the people running the individual disciplines need to be doing it for the sport and not for self interest.

Amen ......

Kevin G
8th June 2013, 16:28
I still cant understand that we once had a person paid a 6 figure income, and now the person doing his job is paid nothing..... Got me fucked.
We certainly get what we pay for.

Not quite correct....The last MNZ president before Jim was Sandra Perry who was also unpaid. You are confusing this position with the paid employee position of CEO that was disestablished some years back after an independent external review was done of the organisation and they recommended this was done among other changes.

Kevin Goddard

slowpoke
9th June 2013, 11:37
Yip,

Alot of the above is true,However,I don't see how paying the commissioners and board is going to fix any of the problems we face at present,Firstly for us to be paying officials on a similar level to other countries,Our licence/membership fee would be horrendous(I would estimate somewhere around $1000.00 plus),Remembering other countries have a huge number more members than we do,Take for example Australia where their licence fee is $500 AUD per year and they probably have twice the membership we do.

Also,I think the system we have CAN work,If its properly implemented,IE the Sidecar racing association,If all the other classes had a similar system to them,Things would be a lot easier to organise,I have started forming sub commissions for the different National level classes to try and allow myself more time to concentrate on moving the discipline forward,However even that has been a challenge,Also(Hear comes the broken record) If everybody read the rulebook and followed the correct procedures,It would definitely make the commissioners jobs easier,IE,Recently I spent countless hours trying to work with the guys at Shoutout Events to get their Supermoto class series up and running,As did the folks at Motorcycling Canterbury,However they thought they could just flout the rules and do whatever,Whenever,Partly because they hadn't bothered to read the rules properly in the first place,When it came to a head and MCI withdrew the permit application they had put forward on Shoutout's behalf,They read the rules and realised where they went wrong,Unfortunately by then it was too late as they had lost the confidence of MCI and had no club to apply for their permits,Leaving them to run "black" and meaning any series they run will mean nothing.Wasting a whole bunch of my time that could have been spent elsewhere moving us forward.

Another problem facing officials is the complete lack of agreement amongst the members as to what it is they actually want,Most of the time a majority is around 25-30% on any one subject leaving the commissioners and board to sort the rest out,In any event the decisions we make are never going to please as many as we would like,Yip we get what we pay for but we can make things alot better just by taking a bit more notice of whats happening in our sport other than just rubbishing the decisions made by those that are stupid enough to stand in the firing line.

I'm kinda with Scrivy on this one, regards paying Commissioners: knowing what you put into he sport you musct be massively out of pocket. It's bad enough being under time pressure but assuming that sort of role shouldn't entail financial pressure as well.

Your rule book comments are justified but I wonder if the first port of call shouldn't be to our respective clubs rather than to the Commissioner? Follow the chain of command and if you get no joy then take it further up the ladder. Spread the load and let you concentrate on the bigger picture stuff. I realise it's very dependent on the questions or problems encountered but if the clubs could head off some of the issues at the pass then it would obviously make things easier on you. You might be a victim of your own availaibility/willingness to help, which is a good thing, but not doing yourself any favours.

Your last comment regarding getting some sort of accord amongst stakeholders is a valid one, but if you get that MNZ Forum up and running it should help get people involved, interested and understanding of the details related to different issues. Instant feedback should also help streamline things a bit? Ya never know, might even get interested parties involved and assume some of your load? Stranger things have happened.

shoutout
9th June 2013, 20:17
Yip,

Alot of the above is true,However,I don't see how paying the commissioners and board is going to fix any of the problems we face at present,Firstly for us to be paying officials on a similar level to other countries,Our licence/membership fee would be horrendous(I would estimate somewhere around $1000.00 plus),Remembering other countries have a huge number more members than we do,Take for example Australia where their licence fee is $500 AUD per year and they probably have twice the membership we do.

Also,I think the system we have CAN work,If its properly implemented,IE the Sidecar racing association,If all the other classes had a similar system to them,Things would be a lot easier to organise,I have started forming sub commissions for the different National level classes to try and allow myself more time to concentrate on moving the discipline forward,However even that has been a challenge,Also(Hear comes the broken record) If everybody read the rulebook and followed the correct procedures,It would definitely make the commissioners jobs easier,IE,Recently I spent countless hours trying to work with the guys at Shoutout Events to get their Supermoto class series up and running,As did the folks at Motorcycling Canterbury,However they thought they could just flout the rules and do whatever,Whenever,Partly because they hadn't bothered to read the rules properly in the first place,When it came to a head and MCI withdrew the permit application they had put forward on Shoutout's behalf,They read the rules and realised where they went wrong,Unfortunately by then it was too late as they had lost the confidence of MCI and had no club to apply for their permits,Leaving them to run "black" and meaning any series they run will mean nothing.Wasting a whole bunch of my time that could have been spent elsewhere moving us forward.

