View Full Version : Big red box
Berries
12th June 2013, 23:26
What is the world coming to? Some story on TV about an offensive menu relating to the Australian Prime Minister. NZ television describes the offensive menu item as "Julia Gillard Kentucky Fried Quail: Small Breasts, Huge Thighs and A Big Red ****". Note the four letters of the obscene word. I can fill in the gaps thank you very much.
The actual news according to the scanned menu on t'internet is "Julia Gillard Kentucky Fried Quail: Small Breasts, Huge Thighs and A Big Red Box".
I thought they meant cunt.
EDIT - Perhaps I should be posting in the What are you Drinking thread?
awa355
13th June 2013, 04:25
She'd probably be okay to nibble on, ( after a dozen Fosters), until she decided to speak.
scissorhands
13th June 2013, 07:39
Its the same ridiculing of Helens that began here, 8yrs ago?
Leave the pricks to burn in hell...
Tune in, turn on, and drop out
Katman
13th June 2013, 08:23
I think Australian politics is further in the shit than ours has ever been.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyY-xI6zgfk
unstuck
13th June 2013, 08:37
Looked like he really really wanted to headbutt that reporter.:brick::nya::nya:
scumdog
13th June 2013, 08:43
hmmm...more P.C. gone mad.:rolleyes::weird:
jellywrestler
13th June 2013, 08:51
sure it doesn't come with two right wings?
Naki Rat
13th June 2013, 08:52
I think Australian politics is further in the shit than ours has ever been.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyY-xI6zgfk
Economic advisors (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-30/clarke-and-dawe--a-fresh-perspective/4722768) here on KB as well ;)
Katman
13th June 2013, 08:52
hmmm...more P.C. gone mad.:rolleyes::weird:
Do you mean the four little asterisks or the reaction to the menu?
scumdog
13th June 2013, 09:51
Do you mean the four little asterisks or the reaction to the menu?
The reaction.
Too many people jump up and down to object to something said/printed that is directed at an individual.
Even if said individual doesn't care themselves...
(As an example, Paul Henry was subject to this sort of thing a couple of years back)
Katman
13th June 2013, 09:58
The reaction.
Too many people jump up and down to object to something said/printed that is directed at an individual.
Even if said individual doesn't care themselves...
(As an example, Paul Henry was subject to this sort of thing a couple of years back)
Another fine response from a policeman who doesn't care about cover-ups.
You're on a roll.
scissorhands
13th June 2013, 10:03
You cant say just anything and not expect to have your head roll.
Paul Holmes stayed after his cheeky darky comment, look what happened to him...
Karmas a bitch
usually white male cunts humiliating non white male cunts:nya:
scumdog
13th June 2013, 10:09
Another fine response from a policeman who doesn't care about cover-ups.
You're on a roll.
I struggle to see how the comments by me event remotely relate to a 'cover up'...:rolleyes:
Please elucidate...
But I guess you lean to the "OOOhh, he shouldn't have said that about Mr Smith, I want to complain - but I dont care if Mr Smith is offended or not' line of though?
Katman
13th June 2013, 10:41
I struggle to see how the comments by me event remotely relate to a 'cover up'...:rolleyes:
Please elucidate...
You know full well that I'm referring to your "who cares if there's a cover-up" attitude shown in the other thread.
As I said in that thread, that's a fundamentally fucked up attitude for a policeman to display on a public forum.
(As is the belief that making crass references to Julia Gillard's genitalia as a means for political points scoring is all good for a giggle).
Do you ever think before opening your mouth?
scumdog
13th June 2013, 10:52
You know full well that I'm referring to your "who cares if there's a cover-up" attitude shown in the other thread.
As I said in that thread, that's a fundamentally fucked up attitude for a policeman to display on a public forum.
(As is the belief that making crass references to Julia Gillard's genitalia as a means for political points scoring is all good for a giggle).
Do you ever think before opening your mouth?
This thread is on the verge of morphing into another ANZAC thread...i
Katman
13th June 2013, 11:02
The reaction.
Too many people jump up and down to object to something said/printed that is directed at an individual.
Even if said individual doesn't care themselves...
(As an example, Paul Henry was subject to this sort of thing a couple of years back)
And besides, what makes you think that Julia Gillard doesn't care about it?
