PDA

View Full Version : Name suppression for high profile people



Laava
20th July 2014, 13:10
I don't agree with it, it breeds a culture of impunity amongst the elite. Such as this guy, convicted of committing an indecent act and then gets name suppression.
http://www.humanheadline.com.au/hinch-says/victims-must-come-first
Here is todays Herald article
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11296290

The Reibz
20th July 2014, 13:12
Can someone name drop him?

Laava
20th July 2014, 13:13
Who? The guy mentioned in the article?

Katman
20th July 2014, 13:14
Can someone name drop him?

Did you not read the first link in the first post?

unstuck
20th July 2014, 13:14
Justice system. :killingme:killingme:killingme:killingme Justice, there is no such thing. The system is a joke, and anyone who supports it is a joker.:devil2:

The Reibz
20th July 2014, 13:14
Lol yep never mind, found it. Skim read past it

NAME REMOVED

unstuck
20th July 2014, 13:16
*Moderated Post*

Laava
20th July 2014, 13:21
I deliberately didn't actually name him here because he has name suppression and it could be a problem for the forum legally. As far as I know.

oneofsix
20th July 2014, 13:32
Don't agree with the suppression system, only pleaded guilty on the understanding blar blar blar - yeah right, more like he didn't want the woman's story reinforced by others. About time NZ's over paid judges tackled these "high profile" pricks. Yes, the pun was intended.

I don't agree with the register due to its affects on teens and its use from overprotective, over controlling parents. Classic case is the 16yo boy dating the 15.5yo Girl can end up on a register and have the rest of his live ruined.

Do the crime, do the time, no suppression, but that is where it ends.

MVnut
20th July 2014, 13:58
There should be no name suppression after guilt is proven or admitted. Prior to proving guilt, I agree with name suppression

Madness
20th July 2014, 14:16
*Moderated post*

MisterD
20th July 2014, 14:53
There might even be legal issues with posting a link to a site that gives a suppressed name - mods might want to exercise some caution.

Akzle
20th July 2014, 15:05
vote, fuckers!

unstuck
20th July 2014, 15:50
vote, fuckers!

Who for Boss? I think they are all a pack of muppets, so I may as well vote for Jim Henson. :yes:

Katman
20th July 2014, 15:54
Who for Boss? I think they are all a pack of muppets, so I may as well vote for Jim Henson. :yes:

Best thing Labour could do at the moment would be to make Jacinda Adern leader.

She'd probably sway a lot of the undecided/uninterested/toolazytovote voters.

Akzle
20th July 2014, 16:29
doesn't matter. consent to be governed. consent to the system. your misguided sign(of your)nature is all that's required.

jasonu
20th July 2014, 17:38
Who in his right mind would want to diddle that hog Maggie Barrie?

Edbear
20th July 2014, 17:58
Who in his right mind would want to diddle that hog Maggie Barrie?

Men who let the little head do their thinking for them can't see past the tip. Mind you, Maggie isn't the worst looking woman in the world, either.

You see women through the eyes of the young. :innocent:

unstuck
20th July 2014, 18:02
Snigger.:shifty: Margaret Barry.


http://mainlynorfolk.info/folk/images/largerec/streetsongsandfiddletunes_10t6.jpgFiddle tunes, she planned it all along.

Laava
20th July 2014, 18:23
doesn't matter. consent to be governed. consent to the system. your misguided sign(of your)nature is all that's required.

How the fuck did you think this thread has anything to do with an upcoming election?
Got a fresh harvest in?

Akzle
20th July 2014, 18:25
How the fuck did you you think this thread has anything to do with an upcoming election?
Got a fresh harvest in?

fucken, season hasn't even started homie, still got some phat skunkiez tho, come on over for some whores and a bong bro!

(the system, it usually all come back to the system. you vaginarise about it, i say fuck it all)

Laava
20th July 2014, 18:29
Why don't you wait till the election and not vote? That'll fuckin show em!

unstuck
20th July 2014, 18:31
Yeah, fuck the system.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/I8W5SSu6gSk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>:Punk::Punk:

caspernz
20th July 2014, 19:00
That name suppression won't last long, name is already out in some circles, albeit in carefully veiled ways such as the link provided.

Guys who fiddle with kids just make my trigger finger itch...:innocent:

Akzle
20th July 2014, 19:15
Why don't you wait till the election and not vote? That'll fuckin show em!

one day, not too far away, you old white folk'l be dead.
I hope you enjoyed the ride.

