View Full Version : Brave
ellipsis
1st February 2016, 18:56
...I asked my wife if I could go but she said no...
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/76465470/neomasculinist-group-plan-international-meetup
nzspokes
1st February 2016, 18:57
Yeah just read that. It will end well.
Virago
1st February 2016, 19:02
Betcha Yokel will be in there boots 'n all.
mashman
1st February 2016, 19:31
...I asked my wife if I could go but she said no...
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/76465470/neomasculinist-group-plan-international-meetup
When I asked if I could go the missus said, you tell me. Just livin the dream.
Woodman
1st February 2016, 19:41
LOL at keyboard warriors fronting up in person:lol::lol::killingme:killingme
Akzle
1st February 2016, 20:28
menarebetterthanwomen.com
TheDemonLord
1st February 2016, 21:04
RoTK doing something - should be interesting....
Moi
1st February 2016, 21:06
Paging Ms Greer, Ms Germaine Greer... can you please call at the pet shop.
AllanB
1st February 2016, 21:10
Closed the page after the first couple of sentences ................
It's a sad world we live in.
Oakie
1st February 2016, 21:43
Closed the page after the first couple of sentences ................
It's a sad world we live in.
Nah. There's just some sad people who live in our world.
I don't actually mind if they all get together as planned. Makes them an easier target for God, a drone strike, a massacre by militant lesbians. Don't really care which.
TheDemonLord
1st February 2016, 21:49
So I decided to read a little (being familiar with RoTK) about some of the claims in the article - what is interesting is how out of context things are being taken.
http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape
This is the article that talks about legalizing rape on private property - the article is clearly hyperbole.
For the record, I said I was familiar with RoTK, and that my position is that I think although Roosh has some valid critiques in certain areas, in others he fails to equate biological differences with legal differences and treatment under the law.
ellipsis
1st February 2016, 21:52
...i could guarantee it would be a boring piss up, after the meeting of the grated minds...
yokel
2nd February 2016, 06:00
Betcha Yokel will be in there boots 'n all.
If you're a woman, transgender man or homosexual man then are not invited.
It's funny how a group that wants to put bitches in their place is called "anti-women"?
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/y6hx1nXe41A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
bogan
2nd February 2016, 06:25
If you're a woman, transgender man or homosexual man then are not invited.
What a bummer, eh! :eek:
Virago
2nd February 2016, 07:47
If you're a woman, transgender man or homosexual man then are not invited.
Bugger. Don't let that put you off mate - get in there.
It's funny how a group that wants to put bitches in their place is called "anti-women"?
Yeah, funny that...:crazy:
yokel
2nd February 2016, 09:27
Bugger. Don't let that put you off mate - get in there.
If the wife wasn't pregs I prolly would.
jonbuoy
2nd February 2016, 10:19
Maybe if he wasn't such a douche he might be able to find a woman to have consensual sex with. Only someone insecure or unable to get laid would go along with any of his bullshit.
willytheekid
2nd February 2016, 10:52
...If you're a woman, transgender man or homosexual man then are not invited.
https://cdn-payscale.com/cms-images/default-source/Blogs/287021.png?sfvrsn=0
...so...just to confirm...us honda riders aint invited?:blink: (...but...Wot If promise to bring sandwiches?)
ps...I say we send Drew an his lads to there Dunners Gig...get him drunk first, push his bike over, and tell him these pricks did it (Then just lock the door and wait for the screaming to end) :killingme
5150
2nd February 2016, 13:08
...so...just to confirm...us honda riders aint invited?:blink: (...but...Wot If promise to bring sandwiches?)
You are invited but only if you ride a Goldwing....
willytheekid
2nd February 2016, 13:23
You are invited but only if you ride a Goldwing on the back wheel @ 90+ right THROUGH these arseholes meeting
:eek:Yup!...I can do that my friend:yes:
http://arvidl.tripod.com/under.jpg
...and with a smile:D
("gigitty"...I get to go out in public again:wings:)
ps...can I borrow someones goldwing??...please, is for a good cause! :D
awa355
2nd February 2016, 13:47
"A woman's value significantly depends on her fertility and beauty. A man's value significantly depends on his resources, intellect, and character."
Sorta rules most of us out then:gob:
Moi
2nd February 2016, 13:55
...so... just to confirm... us Honda riders ain't invited? (... but... Wot I if promise to bring fairy cakes?)
Fixed it for you... :lol:
bogan
2nd February 2016, 17:04
ps...I say we send Drew an his lads to there Dunners Gig...get him drunk first, push his bike over, and tell him these pricks did it (Then just lock the door and wait for the screaming to end) :killingme
Better idea, send a bloke to go around collecting these muppets with the super secret passphrase (pet shops indeed); then just take them to a gay bar...
yokel
2nd February 2016, 18:55
Looks like some faggot white knights are going to protest these sexy Misogynists.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/76471698/new-zealand-men-to-protest-neomasculinist-group-meetings
How to embrace your inner mangina https://youtu.be/ZLRu6PJtRv4
Woodman
2nd February 2016, 19:42
Bash a neomasculanist day.....They won't fight back.
scumdog
2nd February 2016, 20:00
Closed the page after the first couple of sentences ................
It's a sad world we live in.
The shame is that the dumb media gave the mysoginistic retarded shit-for-brains the space in their cheap tawdry report.:angry:
ellipsis
2nd February 2016, 20:07
Bash a neomasculanist day.....They won't fight back.
...amd you could drag them back onto your patch and fuck some sense into them, legally, whether consensual or not...just sayin'...
TheDemonLord
2nd February 2016, 20:14
The shame is that the dumb media gave the mysoginistic retarded shit-for-brains the space in their cheap tawdry report.:angry:
And why did the Media give them the time of day in the first place?
yokel
2nd February 2016, 20:48
And why did the Media give them the time of day in the first place?
The answer to that question is how ROK is portraid by the "Media".
eg "pro rapist" or "anti-women"
Woodman
2nd February 2016, 20:53
The answer to that question is how ROK is portraid by the "Media".
eg "pro rapist" or "anti-women"
Tell us how you portray him then.
No youtubes.
TheDemonLord
2nd February 2016, 20:54
The answer to that question is how ROK is portraid by the "Media".
eg "pro rapist" or "anti-women"
Fuck me, you are even wrong about shit you claim to support.
Banditbandit
3rd February 2016, 15:05
If the wife wasn't pregs I prolly would.
Wait wait wait .. you have a wife? How much did she cost you ???
Looks like some faggot white knights are going to protest these sexy Misogynists.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/76471698/new-zealand-men-to-protest-neomasculinist-group-meetings
How to embrace your inner mangina https://youtu.be/ZLRu6PJtRv4
Hmmm .. some of us might go down there and beat the crap out of the shithead ...
yokel
4th February 2016, 20:41
Wait wait wait .. you have a wife? How much did she cost you ???
Hmmm .. some of us might go down there and beat the crap out of the shithead ...
Cost me a pretty penny.
Well looks like you faggot white knight feminists have scared them off? http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/76578614/neomasculinist-group-return-of-kings-cancels-worldwide-meetups
You feminists are just a bunch of stupid bigoted cunts, and this Roosh guy is making you look like mob of ignorant fools.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zAYJvSB9jso" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Woodman
4th February 2016, 20:56
AAwww, the weal men to afwaid to fwont up. The poor wee fings...
Fucken nancy boys.
bogan
5th February 2016, 06:23
AAwww, the weal men to afwaid to fwont up. The poor wee fings...
Fucken nancy boys.
Free speech trumps Hate Speech yet again. Excellent to see the arc of the moral universe further bending towards justice.
Banditbandit
5th February 2016, 09:24
Cost me a pretty penny.
Well looks like you faggot white knight feminists have scared them off? http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/76578614/neomasculinist-group-return-of-kings-cancels-worldwide-meetups
You feminists are just a bunch of stupid bigoted cunts, and this Roosh guy is making you look like mob of ignorant fools.
Oh dear .. the poor wee boy - couldn't face us faggot white knight feminists?
So much for neo-masculinity - he's even more wimpy than the current crop ...
yokel
5th February 2016, 14:03
Oh dear .. the poor wee boy - couldn't face us faggot white knight feminists?
So much for neo-masculinity - he's even more wimpy than the current crop ...
If he's so "wimpy"? why then are governments blocking him from even entering their counties?
yet are mad keen on letting in rapugees.
The reason the current crop of pussy worshipping males are fucking lame (you know the cunts letting in the rapugees) is because they think they're "equal" to the females.
Do you think you're equal to a woman?
My last misses had some dumb arse sociology degree, what an eye opening experience that was.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yjw60170V5A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Drew
5th February 2016, 14:34
[
ps...I say we send Drew an his lads to there Dunners Gig...get him drunk first, push his bike over, and tell him these pricks did it (Then just lock the door and wait for the screaming to end) :killingme
I live in Wellington, I'm from Dunedin. Sadly, if these fuckwits do converge in Dunedin then I'll probably have known more than a couple from way back when.
Plus, I'm a pussy. I'd just post how fucked off I am on here.
Banditbandit
5th February 2016, 14:53
If he's so "wimpy"? why then are governments blocking him from even entering their counties?
yet are mad keen on letting in rapugees.
The reason the current crop of pussy worshipping males are fucking lame (you know the cunts letting in the rapugees) is because they think they're "equal" to the females.
Do you think you're equal to a woman?
My last misses had some dumb arse sociology degree, what an eye opening experience that was.
You are so dumb .. you can't even see the contradictions in your own bullshit ...
One minute your supporting a dick who thinks rape should be legal (on private property) .. and then in the next sentence you use "rapugee" as if rape was an insult ... and something not to be allowed ...
I never thought I'd s a character who made Homer Simpson look like Albert Eienstein ...
Do you even understand what "misogyny" means?
(And anyone with any brains will tell you that sociology graduates are crap in bed ...)
yokel
5th February 2016, 15:16
You are so dumb .. you can't even see the contradictions in your own bullshit ...
One minute your supporting a dick who thinks rape should be legal (on private property) .. and then in the next sentence you use "rapugee" as if rape was an insult ... and something not to be allowed ...
I never thought I'd s a character who made Homer Simpson look like Albert Eienstein ...
Do you even understand what "misogyny" means?
(And anyone with any brains will tell you that sociology graduates are crap in bed ...)
You're the moron that actually thinks he wants rape to be legal.
Like all feminists you're just proving your self to be an ignorant cunt.
My interest is in the hysteria about this Roosh guy, not the man himself so much.
She might have been crap in bed, but at least she didn't fucking wet the bed ha!
The only thing that's oppressing the women is reality, it's why feminist are allergic to facts.
I'll ask again, you think you're equal to a woman?
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Pjl34gZzDJU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
yokel
5th February 2016, 15:37
The actual article it self, titled "how to stop rape"
http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape
Tazz
5th February 2016, 15:45
(And anyone with any brains will tell you that sociology graduates are crap in bed ...)
My testicles, which sometimes tag in and take over for my brain, would like to disagree with that comment :bleh:
Not only are they terrible at life and career decisions, but in my experience history grads are the worst shags.
Woodman
5th February 2016, 17:42
If he's so "wimpy"? why then are governments blocking him from even entering their counties?
yet are mad keen on letting in rapugees.
The reason the current crop of pussy worshipping males are fucking lame (you know the cunts letting in the rapugees) is because they think they're "equal" to the females.
Do you think you're equal to a woman?
My last misses had some dumb arse sociology degree, what an eye opening experience that was.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yjw60170V5A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Did your cat just walk over the keyboard? Your best answer (to avoid looking really really really thick) would be "yes".
scumdog
5th February 2016, 18:00
This thread is such a dag 'cos yokel is still on my ignore list and the rest are responding to posts I'll never see!:lol::lol::banana:
Katman
5th February 2016, 18:19
This thread is such a dag 'cos yokel is still on my ignore list and the rest are responding to posts I'll never see!:lol::lol::banana:
But you're still bored enough to comment.
Yeah, your life sounds full of win.
Woodman
5th February 2016, 18:25
This thread is such a dag 'cos yokel is still on my ignore list and the rest are responding to posts I'll never see!:lol::lol::banana:
What? Yokel is on your ignore list, faaark he is half he reason I still go on KB. Comedy plus.
bogan
5th February 2016, 18:33
This thread is such a dag 'cos yokel is still on my ignore list and the rest are responding to posts I'll never see!:lol::lol::banana:
You ain't got shit, check out what the stupid worlder thread often looks like on mine :laugh:
yokel
5th February 2016, 18:56
So what's the story with you gay cunts putting people on some lame ignore list, to then tell people that they're on this list??
Who the fuck cares.
go back to your safe space.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sXQkXXBqj_U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
bogan
5th February 2016, 19:05
So what's the story with you gay cunts putting people on some lame ignore list, to then tell people that they're on this list??
Have you disabled sigs or something?
Daffyd
5th February 2016, 23:48
I read today that he's had so many death threats etc that he's cancelled all the meetings and is hiding in his mummy's basement.
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 13:44
Fuck this Fucks me off.
Yokel is the reason the public can't have discussions around this.
FFS.
yokel
6th February 2016, 16:04
Fuck this Fucks me off.
Yokel is the reason the public can't have discussions around this.
FFS.
I'm the reason? fuck that's funny.
The reason is people can't handle the truth or reality. (I'm still waiting on Banditbandit to tell me he's equal to a woman)
The idea that men oppress women (misogyny) is a complete crock of shit.
It's like saying adults or parents oppress children or gravity hates women and treats them unfairly.
Men have to run the show or you get what's happening now, one big cluster fuck.
Women are pretty much adult sized children.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Txx7lPGIZUo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 18:57
I'm the reason? fuck that's funny.
The reason is people can't handle the truth or reality. (I'm still waiting on Banditbandit to tell me he's equal to a woman)
The idea that men oppress women (misogyny) is a complete crock of shit.
It's like saying adults or parents oppress children or gravity hates women and treats them unfairly.
Men have to run the show or you get what's happening now, one big cluster fuck.
Women are pretty much adult sized children.
Yes.
You are the Reason.
You are calling all women Children. I do believe that men and women are equal - but Equal in the sense does not mean Identical. Women excel in some areas, men in others. The problem is when rational people try to talk about some of the issues facing Men (High Suicide rate, No reproductive rights, unequal family court rights, Alimony, Receiving harsher sentences for the Exact Same Crime, Affirmative action running contrary to a Meritocracy) - The opposing camp point to people like you and use your ramblings as a brush to smear everyone who says that maybe Modern Feminism isn't being entirely truthful about some of its ideological tenants (Mythical Wage gape, a non-existant Rape Culture, Negative and even repressive attitudes towards Human and in particular Male sexuality) and that maybe the Modern man having given up some of the traditional perks of Masculinity, is still unequally burdened with all of the responsibilities.
So yes - You are the Reason - and it Fucks me off.
mashman
6th February 2016, 19:11
Fuck this Fucks me off.
Yokel is the reason the public can't have discussions around this.
FFS.
Around what? Legalising rape on private property would make women more careful with their bodies?
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 19:41
Around what? Legalising rape on private property would make women more careful with their bodies?
Roosh is an ass - the Article however was Hyperbole. What he is talking about is when someone has, of their own free will, gone out, Get drunk, Slept with someone and made some bad choices and then blamed someone else after the fact because they regretted it, instead of taking responsibility for their actions that lead to them making bad choices.
As a testament to what he is raging against - there is a large group of Feminists who want to change the law so that if a Man has Sex with a women and she is over the legal driving limit for Alcohol, then it is Rape.
Just think about that - I'm sure if you ever had drunken hookups (I'm presuming that you did and 99% of KB members did to) - Congratulations, we are all now Rapists - and this is is the context in which the article is written as a peice of Hyperbole.
mashman
6th February 2016, 19:49
Roosh is an ass - the Article however was Hyperbole. What he is talking about is when someone has, of their own free will, gone out, Get drunk, Slept with someone and made some bad choices and then blamed someone else after the fact because they regretted it, instead of taking responsibility for their actions that lead to them making bad choices.
As a testament to what he is raging against - there is a large group of Feminists who want to change the law so that if a Man has Sex with a women and she is over the legal driving limit for Alcohol, then it is Rape.
Just think about that - I'm sure if you ever had drunken hookups (I'm presuming that you did and 99% of KB members did to) - Congratulations, we are all now Rapists - and this is is the context in which the article is written as a peice of Hyperbole.
Consent still exists. Lies also exist. Both always will exist. There are useless fuckers of both genders who believe that a law putting "power" into the hands of one gender or another will make a blind bit of fuckin difference to any of it. I feel like I've dropped several aspy AQ points having to point such logic, reason and common sense out. There is no debate, just dickheads who believe there should be.
yokel
6th February 2016, 20:08
Yes.
You are the Reason.
You are calling all women Children. I do believe that men and women are equal - but Equal in the sense does not mean Identical. Women excel in some areas, men in others. The problem is when rational people try to talk about some of the issues facing Men (High Suicide rate, No reproductive rights, unequal family court rights, Alimony, Receiving harsher sentences for the Exact Same Crime, Affirmative action running contrary to a Meritocracy) - The opposing camp point to people like you and use your ramblings as a brush to smear everyone who says that maybe Modern Feminism isn't being entirely truthful about some of its ideological tenants (Mythical Wage gape, a non-existant Rape Culture, Negative and even repressive attitudes towards Human and in particular Male sexuality) and that maybe the Modern man having given up some of the traditional perks of Masculinity, is still unequally burdened with all of the responsibilities.
So yes - You are the Reason - and it Fucks me off.
"Women excel in some areas, men in others" haha thats funny
When I say women are pretty much adult sized children, I'm not saying they are children.
But their mentality is very child like.
Obviously you have a limited understanding of how the female mind works.
All those issues you point out are because of the ideology of feminism.
My bro in-law tried to hang himself when his last misses took off with his baby, I've been helping him in mediation and setting up parental agreement and making sure his ex cunt doesn't emasculate and emotionally manipulate him.
This women was meant to be some high intelligent so in so that works for big money in Aus and I helped him fuck her in to submission.
"traditional perks of Masculinity"? like what?
A rational person knows it's ok to make generalisation.
And when I talk about women, I'm talking about all women.
that means even though there are a few smart responsible sane women out there, they are the exception to the rule.
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 20:19
Consent still exists. Lies also exist. Both always will exist. There are useless fuckers of both genders who believe that a law putting "power" into the hands of one gender or another will make a blind bit of fuckin difference to any of it. I feel like I've dropped several aspy AQ points having to point such logic, reason and common sense out. There is no debate, just dickheads who believe there should be.
There is no Debate?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_case
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattress_Performance_%28Carry_That_Weight%29
I agree that assholes exist on both sides - the problem is that one lot of Assholes are the ones running the Universities and indoctrinating a generation of students, Have the ear of the President, and whenever someone tries to call into question their facts - they get called Mysognists, Rape Apologists, White Privledged Males etc.
One Lot of Assholes can make a false (or dubious) accusation, destroy someone elses life and face no where near the same consequences as the falsely accussed.
Case in Point:
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2013/01/07/rape-consent-and-responsibility/
But Feminist attempts at redefine what is and isn't rape is only part of the issue - and it isn't just based on Blood Alcohol Level either:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin
All Sex is Rape according to one academic Feminist.
There are other issues that I have listed, but are you interesting in discussing those?
mashman
6th February 2016, 20:37
I agree that assholes exist on both sides - the problem is that one lot of Assholes are the ones running the Universities and indoctrinating a generation of students, Have the ear of the President, and whenever someone tries to call into question their facts - they get called Mysognists, Rape Apologists, White Privledged Males etc.
There are other issues that I have listed, but are you interesting in discussing those?
WTF? Agreed.
No need to step outwith the bounds of the first statement paragraph, because addressing that will render the rest moot. "Owning" the education system, and therefore knowledge considered fact, is everything. The only way to do that is to become the "authority" that everyone believes themselves subjugated to. Anything outside of that is bullshit rhetoric/politics of normalcy... or indeed a fuckin good laugh to see how subjugated people really believe themselves to be. That's really all you need to focus on, I promise you that... but it's entirely up to you whether you choose the bullshit or fight for something better, even if it does cost you something that others tell you that it has cost you :laugh:.
I add this by way of illustrating the point. These fuckers are littered through history and our modern day mechanisms are fuckin slick at pushing the buttons. Law does NOT stop a fuckin thing when you can ignore it at whim. That's what link to the false flags is really about... your subjugation.
http://i.imgur.com/6v7tR.jpg
yokel
6th February 2016, 21:00
The thing about women is they lie, lie a fucking lot, even to themselves.
I had an uncle accused of sexually molesting his kinds by the ex lying bitch.
Never expect a woman to stick to her word.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Gbb03SnhHOM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
mashman
6th February 2016, 21:11
The thing about women is they lie, lie a fucking lot, even to themselves.
I had an uncle accused of sexually molesting his kinds by the ex lying bitch.
Never expect a woman to stick to her word.
Men are no better... even to themselves.
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 21:35
Men are no better... even to themselves.
There is a point to be made on this:
When a Man Lies (in the Public domain) and found out - he is forced to accept responsibility for his actions and suffer the consequences.
When a Woman lies (in the Public Domain) and found out - they are often not held to the same level of accountability.
Take the case of Tim Hunt (a Nobel prize winning scientist) who made a self-depreciating joke about Women, Science and himself.
Connie St Louis cherry picked parts of his speech and completely lied about the context and the Audience reaction to his speech.
He gets fired from his job.
Then later it comes to light that she was actually full of shit, when the full audio recording was made public.
I'll repeat, She lied intentionally - got a Nobel prize winning scientist fired from his job (Based on a lie)
And she has kept her Job.
Oh.
and she also lied on her CV to GET that Job.
So yes - Men are no better, but there is a massive double standard between when a Man does it and when a women does it.
mashman
6th February 2016, 21:47
So yes - Men are no better, but there is a massive double standard between when a Man does it and when a women does it.
Subjugation chosen.
"They are no better, but there's a double standard" :facepalm:
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 21:59
Subjugation chosen.
"They are no better, but there's a double standard" :facepalm:
The Double standard is how we hold them accountable, not their actions in of themselves.
I accept that there are always going to be Assholes and liars - All I ask is that we treat them equally, regardless of the Gender/Orientation/Melanin pigmentation/disability status.
mashman
6th February 2016, 22:11
The Double standard is how we hold them accountable, not their actions in of themselves.
All I ask is that we treat them equally, regardless of the Gender/Orientation/Melanin pigmentation/disability status.
There is no double standard. It's what happens to both men and women at the hands of both men and women.
Impossible! Even in "utopia".
Aio ki te Aorangi
Aroha ki te Aorangi
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 22:19
There is no double standard. It's what happens to both men and women at the hands of both men and women.
Impossible! Even in "utopia".
Aio ki te Aorangi
Aroha ki te Aorangi
You sure about that?
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002
There is a Demonstrable double standard. The Tim Hunt case is just another manifestation of it - we don't hold women accountable to the standard we hold men.
mashman
6th February 2016, 22:35
You sure about that?
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144002
There is a Demonstrable double standard. The Tim Hunt case is just another manifestation of it - we don't hold women accountable to the standard we hold men.
Damned sure. For every case you can put up, ironically a case heard on the facts known at the time, there's a case where the opposite happens or there's a same sex rivalry... in fact it's well documented that women aren't paid as well as men yet I don't see you leaping up and down about that. Did they burn the judge for bringing bias into his judgement?
Another bullshit study? bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 22:53
in fact it's well documented that women aren't paid as well as men yet I don't see you leaping up and down about that.
Because they aren't.
This one has been busted so many times.
Typically you will hear the 77c to a Dollar myth*. I'll do a very quick demo on why this isn't true (oversimplified for brevity sake)
I earn $10/hr - you earn $10/hr - We are both paid the same.
I take home from a 40 hour week $400, you take home from a 40 hour week $400 - we are paid the same. Our ratio is 1:1
Now assume you only work 30 hours a week - I take home my $400 - you take home $300 - Our Ratio is now 0.75:1 - Tell me - are we paid the same?
When you factor the following:
Hours worked, Level of Education, Time spent in field, Occupation and specialisation etc. etc. The wage gap shrinks to about 99c for Women to a Dollar - the most common reason for this difference is that Men are often more aggressive in asking for pay rises.
In fact - a recent study shows that for young Women leaving University - they are now getting paid more than their male counterparts:
http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/aug/29/women-in-20s-earn-more-men-same-age-study-finds
However, when women get to about 30 - the 'gap' re-appears - It's almost like most women do something around that age that requires them to take 1-2 years out of the Work Force......
So no - Women are Paid as well as men, however they don't earn as much as men (and there is a big difference between those 2 words)
As a side note - you said it is well documented - it is only Well Documented by Feminists who have a vested interest in continuing with this narrative.
As a further side note - this is must unlike you to repeat official dogma and stories perpetuated by the MSM - are you feeling okay?
Edit - *Depends on the Feminist you are talking to - this figure can be anywhere from 70 cents, 77 cents, 64 cents to every Dollar - the massive variance in figures quoted alone tends to suggest BS.
But don't take my word for it - have some articles:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-wage-gap-myth-that-wont-die-1443654408
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/05/the-biggest-myth-about-the-gender-wage-gap/276367/
And finally - have some Christina Hoff-Sommers (who I am quite fond of)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58arQIr882w
mashman
6th February 2016, 22:57
As a side note - you said it is well documented - it is only Well Documented by Feminists who have a vested interest in continuing with this narrative.
As a further side note - this is must unlike you to repeat official dogma and stories perpetuated by the MSM - are you feeling okay?
Funny, I've had access to payroll databases before and have looked. So yeah, I'm fine.
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 23:02
Funny, I've had access to payroll databases before and have looked. So yeah, I'm fine.
So, how did the Lawsuit for a breach of the Equal Pay of 1972 go then?
And you forget - I also have access to Payroll Databases.
mashman
6th February 2016, 23:07
So, how did the Lawsuit for a breach of the Equal Pay of 1972 go then?
And you forget - I also have access to Payroll Databases.
I didn't do it for anyone else's knowledge.
How can I forget what I didn't know. Select Name from Table Order By RateOfPay. No breach of anything. Anyway, if the employer is even half smart it'll be experience based ;).
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 23:12
I didn't do it for anyone else's knowledge.
How can I forget what I didn't know. Select Name from Table Order By RateOfPay. No breach of anything. Anyway, if the employer is even half smart it'll be experience based ;).
If it's experience based, then its not being paid less for the same work just because Vagina is it?
which is entirely my point when I say the gap is a Myth, built upon crap maths, used to repeat an ideological narrative.
mashman
6th February 2016, 23:15
If it's experience based, then its not being paid less for the same work just because Vagina is it?
which is entirely my point when I say the gap is a Myth, built upon crap maths, used to repeat an ideological narrative.
Ugh. I knew the people involved and there were relatively open conversations about these things at a couple of places I've worked... so I've known who did what and who worked harder than whom, else it would have been a pointless query.
No, it's because you read reports and buy the bullshit. I'm not saying it happens everywhere, but it definitely happens. No ideology, no narrative.
TheDemonLord
6th February 2016, 23:22
No, it's because you read reports and buy the bullshit. I'm not saying it happens everywhere, but it definitely happens. No ideology, no narrative.
Undoubtedly there are isolated instances where it happens (and vice versa) - but this isn't what we are talking about - we are talking about Bogus stats used to promote a narrative that there is a widespread issue with Pay disparity in the Western world (despite all western countries having equal pay acts).
mashman
6th February 2016, 23:56
Undoubtedly there are isolated instances where it happens (and vice versa) - but this isn't what we are talking about - we are talking about Bogus stats used to promote a narrative that there is a widespread issue with Pay disparity in the Western world (despite all western countries having equal pay acts).
No, you were talking about women being inferior and needed to change the focus from that... but hey.
yokel
7th February 2016, 06:13
Funny, I've had access to payroll databases before and have looked. So yeah, I'm fine.
The pay gap is irrelevant, how much of the money men make end up in women's hands and vice versa?
How much money does the government spend on the cunts?
Why do you think when a woman gives birth it is called "going in to labour"?
You should also think about why a woman is called a widow and a man is the widower.
The reason women can lie and get away with it is because things like integrity and responsibility are masculine traits.
You know that lame saying "a woman is always right" It's because they can't handle being told they'er wrong. they go fucking mental.
Women are passive and indirect, they want shit to come to them eg "the universe (man) will provide" while men are aggressive and direct.
There is nothing worse than passive have no direction go with the flow dudes, because thats a female way of thinking.
TheDemonLord
7th February 2016, 06:41
No, you were talking about women being inferior and needed to change the focus from that... but hey.
No - Yokel was talking about women being Inferior.
I said:
I do believe that men and women are equal - but Equal in the sense does not mean Identical.
I then said that Society holds women less accountable for their words and actions - even presenting statistical proof of this (40% less accountable in fact).
But hey, Feel free to put words in my mouth and setup a Strawman.
Akzle
7th February 2016, 06:56
why the fuck anyone would want to employ something that's only going to work (and i use the term loosely) for three weeks in the month is fucken beyond me.
mashman
7th February 2016, 09:51
No - Yokel was talking about women being Inferior.
I said:
I then said that Society holds women less accountable for their words and actions - even presenting statistical proof of this (40% less accountable in fact).
But hey, Feel free to put words in my mouth and setup a Strawman.
As were you, because you were making equivalent pay arguments, not equal pay, just like the fucknuckle below.
Statistical proof is wank, completely totally and utterly as it can't calculate the environment at the time the lie was told. Stop believing in that shit as fact, because it's a guess... and to be honest even IF the analysis holds some form of water, men have only themselves to blame because they have created an environment that treats women differently based on gender and the bodily functions and drives that women have. Anyone can walk out of a job at any time. Your argument is to be expected though, because you know no better... you really don't. It's also highly hypocritical given the argument that you're making in regards to roosh. Essentially if society i.e. you, didn't have the prejudices you have towards women, then there'd be no problem. Ironically your history contains evidence of societies that treated the being as a being, not a man or a woman. The distinction is the problem, it always is and it always has been when the male dominator cultures splattered the brains of men, women and children alike over beaches and fields in pursuit of money and power. You are indoctrinated by someone else's belief and a history of lies.
No Strawman, just your usual lack of understanding and the backing up of that understanding using guesses and other society's bullshit. Stupidity beyond belief, but hey, that's the way you've allowed yourself to be educated (as was I, once). Men and women are different is all. Treating them (including race, age etc...) as such merely buys into the bullshit and keeps it going for the next generation to have the separation wedged even further into society's accepted norms. Grow the fuck up man.
why the fuck anyone would want to employ something that's only going to work (and i use the term loosely) for three weeks in the month is fucken beyond me.
jew.
Akzle
7th February 2016, 10:01
jew.
baaaahahahahahhaah. Bleeding out the vagina is a perfectly legitimate excuse for not working. Why the fuck theyre allowed/ pretend to is beyond me.
mashman
7th February 2016, 10:11
The pay gap is irrelevant, how much of the money men make end up in women's hands and vice versa?
How much money does the government spend on the cunts?
Why do you think when a woman gives birth it is called "going in to labour"?
You should also think about why a woman is called a widow and a man is the widower.
The reason women can lie and get away with it is because things like integrity and responsibility are masculine traits.
You know that lame saying "a woman is always right" It's because they can't handle being told they'er wrong. they go fucking mental.
Women are passive and indirect, they want shit to come to them eg "the universe (man) will provide" while men are aggressive and direct.
There is nothing worse than passive have no direction go with the flow dudes, because thats a female way of thinking.
So, if you have empathy, compassion and know how to love, you're thinking like a woman? There are no fuckin traits... just societal norms and a very long history of men dominating women, PERIOD!
The thing I love though, is now that men are getting a taste of their own medicine i.e. perceived female dominance, they seem to need to cram women back into the society boxes so that they don't get immasculated. Here's a suggestion, grow a pair, grow the fuck up and stop blaming gender differences, enforced by thousands of years of gender repression, as an excuse for men allowing themselves to be dominated by a woman. Same goes for any woman that is dominated by a man, the subjugated party chooses that position. It's pathetic scared old blind white male muthafucka thinking.
mashman
7th February 2016, 10:15
baaaahahahahahhaah. Bleeding out the vagina is a perfectly legitimate excuse for not working. Why the fuck theyre allowed/ pretend to is beyond me.
No, it isn't, however it's debilitating for some women some of the time, not all women all of the time innit. We had a guy in our office who constantly had migraines. He was replaced by a woman and the place worked well... she also had more in the way of balls that he did. Meh, some of you dickheads just lubs yer indoctrinated bullshit, eh sensei :bleh:
TheDemonLord
7th February 2016, 11:57
As were you, because you were making equivalent pay arguments, not equal pay, just like the fucknuckle below.
No - Did I say anything about Women being inferior? No - I am saying that once you account for all the variables that would determine whether someone should be paid more or less:
Ie Comparing a man, with the same degree of education, the same hours worked, the same years experience, in the same field and specialisation to a Woman - the Pay gap disappears. This is because Men and Women Earn the same for the same work.
Statistical proof is wank, completely totally and utterly as it can't calculate the environment at the time the lie was told.
Wow! The Hypocrisy:
in fact it's well documented that women aren't paid as well as men
How can I forget what I didn't know. Select Name from Table Order By RateOfPay.
In case you are confused - a SQL Query counts as a statistical analysis - so Statistical proof is 'Well documented' when it agrees with what you believe, but is Wank when it completed disproves it.
The absolute Hypocrisy.
Stop believing in that shit as fact, because it's a guess...
I'll bend over and grant you that all the variables that we are currently able to measure, there are several that we are unable to measure - however if these were a significant factor, when we account for the variables that we can accurately measure - we would expect there to be still a noticeable difference between the earnings of men and women - but we don't - which suggests that any effect these variables might have is negligible
and to be honest even IF the analysis holds some form of water, men have only themselves to blame because they have created an environment that treats women differently based on gender and the bodily functions and drives that women have.
Oh Wow. The 'Even if Women do xyz, its all Mens Fault anyway' argument. Do you have any idea how incredibly sexist this argument is? First off - it robs women of all Agency - it doesn't matter what a woman can do, because Men - Do you really have that low opinion of Women? Secondly Why are men responsible for Womens choices? A large number of women choose either part time work or to forgo more lucrative work that could interfere with their family life. If women want to choose this - then that is there choice and I 100% support their right to choose - however this doesn't mean they should earn the same as someone who works full time or decides to take a more lucrative position, Exactly the same way that a Man shouldn't either.
Case in point - compare the Degrees being taken by Women in Sweden (one of the most egalitarian societies) with India (where there is a demonstrable Rape culture, Institutionalised Mysoginy, not to mention the Caste system and 'honor' killings).
The women in India who entire University make up a higher percentage of STEM degrees, when compared to women in Sweden.
It shows that when women are free to make the choices they want to make, they don't make the same choices as men.
Anyone can walk out of a job at any time. Your argument is to be expected though, because you know no better... you really don't.
What is it you always post?
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Yes - I do know better - because I have walked out of a Job (and it was the best damn decision I ever made) - Any more assumptions about me and my past that you would like to make that are completely untrue?
It's also highly hypocritical given the argument that you're making in regards to roosh.
Roosh is an Ass - but are you so dim-witted that you can't recognise Hyperbole? Its just the same as when I suggest that to stop Car drivers pulling out in front of Bikes, we should equip Motorcycles with RPGs - yet I don't see you calling me a Car hater for that?
Essentially if society i.e. you, didn't have the prejudices you have towards women, then there'd be no problem.
Except I don't have Prejudices towards women - I just treat them exactly the same as I would treat a Man and want the Law to treat them the same as a Man, I don't want them to receive preferential treatment because I believe this runs counter to the principles of Meritocracy.
Ironically your history contains evidence of societies that treated the being as a being, not a man or a woman.
Tell me then - did these societies have perfect Pay Parity? And to which societies are you referring to?
The distinction is the problem, it always is and it always has been when the male dominator cultures splattered the brains of men, women and children alike over beaches and fields in pursuit of money and power. You are indoctrinated by someone else's belief and a history of lies.
Wait a minute - are you saying that history shows humanity to be Violent and Greedy - NOW where have I heard you say that it isn't so, denying it vigorously...
But yes - Men have committed atrocities in the search for Domination, Money, Power etc. I answer the charge truthfully - but such charges are a double edged blade - The drive for Domination is what produced excellence, advancement. The evolutionary drive to be the best (In B4 you try and dismiss evolutionary biology despite agreeing with its existence above, when it suits your argument) is the same for the SAS soldier as it is for the Nobel prize winning scientist - different applications, same drive.
As an interesting note - the Bell curve for IQ for women tends to be narrower than for Men - there is no evolutionary benefit for having exceptional women - as in a primitive tribal settings, even the Average females get to have offspring, conversely only Exceptional men had the right to have offspring, thus there are more Male geniuses (one way of being exceptional) but also more male Meatheads (the other way of being exceptional)
No Strawman, just your usual lack of understanding and the backing up of that understanding using guesses and other society's bullshit.
You know - I am getting really tired of you dismissing Sciences and fields of studies that you don't like because they disagree with your beliefs - especially when you have nothing in the way of valid critique other than 'I don't like them' or 'they can't possibly know that', especially when you are so quick to use them to support your beliefs. So yes, Keep Setting up Strawmen, but know that it is not my lack of understanding at work here.
Stupidity beyond belief, but hey, that's the way you've allowed yourself to be educated (as was I, once).
DING DING DING! We have a Winner - No I was never educated as such - in fact I was educated quite the opposite - When I was at primary school - we were told not to hit Girls - this is probably the first instance when I realized that something wasn't right, I didn't have the mental reasoning at that age to express or understand why this was wrong - it wasn't for a desire to hit girls (far from it) but I reason that if there is a scenario where it is acceptable to hit a Male (Self Defence, Defence of someone who cannot defend themselves etc.) then surely it is equally acceptable to hit a Female for the same reasons - yet this is not the case.
You could argue that due to sexually dimorphism in our species (50% more upper body strength, thicker bones, greater height, reach and weight on average) that there is a reason for this rule - but again I contend that Men and Women should be treated equally.
Men and women are different is all. Treating them (including race, age etc...) as such merely buys into the bullshit and keeps it going for the next generation to have the separation wedged even further into society's accepted norms. Grow the fuck up man.
Except you are the one who uses an argument that robs women of all freedom of choice. I believe Women are Equal but not identical to Men, All I want is for them to be treated equally under the Law and by society.
And as I have posted, there are numerous studies that show Women get preferrential treatment in a multitude of areas - by Society, by the Law and by the State - If we are ever to acheive Equality - don't you think these should be looked at critically?
mashman
7th February 2016, 12:39
No - Did I say anything about Women being inferior? No - I am saying that once you account for all the variables that would determine whether someone should be paid more or less:
Ie Comparing a man, with the same degree of education, the same hours worked, the same years experience, in the same field and specialisation to a Woman - the Pay gap disappears. This is because Men and Women Earn the same for the same work.
Wow! The Hypocrisy:
No, just your misunderstanding.
In case you are confused - a SQL Query counts as a statistical analysis - so Statistical proof is 'Well documented' when it agrees with what you believe, but is Wank when it completed disproves it.
There is no statistical analysis using the query I posted. You don't know what statistical analysis is.
The absolute Hypocrisy.
I'll bend over and grant you that all the variables that we are currently able to measure, there are several that we are unable to measure - however if these were a significant factor, when we account for the variables that we can accurately measure - we would expect there to be still a noticeable difference between the earnings of men and women - but we don't - which suggests that any effect these variables might have is negligible
There are no variables where you are treating someone the same.
Oh Wow. The 'Even if Women do xyz, its all Mens Fault anyway' argument. Do you have any idea how incredibly sexist this argument is? First off - it robs women of all Agency - it doesn't matter what a woman can do, because Men - Do you really have that low opinion of Women? Secondly Why are men responsible for Womens choices? A large number of women choose either part time work or to forgo more lucrative work that could interfere with their family life. If women want to choose this - then that is there choice and I 100% support their right to choose - however this doesn't mean they should earn the same as someone who works full time or decides to take a more lucrative position, Exactly the same way that a Man shouldn't either.
Case in point - compare the Degrees being taken by Women in Sweden (one of the most egalitarian societies) with India (where there is a demonstrable Rape culture, Institutionalised Mysoginy, not to mention the Caste system and 'honor' killings).
The women in India who entire University make up a higher percentage of STEM degrees, when compared to women in Sweden.
It shows that when women are free to make the choices they want to make, they don't make the same choices as men.
Misrepresentation.
What is it you always post?
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Yes - I do know better - because I have walked out of a Job (and it was the best damn decision I ever made) - Any more assumptions about me and my past that you would like to make that are completely untrue?
It was highlighting the idocy of your argument in regards to your variable of women getting to a certain age and then not working to raise kids. So you misrepresented that too.
Roosh is an Ass - but are you so dim-witted that you can't recognise Hyperbole? Its just the same as when I suggest that to stop Car drivers pulling out in front of Bikes, we should equip Motorcycles with RPGs - yet I don't see you calling me a Car hater for that?
More misrepresentation via lack of post understanding.
Except I don't have Prejudices towards women - I just treat them exactly the same as I would treat a Man and want the Law to treat them the same as a Man, I don't want them to receive preferential treatment because I believe this runs counter to the principles of Meritocracy.
You end with Meritocracy, which demands prejudice by definition.
Tell me then - did these societies have perfect Pay Parity? And to which societies are you referring to?
They weren't using money.
Wait a minute - are you saying that history shows humanity to be Violent and Greedy - NOW where have I heard you say that it isn't so, denying it vigorously...
But yes - Men have committed atrocities in the search for Domination, Money, Power etc. I answer the charge truthfully - but such charges are a double edged blade - The drive for Domination is what produced excellence, advancement. The evolutionary drive to be the best (In B4 you try and dismiss evolutionary biology despite agreeing with its existence above, when it suits your argument) is the same for the SAS soldier as it is for the Nobel prize winning scientist - different applications, same drive.
As an interesting note - the Bell curve for IQ for women tends to be narrower than for Men - there is no evolutionary benefit for having exceptional women - as in a primitive tribal settings, even the Average females get to have offspring, conversely only Exceptional men had the right to have offspring, thus there are more Male geniuses (one way of being exceptional) but also more male Meatheads (the other way of being exceptional)
99% of the population was being peaceful at the time. I never said our entire history was that way, just your usual lack of understanding and misrepresetation. Ironically you're lying to yourself.
You know - I am getting really tired of you dismissing Sciences and fields of studies that you don't like because they disagree with your beliefs - especially when you have nothing in the way of valid critique other than 'I don't like them' or 'they can't possibly know that', especially when you are so quick to use them to support your beliefs. So yes, Keep Setting up Strawmen, but know that it is not my lack of understanding at work here.
I dismiss it because it's demonstrably bullshit. The irony is, I used to believe exactly the same shit you do. You won't understand what that means though, because you are incapable of shifting your thinking because someone else says that you're right. No strawman required.
DING DING DING! We have a Winner - No I was never educated as such - in fact I was educated quite the opposite - When I was at primary school - we were told not to hit Girls - this is probably the first instance when I realized that something wasn't right, I didn't have the mental reasoning at that age to express or understand why this was wrong - it wasn't for a desire to hit girls (far from it) but I reason that if there is a scenario where it is acceptable to hit a Male (Self Defence, Defence of someone who cannot defend themselves etc.) then surely it is equally acceptable to hit a Female for the same reasons - yet this is not the case.
You could argue that due to sexually dimorphism in our species (50% more upper body strength, thicker bones, greater height, reach and weight on average) that there is a reason for this rule - but again I contend that Men and Women should be treated equally.
You were educated that way, because I was and recognise exactly the same positions that you've taken because I once took them myself. So, more misrepresentation. You're coming from some perspective that YOU think I have, which is so wrong it almost brings me to tears... in a good way mind.
Except you are the one who uses an argument that robs women of all freedom of choice. I believe Women are Equal but not identical to Men, All I want is for them to be treated equally under the Law and by society.
And as I have posted, there are numerous studies that show Women get preferrential treatment in a multitude of areas - by Society, by the Law and by the State - If we are ever to acheive Equality - don't you think these should be looked at critically?
More misrepresentation because of your lack of understanding.
I thought it worth getting "my" wife's input on the recent pages, especially as she's known me for 20 years, and is a woman. This is why I can categorically state 100% that your misrepresentation is brought on by YOUR lack of understanding. No one else's, YOURS. I mentioned that you had recently had a kid in rebuttal of her argument that you don't seem to have any balls. You're welcome.
He has misrepresented absolutely everything you've posted.
Akzle
7th February 2016, 13:11
No, it isn't, however it's debilitating for some women some of the time, not all women all of the time innit. We had a guy in our office who constantly had migraines. He was replaced by a woman and the place worked well... she also had more in the way of balls that he did. Meh, some of you dickheads just lubs yer indoctrinated bullshit, eh sensei :bleh:
if i bled out the nose for a week, i wouldnt be working. Same if migraines.
There are fundamental differences between male and female. We're not all just "beings"
and as it is, fuck working anywhere near women. They suck at working.
TheDemonLord
7th February 2016, 13:13
No, just your misunderstanding.
Right - your argument must be so strong and your evidence so robust is you just reply with 'your Misunderstanding' - if it was my misunderstanding - you would post evidence to the contrary or you would correct my misunderstanding by Clarifying your position. You have done neither.
There is no statistical analysis using the query I posted. You don't know what statistical analysis is.
The Definition:
statistical analysis involves collecting and scrutinizing every data sample in a set of items from which samples can be drawn. A sample, in statistics, is a representative selection drawn from a total population.
Your sample is the Workers at the company, The Data is the content of the DATAbase, and the scrutinizing is running a select statement and ordering the results. Not a very in depth or long winded statistical analysis, but an analysis of data none the less.
There are no variables where you are treating someone the same.
I despair - Treating people who have the same key variables (in a work context) the same is what I am saying happens - you are saying that it doesn't because of what swings between their legs.
Misrepresentation.
See point 1.
It was highlighting the idocy of your argument in regards to your variable of women getting to a certain age and then not working to raise kids. So you misrepresented that too.
you are starting to convince that you are being intentionally dim. I'll spell it out:
When a women leaves the workforce to raise kids (for anywhere from 6 months to a year) and then comes back - she doesn't have the same amount of experience as a person of Same Age, Education etc. Therefore She is Paid less, not because she is a woman but because she has less experience due to life choices than her peers.
More misrepresentation via lack of post understanding.
See point 1.
You end with Meritocracy, which demands prejudice by definition.
Absolutley - but NOT of Gender. Meritocracy prejudices on results and performance. If a Women produces the same results or performance as a Man then she should be paid the same, if she produces more results or better performance than a Man, she should be paid more, if she produces less or has worse performance she should be paid less.
At no time there is any discrimination on Gender.
They weren't using money.
Who was the Civilization and how do you know that there was parity between the sexes?
99% of the population was being peaceful at the time. I never said our entire history was that way, just your usual lack of understanding and misrepresetation. Ironically you're lying to yourself.
But you did say that it Always happens - Always and Entire - very similar meanings. Also: See point 1.
I dismiss it because it's demonstrably bullshit. The irony is, I used to believe exactly the same shit you do. You won't understand what that means though, because you are incapable of shifting your thinking because someone else says that you're right. No strawman required.
If it is Demonstrably Bullshit - then by all means write a paper, submit your 'Demonstrable' evidence, claim your Nobel prizes in Mathematics, Biology etc. I'd be willing to bet my House that you won't win a Nobel prize though.
What you have actually written here is a perfect example of indoctrination: 'You would see I'm right if only you would think the way I do' as opposed to submitting EVIDENCE to prove your case.
You were educated that way, because I was and recognise exactly the same positions that you've taken because I once took them myself. So, more misrepresentation. You're coming from some perspective that YOU think I have, which is so wrong it almost brings me to tears... in a good way mind.
See point 1.
More misrepresentation because of your lack of understanding.
See point 1.
I thought it worth getting "my" wife's input on the recent pages, especially as she's known me for 20 years, and is a woman. This is why I can categorically state 100% that your misrepresentation is brought on by YOUR lack of understanding. No one else's, YOURS. I mentioned that you had recently had a kid in rebuttal of her argument that you don't seem to have any balls. You're welcome.
So - I'm wrong because your wife says so..... And she was saying something about Balls?
He has misrepresented absolutely everything you've posted.
See. Point. Fucking. 1.
Madness
7th February 2016, 13:14
if i bled out the nose for a week, i wouldnt be working. Same if migraines.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3904/15087880289_7256a1ca3b_b.jpg
yokel
7th February 2016, 13:25
So, if you have empathy, compassion and know how to love, you're thinking like a woman? There are no fuckin traits... just societal norms and a very long history of men dominating women, PERIOD!
The thing I love though, is now that men are getting a taste of their own medicine i.e. perceived female dominance, they seem to need to cram women back into the society boxes so that they don't get immasculated. Here's a suggestion, grow a pair, grow the fuck up and stop blaming gender differences, enforced by thousands of years of gender repression, as an excuse for men allowing themselves to be dominated by a woman. Same goes for any woman that is dominated by a man, the subjugated party chooses that position. It's pathetic scared old blind white male muthafucka thinking.
Yes you are thinking like a woman or a man thinking in a feminine way.
Do you know the diffidence between how a man expresses love vs a woman?
The fact is men as a whole are superior both physical and mentally eg 10% bigger brains with more grey matter.
but women are equally important as men because they make the babies.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/-0XVuU-iF5U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
And speaking of pathetic scared old blind white male muthafucka
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zCpjmvaIgNA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
You can't win this argument, even with the help of your wife.
so just submit to my dominating intellect like a good little bitch.
TheDemonLord
7th February 2016, 13:30
So, if you have empathy, compassion and know how to love, you're thinking like a woman? There are no fuckin traits... just societal norms and a very long history of men dominating women, PERIOD
If there is no such thing as thinking and feeling like a Woman (or a Man for that matter) - How do you explain Transgender people? Biologically one gender, but identify as another?
Also:
The thing I love though, is now that men are getting a taste of their own medicine
What the Actual Fuck?!?!
'Sir! Sir, They did it first Sir, so I did it back'
That makes it right does it?
Edit:
Also - I'm not sure what Medicine you might be thinking but Highest Suicide rates, Highest Murder Victim rates, Highest rates of being assaulted, Highest Work place death rates (in many years in NZ its 100%) - Sounds like the 'Medicine' wasn't all bitter and oppression.
mashman
7th February 2016, 14:05
If there is no such thing as thinking and feeling like a Woman (or a Man for that matter) - How do you explain Transgender people? Biologically one gender, but identify as another?
Also:
What the Actual Fuck?!?!
'Sir! Sir, They did it first Sir, so I did it back'
That makes it right does it?
Edit:
Also - I'm not sure what Medicine you might be thinking but Highest Suicide rates, Highest Murder Victim rates, Highest rates of being assaulted, Highest Work place death rates (in many years in NZ its 100%) - Sounds like the 'Medicine' wasn't all bitter and oppression.
The question mark should have given away what I was asking. YOUR misunderstanding
No, I'm just laughing at men crying foul given the history of the fight of women for recognition against their male oppressors... the same recognition you claim they should have, I already give without question or variable. I guess your misunderstanding and misrepresentation knows no bounds.
As for medicine... bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. I would have addressed the point if you hadn't have misrepresented everything, and I do mean just about everything, that I had already posted.
mashman
7th February 2016, 14:10
if i bled out the nose for a week, i wouldnt be working. Same if migraines.
There are fundamental differences between male and female. We're not all just "beings"
and as it is, fuck working anywhere near women. They suck at working.
Pussy.
There are... but we still are all beings. Making an issue of it i.e. pointing it out as some form of justification for something, is moronic at best and is why women were repressed in the first place.
I'm calling CYFS.
TheDemonLord
7th February 2016, 14:13
The question mark should have given away what I was asking. YOUR misunderstanding
No, I'm just laughing at men crying foul given the history of the fight of women for recognition against their male oppressors... the same recognition you claim they should have, I already give without question or variable. I guess your misunderstanding and misrepresentation knows no bounds.
As for medicine... bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. I would have addressed the point if you hadn't have misrepresented everything, and I do mean just about everything, that I had already posted.
Yes.
Young men dying is Fucking Hilarious.
I see you still haven't clarified any of the shit you are posting or put up any Evidence - Funny that.
Here's a different question - can you name a Legal right (in NZ) that is extended to a Man that is NOT extended to a Woman? Can you then name a Legal right that is Extended to a Woman that is not extended to a Man?
I can't think of any that I have that a Woman doesn't - but I can think of at least 3 off the top of my head for the Latter.
Edit:
And for ease I'm just talking about Legislation, not to mention things like State funded services or programs or campaigns.
mashman
7th February 2016, 14:14
Right - your argument must be so strong and your evidence so robust is you just reply with 'your Misunderstanding' - if it was my misunderstanding - you would post evidence to the contrary or you would correct my misunderstanding by Clarifying your position. You have done neither.
:facepalm: :killingme :facepalm: I have already posted, you have misundertood and misrepresented what was posted. Figure it out man.
mashman
7th February 2016, 14:17
Yes.
Young men dying is Fucking Hilarious.
I see you still haven't clarified any of the shit you are posting or put up any Evidence - Funny that.
Here's a different question - can you name a Legal right (in NZ) that is extended to a Man that is NOT extended to a Woman? Can you then name a Legal right that is Extended to a Woman that is not extended to a Man?
I can't think of any that I have that a Woman doesn't - but I can think of at least 3 off the top of my head for the Latter.
My mum used to work for the CSA... I'm well aware of the issues you highlight. But by all means use that as your only retreat.
Actually I'm gonna stop this insanity right here, because you really aren't even attempting to shift position... which is required in order to understand what has been posted and that means ditching your pseudo-science.
You're right about everything you've posted, it is all my misunderstanding and I'm so sorry for wasting your time by asking you to think for yourself and come from a position of being wrong.
TheDemonLord
7th February 2016, 14:17
:facepalm: :killingme :facepalm: I have already posted, you have misundertood and misrepresented what was posted. Figure it out man.
Redacted.
It was cheap point scoring, and since the comment below un-warranted.
mashman
7th February 2016, 14:23
Yes you are thinking like a woman or a man thinking in a feminine way.
Do you know the diffidence between how a man expresses love vs a woman?
Mutual acceptance of each others differences without condemnation. That stands for both.
The fact is men as a whole are superior both physical and mentally eg 10% bigger brains with more grey matter.
but women are equally important as men because they make the babies.
And speaking of pathetic scared old blind white male muthafucka
You can't win this argument, even with the help of your wife.
so just submit to my dominating intellect like a good little bitch.
Bigger brain = more power? bwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Yup, they CAN be physically stronger, but I'm always pissin myself when they carry the baby and their arms get tired and the woman takes over and doesn't bitch like a pussy whipped faggot for hours on end.
I'm not trying to win anything you moron. I passed it to me wife because I love watching her cry when she laughs.
You've got nothing except a need to overcompensate and justify bigotry because your mate was treated badly once upon a time. Ironically, you're lying to yourself.
TheDemonLord
7th February 2016, 14:24
My mum used to work for the CSA... I'm well aware of the issues you highlight. But by all means use that as your only retreat.
Actually I'm gonna stop this insanity right here, because you really aren't even attempting to shift position... which is required in order to understand what has been posted and that means ditching your pseudo-science.
You're right about everything you've posted, it is all my misunderstanding and I'm so sorry for wasting your time by asking you to think for yourself and come from a position of being wrong.
So many comments I could make - but I'll honor the gesture and reciprocate.
mashman
7th February 2016, 14:25
Problem is - I already have figured it out - You're full of shit :msn-wink:
Only in your tiny lunchbox.
yokel
7th February 2016, 17:04
Mutual acceptance of each others differences without condemnation. That stands for both.
