PDA

View Full Version : What octane spins your wheels?



Hitcher
22nd January 2004, 08:30
I was reading a thread about the retail availability of avgas (or similar) and was wondering what fuel most people used already and whether anybody used octane-boosting additives (orange syringes or other products).
:doctor:

Motoracer
22nd January 2004, 09:05
I just run on 96-98 for the race bike and the road bike during summer. In winter, I'd run my road bike on 91 due to cooler temperatures.

I'd recommend Gull 97 out of all of them for road and amature track use (stock engines).

Motu
22nd January 2004, 09:21
Doesn't matter with any of my bikes,nearest available pump.Some of my cars need to use BP Ultimate and one had to have an octane booster,but it has to be a quality booster,not STP type crap...plus 4 or plus 8 I used to use in the old Falcon.

James Deuce
22nd January 2004, 11:31
The FIAT pinks on 91. No such issue on 98.

The Yamaha runs fine on 91.

riffer
22nd January 2004, 13:34
The Yamaha runs fine on 91.

I was told when I got the Fizzer that it runs on 91, so that's what I use.

What would happen if I used 96 on it, apart from it costing more to run?

jrandom
22nd January 2004, 14:40
What would happen if I used 96 on it, apart from it costing more to run?

As far as I've heard, nothing different, apart from indeed having it cost more to run. IANAC, but I've heard stuff about higher-octane fuels being 'slower burning' and therefore...? What? Is it implied that somehow the fuel will fail to combust quickly enough to create maximum cylinder pressure during the combustion cycle? What am I missing?

All I really know is, if you've got high compression, you need a fuel that withstands predetonation. Hence high octane in motorcycle engines. I just can't see how the 13.5:1 compression in the FXR can work well with the same octane ratio as the about-half-that compression in, say, my Ford Laser. That 150cc single cylinder is making the same power:capacity as the engine in a McLaren F1, and nobody would seriously consider tuning *that* engine to run on 91 octane, would they?

I swear the FXR runs better on Mobil 98. No observable difference between 91 and 96 though.

Slingshot
22nd January 2004, 14:57
This is interesting, it's from the how stuff works website:

The octane rating of gasoline tells you how much the fuel can be compressed before it spontaneously ignites. When gas ignites by compression rather than because of the spark from the spark plug, it causes knocking in the engine. Knocking can damage an engine, so it is not something you want to have happening. Lower-octane gas (like "regular" 87-octane gasoline) can handle the least amount of compression before igniting.

Hitcher
22nd January 2004, 15:08
I'd always thought that a higher octane fuel burnt more efficiently and effectively and, although more expensive, should improve your fuel economy. That could well be an urban legend promulgated by oil company employees...
:bye:

k14
22nd January 2004, 15:39
I'd always thought that a higher octane fuel burnt more efficiently and effectively and, although more expensive, should improve your fuel economy. That could well be an urban legend promulgated by oil company employees...
:bye:

Dont think i have heard that before, but slingshot is right. The reason you use higher octane petrols is to stop knocking, which severly screws up the engine. I can definately feel the difference between 91 and 96 on my CBR, even at idle. It just runs a whole lot smoother on 96.

jrandom
22nd January 2004, 15:41
I'd always thought that a higher octane fuel burnt more efficiently and effectively

Oh phooey. I suppose I could go and Google it, or even go find a chemistry reference somewhere, but I'm too bloody lazy so here's the pseudoscience blithering that I can remember off the top of my head.

AFAIK the octane rating really just refers to the ratio of hydrocarbons affecting the volatility (?) of the fuel (I *told* you I wasn't a chemist), the whole numbering thing is a ratio to straight iso-octane, which has a certain tendency (or not) to go bang under pressure. That gets numbered an even 100, and all other petrochemical compounds and mixtures thereof get numbered in relation to that. Lower numbers mean less resistance and therefore more likelihood to ignite uncontrollably under high pressure (ie, 'knocking'), higher numbers have greater resistance and are more likely to burn smoothly under high pressure, creating a nice even wave of ignition out from the firing point in a cylinder and therefore a useful pressure ramp.

Not having a smooth pressure curve in the cylinder is destructive - low-octane fuel can be like burning overfine gunpowder in a rifle (or whatever) chamber, causes mechanical failure from pressure spikes.

In any case all of the above means that SO LONG AS the octane rating of your fuel doesn't put it in danger of uncontrolled pressure ignition within the cylinder, it should make no difference. Bigger octane numbers give more safety margin for higher-compression engines.