Another problem facing officials is the complete lack of agreement amongst the members as to what it is they actually want,Most of the time a majority is around 25-30% on any one subject leaving the commissioners and board to sort the rest out,In any event the decisions we make are never going to please as many as we would like,Yip we get what we pay for but we can make things alot better just by taking a bit more notice of whats happening in our sport other than just rubbishing the decisions made by those that are stupid enough to stand in the firing line.

Hi Billy, Dean from Shoutout Events.
You sent me an email on 14/05/2013 after we where working together on progressing a Supermoto Championship, you where asking why we advertised a Nationals and had our permit put on hold.
As per my email on we just added the word " National " and i asked why this was causing a problem you replied " read the rule book " remove the word " national " asap no reference to a clause in rule book.
We replied again adding reference to clause 4.10.5 and 4.1.1 , your reply was " interesting i have forwarded your concerns to office and board and to date we have had no other contact from MNZ office on this matter.

I have sent a number of emails to Jim which have gone unanswered to date to

Then we get a call from MCI on 28/05/2013 to say our permit have been rejected, i send a email to MNZ and you asking where we failed to meet MNZ rules, You replied that you forwarded this to MNZ office and you spoke to MCI about what was going on, and repeated to inform me to read the rule book. I repeat we have only had correspondence from you.
We get a email from Jim stating that " ShoutOut has been advised several times by multiple people " this is no true we have only had feed back from you, NOT the MNZ office.

Billy we could not understand what the problem was, in our eyes we where not calling in a Championship so whats wrong, but with what was going down made us to keep re reading the rule book and on 29/05/2013 we came across ruling 5.5.6 and 5.5.8 which we sent a email to MNZ and you explaining that
Dear Graeme, Jim, Vicky and Jannine



We have studied the MNZ rule book again and have come across the following ruling:



Additional rules applying to New Zealand and Island Championships 5.5.6 and 5.5.8



We can see MNZ’s position and are now in and are still open to discussion and addressing this with a view to a positive outcome for all parties. We would like to make very clear we did not know of this ruling in our naming of our event and in no way wanted to go against this ruling, but this has occurred and we are all now are at the position we find ourselves in.


We except that ShoutOut Events should know the MNZ rules if we want to be a part of them and again apologise for any miss communication, our intention was and is to only grow the Supermoto sport of motorcycling



Our first step would be to continue this in the original format that was presented to MNZ, but as a Private Promoter rather than third hand through my club.( MCI )



We think with open dialogue we can progress from here but this requires all parties to come to the table with an open mind and the desire to advance motorcycling. Shoutout Events is more than open to discuss this and to continue jointly with partnership from MNZ.




Yours faithfully,
Your reply was happy to try and get this sorted out amicably and wait for MNZ to return 30/05/2013
my reply was
Hi Billy,
We are all after the same out come more butts on bikes make it fun and entertaining for spectators grow the sport, yes we all could improve our skills of communication but let's just focuss on moving forward .
Cheers Dean

04/06/2013 I emailed you and MNZ about requesting a formal reply to our email and get a MCI have removed applications for Supermoto events you need to become a private promoter and included all attachments to do this.

05/06/2013 we replied
First thanks for your reply,

As i remember our conversation it was suggested that we use my club, MCI to apply for permits, and have looked at the Private promoter pack, which is my understanding that requires 90 days before a event and board approval, guessing another 10 days, so looks like 100 days out before an event.

With our race calendar already well established, booked and deposit paid we would like to thank MNZ for there investment of time and energy towards our vision, goals and objective and have seeked further advice on this matter.

Regards Dean

So now here we are, on a forum that is not MNZ but i felt i needed to answer your comments
We haven't asked another club we believe the best way forward would be private promoter
What is a " black " i couldn't find in in the rule book ??
Why would you feel our series means nothing ??
MNZ have not run a Supermoto Championship to date and we have the only Championship track in New Zealand and we want to run a Championship.

