View Full Version : Is Triumph street triple 660 worth the price?
bennz
28th May 2015, 17:08
After riding few months on my ninja 300 ( on learners still ), I decided to test ride the Triumph street triple 660 to just see what is my capabilities in handling more powerful bike.
Wish I didn't :(
I absolutely loved the triple 660 beyond belief, I was surprised how much better I managed to ride, manoeuvre, be comfortable and actually enjoy the riding more than the ninja 300.
The handling is superb, power is outstanding, comfort if perfect (for me) and I almost went mad to trade in my ninja for the bike. But the difference the dealer wanted was very dear.
Now I'm tempted to sell my ninja and get the triple 660 to simply enjoy riding.
But I am worried $14000 for a LAMS triple 660 is very high. Technically I can afford to pay for it , but thinking that the bike will be always restricted ( can not be derestricted at any stage due to specific ECU coding ).
Is the bike worth that much or will retain the value even as a LAMS triple ?
I have Yamaha MT-07 in mind as well , I haven't ridden it yet, but lack of ABS worries me ( as a newbie) when dealing with that much power.
Albeit Yamaha is almost $3000 cheaper , and produces same power and torque almost.
What should I do???
I would really appreciated your help and advice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mike.Gayner
28th May 2015, 17:31
You'd be out of your mind spending $14k on a learner bike. Get your full, buy the full fat version.
50Shades
28th May 2015, 17:32
Have you read the Bike Trader shootout on all the 600cc LAMS models?, this may help you
mossy1200
28th May 2015, 17:40
Have you read the Bike Trader shootout on all the 600cc LAMS models?, this may help you
You cant make statements like this without a link.
mossy1200
28th May 2015, 17:57
Wont matter which one you buy if its looked after then your loss when you change it will be about the same.
kiwi-on-wheels
28th May 2015, 19:30
stick with the 300. won't take as much of a hit when it comes to trading up to a full fat bike, and you already have it. i was thinking about buying one of the 650 learner bikes, but decided f**k it, i have a perfectly fine bike to learn on, it does the job, and means you have to learn how to corner well as you can't just flick the wrist to hide a mistake.
mossy1200
28th May 2015, 19:34
You can't just flick the wrist to hide a mistake.
Bet a lot of guys wished they had flicked their wrist rather than make a mistake.:baby:
boman
28th May 2015, 20:56
After riding few months on my ninja 300 ( on learners still ), I decided to test ride the Triumph street triple 660 to just see what is my capabilities in handling more powerful bike.
Wish I didn't :(
I absolutely loved the triple 660 beyond belief, I was surprised how much better I managed to ride, manoeuvre, be comfortable and actually enjoy the riding more than the ninja 300.
The handling is superb, power is outstanding, comfort if perfect (for me) and I almost went mad to trade in my ninja for the bike. But the difference the dealer wanted was very dear.
Now I'm tempted to sell my ninja and get the triple 660 to simply enjoy riding.
But I am worried $14000 for a LAMS triple 660 is very high. Technically I can afford to pay for it , but thinking that the bike will be always restricted ( can not be derestricted at any stage due to specific ECU coding ).
Is the bike worth that much or will retain the value even as a LAMS triple ?
I have Yamaha MT-07 in mind as well , I haven't ridden it yet, but lack of ABS worries me ( as a newbie) when dealing with that much power.
Albeit Yamaha is almost $3000 cheaper , and produces same power and torque almost.
What should I do???
I would really appreciated your help and advice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Save your money and stick with the 300. When you get your full buy the 675 Triple.
Its that much better again.
You will not wipe the grin from your face when you ride it.
HenryDorsetCase
28th May 2015, 21:31
You'd be out of your mind spending $14k on a learner bike. Get your full, buy the full fat version.
I know two people who have them and really like them. Sure, you get the depreciation hit of any new vehicle, but both the people I know are people who have sat on their learners for ages then got "Caught out" and have to now sit for ages on restricted or whatever it is now.
Both wanted a "proper motorbike" and one that they didnt loathe after quarter of an hour, or feel obliged to sell as soon as they got their full licence.
