PDA

View Full Version : Where were you in 1989?



Bonez
20th August 2020, 19:00
Where were you in 1989?

Dean
20th August 2020, 19:07
In my dads left ball sack

Kb2020dope
20th August 2020, 19:21
Where were you in 1989?

I know its been 31 years but im not willing to talk about that. I haven't really been the same since " the accident "

jellywrestler
20th August 2020, 20:43
Where were you in 1989?

designing that very same t shirt actually

Bonez
20th August 2020, 20:53
designing that very same t shirt actuallyI thought that was the case spyda. It's a sweat shirt btw. Well traveled as well. :)

rastuscat
20th August 2020, 20:53
HMNZS Canterbury, on my first overseas deployment, leaving my GPz550H2 in Devonport.

BMWGSER
20th August 2020, 21:33
Must of been close to Rastuscat joining Auckland City Council and getting a BMW R80 TIC to ride around on. That year I bought a new Honda CBR1000F and going to the world superbike races at Manfeild.Only just over 30 years ago.

jellywrestler
20th August 2020, 22:00
I thought that was the case spyda. It's a sweat shirt btw. Well traveled as well. :)

the 14th kiwi was postponed after bad weather, we needed to make the 15th a big thing, i tracked down the old logos and got them incorparated into that years t shirt. and sweat short

Navy Boy
21st August 2020, 13:33
HMNZS Canterbury, on my first overseas deployment, leaving my GPz550H2 in Devonport.

Nice... Steam baby, Steam! ;)

I was finishing high school and listening to Fine Young Cannibals - A lot.

All the while surviving South Africa (Where I grew up).

Jase H
23rd August 2020, 10:56
This sounds like a loaded question. I am NOT your father; I've never even met your mother. :-)

Bonez
23rd August 2020, 11:09
This sounds like a loaded question. I am NOT your father; I've never even met your mother. :-)Oh goody. Another snowflake to play with.

I wonder how long it will take until this one melts?

Bonez
23rd August 2020, 11:49
Wow! That must be some sort of world record.:lol:

They don't build them like they use to.

IronPawz
23rd August 2020, 19:03
Mmmm 1989

I was working in orchards in Hawks Bay. Still had my GS550 Katana Styled bike and broke a few Cortina's that year.

It was all about night clubs and getting laid. Life was simple and my bike did like 175 lying flat on the tank all taps on full. Shit I even had hair!

RDJ
23rd August 2020, 19:35
Metro Manila for work. Including late-in-year coup days.

Interesting times... the rebels almost succeeded.

But 'almost' means the same as 'didn't'.

TheDemonLord
24th August 2020, 12:08
Walking around, tripping over, picking stuff up off the floor, hitting things with any vaguely hitty-shaped thing I could get my hands on.

Basic Boy stuff really.

Banditbandit
24th August 2020, 14:35
Working on a newspaper in Hawke's Bay ..

pete376403
24th August 2020, 16:11
A year away from being made redundant by IBM. Came out of it financially ok, but was the first time I had ever been put out of a job (as opposed to leaving on my terms). Just about over it.

fridayflash
24th August 2020, 18:05
1989?

turning 16 years old, leaving high school, drinking flagons, smoking pall mall filterless, hillman superminx, ac/dc , the sex pistols etc

honda cg125 with coby exhaust.

ellipsis
24th August 2020, 19:18
...I was 40+ years old, at my peak, and looked half my age...things have changed since then...fucking good to be alive and our four kids are all sussed...

...grandkids just make you feel old...

Bonez
24th August 2020, 19:40
1989?

turning 16 years old, leaving high school, drinking flagons, smoking pall mall filterless, hillman superminx, ac/dc , the sex pistols etc

honda cg125 with coby exhaust.I bought a CG125 for Connies twin boys to muck around with on the land behind her place.
Half the neighborhood boys thrashed the hell out of it. It was good to see the wide smiles on their faces. No helmet no leathers and no gloves. I did make sure they were at least wearing sneakers. Non of them got seriously injured at all. All the kids just laughed at any rider that fell of it doing jumps on a dirt mound.

Badgermat
24th August 2020, 22:18
In the UK.

I was six months into my first business (computer support … don’t ask, it was an utter failure) with a one year-old child and a bank chasing me for money.

Between bikes, but I had a leased Alfa 33 and a massive Motorola 8500 mobile.

bm

R650R
4th September 2020, 16:49
Working on a newspaper in Hawke's Bay ..

Back when they were both respectable publications :)

Would have delivered some of those

Bonez
4th September 2020, 16:50
Back when they were both respectable publications :)

Would have delivered some of thoseHerald Tribune?