Is this advancing the sport of motorcycling ??

Cheers Dean James ShoutOut Events

Kickaha
9th June 2013, 21:13
What is a " black " i couldn't find in in the rule book ??
A meeting run outside of MNZ channels and not using a MNZ permit

Billy
9th June 2013, 22:36
A meeting run outside of MNZ channels and not using a MNZ permit

Bingo,

If its not run under an MNZ permit,Then it is not under the FIM umbrella and is not a recognised championship.

Dean,

I'm not going to bother quoting your post as it will take up the best part of a page,However,Just let me say,I offered a brief account of the time I spent on your requests as an example of the time that can be needlessly wasted,However if you wish to discuss publicly the whole issue,So be it,But please try and stick to the facts,Your permit applications were not rejected as you claim,As I stated earlier,The good folks at Motorcycling Canterbury withdrew them,Not MNZ,I understand their President had dialogue with you at their AGM 2 weeks ago and explained their position,Im sure the fact that Shoutout events insisted I exclude their club secretary from any correspondence in relation to their permit application played no small part.You were kept informed by the office administrator at MNZ of what was required of you and I have replied to every email you and your partner have sent me,On that basis I am bewidered as to your claim of a lack of communication and unanswered emails and phonecalls mentioned on your facebook page,Any further correspondence on this matter should be directed to mnzrrc@gmail.com

slowpoke
10th June 2013, 10:39
Bingo,

If its not run under an MNZ permit,Then it is not under the FIM umbrella and is not a recognised championship.


Not recognised by MNZ or FIM. The general public and Supermoto crew may view that differently. I'm just sayin', not takin' sides......

scott411
10th June 2013, 10:44
Not recognised by MNZ or FIM. The general public and Supermoto crew may view that differently. I'm just sayin', not takin' sides......

agreed, there are a number of off road races in NZ that are non MNZ, and still held in very high regard by the people that racing community, and the distributors as well,

Billy
10th June 2013, 10:55
Not recognised by MNZ or FIM. The general public and Supermoto crew may view that differently. I'm just sayin', not takin' sides......


agreed, there are a number of off road races in NZ that are non MNZ, and still held in very high regard by the people that racing community, and the distributors as well,

Agreed in both cases,But the facts are,It will not be recognised internationally and therefore carries no real recognition,

I don't necessarily disagree with them running outside the MNZ parameters,So long as their competitors are made aware of all the facts,There have been a number of entrants contacting the office to have their licence upgraded to a National level licence on the advice of the organiser,Despite their repeated denials they have been labelling this a National event,More power to them so long as they are upfront with everybody.

Fortunately for those who have been misled into a licence upgrade,The office staff at MNZ have once realised there was no need for the unecessary upgrade,Offered a credit to those involved toward next years licence.

Drew
10th June 2013, 10:57
I'm reminded of the baseball "world series"...Where no team from any other country is invited to play.

It's a name, if someone want's to call it a national championship they can I would think.

"Shoutout national supermoto championship", is a name only. I don't think MNZ could legally use that to deny a permit if all conditions for said permit are adhered to.

But I'm no lawyer.

Billy
10th June 2013, 11:11
I'm reminded of the baseball "world series"...Where no team from any other country is invited to play.

It's a name, if someone want's to call it a national championship they can I would think.

"Shoutout national supermoto championship", is a name only. I don't think MNZ could legally use that to deny a permit if all conditions for said permit are adhered to.

But I'm no lawyer.

Time for you to read the rules,Me thinks,There are certain protocols that need to be followed for National events,They are put in place to make it fair for everybody wishing to compete at such meetings,IE A reasonable amount of time has to allowed for people from all over the country to arrange travel,Accomodation etc,Otherwise you only get those within a close proximity or with substantial funding attend,Hardly a fair National event.

Drew
10th June 2013, 11:14
Time for you to read the rules,Me thinks,There are certain protocols that need to be followed for National events,They are put in place to make it fair for everybody wishing to compete at such meetings,IE A reasonable amount of time has to allowed for people from all over the country to arrange travel,Accomodation etc,Otherwise you only get those within a close proximity or with substantial funding attend,Hardly a fair National event.

I'm not suggesting MNZ have to post the results, and recognise it as the national standings. Just that they can call the event whatever they like.

Billy
10th June 2013, 11:17
I'm not suggesting MNZ have to post the results, and recognise it as the national standings. Just that they can call the event whatever they like.

