View Full Version : NZTA and other compliance type shit
R650R
2nd August 2014, 08:35
Look at this, a pontential export niche market/business to be based in NZ but blown out of the water by NZTA.
Anyone else think this could be a sweet design for putting bikes into vans etc...
The drivers are already disabled so if they have another crash, murphys law and all it will prob be their last anyway...
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11302855
buggerit
2nd August 2014, 22:20
Matangi Motors build vehicles that function the same, but meet certification standards.
swbarnett
3rd August 2014, 00:30
Matangi Motors build vehicles that function the same, but meet certification standards.
Do you have details?
I've followed this saga for sometime as I know Barry. It seems unlikely that a comparable solution exists but if it does I'm sure he'd be interested to hear of it.
Edit: Found the "Attitude" article. The Skoda Yeti is not really comparable with what Matangi are doing. For starters it's not a van.
avgas
3rd August 2014, 06:03
I would like to see the test results or calculations the NZTA performed to come to the conclusion. I suspect they don't exist - like the NZTA's understanding of transport engineering. Seeing as they technically don't hire any transport engineers.
Don't believe me - check out this "plan" http://www.ssc.govt.nz/sites/all/files/pif-nzta-review-may11.PDF
tell me what part of that plan involves the hiring/consulting with someone who has engineering capabilities in transport design.
They should stick with the topics they actually can get experience in........the easy one.........building a flat surface to drive on / roads (and they even get that one wrong).
buggerit
3rd August 2014, 15:05
I would like to see the test results or calculations the NZTA performed to come to the conclusion. I suspect they don't exist - like the NZTA's understanding of transport engineering. Seeing as they technically don't hire any transport engineers.
Don't believe me - check out this "plan" http://www.ssc.govt.nz/sites/all/files/pif-nzta-review-may11.PDF
tell me what part of that plan involves the hiring/consulting with someone who has engineering capabilities in transport design.
They should stick with the topics they actually can get experience in........the easy one.........building a flat surface to drive on / roads (and they even get that one wrong).
From what I know, a whole can of worms opened up when a transport engineer did view a particular van (from what manufacturer I am not sure) and was
very concerned about the poor engineering.
buggerit
3rd August 2014, 15:18
Do you have details?
I've followed this saga for sometime as I know Barry. It seems unlikely that a comparable solution exists but if it does I'm sure he'd be interested to hear of it.
Edit: Found the "Attitude" article. The Skoda Yeti is not really comparable with what Matangi are doing. For starters it's not a van.
Check out "Matangi Motors youtube"
swbarnett
3rd August 2014, 16:42
From what I know, a whole can of worms opened up when a transport engineer did view a particular van (from what manufacturer I am not sure) and was
very concerned about the poor engineering.
It wasn't this one.
Berries
3rd August 2014, 16:47
Nah, it was my old Hi-ace the bastards.
R650R
3rd August 2014, 17:45
Interesting info, so wonder who originally certified skodas or if at all???
avgas
3rd August 2014, 18:08
From what I know, a whole can of worms opened up when a transport engineer did view a particular van (from what manufacturer I am not sure) and was
very concerned about the poor engineering.
VW Caddy?
Biggest heap of shit I drove........and I have driven cars with no doors and no brakes.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.