OP might be in that category.
Clearly there is a market for them because they have sold a ton of them. And it isnt even the most expensive LAMS bike. there is a Ducati that is like $18k.
bennz
28th May 2015, 21:50
I see myself in the same category, just thinking to move on to a bike which I can still enjoy with my learners but potentially keep it for few years.
That would mean a bike I enjoy and feel more confident and has an actual good performance. Just paying $14 is something I am struggling with. I probably ride mt07 to just see and be sure.
Are there any other bikes which fit LAMS groups and similar to triple 660 but older ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AllanB
28th May 2015, 21:51
You'd be out of your mind spending $14k on a learner bike. Get your full, buy the full fat version.
What he said. $14k............
mossy1200
28th May 2015, 22:54
I see myself in the same category, just thinking to move on to a bike which I can still enjoy with my learners but potentially keep it for few years.
That would mean a bike I enjoy and feel more confident and has an actual good performance. Just paying $14 is something I am struggling with. I probably ride mt07 to just see and be sure.
Are there any other bikes which fit LAMS groups and similar to triple 660 but older ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That triple is very nice though. Idd buy that. Buy the mt07 and it will devalue 3k approx. Buy the trumpet and 4k. Differnce is 1k. Idd pay 1k more to own the trumpet over the couple of years. 10dollars a week extra rental. Worth it. Get it. Do it. You know you will wish you did if you don't.:cry:
Any brand new vehicle is going to lose you a ton of money.
Resale on a LAMs bikes is better than non LAMs though.
caspernz
29th May 2015, 11:46
We've all been in the L plate bike situation before...but if you've got the money to step up to a better L plate bike, what's stopping you?
bennz
29th May 2015, 12:05
I'm just wanting to know others opinion if the bike is worth that much or better to consider MT-07. Not enjoying the ninja as much due it characteristics for me, it has been good to learn on but wanting something bigger and possible in street naked range
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mossy1200
29th May 2015, 12:36
I'm just wanting to know others opinion if the bike is worth that much or better to consider MT-07. Not enjoying the ninja as much due it characteristics for me, it has been good to learn on but wanting something bigger and possible in street naked range
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You need to make the final decision. If you buy your second choice bike then decide to upgrade again then you will loose money twice.
If you ride the Yamaha and love it the same or more buy it.
If you ride the Yamaha and don't you will wish you bought the triumph.
If your not sure what to do keep the bike you have.
caspernz
29th May 2015, 12:42
I'm just wanting to know others opinion if the bike is worth that much or better to consider MT-07. Not enjoying the ninja as much due it characteristics for me, it has been good to learn on but wanting something bigger and possible in street naked range
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Buying a bike is largely an emotional decision, so buy whichever bike gives you the biggest thrill. And no that's not sexual innuendo...:sweatdrop
Latte
29th May 2015, 14:06
Blag a ride on a full power street triple, or something considered "full size", then test ride the 660. If you still think you'll keep it for a while (few years) get the 660 now. if you know you'll be pining for a bigger bike as soon as you get your full then tough it out.
Mike.Gayner
29th May 2015, 14:19
Personally for the money I reckon the mt07 is way better value. Though I don't know what the neutered nz version is like.
bennz
29th May 2015, 18:03
I did a test ride on a MT-07 today and without a doubt Triple 660 is a superior bike to that. Both were done under 100kms , and I can only say triple 660 is outstanding! It is my opinion only.
Now just need to do the math and finances
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ender EnZed
29th May 2015, 18:27
Buy the full power 675 and don't crash it or get pulled over.
Mike.Gayner
29th May 2015, 19:19
I can only say triple 660 is outstanding! It is my opinion only.
And as a leaner your opinion means dick.
Either stick with your learner bike or buy a proper bike and don't get caught. The $14k compromise option is about the stupidest move you could make.
bogan
29th May 2015, 19:31
And as a leaner your opinion means dick.
Either stick with your learner bike or buy a proper bike and don't get caught. The $14k compromise option is about the stupidest move you could make.
bennz, meet mike, he is our resident customer service adviser :laugh:
Yours is the only opinoin that matters, make sure you test drive a good range mind you. I personally have a 650 naked (I think it is now on the lams list actually) and 750 faired; no problem using either around town or on the open road... I prefer the 750 for its riding position and less windage when touring though. What I'm saying is a 660 is more than capable of being all the bike you need, is the 14k price tag worth it? depends what else you find for less.
bennz
29th May 2015, 19:54
What a lovely guy is Mike :D
Did it hurt you by saying how I felt about MT-07 ?
Thanks Bogan for your input. How have you found the build quality of your bikes ? Is the service and repair costs quite hefty or manageable ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bogan
29th May 2015, 20:02
Thanks Bogan for your input. How have you found the build quality of your bikes ? Is the service and repair costs quite hefty or manageable ?
Not really the one to talk to about that stuff, as I do my own service/repairs/ mods, and the bikes are 25 years old.
mossy1200
29th May 2015, 20:10
Assuming the 660 is at motorad I might go have a ride. Im curious now. Might be raining tomorrow though. Not curious to get wet on a bike im not buying. From what I read about the triple with the torque moved down low in the rev range you cant tell its got less power at normal riding speeds. Different story at speeds well above the speed limit though. That's not always a bad thing. I bought a T100 triumph after owning a zx12 and it was fun to ride because you needed to shift more often rather than depend on massive power.
Blackbird
29th May 2015, 20:13
I came from an 1100 Blackbird to a 675 Street Triple. Under normal road conditions, the performance difference isn't as much as you might think. I'll have owned it for 6 years in October and all I've had to do is have the mirror stalks replaced under warranty (rusting), rectifier changed as part of a world wide recall and that's about it. I'll be replacing it at the end of the year with another one, either the R or RX sport version.
As others have said, I'd save your pennies, get your full licence as quick as you can and get a 675. If you thought the 660 was good, the 675 is so much better.
bennz
29th May 2015, 20:17
Thanks blackbird for your input as well . Appreciate the advice too :) I'm not in the immediate rush to pay that much money.
But evaluating my options against what would be valuable and fun for now until I have my full, made me consider triple 660.
And you are right about 675, it is more powerful bike at only $2500 more than 660.
I was hoping to hear from one or more owners of 660 about their opinion as well in terms of what made them to choose to buy the bike.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Blackbird
29th May 2015, 20:34
No worries. If you want to see an in-depth review of the Triple, this is my evaluation. http://geoffjames.blogspot.co.nz/2010/08/triumph-street-triple-review-revisited.html . It's now covered 65,00 km and have replaced the OEM shock with an upmarket one, but it's still running like a dream.
bennz
29th May 2015, 21:21
Very awesome and detailed review blackbird ! Thanks for sharing :)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
James Deuce
29th May 2015, 21:28
Cynical marketing by a cynical company whose pricing policy simply doesn't gel with what other markets pay for the same product. The Street Triple is one of the best bikes ever. The Street Cripple is just an attempt to get you to buy two $15k bikes in two years. Or most likely a Street Cripple followed by a Speed Triple, so a $15k bike then a $26k bike.
Cynical in the extreme.
mossy1200
29th May 2015, 21:36
Cynical marketing by a cynical company whose pricing policy simply doesn't gel with what other markets pay for the same product. The Street Triple is one of the best bikes ever. The Street Cripple is just an attempt to get you to buy two $15k bikes in two years. Or most likely a Street Cripple followed by a Speed Triple, so a $15k bike then a $26k bike.
Cynical in the extreme.
Yes but in 2 years time you will likely get 70% trade in price return for the lams bike as they hold value better than most new bikes.
Lets say you get 9k trade in in 24 months then bike has cost 2.5k per year to own. Now ask yourself if renting the bike for $50 per week is worth while or would you rather rent the Yamaha for about $40 per week if that's worth 7k trade in after 2 years.
Anyone planning on buying a new bike and getting no return after 2 years can pm me the collection details.
The question is how much your prepared to lose per week to ride the bike you want.
My last bike cost me $100 per week in capital loss.