Not if they run under an MNZ permit.

jellywrestler
10th June 2013, 11:19
I'm not suggesting MNZ have to post the results, and recognise it as the national standings. Just that they can call the event whatever they like.

takes the respect out of an event if anyone can call it anything they like really.
it's a bit like being the tallest dwarf isn't it!

Drew
10th June 2013, 11:21
takes the respect out of an event if anyone can call it anything they like really.
it's a bit like being the tallest dwarf isn't it!

Tall dwarves get ostricised by their little community I'm told.

Drew
10th June 2013, 11:22
Not if they run under an MNZ permit.Sweet as. I'm not likely to ever try and organise an event, so it doesn't effect me much.

jellywrestler
10th June 2013, 11:35
Tall dwarves get ostricised by their little community I'm told.

yes I heard you were told to move on...

Drew
10th June 2013, 11:40
yes I heard you were told to move on...

I wasn't happy...

jasonu
10th June 2013, 16:29
Agreed in both cases,But the facts are,It will not be recognised internationally and therefore carries no real recognition,

.

Recognised (or not) internationally by who exactly?
Is there really anyone or organization outside of NZ that actually cares enough (ie to give a shit) about NZ motorcycle competition to recognize or not recognize the events held and the results?
I'm not attempting to belittle or marginalize NZ motorcycling, just wondering who you might be referring to.

Deano
10th June 2013, 16:37
I wasn't happy...

Were you Grumpy then ? Dopey ? :confused:

Billy
10th June 2013, 18:03
Recognised (or not) internationally by who exactly?
Is there really anyone or organization outside of NZ that actually cares enough (ie to give a shit) about NZ motorcycle competition to recognize or not recognize the events held and the results?
I'm not attempting to belittle or marginalize NZ motorcycling, just wondering who you might be referring to.

Anybody who's only competing with in NZ would maybe not care,If however they were hoping to compete overseas the "National" Title they had won would be worthless,Not all will care obviously,But surely it is only fair that everybody knows the truth up front

quickbuck
10th June 2013, 18:12
Anybody who's only competing with in NZ would maybe not care,If however they were hoping to compete overseas the "National" Title they had won would be worthless,Not all will care obviously,But surely it is only fair that everybody knows the truth up front

That is Game, Set, and Match right there..........

On one hand we are going on about how little NZ Motorcycle racers are not recognised on the world stage, and find it hard to get a break, then on the other we are wanting to call all sorts of events a national event.....

Yup, if the title is a joke, then the spotters over seas are not even going to look....

That said, I must say the young guns we have in Europe at the moment are doing us proud.

Shorty_925
10th June 2013, 18:22
I remember reading an article about this and was surpsied about it:

http://iamspecialized.com/motorsports/rider/davide-gozzini

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davide_Gozzini

NZ Supermoto championship was the Tri Series in '08 and '09?

wharfy
10th June 2013, 18:27
Wouldn't it be easier just to flip a coin? Couse you'd get the same result as forcing people to vote.

I didn't vote this year, as after 5 or 6 years with a licence, I still wouldn't know the face of Jim or others. (Ok I know Billy's face, - but I try and Block that out as much as I can...)

I don't know what they've done. I don't know what they stand for in the future.
Maybe not their fault, as I don't/can't get to high profile events. (Just a club racer).
Can't get to AGM's (tho I'd like to be a part of that - would certainly watch if they were streamed online.)

In the past, I had voted for somebody because someone I Did know, said the were good.

So to force me to vote - would just be a random click of a button. And over the entire process it would be a result of, - how many Random clicks for This guy, over That guy.

My thoughts are, if only 10% of all licence hold really know what's going on in the sport, then maybe a vote by just that 10% would be better for All, than 100% of members just clicking random buttons.

(This post is meant to be Helpful, - and give food for thought)

Racey

I agree Racey, forcing people to vote is wrong.
Having said that I certainly encourage every licence holder to vote. If your not sure do some homework, ask the opinion of people who's judgement you trust what they think, read the MNZ reports, go to some of your clubs meetings, read their reports, ask your club committee what the issues facing the club are. And dare I say it trawl Kiwibiker :)

wharfy
10th June 2013, 18:37
Recognised (or not) internationally by who exactly?
Is there really anyone or organization outside of NZ that actually cares enough (ie to give a shit) about NZ motorcycle competition to recognize or not recognize the events held and the results?
I'm not attempting to belittle or marginalize NZ motorcycling, just wondering who you might be referring to.