R650R
4th September 2020, 16:55
Sunny HB about half population size of today

Doing dumb stuff on pushbike as a teen riding on hilly walking trails where that kind of fun is banned now.
Playing with lathes and spot welders in metal work class, burning stuff in science class and throwing fireworks at each other after school.
Catching my first glimpses of 500cc GP race on telly.

R650R
4th September 2020, 16:58
Herald Tribune?

That’s was Hastings, Napier was The Daily Telegraph. Both had their own distinct style but were both accurate and in house photojournalists not this blurry cellphone shit sent in by readers like today.
The only opinion piece was by the editor and no corporate press releases masquerading as news like today.

rok-the-boat
4th October 2020, 15:47
In Japan, riding a Suzuki DR125 that cost me Y10,000.

BMWST?
4th October 2020, 18:20
Wellington, probably had just bought a well used FZ750(had done a 6 hr) after trading my BMWK100RS in for a house deposit a couple of years before

Grumph
4th October 2020, 18:56
About Ellipse's age - and looked it. At my peak as a tuner of F1 bikes on Methanol. Due to probs with the lessee of our F1 bike, it was a last minute deal to help Robbie Dean to his F1 title.
Most remenmbered incident was working half the night to patch his GSXR up after a practise crash at Teretonga.

It was the last season of open fuel alas. And my last of self-employment.

And two years away from my first major heart attack.

ellipsis
4th October 2020, 19:42
...I was 31 and had spent 8 years overseas chasing motorcycle racing, F1 and hiding in a very unsafe but very safe environment, for me, in the Nth Sea...

...I was happily married with a son and back here in my fathers chosen land...catching big fish and as cocky as a hard nosed, aggro type of scots cunt could be...Roger Douglas had stolen or sold the foundation of why I had come back home with an English bride...


...at the time I wondered why the fuck I had come back to this fucked up but beautiful place...my wife left me and I turned into a bigger cunt than I was before...still fearless but more determined...I smacked a lot of wankers who fucked with me around the head and was invited to an institution that dealt with psycho cunts like me...only to find out I was just angry and normal but 'braw'...a silly cunt that would prefer to fight to the end than back down...

...nothing has changed as a lot of silly cunts that have fucked with me since then will testify...life's good and speedway is King...

...a long time ago though...and history is just the sands of time, blowing in the wind...

Dean
5th October 2020, 18:29
Reading all of these posts and it’s clear that 1989 was a great time to be alive.

You were employed, had plenty opportunities & no real dramas like that of what we face today.

And the Boomers say to me “back in my day”???

You clearly didn’t have it hard at all.
Imagine what us Millennials will have to say about what we went through...

Grumph
5th October 2020, 18:51
Reading all of these posts and it’s clear that 1989 was a great time to be alive.

You were employed, had plenty opportunities & no real dramas like that of what we face today.

And the Boomers say to me “back in my day”???

You clearly didn’t have it hard at all.
Imagine what us Millennials will have to say about what we went through...

Fuck off. You don't know you're alive.

The leaving self-employment was in order to service the first mortgage at 12.5% - and the second at 21%. Pretty normal rates for those days.
Yes, houses were cheaper - but money was a fucking sight harder to borrow.

The heart attack was a logical outcome of working 60 hour weeks to service the fucking motgages.

Yes, I have a nice property now. But it's cost me.
How many hours are you working ?

pritch
5th October 2020, 19:22
And the Boomers say to me “back in my day”???

You clearly didn’t have it hard at all.
Imagine what us Millennials will have to say about what we went through...

It's possible you might improve your understanding by studying some history. Roger Douglas introduced his "surprise" economic theory and probably hundreds of thousands of people lost their jobs. The "sunset industries" were gone and the jobs with them. Tens of thousands of government jobs too were gone. We don't manufacture much here any more, it's more efficient to buy it from China. Lots of jobs in China, successive generations of permanent unemployed here. Plus large numbers of people trying to survive on the minimum wage.

Prior to Rogernomics the economy was government controlled. The government set the exchange rate, they set the rules by which the bank could offer housing loans, and sometimes they intentionally made it very difficult if they were worried about inflation at the time. The other big expense they controlled was the hire purchase regulations, if they thought too many were buying cars they would require a bigger deposit and/or a shorter time to pay. IIRC the most difficult was 50% deposit, one year to pay the balance.

The Millenials are facing difficulties, no question, but things aren't looking too flash for the Gen Zs as they leave school and try to join the workforce.

Then there's a pandemic to further complicate things for everybody.

Dean
5th October 2020, 20:40
Fuck off. You don't know you're alive.

The leaving self-employment was in order to service the first mortgage at 12.5% - and the second at 21%. Pretty normal rates for those days.
Yes, houses were cheaper - but money was a fucking sight harder to borrow.

The heart attack was a logical outcome of working 60 hour weeks to service the fucking motgages.

Yes, I have a nice property now. But it's cost me.
How many hours are you working ?