James Deuce
29th May 2015, 21:42
Yes but in 2 years time you will likely get 70% trade in price return for the lams bike as they hold value better than most new bikes.
Lets say you get 9k trade in in 24 months then bike has cost 2.5k per year to own. Now ask yourself if renting the bike for $50 per week is worth while or would you rather rent the Yamaha for about $40 per week if that's worth 7k trade in after 2 years.
Anyone planning on buying a new bike and getting no return after 2 years can pm me the collection details.
The question is how much your prepared to lose per week to ride the bike you want.
My last bike cost me $100 per week in capital loss.
Blah blah brand loyalty bullshit, over priced old designs sold at a 25% premium unique to the NZ market. Followed by marketing more cynical than the bloated HP figures quoted for two stroke 250cc race reps 30 years ago.
Both Yamaha and Triumph have earned my eternal enmity over the Street Cripple and MT-07. They take the piss and everybody fawns at their feet.
Buy something second hand, don't buy new, don't read the marketing bullshit or bike tests. Ride something and if you really like it buy it. But avoid Triumph and Yamaha at all costs.
mossy1200
29th May 2015, 21:59
Blah blah brand loyalty bullshit, over priced old designs sold at a 25% premium unique to the NZ market. Followed by marketing more cynical than the bloated HP figures quoted for two stroke 250cc race reps 30 years ago.
Both Yamaha and Triumph have earned my eternal enmity over the Street Cripple and MT-07. They take the piss and everybody fawns at their feet.
Buy something second hand, don't buy new, don't read the marketing bullshit or bike tests. Ride something and if you really like it buy it. But avoid Triumph and Yamaha at all costs.
So forget the 2 bike OP likes and buy a near new cb500fa, er650n, monster 660, Hyosung gt650 comet or cf650nk or continue to ride the bike he would rather upgrade?
Blackbird
29th May 2015, 22:31
Buy something second hand, don't buy new, don't read the marketing bullshit or bike tests. Ride something and if you really like it buy it. But avoid Triumph and Yamaha at all costs.
Oh dear Jim, maybe a few people aren't as politicised and easily upset as you! There are bugger-all organisations in the world who don't cynically market their goods and services. As you know, I've had a fantastic run with the Triple and the launch of the 660 isn't going to put me off getting another 675 :bleh: Then again, I might just be a shallow old fart just trying to have fun before the Grim Reaper shows up :laugh:
Mike.Gayner
29th May 2015, 22:35
Yes but in 2 years time you will likely get 70% trade in price return for the lams bike as they hold value better than most new bikes.
Lets say you get 9k trade in in 24 months then bike has cost 2.5k per year to own.
That's a nice crystal ball you've got there. Knowing what these will be worth in a few years from now with absolutely no data to back it up is impressive. Wait, is that the right word? No - STUPID, that's the word I'm looking for.
mossy1200
29th May 2015, 23:23
No - STUPID, that's the word I'm looking for.
Nail on head. If you cant understand the meaning of LIKELY in the context of the sentence that's not my problem.
In my opinion a 30% reduction in value for a well looked after LAMS approved bike would be close. We can wait 2 years and see though as I cant find any 2 years old 660 triumph triples to get the pricing trend exact.
Smifffy
29th May 2015, 23:26
Nail on head. If you cant understand the meaning of LIKELY in the context of the sentence that's not my problem.
In my opinion a 30% reduction in value for a well looked after LAMS approved bike would be close. We can wait 2 years and see though as I cant find any 2 years old 660 triumph triples to get the pricing trend exact.
Bound to be some smart arse revisit this thread in two years time with the benefit of hindsight claiming to have known it all, all along...
awayatc
30th May 2015, 07:43
That's a nice crystal ball you've got there. Knowing what these will be worth in a few years from now with absolutely no data to back it up is impressive. Wait, is that the right word? No - STUPID, that's the word I'm looking for.
It takes intelligence to come up with a prediction likely to be reasonably accurate...
To call that stupid is .......
well........
rather stupid....
HenryDorsetCase
30th May 2015, 08:31
Cynical marketing by a cynical company whose pricing policy simply doesn't gel with what other markets pay for the same product. The Street Triple is one of the best bikes ever. The Street Cripple is just an attempt to get you to buy two $15k bikes in two years. Or most likely a Street Cripple followed by a Speed Triple, so a $15k bike then a $26k bike.
Cynical in the extreme.
Jesus dude, take a pill.
The LAMS version of any bike are a response to a legislative system that affects market conditions. All companies are cynical.
HenryDorsetCase
30th May 2015, 08:33
Oh dear Jim, maybe a few people aren't as politicised and easily upset as you! There are bugger-all organisations in the world who don't cynically market their goods and services. As you know, I've had a fantastic run with the Triple and the launch of the 660 isn't going to put me off getting another 675 :bleh: Then again, I might just be a shallow old fart just trying to have fun before the Grim Reaper shows up :laugh:
We are all doing that........
TheDemonLord
1st June 2015, 12:14
That's a nice crystal ball you've got there. Knowing what these will be worth in a few years from now with absolutely no data to back it up is impressive. Wait, is that the right word? No - STUPID, that's the word I'm looking for.
I got 70% trade in value on my large capacity LAMS bike....
Jus Sayin....
Crasherfromwayback
1st June 2015, 13:06
And as a leaner your opinion means dick.
.
And by a lot of other peoples standards you're still a learner and/or a novice too. Doesn't stop you having an opinion.
jonnyk5614
2nd June 2015, 12:45
Save your money and take your restricted test.
A year on your restricted isn't long to wait in the grand scheme of things, not when you will likely own the Triumph for 5+ years.
Banditbandit
2nd June 2015, 15:00
We've all been in the L plate bike situation before...but if you've got the money to step up to a better L plate bike, what's stopping you?
many of us are old enough to have got licences before that system came in ... 6 month provisional (with no restriction on bike size) then full licence ....
Bennz - keep the Ninja till you have a full licence .. then the field is open to you ..
mossy1200
2nd June 2015, 18:07
I went and had a sit on it today.
I would buy it if I was going to be on a LAMS restriction. Top bike.
Are they offering you the demo at a reduced price or are you looking new.
Red wouldn't be my colour choice but that's a personal thing.
bennz
2nd June 2015, 18:41
Mossy you should have ridden it.
They weren't that flexible with the demo , and the trade in wasn't best offer.
I will get the black . White is not my color , and red was not as nice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mossy1200
2nd June 2015, 19:16
Mossy you should have ridden it.
They weren't that flexible with the demo , and the trade in wasn't best offer.
I will get the black . White is not my color , and red was not as nice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Was rush hour traffic when I got there and raining after work today.
With a claimed 65hp I would expect with good torque it will be a good ride.
What people forget is 20 years ago manufacturers talked up max hp. Now manufacturer makes a LAMS bike they wont talk up they will talk down the hp to make it legal. Also when you cap hp you can set the bike up to have the hp for a bigger percentage of the rev range rather than a top end peak value.
Some that ride 100hp bike but ride it in the first 2/3 of its max rpm are riding it at 65 odd hp mark.
End of the day you need decide if you want to spend the money and accept that a percentage of that money wont return when you upgrade. How much loss you can accept will dictate what you do.
My last bike loss was 28k less 17k trade plus 4k extras. Loss 15k in 30 months and travelled 6 thou km. 50cents per km:weep:
Bought mine at top dollar before prices on my bike dropped.
What I don't manage to spend on bikes my wife will spend on other stuff.
casualsonic
3rd June 2015, 05:32
Like bogan said bro, the only opinion that matters is yours!
I purchased the MT-07. Went in to test ride the MT-03 and was originally only wanting to spend $7-8k.
The dealer put me on the MT-07 and I loved it. So, bought it!
The reasons I purchased the MT-07 are here:
-LAMS Approved (I am on restricted and I hadn't owned a bike for 4 years, wanted to get my full)
-I wanted a bike which had enough power to last into a few years of Full Licence riding
-Styling
-Price of New compared to 2nd hand Er6N's, MT-03, XJ6N's and GSR600's (only a few thousand more)
-Price compared to other new bikes of similar class (very competitive @ $10990)
-Rideablity
-good commuter bike as well as longer distance rides for weekends
-and the reviews the bike was getting
I really like my bike, others may scoff at it but it fits a purpose for me at my stage. I purchased mine the same month they were released in NZ and plan on hanging onto it for the next few years at least and may look at going to the MT-09 or a cruiser in years to come.
Do what suits you bro and enjoy it if you take the plunge :D
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ender EnZed
3rd June 2015, 14:46
With a claimed 65hp I would expect with good torque it will be a good ride.
54hp. (http://www.motorad.co.nz/motorcycles/2014-triumph-street-triple-660-lams)
A LAMS bike would need to weigh 234kg to fit under 150kW/T with 65hp.
lol, hurry up and trade that sewing machine in and get that 660 just to piss Mike off :p
bogan
3rd June 2015, 16:59
lol, hurry up and trade that sewing machine in and get that 660 just to piss Mike off :p
I think it is his default state init?
http://replygif.net/i/100.gif
mossy1200
3rd June 2015, 17:26
54hp. (http://www.motorad.co.nz/motorcycles/2014-triumph-street-triple-660-lams)
A LAMS bike would need to weigh 234kg to fit under 150kW/T with 65hp.
Yeah sorry typo was ment to be 55hp. They listing them at 61 crank I think at the bike shop.
Ender EnZed
3rd June 2015, 17:54
Yeah sorry typo was ment to be 55hp. They listing them at 61 crank I think at the bike shop.
Still enough to have a good bit of fun with.
I can't seem to find a dyno curve of a ST3 660 but I agree that you can go pretty quick working within the first 2/3 of the rpm of a ~100hp bike.
mossy1200
3rd June 2015, 18:13
Best OP gets a IT490
specs are only 35HP :confused:
Smifffy
4th June 2015, 18:53
To the OP:
Do you wear Jocks, boxers or commando? How many people on the internet did you ask before you settled on a preference?
bennz
4th June 2015, 20:01
Smiffy I am all in for naked since my liking of Striple :)
Haven't settled on anything yet. Still deciding but most likely either going for triple 660
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mossy1200
4th June 2015, 20:07
Smiffy I am all in for naked since my liking of Striple :)
Haven't settled on anything yet. Still deciding but most likely either going for triple 660
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You better watch out the red demo is the only one they have left at the moment. The white one sold and is waiting to be collected.
Smifffy
4th June 2015, 20:08
Smiffy I am all in for naked since my liking of Striple :)
Haven't settled on anything yet. Still deciding but most likely either going for triple 660
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When I went through my learners, it was on a road legal 125 4 farm bike, and was restricted to 50 km/h everywhere, including the open road, for 6 months. A street triple 660? Luxury. Probably superior to the bikes we had to ride when finally got the full.
bennz
4th June 2015, 20:12
Mossy, they can get more easily , it's their sale technique haha.
I personally only like the black and at that price I would get new one ( they weren't offering any specials on the red one )
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mossy1200
4th June 2015, 20:17
Mossy, they can get more easily , it's their sale technique haha.
You would need confirm that with them. There is no point them using a sales technique on me as I just bought a new bike from them 2 weeks ago and they know I don't want another unless its a motard cheap enough to pay for without my wife noticing that I can hide in the back of my garage.:innocent:
They arnt sure if they can get more for a while now as NZ stock sold faster than expected.
bennz
4th June 2015, 20:28
I did talk to them yesterday about a black one and was told it can be arranged as soon as they see the $$$
Maybe a new shipment ?
Although I still haven't made my final decision to either keep the 300, get the 660 ... Or 675 but be under radar, although insurance won't work so technically have two options hah
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mossy1200
4th June 2015, 20:43
I did talk to them yesterday about a black one and was told it can be arranged as soon as they see the $$$
Maybe a new shipment ?
Any thing is possible. 2 years ago they got me a pure black zx14r with ABS from Australian stock because only flame versions had ABS in NZ stock but I had to wait a few weeks.