I'm guessing that if you were trying to get a ride in an overseas team and your CV had NZ Champ on it part of their "due diligence" would be to check the MNZ record books. A non sanctioned event wouldn't show up.

Of course if you are applying for a job like chief scientist for the defence force you can bullshit all you like - they can't be arsed checking :)

Kickaha
10th June 2013, 19:00
Were you Grumpy then ? Dopey ? :confused:

Pretty hard to make a call either way

husaberg
10th June 2013, 19:08
I got the voting email had a look and well didn't vote as i felt i didn't really have the information to make an informed choice.Apathy won

I was thinking at the time We never used to vote for the president in the old days did we?
I thought it was vote at club/delegate level then the chosen board voted the Chair etc. Is that how it used to work?

scott411
10th June 2013, 21:28
I remember reading an article about this and was surpsied about it:

http://iamspecialized.com/motorsports/rider/davide-gozzini

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davide_Gozzini

NZ Supermoto championship was the Tri Series in '08 and '09?

there has never been a MNZ NZ supermoto championship, there has been a non MNZ one in about 04 at Taupo and Tamaranui, Paul Brown won it, Aaron Slight raced it as well,

steveyb
10th June 2013, 22:04
Of course if you are applying for a job like chief scientist for the defence force you can bullshit all you like - they can't be arsed checking :)

Where's the advert, that sounds interesting.....:Police:

quickbuck
11th June 2013, 22:10
Where's the advert, that sounds interesting.....:Police:

You're over qualified....
Apparently you have had to play rugby for Wales, and coached a bob sled team in the tropics though.

CHOPPA
11th June 2013, 23:42
Recognised (or not) internationally by who exactly?
Is there really anyone or organization outside of NZ that actually cares enough (ie to give a shit) about NZ motorcycle competition to recognize or not recognize the events held and the results?
I'm not attempting to belittle or marginalize NZ motorcycling, just wondering who you might be referring to.

Do you suffer from depression?

jellywrestler
12th June 2013, 09:47
Recognised (or not) internationally by who exactly?
Is there really anyone or organization outside of NZ that actually cares enough (ie to give a shit) about NZ motorcycle competition to recognize or not recognize the events held and the results?
I'm not attempting to belittle or marginalize NZ motorcycling, just wondering who you might be referring to.

you must have been shaken as a baby, per capita NZ has produced many a fine internationally able motorycle racer over the years and yes during the New Zealand Superbike championships this year the live broadcasting statistics showed we had interest from many places worldwide.
furthermore when our competitors go overseas if they have results in NZ it is certainly looked into

scrivy
12th June 2013, 11:10
furthermore when our competitors go overseas if they have results in NZ it is certainly looked into

I had a blood test result a few years ago - showed I was fighting fit...... I don't really think the Aussies at Eastern Creek really gave a shit about it thou......

:eek5::wacko::scratch:

RobGassit
12th June 2013, 11:18
Do you suffer from depression?

I often get depressed reading Jason's posts. Does that count?

scrivy
12th June 2013, 12:25
Do you suffer from depression?

The good thing is, its ok to talk about it.........:yes:

Billy
12th June 2013, 12:25
Recognised (or not) internationally by who exactly?
Is there really anyone or organization outside of NZ that actually cares enough (ie to give a shit) about NZ motorcycle competition to recognize or not recognize the events held and the results?
I'm not attempting to belittle or marginalize NZ motorcycling, just wondering who you might be referring to.

Recognised by the FIM,The world governing body,

IE, If you hold a National title that is recognised under the FIM umbrella,You become eligible for wildcard entries for World championships in your recognised class,Also it can mean millions of dollars in sponsorship if you do have access to world titles,A good example is Stroudy when he was doing world supers,If he won an NZ title it enabled him a sponsorship deal worth close to a million dollars,If he got 2nd,The deal was off,Imagine how that would work with your "out of a weetbix box"title organised outside the FIM parameters.

Basically without recognition from the governing body,Its like Dan Carter and his brothers holding their own RWC,In the backyard.

jasonu
12th June 2013, 16:32
:cry::cry::cry:Well that was depressing...:cry::cry::cry:

scrivy
12th June 2013, 16:36
:cry::cry::cry:Well that was depressing...:cry::cry::cry:

Just do what I do when that happens..... go lick some windows.......:crazy: