Log in

View Full Version : Aussie jihadist and his spawn



MVnut
11th August 2014, 18:45
Ok well I won't post a pic, we've probably all seen it.....the Aussie Jihadist' 7 year old son holding aloft a severed head of a Syrian fighter. My thoughts, a few thousand drones or a nuke would not go amiss....kill these jihadists that raise their kids like this, kill the kids too.

Drew
11th August 2014, 18:56
I can almost understand someone voicing support for jihadists, not that I condone what they do.

But the guy hasn't grown up with the oppression, from what I saw. He has no right (not that any of them do) do be udset to the level of murder.

unstuck
11th August 2014, 19:02
Yep, fight war with war. Always works.

mashman
11th August 2014, 19:03
Nuke america and there would be no more jihadists.

Drew
11th August 2014, 19:07
Nuke america and there would be no more jihadists.

Not true. They are not anti America, they're anti West.

mashman
11th August 2014, 19:10
Not true. They are not anti America, they're anti West.

Shame, but it'd make it easier for them, right.

MVnut
11th August 2014, 19:14
I am more talking about parents who bring up their kids to be extremists....and yes in some instances fight war with war. I am expecting some comments re the kids being the innocents....what a load of bullshit. Kids brought up like this will not make a positive contribution, better off being dead for all concerned.

Drew
11th August 2014, 19:14
Shame, but it'd make it easier for them, right.

Not sure really. I don't understand what it is they're trying to achieve. Revenge seems to be what it boils down to.

They aren't trying to take over anywhere.

unstuck
11th August 2014, 19:18
War on drugs, war on terrorism, war on corruption. Anything you fight and resist will keep growing. Look around the world, you will see this is happening everywhere.:2thumbsup

mashman
11th August 2014, 19:20
I am more talking about parents who bring up their kids to be extremists....and yes in some instances fight war with war. I am expecting some comments re the kids being the innocents....what a load of bullshit. Kids brought up like this will not make a positive contribution, better off being dead for all concerned.

They were born like that. It is human nature.


Not sure really. I don't understand what it is they're trying to achieve. Revenge seems to be what it boils down to.

They aren't trying to take over anywhere.

I've read a few things as to why Al Kaieater are fighting... and they'd stop, or so they say, if 3 conditions were met. Palestine, Something else and the US (US only) removing all of their bases out of the "East". Prolly is revenge for some, a duty for others, a crusade for others, an adventure, a fight for freedom etc... It does highlight that there is an issue though, ha.

:rofl: ask the right whinge of many a country and I bet you'll get a different version to that. The dutch, french and engrish being some of the more recent that I can remember holding anti Islam protests. Think there was one instance where the Muslims came out and gave the "demonstrators" tea and biscuits.

MVnut
11th August 2014, 19:21
Let's put it another way...if you were a US military sniper and your orders were to kill jihadists, assume you kill the father and then see this 7 year old holding up a severed head and his brothers there too. Would you kill them all or can these kids 'be saved' ? Me, I wouldn't hesitate to shoot

mashman
11th August 2014, 19:22
Let's put it another way...if you were a US military sniper and your orders were to kill jihadists, assume you kill the father and then see this 7 year old holding up a severed head and his brothers there too. Would you kill them all or can these kids 'be saved' ? Me, I wouldn't hesitate to shoot

Anyone with a towel on their head is a potential jihadist.

Drew
11th August 2014, 19:25
Let's put it another way...if you were a US military sniper and your orders were to kill jihadists, assume you kill the father and then see this 7 year old holding up a severed head and his brothers there too. Would you kill them all or can these kids 'be saved' ? Me, I wouldn't hesitate to shoot

Don't believe anyone with no personal agenda or stable mind, could kill a seven year old child. Self defense is the only excuse. The child can be tought to reason, then make it's educated mind up before it can be condemned.

Robbo
11th August 2014, 19:59
Anyone with a towel on their head is a potential jihadist.

Apparently calling them "Towel Heads" is no longer politically correct as they are sheets on their heads
and not towels. So from here on in they are to be referred to as "Sheet Heads" :rolleyes:

Laava
11th August 2014, 20:01
Anyone with a towel on their head is a potential jihadist.

What about a hanky tied at the corners in little knots? Saw plenty of them cunts on Bournemouth beach in their socks and sandals.

mada
11th August 2014, 20:13
I am more talking about parents who bring up their kids to be extremists....and yes in some instances fight war with war. I am expecting some comments re the kids being the innocents....what a load of bullshit. Kids brought up like this will not make a positive contribution, better off being dead for all concerned.