The problem is when you look at dealer listings especially on tardme they keep them up after the bike has sold so if they get another they don't need pay to list again or the old listing can sell another that they can order in if available.
If enough have been sold im sure more have been ordered its just a matter of when they will arrive.
Or. Go to Cook Islands and get a full licence then come back and get full NZ licence. Then buy 675 trumpet.
Assumption is the Raro loop hole still exists.
bennz
6th June 2015, 17:53
Well the ninja is gone . Thought about it and wasn't the right bike for me.
Had some cheeky thoughts of ditch lams only bikes and get something proper with less money for triple 660. But not sure the consequence of that , specially with the insurance.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
manxkiwi
6th June 2015, 20:19
But I am worried $14000 for a LAMS triple 660 is very high. Technically I can afford to pay for it , but thinking that the bike will be always restricted ( can not be derestricted at any stage due to specific ECU coding ).
Is the bike worth that much or will retain the value even as a LAMS triple ?
I have Yamaha MT-07 in mind as well , I haven't ridden it yet, but lack of ABS worries me ( as a newbie) when dealing with that much power.
Albeit Yamaha is almost $3000 cheaper , and produces same power and torque almost.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You probably know by now, that it's not just the ECU that restricts the 660. The crank has a shorter stroke. So it would be basically impossible to make into a 'normal' 675. The NZ MT07 (the only version they are importing) has a smaller bore, so is in the same camp of, never being able to be de-restricted.
By the sound of the thread, I'm sure that's not a major in your decision.
I haven't ridden the 660, but it sounds awesome in tests. Most riders don't ride in the top 2k of the rev range all the time, so I think it sounds quite good. But....as said before, if you get your full, you can go for whatever you want.
Hope you enjoy what you end up with anyway..
bennz
14th June 2015, 19:20
Got the 660 and I must say its an amazing machine , got the first 2016 colour scheme ( black and matte grey ) with red circle wheels. Breaking it in happily :)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SVboy
14th June 2015, 19:39
Well done!!
mossy1200
14th June 2015, 20:49
Sounds good. Were you at the shop with your old man on Friday about 4.30?
Just looked like the kind of guy that would own a triple trumpet standing outside the shop front.
bennz
14th June 2015, 23:48
Thanks SCboy :) and no mossy that wasn't me. I was there earlier briefly to do the paper work and picked it up yesterday morning .
And was so lucky to have such a great weekend to enjoy the bike. I'm surprised at how much more confident I feel with this bike even it has more power than ninja. Feels like the right one
A photo of the bike going through pre-delivery checks
312785312786
_3lmo_
21st December 2017, 22:29
Don't buy the MT07!
You'll wish ya mother had slapped you in the face with a wet fish if you do. ;)
After riding few months on my ninja 300 ( on learners still ), I decided to test ride the Triumph street triple 660 to just see what is my capabilities in handling more powerful bike.
Wish I didn't :(
I absolutely loved the triple 660 beyond belief, I was surprised how much better I managed to ride, manoeuvre, be comfortable and actually enjoy the riding more than the ninja 300.
The handling is superb, power is outstanding, comfort if perfect (for me) and I almost went mad to trade in my ninja for the bike. But the difference the dealer wanted was very dear.
Now I'm tempted to sell my ninja and get the triple 660 to simply enjoy riding.
But I am worried $14000 for a LAMS triple 660 is very high. Technically I can afford to pay for it , but thinking that the bike will be always restricted ( can not be derestricted at any stage due to specific ECU coding ).
Is the bike worth that much or will retain the value even as a LAMS triple ?
I have Yamaha MT-07 in mind as well , I haven't ridden it yet, but lack of ABS worries me ( as a newbie) when dealing with that much power.
Albeit Yamaha is almost $3000 cheaper , and produces same power and torque almost.
What should I do???
I would really appreciated your help and advice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pritch
22nd December 2017, 20:51
That's a serious dredge.
The MT-07 was bike of the year in some of the overseas press, admittedly not the LAMS version but even that has its fans. Of course if your opinion is based on many thousands of kilometres of personal experience I will defer to your superior knowledge.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.