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/special-features/prime-minister-julia-gillard-blasts-menu-slur-as-lack-of-respect-by-coalition/story-fnho52jj-1226662752184
scumdog
13th June 2013, 11:50
And besides, what makes you think that Julia Gillard doesn't care about it?
ONLY for the political mileage I suspect...
bogan
13th June 2013, 11:54
The reaction.
Too many people jump up and down to object to something said/printed that is directed at an individual.
Even if said individual doesn't care themselves...
(As an example, Paul Henry was subject to this sort of thing a couple of years back)
To be fair though, Paul Henry had a bit of wit in most cases, this is pretty low brow.
buggerit
13th June 2013, 12:38
I think Australian politics is further in the shit than ours has ever been.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyY-xI6zgfk
I think thier minders just have them on a looser rein, at least you might hear what they really think sometimes without the spin doctors
sanitising it.:yes:
Katman
13th June 2013, 12:41
ONLY for the political mileage I suspect...
Yes, but you've already proven how suspect your suspicions are.
buggerit
13th June 2013, 12:49
hmmm...more P.C. gone mad.:rolleyes::weird:
+1 on that one, I miss politics in the days before spin doctors.
besides a blind man could see she has a great rack aye Katman;)
Banditbandit
13th June 2013, 13:17
+1 on that one, I miss politics in the days before spin doctors.
besides a blind man could see she has a great rack aye Katman;)
Yes ... more than a mouthful is just being indulgent (or Standard British handful in emperial measurements.)
oneofsix
13th June 2013, 13:24
Yes ... more than a mouthful is just being indulgent (or Standard British handful in emperial measurements.)
You either have a big mouth or small hands. You need enough for speedboats but the SBH is enough for that but I can lick my way around more than a single mouthful.
scissorhands
13th June 2013, 13:29
I think thier minders just have them on a looser rein, at least you might hear what they really think sometimes without the spin doctors
sanitising it.:yes:
the cleaner has arrived
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10890286
Eulogy scripted to praise cop who planted Crewe evidence
By David Fisher @DFisherJourno
11:40 AM Thursday Jun 13, 2013
The eulogy by one of the country's police officers for a controversial detective was scripted to offer praise for his integrity - despite the former colleague being found to have planted evidence.
Documents reveal deputy commissioner Mike Bush was offered his own personal endorsement for former detective inspector Bruce Hutton, the officer who led the flawed inquiry into the murders of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
Previously, Commissioner Peter Marshall backed up his deputy, saying the eulogy included "a range of positive comments from the service file of Bruce Hutton".
Mr Hutton was found by a Royal Commission of Inquiry in 1980 to have planted the cartridge case used to wrongly convict farmer Arthur Thomas of the murders. It also found Mr Thomas should never have been charged over the murders, which remain unsolved.
Documents released sourced through the Official Information Act show there were comments which did not come from Mr Hutton's service file.
In contrast, they were made written in a section of the speech in which Mr Bush shared his recollections of Mr Hutton.
In a reference to the Crewe inquiry, he said: "It is a great tragedy and irony that a man of such character should have been subject to devastating accusations of dishonesty."
A spokesman for the commissioner said previous comments had not referred to the entire speech. "He did not suggest the entire speech were verbatim comments from the file. Other comments made by DC Bush reflected the feelings of the grieving friends and family whom he was addressing."
Des Thomas, Arthur's brother, said the family was concerned at the police stance on the case. He said Mr Bush and Mr Marshall should not have input or responsibility for the current review into the case.
The police review is currently reviewing the murder inquiry after a plea from the murdered couple's surviving daughter, Rochelle.
What happened?
Former Detective Inspector Bruce Hutton was found to have planted evidence in a double murder inquiry. He died this year and police held an honour guard at his funeral, at which Deputy Commissioner Mike Bush spoke of Mr Hutton's integrity.
How did they explain that?
Deputy Commissioner Mike Bush said: "At no time did I make specific reference to the royal commission of inquiry. There was no intention to create the perception that I or NZ Police was challenging the findings of the [inquiry] or the integrity of any individual connected with the inquiry."
What do the speech notes scripted at police headquarters say?