Bigger brain = more power? bwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Yup, they CAN be physically stronger, but I'm always pissin myself when they carry the baby and their arms get tired and the woman takes over and doesn't bitch like a pussy whipped faggot for hours on end.
I'm not trying to win anything you moron. I passed it to me wife because I love watching her cry when she laughs.
You've got nothing except a need to overcompensate and justify bigotry because your mate was treated badly once upon a time. Ironically, you're lying to yourself.
Yes delusional people do laugh a lot.
You are the one that has got nothing, hence why you tell yourself not to try and win.
And it's is kinda odd you saying "I'm not trying to win anything you moron" then in the next breath tell me "You've got nothing except a need to overcompensate meow meow meow........."
You know we're discussing objective reality, if you want to deny the objective reality that men are smarter than women? then thats your delusion.
This means there is no place for your subjective feminist or female nonsense.
And I fail to see how not wanting to hold a baby for longer than is absolutely necessary makes a man a pussy?
It's a woman's job to sort out baby and baby related shit.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yjw60170V5A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
jonbuoy
7th February 2016, 17:22
Yes you are thinking like a woman or a man thinking in a feminine way.
Do you know the diffidence between how a man expresses love vs a woman?
The fact is men as a whole are superior both physical and mentally eg 10% bigger brains with more grey matter.
but women are equally important as men because they make the babies.
And speaking of pathetic scared old blind white male muthafucka
You can't win this argument, even with the help of your wife.
so just submit to my dominating intellect like a good little bitch.
Your not making use of that extra 10%. Do you prefer the company of men to women?
yokel
7th February 2016, 19:18
Your not making use of that extra 10%. Do you prefer the company of men to women?
In what context are you talking?
Would you prefer to go out hunting with a woman?
A bunch of direction less women stuck on an island.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/nLFLORx6xsU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
mashman
7th February 2016, 19:44
Yes delusional people do laugh a lot.
You are the one that has got nothing, hence why you tell yourself not to try and win.
And it's is kinda odd you saying "I'm not trying to win anything you moron" then in the next breath tell me "You've got nothing except a need to overcompensate meow meow meow........."
You know we're discussing objective reality, if you want to deny the objective reality that men are smarter than women? then thats your delusion.
This means there is no place for your subjective feminist or female nonsense.
And I fail to see how not wanting to hold a baby for longer than is absolutely necessary makes a man a pussy?
It's a woman's job to sort out baby and baby related shit.
You're right. I do apologise and will take your words as me getting the learn.
jonbuoy
7th February 2016, 20:03
In what context are you talking?
Would you prefer to go out hunting with a woman?
A bunch of direction less women stuck on an island.
Depends on the woman. A lot of "modern" men wouldn't fair much better either. They can definitely see things from a different perspective, generally have better memories, pay more attention to details and are a hell of a lot nicer to snuggle up with.
Laava
7th February 2016, 20:32
It's a woman's job to sort out baby and baby related shit.
This is a very sad indictment on your mother. Not that she probably gives a shit.
yokel
7th February 2016, 21:26
You're right. I do apologise and will take your words as me getting the learn.
You know you're a lot more fun when you disagree.
Depends on the woman. A lot of "modern" men wouldn't fair much better either. They can definitely see things from a different perspective, generally have better memories, pay more attention to details and are a hell of a lot nicer to snuggle up with.
The thing about women is they have 50,000 different perspectives on shit.
It's all part of that paying too much attention to pointless details thing that they do, which is fine when it's things that are unimportant.
but now the they're trying to fuck with the natural order of things, how many genders are we up to now?
But yeah nice to snuggle the shit out of em.
This is a very sad indictment on your mother. Not that she probably gives a shit.
My mum use to say "a little bit of neglect never hurt anybody"
mashman
7th February 2016, 22:51
You know you're a lot more fun when you disagree.
That you Roosh?
jonbuoy
7th February 2016, 22:54
You know you're a lot more fun when you disagree.
The thing about women is they have 50,000 different perspectives on shit.
It's all part of that paying too much attention to pointless details thing that they do, which is fine when it's things that are unimportant.
but now the they're trying to fuck with the natural order of things, how many genders are we up to now?
But yeah nice to snuggle the shit out of em.
My mum use to say "a little bit of neglect never hurt anybody"
How would men have survived without women nagging at them to stock up on firewood and meat for the winter?:scratch:
mashman
8th February 2016, 10:34
“The philosophy of slavery is well evolved on our planet. People have been enslaving each other for thousands of years. But to keep people enslaved physically, you have to house them, feed them and clothe them. Through the introduction of money as a tool of enslavement, people have to work; feed themselves, clothe themselves, and house themselves. To do all this, people need that stuff called money, which is controlled and supplied by those at the top. What a brilliant and simple scam to keep humanity enslaved – money.” - someone slaves' writings
"WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Less than one-third (31.5%) of U.S. workers were engaged in their jobs in 2014. The average is up nearly two percentage points from 29.6% in 2013 and represents the highest reading since 2000, when Gallup first began tracking the engagement levels of the U.S. working population. However, a majority of employees, 51%, were still "not engaged" and 17.5% were "actively disengaged" in 2014." - some slaves' poll
I'll leave this here.
yokel
8th February 2016, 12:03
How would men have survived without women nagging at them to stock up on firewood and meat for the winter?:scratch:
Well now all that manly type stuff is not required, we can all kick back relax.
But it would seem the nagging is not going to stop.
The establishment's narrative is collapsing.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Twbnr3sSupw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
yokel
8th February 2016, 12:25
That you Roosh?
This is Roosh.
Good vid.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CD6ajfna7tE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
mashman
8th February 2016, 16:54
This is Roosh.
Good vid.
No doubt....
Woodman
8th February 2016, 17:14
No doubt....
What? you mean you aren't even going to watch one of Yokels videos? :rolleyes:
mashman
8th February 2016, 17:18
What? you mean you aren't even going to watch one of Yokels videos? :rolleyes:
The guy may well have excellent points. Meh.
scumdog
8th February 2016, 18:54
Mutual acceptance of each others differences without condemnation. That stands for both.
Bigger brain = more power? bwwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Yup, they CAN be physically stronger, but I'm always pissin myself when they carry the baby and their arms get tired and the woman takes over and doesn't bitch like a pussy whipped faggot for hours on end.
I'm not trying to win anything you moron. I passed it to me wife because I love watching her cry when she laughs.
You've got nothing except a need to overcompensate and justify bigotry because your mate was treated badly once upon a time. Ironically, you're lying to yourself.
Stop quoting the thread idiot - it buggers up my 'ignore' setting!!!
mashman
8th February 2016, 19:46
Stop quoting the thread idiot - it buggers up my 'ignore' setting!!!
:killingme... ignore it fuzzball.
Banditbandit
9th February 2016, 10:59
.
(I'm still waiting on Banditbandit to tell me he's equal to a woman)
Go on - hold your breath shit for brains ... hold it till I answer .. I dare you ..
I don't give a fuck what you think and I am not answerable to you ... so you can go fuck yourself ...
yokel
9th February 2016, 18:56
Go on - hold your breath shit for brains ... hold it till I answer .. I dare you ..
I don't give a fuck what you think and I am not answerable to you ... so you can go fuck yourself ...
Being a man of no words means you're equal to a woman.
A woman that does not want to be held accountable for the words that come out of her pretty mouth.
yokel
9th February 2016, 19:19
Bill Burr - Epidemic of gold digging whores.
This includes the "gender pay gap" whores
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/w7gGKkF6bBw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Banditbandit
10th February 2016, 08:56
Being a man of no words means you're equal to a woman.
A woman that does not want to be held accountable for the words that come out of her pretty mouth.
Fuck you're full of shit ..
OK ..
You question is inane (use a dictionary and look it up).
You question has connotations that men need to be as good as women ... why not ask the reverse question: Are women equal to men? The diferent questions place the people seeking equality in different relationships (still a bullshit question though)
By what standards are you judging equality? (I never speak of equality it's a bullshit concept - I'll get to that)
There are women who are stronger than me and women who are weaker than me.
There are women who are more intelligent than me and women who are les intelligent.
There are women who can ride bikes faster than me and women who can't.
There are women who are better cooks than me, and I am a better cook than some women.
There are women who earn more money then me, and I earn more money than some women.
And on and on ... which one or ones do you want to use to judge "equality"?
Why do you feel the need to be "superior" to women? By doing so you are denying basic humanity to 51% of the population.
And I really feel sorry for you - you live in a very dark place when your ego needs to be fulfilled by writing off a large part of our population so you feel superior. What happened in yiour life that makes you feel the need to denigrate half the population?
My ego is strong enough not to need such bullshit massaging ... So I never speak of equality ..
jonbuoy
10th February 2016, 09:22
Bill Burr - Epidemic of gold digging whores.
This includes the "gender pay gap" whores
We all understand - you've been turned down and rejected by many women hence the scorn and resentment. I don't mind admiting I'm "equal" to a woman, they have different strengths and weaknesses. I respect and admire the workload a lot of single mums face after the dad walks out because he misses his free and easy child free life.
TheDemonLord
10th February 2016, 10:26
Fuck you're full of shit ..
OK ..
You question is inane (use a dictionary and look it up).
You question has connotations that men need to be as good as women ... why not ask the reverse question: Are women equal to men? The diferent questions place the people seeking equality in different relationships (still a bullshit question though)
By what standards are you judging equality? (I never speak of equality it's a bullshit concept - I'll get to that)
There are women who are stronger than me and women who are weaker than me.
There are women who are more intelligent than me and women who are les intelligent.
There are women who can ride bikes faster than me and women who can't.
There are women who are better cooks than me, and I am a better cook than some women.
There are women who earn more money then me, and I earn more money than some women.
And on and on ... which one or ones do you want to use to judge "equality"?
Why do you feel the need to be "superior" to women? By doing so you are denying basic humanity to 51% of the population.
And I really feel sorry for you - you live in a very dark place when your ego needs to be fulfilled by writing off a large part of our population so you feel superior. What happened in yiour life that makes you feel the need to denigrate half the population?
My ego is strong enough not to need such bullshit massaging ... So I never speak of equality ..
Put Ego to one side for a moment - if you took a random sample of 1000 Men and a 1000 Women - would you see the same characteristics between both groups and with the same distribution? We would expect the sample of Men to have higher strength (on average up to 50% higher), We would expect the group of Women to have better social skills. When I talk about the differences - it is not from a point of view of superiority, but simply that there are differences between the Sexes, it also doesn't mean that overall one is better than the other. In Certain contexts Males on average do better than Females, but in others - Women on average outperform Men.
The problem that various Mens groups have is that there are societal differences between how men and women are treated - many of these are left overs from when Women weren't seen as Equals, they were both simultaneously oppressed and protected (couldn't vote or own land but couldn't be drafted into Battle) We now have Acts protecting Womens rights from when they were oppressed, but we don't have anything that revokes some of the protections that they had.
Akzle
10th February 2016, 11:23
We would expect the group of Women to have better social skills.
dont know many women, huh?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IUFz9nPlvzg
TheDemonLord
10th February 2016, 11:50
dont know many women, huh?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IUFz9nPlvzg
That's still a Skill - I never said it was all positive skills, just that they are statistically going to have better social skills.
scumdog
10th February 2016, 11:59
dont know many women, huh?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IUFz9nPlvzg
It still explains a lot about you....:bleh:
Akzle
10th February 2016, 12:52
That's still a Skill - I never said it was all positive skills, just that they are statistically going to have better social skills.
the fuck it is. The fuck they are. Thats the kind of shit you get when your CNS connects your vagina to your brain.