Virago
20th July 2014, 19:17
one day, not too far away, you old white folk'l be dead.
I hope you enjoyed the ride.

The brown folk have a shorter life expectancy.

Akzle
20th July 2014, 19:21
The brown folk have a shorter life expectancy.

replace 'o.w.f' with 'voting money worshiping jews'.

...there ya go.

caspernz
20th July 2014, 19:22
The brown folk have a shorter life expectancy.

The only brown in Akzle is the shit he talks though...

Akzle
20th July 2014, 19:34
The only brown in Akzle is the shit he talks though...

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

Laava
20th July 2014, 19:51
one day, not too far away, you old white folk'l be dead.
I hope you enjoyed the ride.

Yeah, for sure. Then the world will be run by.....?
Do you have any idea? Seriously, expand our knowledge with your worldly wisdom. Can't take too long...

Akzle
20th July 2014, 20:02
Yeah, for sure. Then the world will be run by.....?
Do you have any idea? Seriously, expand our knowledge with your worldly wisdom. Can't take too long...

you say that like 'the world' needs running.
Wwjd?
And how did the world not run before white governance?
Wait, you already have a fuken dozen unanswered questions.
Walking on the moon, is, like, literally, walking on the moon. Hows tv?

Woodman
20th July 2014, 20:16
Why don't you wait till the election and not vote? That'll fuckin show em!

By not voting he is still influencing the outcome of the election, most probarbly in favour of the right wing parties.

Laava
20th July 2014, 20:31
you say that like 'the world' needs running.
Wwjd?
And how did the world not run before white governance?
Wait, you already have a fuken dozen unanswered questions.
Walking on the moon, is, like, literally, walking on the moon. Hows tv?

I'm busy tiling. Sorry you were unable to understand and answer my question. I was not talking about the past.

Laava
20th July 2014, 20:32
By not voting he is still influencing the outcome of the election, most probarbly in favour of the right wing parties.

Do you think he supports the right wing parties?

Akzle
20th July 2014, 20:38
I'm busy tiling. Sorry you were unable to understand and answer my question. I was not talking about the past.

your pad must be coming up sweet.
Two more questions against your tally.
And another: moving forward, who is qualified to 'run the world'?

unstuck
20th July 2014, 20:39
y
And another: moving forward, who is qualified to 'run the world'?

GOD? or is this a trick question? :confused:

Akzle
20th July 2014, 20:40
didja put in underfloor heating? Stepping out a hot 'cuzi onto cold tiles is just... Euch.

Akzle
20th July 2014, 20:41
GOD? or is this a trick question? :confused:

oh sweet. I'll elect god, then.

unstuck
20th July 2014, 20:43
oh sweet. I'll elect god, then.

Are you willing to accept Jesus as your lord and savior, orrrrrrr(cos im from Gorrrre) did you have another God in mind? :innocent:

awayatc
20th July 2014, 20:49
Such as this guy, convicted of committing an indecent act and then gets name suppression.


Yeah, no rose without a thorn..........

Akzle
20th July 2014, 20:52
Are you willing to accept Jesus as your lord and savior, orrrrrrr(cos im from Gorrrre) did you have another God in mind? :innocent:

my god is non sectarian and not capitalised.

And funnily enough, no-one can vote to be governed by anyone above god.

unstuck
20th July 2014, 20:59
my god is non sectarian and not capitalised.

And funnily enough, no-one can vote to be governed by anyone above god.

Who dat?......10

Akzle
20th July 2014, 21:02
Who dat?......10

god dog jah aya gaia, call it what you will.

Laava
20th July 2014, 21:12
Yeah, no rose without a thorn..........

Ooh.........controversial!

awayatc
20th July 2014, 21:29
Ooh.........controversial!

cuntroversial....?

can't be.......... This proverb means that to enjoy a beautiful or pleasant thing, you must sometimes endure something difficult, or even painful.


and the womans name wasn't rose........

Akzle
21st July 2014, 06:50
cuntroversial....?

can't be.......... This proverb means that to enjoy a beautiful or pleasant thing, you must sometimes endure something difficult, or even painful.


and the womans name wasn't rose........

dinncha hear? He's been huffing tiling glue, he's on a completely different planet...

Banditbandit
21st July 2014, 11:41
There should be no name suppression after guilt is proven or admitted. Prior to proving guilt, I agree with name suppression

I agree that being a high profile person should NOT be a reason to grant name suppression ...