Mr Bush's speech notes said: "As we all know, despite the breadth and depth of Bruce's police career, in the public eye he is associated with one case above all. It is a great tragedy and irony that a man of such character should have been subject to devastating accusations of dishonesty."
By David Fisher
Katman
13th June 2013, 13:47
But hey, who cares if there was a cover-up? :rolleyes:
oneofsix
13th June 2013, 13:55
the cleaner has arrived
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10890286
Eulogy scripted to praise cop who planted Crewe evidence
AAT was just another case of "if you have done nothing wrong you have nothing to fair" being bullshit. Now we have security services and govt spying that would make the KGB proud. What did scummy say about "free", as in free world. But that was another thread and he is probably off oiling his leather great coat and hat. don't mention batons
GCSB Thought Police
13th June 2013, 16:10
But hey, who cares if there was a cover-up? :rolleyes:
There never was a cover up, there never has been a cover up and there never will be a cover up. People should never suggest there was a cover up when there has not been a cover up.
And I repeat, there never has been a cover up.
Berries
13th June 2013, 17:26
This thread is full of humour.
scumdog
13th June 2013, 19:01
But hey, who cares if there was a cover-up? :rolleyes:
hey..NOW you're onto it!!:2thumbsup
Akzle
13th June 2013, 19:15
hey..NOW you're onto it!!:2thumbsup
tough day huh? Id expect more from you.
awa355
13th June 2013, 19:22
Electronic surveilance of our citizens is nothing new.
I was being watched way back in 1997. We had just bought our first computer. The 2nd morning we had it, I got home from work at 8am. The wife had gone out so I sat down to the new toy, entered "adult porn' into the search engine and there it was/ lots of porn websites. I opened the first one, barely 5 minutes and there was a heavy knocking on the door. With a shaking hand I opened the door and standing there was a local cop. :eek5:
Christ, they were quick. He tried to pretend he was looking for some guy that used to live at the house, but I knew better. I was able to bluff my way out of that. Geez I was relieved when a work mate told me how to erase the browsing history.
Big brother is definitely out there, and watching. :argh:
Katman
13th June 2013, 19:26
Electronic surveilance of our citizens is nothing new.
I was being watched way back in 1997. We had just bought our first computer. The 2nd morning we had it, I got home from work at 8am. The wife had gone out so I sat down to the new toy, entered "adult porn' into the search engine and there it was/ lots of porn websites. I opened the first one, barely 5 minutes and there was a heavy knocking on the door. With a shaking hand I opened the door and standing there was a local cop. :eek5:
Christ, they were quick. He tried to pretend he was looking for some guy that used to live at the house, but I knew better. I was able to bluff my way out of that. Geez I was relieved when a work mate told me how to erase the browsing history.
Big brother is definitely out there, and watching. :argh:
Seriously?
I think even back in 1997 the police had far more important shit to concern themselves with other than you rubbing one out.
unstuck
13th June 2013, 19:29
Seriously?
:killingme:killingme Dude you need to get laid more.:yes:
Katman
13th June 2013, 19:36
:killingme:killingme Dude you need to get laid more.:yes:
I'm saving myself.
Kickaha
13th June 2013, 19:45
I'm saving myself.
You'll be saving for a long time then
awa355
13th June 2013, 20:52
Seriously?
I think even back in 1997 the police had far more important shit to concern themselves with other than you rubbing one out.
The post was acually a piss take on the big brother spy aspect.
Berries
13th June 2013, 23:06
Christ. You watch Big Brother?
awayatc
14th June 2013, 06:30
I'm saving myself.
why....?
you get no interest.......
MisterD
14th June 2013, 08:20
Eulogy scripted to praise cop who planted Crewe evidence
By David Fisher @DFisherJourno
11:40 AM Thursday Jun 13, 2013
David Fisher in Taking Time Out from Fellating Kim Dotcom Shocker.
BoristheBiter
14th June 2013, 09:34
This thread is full of humour.
It's full of something.
scumdog
14th June 2013, 20:01
It's full of something.
Standard KB issue....
SPman
17th June 2013, 23:47
hmmm...more P.C. gone mad.:rolleyes::weird:
If it's political - it's not correct!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.