So all keen to put a bullet in gang members kids too eh? :rolleyes:

How about John Banks?

mashman
11th August 2014, 20:19
Apparently calling them "Towel Heads" is no longer politically correct as they are sheets on their heads
and not towels. So from here on in they are to be referred to as "Sheet Heads" :rolleyes:

lol... welllllll I'm all for being politically correct, so I shall refer to them as men who just so happen to have sheets on their heads. Although that sounds a bit towelist.


What about a hanky tied at the corners in little knots? Saw plenty of them cunts on Bournemouth beach in their socks and sandals.

bwaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaa... It sounds like you were in Scunthorpe :though eek:

scumdog
11th August 2014, 20:46
Shame, but it'd make it easier for them, right.

Easier? to do what? deal with us and the Aussies?

Ender EnZed
11th August 2014, 20:48
see this 7 year old ... Me, I wouldn't hesitate to shoot

http://www.jointheisraeliarmy.org/?page_id=20

mashman
11th August 2014, 20:50
Easier? to do what? deal with us and the Aussies?

Well duh, yahaa.

scumdog
11th August 2014, 20:53
Well duh, yahaa.

Well lucky us eh...

mashman
11th August 2014, 20:58
Well lucky us eh...

What? You think that being Muslim would change you?

awa355
11th August 2014, 21:22
When they start winning, I'm going to become one :rolleyes:

nodrog
11th August 2014, 21:29
At least he is not out stealing or scribbling on walls.

carburator
11th August 2014, 21:31
Let's put it another way...if you were a US military sniper and your orders were to kill jihadists, assume you kill the father and then see this 7 year old holding up a severed head and his brothers there too. Would you kill them all or can these kids 'be saved' ? Me, I wouldn't hesitate to shoot

There are rules of engagement. ( ROE ) set down for combat situation's.
holding up a severed head is not one of them.

MVnut
11th August 2014, 21:44
I was in Iraq after the first war there, I guess my perspective is different to most, and quite possibly invalid

FJRider
11th August 2014, 21:51
Kids brought up like this will not make a positive contribution, better off being dead for all concerned.

For the kid's ... a likely outcome ...

HenryDorsetCase
11th August 2014, 22:05
anyone who inflicts any religion on their children is practising child abuse. That guy is just taking it to the next level. Its a difference of degree, not kind.

I despair of the whole Middle eastern situation, so I do what any sensible person does: I change channels and watch THE SIMPSONS re-runs.

HenryDorsetCase
11th August 2014, 22:06
So all keen to put a bullet in gang members kids too eh? :rolleyes:

How about John Banks?

where does the line start for that?

mashman
11th August 2014, 22:26
where does the line start for that?

I think I've got the formation right, or should I say correct in this instance. You're late, so you're 2nd on the left to the rear.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vYzhJmBZO7o/UC8XVVJFpkI/AAAAAAAABiE/1yJV7LKMicA/s1600/hail-caesar-flank-collapses.JPG

Berries
11th August 2014, 23:33
When they start winning, I'm going to become one
I think we all will.

Still, I have never French kissed a camel so have got that to look forward to.

Kickaha
12th August 2014, 06:18
I think I've got the formation right,]
No you don't
Archers should be to the rear firing over the top

Akzle
12th August 2014, 07:37
I was in Iraq after the first war there, I guess my perspective is different to most, and quite possibly invalid

define 'first'

mashman
12th August 2014, 07:51
No you don't
Archers should be to the rear firing over the top

Bollocks. I told those fuckers not to move. Fuck it... FIRE!!!!!!!!

MisterD
12th August 2014, 09:07
No you don't
Archers should be to the rear firing over the top

At the sides, firing into the enemy flanks is how the English used them against the Frogs.

HenryDorsetCase
12th August 2014, 09:30
At the sides, firing into the enemy flanks is how the English used them against the Frogs.

why do we not then use the cavalry to outflank them, cut them to ribbons and impale them from the sides, while the infantry holds firm in the centre. Hammer and anvil.

oldrider
12th August 2014, 09:37
why do we not then use the cavalry to outflank them, cut them to ribbons and impale them from the sides, while the infantry holds firm in the centre. Hammer and anvil.