But frequently Name Suppression is granted to protect the victim - so someone is convicted for incest raping their daughter/son/niece/granddaughter ... identifying the guilty person would also identify the victim - adding to their trauma ... in this case I support permanent name suppression.

Big Dog
21st July 2014, 13:24
WWJD? Forgive all who are repentant. I am not so magnanimous, nail the fucker to a cross. He is certainly not repentant if he seeks name suppression.


Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.

awayatc
21st July 2014, 13:50
In my military potty training the mantra was: Man at night...? man in the morning....!

Laava
21st July 2014, 14:01
I agree that being a high profile person should NOT be a reason to grant name suppression ...

But frequently Name Suppression is granted to protect the victim - so someone is convicted for incest raping their daughter/son/niece/granddaughter ... identifying the guilty person would also identify the victim - adding to their trauma ... in this case I support permanent name suppression.

I agree totally. In this case, it is sought because of him being an elite sportsman

oldrider
21st July 2014, 16:04
moving forward, who is qualified to 'run the world'?

Hitler or Stalin were extremely bad examples and just when you think it is not possible to get that low again ... along comes "Netanyahu"! :stoogie: Worst of them all!

Akzle
21st July 2014, 16:48
Hitler or Stalin were extremely bad examples and just when you think it is not possible to get that low again ... along comes "Netanyahu"! :stoogie: Worst of them all!

shhhhhhhh. you're not allowed to say bad things about jew cunts.

stalin was "worse" than hitler, just didn't kill many joos, so didn't get the same media coverage.... nevermind the "allies" etc... wow, what a fucking farce that was, so many people dead,
and now so many old, white cunts still believe in it's righteousness.

Banditbandit
21st July 2014, 17:02
Hitler or Stalin were extremely bad examples and just when you think it is not possible to get that low again ... along comes "Netanyahu"! :stoogie: Worst of them all!

Yeah .. well, that is not surprising ... He's a successor to these types ...

The Stern Gang (Lehi)


Lehi initially sought alliance with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany, offering to fight alongside them against the British in return for the transfer of all Jews from Nazi-occupied Europe to Palestine. On the belief that Nazi Germany was a lesser enemy of the Jews than Britain, Lehi twice attempted to form an alliance with the Nazis. During World War II it declared that it would establish a Jewish state based upon "nationalist and totalitarian principles". After Stern's death in 1942, the new leadership of Lehi began to move it towards support of Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union. In 1944 Lehi officially declared its support for National Bolshevism. It said that its National Bolshevism involved an amalgamation of left-wing and right-wing political elements – Stern said Lehi incorporated elements of both the left and the right

From Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_%28group%29 ... where there's more ..

While Lehi was named "Stern gang" after it's founder, when he died Yitzhak Shamir took over ... Shamir became Prime Minister of Israel in 1983 ...

A long history of nastiness ..

oldrider
21st July 2014, 18:16
I agree that being a high profile person should NOT be a reason to grant name suppression ...

But frequently Name Suppression is granted to protect the victim - so someone is convicted for incest raping their daughter/son/niece/granddaughter ... identifying the guilty person would also identify the victim - adding to their trauma ... in such cases I support permanent name suppression.

Back on track ... totally agree but had to change the last little bit ... sorry BB it seemed to insinuate that the one the OP was referring to should be supported! :no:

Banditbandit
22nd July 2014, 10:07
Back on track ... totally agree but had to change the last little bit ... sorry BB it seemed to insinuate that the one the OP was referring to should be supported! :no:

I didn't mean that at all. In the context, I was responding to a post that implied that all sexual abusers should be named and should never be granted name suppression.

Berries
29th July 2014, 23:20
I'd tap him.

unstuck
30th July 2014, 05:01
I'd tap him.

In the head with a 6lb hammer.:devil2:

Winston001
31st July 2014, 01:13
I agree totally. In this case, it is sought because of him being an elite sportsman

Or was, probably before some KBers were even born.

avgas
31st July 2014, 04:12
All blacks is a team of pussies who can't hack acknowledging to the public they are guilty and they are sorry.

And no I don't agree with name suppression in this circumstance (cos he was famous like 40 years ago........when there was no real choice for heroes).
This guy is a scum bag - scum bags don't get name suppression.

unstuck
31st July 2014, 05:35
scum bags don't get name suppression.

Apparently they do.:wacko:

Bit of a thorny issue this one, Im out. Before I get slapped by a mod again.

oldrider
31st July 2014, 17:25
Can't agree with this guy's continued name supression! :oi-grr: Especially now that I don't know who he is or what he did/does! :killingme