TheDemonLord
10th February 2016, 13:21
the fuck it is. The fuck they are. Thats the kind of shit you get when your CNS connects your vagina to your brain.
Being Bitchy, Back Stabbing, Manipulation, Passive Aggressiveness - All Social Skills.
Also skills that you would expect from a group where it is disadvantageous to fight to the death to establish Dominance.
mashman
10th February 2016, 13:28
Being Bitchy, Back Stabbing, Manipulation, Passive Aggressiveness - All Social Skills.
Also skills that you would expect from a group where it is disadvantageous to fight to the death to establish Dominance.
How many women are on the FED board again? ... coz that's what you've just described.
TheDemonLord
10th February 2016, 13:39
How many women are on the FED board again? ... coz that's what you've just described.
Not sure which FED board you are referring to - but I'd hazard a guess that it is all men - I didn't however say that Men can't have them - just for a given Sample size there are a certain traits we would see a more common prevalence between the 2 sexes.
scumdog
10th February 2016, 14:38
How many women are on the FED board again? ... coz that's what you've just described.
Front Engined Dragster??:wait:
Banditbandit
10th February 2016, 14:51
This includes the "gender pay gap" whores
Now I get it - you're pissed because the whores can charge more to get fucked than you can ... OK.
Well, what do you expect? Your saggy arse can't be worth much at all ...
yokel
10th February 2016, 18:41
Fuck you're full of shit ..
OK ..
You question is inane (use a dictionary and look it up).
You question has connotations that men need to be as good as women ... why not ask the reverse question: Are women equal to men? The diferent questions place the people seeking equality in different relationships (still a bullshit question though)
By what standards are you judging equality? (I never speak of equality it's a bullshit concept - I'll get to that)
There are women who are stronger than me and women who are weaker than me.
There are women who are more intelligent than me and women who are les intelligent.
There are women who can ride bikes faster than me and women who can't.
There are women who are better cooks than me, and I am a better cook than some women.
There are women who earn more money then me, and I earn more money than some women.
And on and on ... which one or ones do you want to use to judge "equality"?
Why do you feel the need to be "superior" to women? By doing so you are denying basic humanity to 51% of the population.
And I really feel sorry for you - you live in a very dark place when your ego needs to be fulfilled by writing off a large part of our population so you feel superior. What happened in yiour life that makes you feel the need to denigrate half the population?
My ego is strong enough not to need such bullshit massaging ... So I never speak of equality ..
WTF is all that shit? eg "There are women who can ride bikes faster than me and women who can't." surly you can't be that fucking dumb?
It's more than being "superior" to women, it's about the natural order of things.
Do you not realise that by trying to increase the number of women (and i'll add fagot SJW hipsters) in higher levels in say the public sector is going to end in disaster.
eg when some cunt in government a little while back suggested schools adopt gender neutral uniforms means there are fucked cunts in government being paid good money for being a retard.
This is what you sound like
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZliPVMxTjY8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
We all understand - you've been turned down and rejected by many women hence the scorn and resentment. I don't mind admiting I'm "equal" to a woman, they have different strengths and weaknesses. I respect and admire the workload a lot of single mums face after the dad walks out because he misses his free and easy child free life.
Women are equal in terms of importance but not function.
So you respect these baby mamas that rooted these "dead beat dads"? and what happens to all these bastard kids these solo mums shit out?
solo mums are a social disease.
Here are some stats https://youtu.be/JpFzanztmB4?t=1m46s and I've seen it first hand.
Madness
10th February 2016, 18:44
Seemed appropriate.
yokel
10th February 2016, 18:55
Being Bitchy, Back Stabbing, Manipulation, Passive Aggressiveness - All Social Skills.
Also skills that you would expect from a group where it is disadvantageous to fight to the death to establish Dominance.
Sounds like anti social skills to me?
The only "social skill" women have is men want to fuck them, protect them and fuck them some more.
Woodman
10th February 2016, 19:42
So Yokel, who decided what the natural order of things is?, and is it set in stone or is it a sliding scale?
yokel
10th February 2016, 21:18
So Yokel, who decided what the natural order of things is?, and is it set in stone or is it a sliding scale?
Nature/god/universe what ever does, have you not noticed that the female is not the same in many many ways as a male?
eg men are willing to kill themselves, women not so much.
Some things are set in stone others are not.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wtUKdZG1o1w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The womens brain has no direction and is all over the place like a mad womens shit.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3XjUFYxSxDk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Woodman
10th February 2016, 22:00
Nature/god/universe what ever does, have you not noticed that the female is not the same in many many ways as a male?
eg men are willing to kill themselves, women not so much.
Some things are set in stone others are not.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/wtUKdZG1o1w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
The womens brain has no direction and is all over the place like a mad womens shit.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3XjUFYxSxDk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Oooooookay then...........
mashman
10th February 2016, 23:36
Front Engined Dragster??:wait:
Financially Elite Dickheads.
TheDemonLord
11th February 2016, 07:03
Financially Elite Dickheads.
Speaking of Such people - a quick google indicated in the US - the highest percentage of Women-Owned Businesses in a state was 13%.
Do you feel that this is Sexism? Or could it indicate something else?
scumdog
11th February 2016, 07:26
Financially Elite Dickheads.
Ah, lucky buggers, they probably laugh at us FSP types!
(Financially Struggling Plebs)
mashman
11th February 2016, 07:36
Speaking of Such people - a quick google indicated in the US - the highest percentage of Women-Owned Businesses in a state was 13%.
Do you feel that this is Sexism? Or could it indicate something else?
The market's tough and women can't be trusted. No, it's perfectly normal... coz mental illness :D
Ah, lucky buggers, they probably laugh at us FSP types!
(Financially Struggling Plebs)
:laugh: I'm sure some of them do... coz mental illness ;).
scumdog
11th February 2016, 08:02
:laugh: I'm sure some of them do... coz mental illness ;).
I'm sure their 'mental ilness' really worries them...Tuis moment.
TheDemonLord
11th February 2016, 09:14
The market's tough and women can't be trusted. No, it's perfectly normal... coz mental illness :D
What about the Risk and sacrifices involved in starting and running your own business? Risk and Risk Taking is certainly something found more among Males - Who make up the Majority of Motorcyclists? Who invented all extreme sports? Who make up the majority of Gamblers?
mashman
11th February 2016, 09:33
I'm sure their 'mental ilness' really worries them...Tuis moment.
Shhhhhh, they don't know that they have it ffs.
mashman
11th February 2016, 09:35
What about the Risk and sacrifices involved in starting and running your own business? Risk and Risk Taking is certainly something found more among Males - Who make up the Majority of Motorcyclists? Who invented all extreme sports? Who make up the majority of Gamblers?
Funny. I explained the risks to my wife, in regards to me retiring, yet here we are. I'm sure every man just dove straight on in there without consulting his wife in regards to risk. And as women aren't known for their rational thinking, statistically speaking, they offer nothing in response other than, "That's nice dear.", whilst thinking, "I'll suck the life out of him before letting him have any fun".
TheDemonLord
11th February 2016, 10:48
Funny. I explained the risks to my wife, in regards to me retiring, yet here we are. I'm sure every man just dove straight on in there without consulting his wife in regards to risk. And as women aren't known for their rational thinking, statistically speaking, they offer nothing in response other than, "That's nice dear.", whilst thinking, "I'll suck the life out of him before letting him have any fun".
Nothing wrong with consulting with someone to discuss Risks - but as a whole Men engage in Riskier behavior, be that Adrenaline Sports, Combat, Motorsport, Business Ventures, Gambling etc.
As for Rational Thinking - something of interest is Chess - probably one of the most egalitarian games, based on rational thinking, Logic, Strategy, Anticipation and intuition. There are 1464 Male and 33 Female Grand Masters. It is not to say that Women can't be good at Chess (Judit Polgar for example) but the massive disparity suggests that there is something to do with Gender as to why more Males are good at Chess when compared to Females.
Banditbandit
11th February 2016, 12:36
So Yokel, who decided what the natural order of things is?, and is it set in stone or is it a sliding scale?
It's set in stone - he's pissed that he's on the bottom when he thinks he should be on top ...
Big Dog
11th February 2016, 13:01
I can't speak for American women, or indeed about women in NZ as a whole but something I have observed, a lot of (most that I know the details of ) women who own 1 or more businesses do so either from behind genderless companies / trusts or in their husbands, fathers and or sons names.
Even when all investment, intellectual property and the general running of the show is them.
For some it is sexism based in that they perceive they will get a better deal from banks, suppliers and customers if the perception is they are just the face of the enterprise.
There are other reasons around survivorship, tax, commitment etc.
Sent via tapatalk.
TheDemonLord
11th February 2016, 13:56
I can't speak for American women, or indeed about women in NZ as a whole but something I have observed, a lot of (most that I know the details of ) women who own 1 or more businesses do so either from behind genderless companies / trusts or in their husbands, fathers and or sons names.
Even when all investment, intellectual property and the general running of the show is them.
For some it is sexism based in that they perceive they will get a better deal from banks, suppliers and customers if the perception is they are just the face of the enterprise.
There are other reasons around survivorship, tax, commitment etc.
Sent via tapatalk.
Interesting, would definitely be a topic I would be interested to learn more of and the reasons for doing so - may provide more insight into the differences (or not) between the sexes.
mashman
11th February 2016, 17:59
Nothing wrong with consulting with someone to discuss Risks - but as a whole Men engage in Riskier behavior, be that Adrenaline Sports, Combat, Motorsport, Business Ventures, Gambling etc.
As for Rational Thinking - something of interest is Chess - probably one of the most egalitarian games, based on rational thinking, Logic, Strategy, Anticipation and intuition. There are 1464 Male and 33 Female Grand Masters. It is not to say that Women can't be good at Chess (Judit Polgar for example) but the massive disparity suggests that there is something to do with Gender as to why more Males are good at Chess when compared to Females.
Ok........
jonbuoy
11th February 2016, 18:45
Some of you are confusing lack of interest with inability to. So what your saying is if women were more in control we would have less wars (they don't like to physically fight), and fewer "big" companies as they aren't so power crazy. Sounds like a win win for the stupid world thread?
jonbuoy
11th February 2016, 18:57
Women are equal in terms of importance but not function.
So you respect these baby mamas that rooted these "dead beat dads"? and what happens to all these bastard kids these solo mums shit out?
solo mums are a social disease.
and I've seen it first hand.
Really your not that thick as to think all single mums are trash are you? I assume you were brought up in a stable household? What was your relationship like with your mother? It sounds like you dont have a very favourable opinion of her?
Single mums are generated when a couple that were happy together had children, at some point someone decided they weren't a happy couple and they split up. Couples split up, it happens. Not talking about unemployed parents spitting out kids for the child support money here. Genuine single mums.
jonbuoy
11th February 2016, 19:07
How many women are on the FED board again? ... coz that's what you've just described.
They leave to have children. My sister worked for a London City corporate law firm, extremely sexist environment was told she would never make partner. Worked her self into the ground to try and prove them wrong. One day met a guy, fell in love got married and decided having kids was more important. She's now a stay at home mum as she didn't want the kids to be brought up by strangers. Her husband has carried on his career and just bought himself into a partnership.