Of course the *other* point is that the octane rating is but a sliver of a measurement in terms of all the factors that go into modern refined petrol fuels, and that 98 octane stuff could have a number of other relevant attributes.

Naturally all of the above could be completely wrong.

slob
22nd January 2004, 16:29
I read somewhere that they use a standardised single cylinder engine with a variable compression ratio mechanism to measure the anti-knocking properties of a given brew of gas.

Apparently it's not just the compression ratio of the engine, the cylinder head design also determines whether it requires higher octane or not. Ignition timing would also play a part I imagine...

From personal experience, 91's worked fine on all bikes I've had (GN125, ZXR400, FZR600, KLX650, TL1000S, FZR400) although when I tried mobil's 98 on the TL it used to stall all the time when cold.

What?
22nd January 2004, 19:25
Naturally all of the above could be completely wrong.
Nah. You put it well. Spot on, in fact.

wkid_one
22nd January 2004, 20:31
All the scientific guff was posted in a previous thread

XRNR
22nd January 2004, 20:44
I like AVgas cause its still got lead in it, and I am used to seeing how my bike is running by looking at the color of the pipe.

I can't tell anything from looking at the modern sooty black pipes.

Maybe I need re-educating like my lack of knowledge about modern speedo drives coming off the gearbox.

Motu
22nd January 2004, 21:10
You heard about those water cooled bikes? Stupid idea,none of my bikes are water cooled - I'm not stupid y'know,I'll wait a few years an see how they stand up.

Yeah,I miss seeing a nice grey pipe and knowing I've got it spot on.Doing a valve grind on a car you would get this sweet taste in the back of your mouth - didn't find out till later that it was lead....no wonder little kids used to eat lead based paint.

LB
23rd January 2004, 04:47
I use 96, or if they have it, 98. Haven't tried 91 in either the Duc or the Beemer.

One of my mates with a 1983 Ducati S2 (900cc) adds a litre of av gas to each tank of petrol - he can really notice it when he's on tour and can't get it, it definitely doesn't run as well.

tlronny
23rd January 2004, 05:50
All I know is that my last 3 bikes (new) all seemed to run better on Gull than the others !! :yes:

boris
23rd January 2004, 07:34
i am told (SVdownunder a dingo web site) carbed bikes/cars don't like the new 98 its made for injection or something like that.I was using 98 in my SV but now i don't.While using it my bike run ruff but while using 96 it seamed to run cleaner .

XRNR
23rd January 2004, 09:08
Rumor control says that 91 is a better quality fuel, So if your bikes designed to run on it, it will probably run better on it than using 96.

PS

You heard about those water cooled bikes? Stupid idea,none of my bikes are water cooled - I'm not stupid y'know,I'll wait a few years an see how they stand up.

Yeah,I miss seeing a nice grey pipe and knowing I've got it spot on.Doing a valve grind on a car you would get this sweet taste in the back of your mouth - didn't find out till later that it was lead....no wonder little kids used to eat lead based paint.

Water cooled, I'll wait a few years an see how they stand up as well, (I guess the closer tolerances is a nice feature though). Other than that a whole lot of extra hassel to maintain & work on. (I didn't notice water pissing out my radiator after dropping it on a hot day in the bush)!

merv
24th January 2004, 12:22
I bought my VFR when the only unleaded fuel available was 91 so that's what I run it on and Honda manual says 91 is OK but make sure you use unleaded. Then the 96 unleaded came out and there was all that hoo hah about the damage it was doing to components on cars so I shied away from it though did use it in my dirt bikes because of recommended octane ratings. I tried the VFR on it and I couldn't tell the difference and it definitely wasn't smoother so I don't bother with the extra cost. However, with my DR250R, you saw me mention this on another thread, the hassle with the 96 is if you leave the bike more than a week or two you gotta drain the carb before attempting to fire it up. Don't know why, but drain the carb and then fill it with fresh fuel from the tank and it fires up easily. I never had that problem with the older fuels before with my previous dirtbikes.

Motu
24th January 2004, 14:02
Strange you should mention the Merv - The XLV750 is always hard to start after sitting a few weeks,but it has an electric fuel pump that only runs when the engine is running,so sometimes use engine start to get her up and running.But I went to start the XT400 up yesterday after a couple of weeks not running - and the dammed thing wouldn't start! I'll try your method next time.