Are you going to change your name to "Vlad the impaler" then? ... Sounds gruesome to me! :lol:

mashman
12th August 2014, 09:55
why do we not then use the cavalry to outflank them, cut them to ribbons and impale them from the sides, while the infantry holds firm in the centre. Hammer and anvil.

You're worried about outflanking John Banks, on his own, with an entire army?

Why not drive your entire force through the centre of the enemy ranks like an arrow head and slay the king and generals. Game over.

Akzle
12th August 2014, 12:08
.50 cal from 1km away...

mada
12th August 2014, 13:02
I was in Iraq after the first war there, I guess my perspective is different to most, and quite possibly invalid

Anyone who thinks we should nuke whole areas killing thousands of innocent people in order to take out a couple of nutters = a nutter.

Funny how psychopaths attract each other and justify their actions based on one another eh?

mada
12th August 2014, 13:09
No you don't
Archers should be to the rear firing over the top

No way. Archers should be mounted, fire their arrows then charge.

Mongols all the way.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_IerR8ijR6Tc/S9pmJsIysjI/AAAAAAAAAjQ/0I_yjyUDGqI/s1600/mongol-LH1.jpg

ellipsis
12th August 2014, 13:16
...Kick has it right according to this vid...they are behind the scenes...


<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/FbHWq8Jdhr4?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

MVnut
12th August 2014, 13:40
Anyone who thinks we should nuke whole areas killing thousands of innocent people in order to take out a couple of nutters = a nutter.

Funny how psychopaths attract each other and justify their actions based on one another eh?

It always amazes me when fuckwits take things so literally

mada
12th August 2014, 13:41
It always amazes me when fuckwits take things so literally

Ah so you're not serious about the nuke, but serious about killing seven year olds?

Shot bro.:weird:

mashman
12th August 2014, 14:23
Anyone who thinks we should nuke whole areas killing thousands of innocent people in order to take out a couple of nutters = a nutter.


Isn't that the whole idea behind benefit sanctions?

Voltaire
12th August 2014, 14:31
why do we not then use the cavalry to outflank them, cut them to ribbons and impale them from the sides, while the infantry holds firm in the centre. Hammer and anvil.

Thats pretty much Douglas Haig's plan of attack.
I recall reading the Allies kept the Cavalry " on standby" just in case for the whole war.( no links to facts though)

The Reibz
12th August 2014, 15:14
http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/1b/1b3ede39d13624ef0e23115fa558e3e936068157e280a0f6e2 57969c996dc916.jpg

mada
12th August 2014, 17:24
Isn't that the whole idea behind benefit sanctions?

Pretty much, punish those who usually the weakest and have the most need of help.

mada
12th August 2014, 17:26
The true outback of Australia:

http://cdn1.vox-cdn.com/assets/4676133/mad-max-fury-road-1.jpg

:ar15:

SMOKEU
12th August 2014, 19:10
Nuke the lot of them.

Owl
13th August 2014, 12:23
Haha:laugh:

http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/562431/20140813/foreign-ministry-cancels-passport-aussie-jihadist-who.htm#.U-qvO1aKXZY

yokel
13th August 2014, 12:28
Caught this shit on the news last night.
I can't but help to think this is just a media stunt to get all the idiots up in arms

Akzle
13th August 2014, 12:58
Nuke the lot of them.

welcome back! How was (hitler) youth camp?

carburator
13th August 2014, 18:36
I was in Iraq after the first war there, I guess my perspective is different to most, and quite possibly invalid

what when genghis khan was running around, well you have aged well then..

SMOKEU
15th August 2014, 22:29
welcome back! How was (hitler) youth camp?

I was busy in Auckland with work and had no access to a proper computer. It was good.

mossy1200
15th August 2014, 23:29
I was dressed as a gimp and had no access to a computer. It was good of mistress to teach me to behave.

Fixed that for you.:shit:

avgas
16th August 2014, 08:01
Caught this shit on the news last night.
I can't but help to think this is just a media stunt to get all the idiots up in arms
http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120930090058/familyguy/images/e/e4/Wacky_Waving_Inflatable_Arm_Flailing_Tube_Man.gif

Akzle
16th August 2014, 08:38
I was busy in Auckland

:nya::nya: .

SMOKEU
16th August 2014, 09:30
:nya::nya: .

It was an all expenses paid for trip, it was worth it. I stayed in Albany too, so hardly any niggers around.