Those old white motherfuckers were right all along.
TheDemonLord
11th February 2016, 19:29
Some of you are confusing lack of interest with inability to. So what your saying is if women were more in control we would have less wars (they don't like to physically fight), and fewer "big" companies as they aren't so power crazy. Sounds like a win win for the stupid world thread?
I have found that interest tends to foster ability.
I'm not saying we would have less wars if Women were in control (cue the joke about a lot of countries not talking to each other)
TheDemonLord
11th February 2016, 19:30
They leave to have children. My sister worked for a London City corporate law firm, extremely sexist environment was told she would never make partner. Worked her self into the ground to try and prove them wrong. One day met a guy, fell in love got married and decided having kids was more important. She's now a stay at home mum as she didn't want the kids to be brought up by strangers. Her husband has carried on his career and just bought himself into a partnership.
Those old white motherfuckers were right all along.
Sounds like a case of Chicken and Egg to me.
jonbuoy
11th February 2016, 19:42
Sounds like a case of Chicken and Egg to me.
Not really, she was working massively long hours, sometimes staying overnight in the office at no notice to deal with people in other time zones or to get a last minute contract drawn up. Only way they could have made it work would have been for the husband to give up work and be a stay at home dad or have a full time live in nanny. Needless to say he wouldn't have been happy in the stay at home dad role so she like thousands of other women gave up hers. Their choice.
jonbuoy
11th February 2016, 19:43
I have found that interest tends to foster ability.
I'm not saying we would have less wars if Women were in control (cue the joke about a lot of countries not talking to each other)
Exactly - if your interested in something you do it more often and get better at it.
TheDemonLord
11th February 2016, 19:52
Not really, she was working massively long hours, sometimes staying overnight in the office at no notice to deal with people in other time zones or to get a last minute contract drawn up. Only way they could have made it work would have been for the husband to give up work and be a stay at home dad or have a full time live in nanny. Needless to say he wouldn't have been happy in the stay at home dad role so she like thousands of other women gave up hers. Their choice.
What I meant by Chicken and Egg was along the lines of - they didn't think she would make the sacrifices requires to be a Partner - turns out they were right. She didn't think she would make partner, so didn't make the sacrifices - turns out she was also right.
jonbuoy
11th February 2016, 20:00
What I meant by Chicken and Egg was along the lines of - they didn't think she would make the sacrifices requires to be a Partner - turns out they were right. She didn't think she would make partner, so didn't make the sacrifices - turns out she was also right.
Im sure she could have if she hadn't left, the old timers would have seen this happen time and time again. Her boss was furious when he found out she was pregnant as he did have hopes of her making partner. Her thinking was on the lines of having a stranger living in her house and her children looking at the nanny as the "mummy figure".
yokel
11th February 2016, 20:20
It's set in stone - he's pissed that he's on the bottom when he thinks he should be on top ...
Oh the burn! haha.
You know I use to treat women with respect and viewed them as my "equal". but now I'm older and much wiser.
Life tip, avoid female tenants, especially the single ones.
Really your not that thick as to think all single mums are trash are you? I assume you were brought up in a stable household? What was your relationship like with your mother? It sounds like you dont have a very favourable opinion of her?
Single mums are generated when a couple that were happy together had children, at some point someone decided they weren't a happy couple and they split up. Couples split up, it happens. Not talking about unemployed parents spitting out kids for the child support money here. Genuine single mums.
Do you under stand what the word "generalisation" means?
Not all single mums are trash, but the their offspring have a greater chance of turning into dysfunctional adults.
The stats on baby mamas https://youtu.be/JpFzanztmB4?t=1m46s
Like I said before, signal mothers are a social disease.
It depends what your definition of "stable household" is?
My old man is a psychopath. much like his dominating husband beating mother.
Akzle
11th February 2016, 20:26
I have found that interest tends to foster ability.
I'm not saying we would have less wars if Women were in control (cue the joke about a lot of countries not talking to each other)
more like cue the joke that war requires tactics, strategy, spending your own money not your husbands, planning...
yokel
11th February 2016, 20:35
Speaking of war.
The main component of "womens logic" is that the result must benefit the female.
https://lorrab.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/male-privlege.jpg
yokel
11th February 2016, 21:18
Funny. I explained the risks to my wife, in regards to me retiring, yet here we are. I'm sure every man just dove straight on in there without consulting his wife in regards to risk. And as women aren't known for their rational thinking, statistically speaking, they offer nothing in response other than, "That's nice dear.", whilst thinking, "I'll suck the life out of him before letting him have any fun".
Ok, lets say you explained the risks to your wife, and it all turns to poos, would you say it's her fault?
Having your wifes support is one thing, following her direction is another.
bogan
11th February 2016, 21:37
Having your wifes support is one thing, following her direction is another.
#justmisogynistthings
jonbuoy
11th February 2016, 21:47
Oh the burn! haha.
You know I use to treat women with respect and viewed them as my "equal". but now I'm older and much wiser.
Life tip, avoid female tenants, especially the single ones.
Do you under stand what the word "generalisation" means?
Not all single mums are trash, but the their offspring have a greater chance of turning into dysfunctional adults.
The stats on baby mamas https://youtu.be/JpFzanztmB4?t=1m46s
Like I said before, signal mothers are a social disease.
It depends what your definition of "stable household" is?
My old man is a psychopath. much like his dominating husband beating mother.
Yup but you seem to be the king of generalisations when it comes to women. I can see where your distrust comes from. Dare I say a lot of feminists who grew up in an abusive household think the same about men. Just because you get bitten by a dog doesn´t mean all dogs are bad.
WristTwister
11th February 2016, 22:48
This whole thing is a circus, there are serious womens and mens issues that need attention, but instead the media are giving more attention to this loser and his deviant views on rape.
mashman
11th February 2016, 23:45
They leave to have children. My sister worked for a London City corporate law firm, extremely sexist environment was told she would never make partner. Worked her self into the ground to try and prove them wrong. One day met a guy, fell in love got married and decided having kids was more important. She's now a stay at home mum as she didn't want the kids to be brought up by strangers. Her husband has carried on his career and just bought himself into a partnership.
Those old white motherfuckers were right all along.
No, they were wrong, but thanks for reinforcing their stereotype and your prejudice :niceone:
jonbuoy
12th February 2016, 08:15
No, they were wrong, but thanks for reinforcing their stereotype and your prejudice :niceone:
They told her she wouldn't make partner, she would leave to have kids. And she did. None of it was my decision.
mashman
12th February 2016, 10:22
They told her she wouldn't make partner, she would leave to have kids. And she did. None of it was my decision.
What I meant was that you were saying that her employer was right, because she fulfilled their prophecy of her leaving to end up having a kid. Would she have had a different perspective on kids if she had have been made partner? Her vagina took a beating, but I'm pretty sure her brain was functioning fine and could be of use? If it was of use in the first place. I agree, highly sexist.
https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-4ce8b9e05eb0067249c91f13da846c7c?convert_to_webp=t rue
jonbuoy
12th February 2016, 10:46
What I meant was that you were saying that her employer was right, because she fulfilled their prophecy of her leaving to end up having a kid. Would she have had a different perspective on kids if she had have been made partner? Her vagina took a beating, but I'm pretty sure her brain was functioning fine and could be of use? If it was of use in the first place. I agree, highly sexist.
https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-4ce8b9e05eb0067249c91f13da846c7c?convert_to_webp=t rue
Not if you want to look after your own kids - they pay them well but expect their pound of flesh. If they tell you on Monday afternoon they need you to say at work for the next two days then that's what your expected to do. They had beds and showers at the office, gophers to get you clean clothes and food. That's the price for the pay check. It's not the sort of industry that will let you do "flexitime" and in some ways would it be fair that other co- workers (female or male) would be the ones that had to stay and work into the wee hours while she buggered off at 3pm to pick the kids up from school?
TheDemonLord
12th February 2016, 11:05
https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-4ce8b9e05eb0067249c91f13da846c7c?convert_to_webp=t rue
The funny thing about the picture - is if you give it Context - For example, applying for an Aborists position, then the exam no longer becomes discriminatory based on species, but based on requirements for the Job.
Related to what Jonbouy said - The business has requirements, if you are unable (or Unwilling) to meet them, then they will look at other people.
yokel
12th February 2016, 15:07
They leave to have children. My sister worked for a London City corporate law firm, extremely sexist environment was told she would never make partner. Worked her self into the ground to try and prove them wrong. One day met a guy, fell in love got married and decided having kids was more important. She's now a stay at home mum as she didn't want the kids to be brought up by strangers. Her husband has carried on his career and just bought himself into a partnership.
Those old white motherfuckers were right all along.
Those sexist bastards did your sister a big favour.
For every woman that becomes some professional means there's one less man available for a woman to get into a relationship with and have kids.
So in essence women are shooting themselves in the foot.
Tazz
12th February 2016, 15:13
Those sexist bastards did your sister a big favour.
For every woman that becomes some professional means there's one less man available for a woman to get into a relationship with and have kids.
Bah. Hardly. Tis all life decisions. My sister pulls six figures (her partner can't be far off either) and manages to also have a farkin sweet family life. It's not so black and white, some people (men and woman) are just useless and or make the wrong choices for where they want to be in life, imo.
yokel
12th February 2016, 15:22
Bah. Hardly. Tis all life decisions. My sister pulls six figures (her partner can't be far off either) and manages to also have a farkin sweet family life. It's not so black and white, some people (men and woman) are just useless and or make the wrong choices for where they want to be in life, imo.
Your sister is a greedy c#@t.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/w__PJ8ymliw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
TheDemonLord
12th February 2016, 15:39
The funny thing about Yokel posting Karen Staughn (I quite like Karen's work btw) is that she is a Single Mother.
yokel
12th February 2016, 16:07
The funny thing about Yokel posting Karen Staughn (I quite like Karen's work btw) is that she is a Single Mother.
Who knows, maybe she didn't want to end up being a single mother?
and I fail to see how her being a single mother changes what she's saying.
or am I meant to disagree with her solely because she's a single mother?
What do you do when someone you don't really like (eg karen straughan being male attention whore) says something you agree with?
Virago
12th February 2016, 18:10
Like I said before, signal mothers are a social disease...
What about signal dads?
Woodman
12th February 2016, 18:24
What about signal dads?
What about the signal corps?
Woodman
12th February 2016, 18:25
Your sister is a greedy c#@t.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/w__PJ8ymliw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
You are an envious fucktard.
mashman
12th February 2016, 19:27
Not if you want to look after your own kids - they pay them well but expect their pound of flesh. If they tell you on Monday afternoon they need you to say at work for the next two days then that's what your expected to do. They had beds and showers at the office, gophers to get you clean clothes and food. That's the price for the pay check. It's not the sort of industry that will let you do "flexitime" and in some ways would it be fair that other co- workers (female or male) would be the ones that had to stay and work into the wee hours while she buggered off at 3pm to pick the kids up from school?
I've no doubt that it's a hard game that requires dedication. I'm surprised people even bother.
yokel
13th February 2016, 12:35
What about signal dads?
The stats show Single dads are better than single mum parents.
men are generally better parents, because they do the fathering.
You are an envious fucktard.
Not at all, I take exception to how the dynamics between the male and female relationship as been shit on.
It is what got us to this point, now we've thrown it under the bus.
Guess what's going to happen next?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.