Firstly let’s talk deposits.
My sister lives in Auckland Penrose, the average house price is circa 1million.
And yes taking Auckland as an example is logical because statistically Auckland accommodates the majority of Millennials and Boomers per city.

The banks now generally require 20% deposit whereas it was only 10% in 1989.
In 1989 annual income was proportionally 1/4 - 1/5 of the house price, nowadays taking Auckland as an example It is 1/12 in proportion (average house price of 1million divided by an average salary of 80k).

Do you think this is achievable & sustainable?

Regarding interest - that was somewhat mitigated with how you factored your repayment scheme and how much you deposited. But generally yes those interest rates were far higher. Except there still exists a vast difference in the total interest & repayment to bank relative to total income.

I actually work 65-70 hours a week.
And no this is not a joke - I wish it was.
I am on well above the average NZ salary with work vehicle etc however It is still hard for me to purchase a house.

My current house cost my landlord $120,000 in the 80’s. It is now valued at 1.2million (well above local inflation rates).
I need to make a deposit of $240,000, I am 27yrs old.
It’s not impossible but it is more challenging than what boomers encountered.

Berries
5th October 2020, 20:53
Try moving from Auckland.

In 1989 I worked the summer on a holiday camp washing dishes and outside that was on the dole or doing 12 hour night shifts watching machines stuff envelopes or sanding shop fittings. I couldn’t afford rent let alone have ideas about buying a house like you do.

Instead of blaming the previous generation I got off my arse and changed things. Took me another 15 years to pay off my debts and had to move countries to do so.

Don’t take this the wrong way but you whinge too much.

ellipsis
5th October 2020, 21:41
It’s not impossible but it is more challenging than what boomers encountered.

...in the '70s you could buy an older house in my little town for between 4 and 8 grand... most of my ilk were young, time served tradesmen who found this a daunting prospect, irrespective of what your perceived views of what then was, and the differing reality of what it really was, and how you fucks became soft, moaning, me, me, me cunts like you are, is tiresome millennial wank...

...get a licence...find some dumb cunt silly enough to marry you, have kids, come back in ten years and talk about it...you may have grown up a little in that time, but you still may not own a house...like many of my boomer mates couldn't either...piss off...

swarfie
6th October 2020, 06:22
Fuck off. You don't know you're alive.

The leaving self-employment was in order to service the first mortgage at 12.5% - and the second at 21%. Pretty normal rates for those days.
Yes, houses were cheaper - but money was a fucking sight harder to borrow.

The heart attack was a logical outcome of working 60 hour weeks to service the fucking motgages.

+1 on that. I've always been an employee. Did my trade, left the Tron to work in Dorkland for a short while before going to Bougainville and working in a shithole in the early 80's for great money to buy a house. First five weeks there I was doing 105 hours a week...you heard that right. Engaged to my lovely wife of 37 years which was tough. Hours gradually got cut down but still @ 84 when I left. The money I earned put us in our house with much less of a mortgage than my mates. It started at 10% and within 18 months had gone to 21%. That put some of my mates out of their houses in mortgagee sales! We had a MK1 Escort, my XR500A, a new fridge and washing machine, a borrowed bed and NOTHING else. Our lounge suite was some big pillows the war office had made. That was it! Call me a moaning old coont but I don't see to many young people getting off their arses and working fucking hard to do the same thing. Yes houses are expensive but as Grumph says money is unbelievably cheap. And who wants to live in Dorkland anyway. Get out and smell the roses.

TheDemonLord
6th October 2020, 11:07
Firstly let’s talk deposits.
My sister lives in Auckland Penrose, the average house price is circa 1million.
And yes taking Auckland as an example is logical because statistically Auckland accommodates the majority of Millennials and Boomers per city.

So, you choose to live somewhere you can't afford to live and then expect sympathy.


The banks now generally require 20% deposit whereas it was only 10% in 1989.
In 1989 annual income was proportionally 1/4 - 1/5 of the house price, nowadays taking Auckland as an example It is 1/12 in proportion (average house price of 1million divided by an average salary of 80k).

Methinks you are substituting the national average and then comparing it to the Auckland Average - Tsk Tsk.

Plus, you are only using a single income, whereas realistically (for both my parents and my In-Laws) they bought a house with a joint income, which changes the calculations somewhat.


Regarding interest - that was somewhat mitigated with how you factored your repayment scheme and how much you deposited. But generally yes those interest rates were far higher. Except there still exists a vast difference in the total interest & repayment to bank relative to total income.

Referencing back to my In-Laws, they nearly lost their house when the Interest rates went through the roof, 20% interest on a Mortgage was crippling. Many had to sell their houses, many had to pay off negative equity. There wasn't much mitigation except for 'doing without' and preying for the interest rates to return to normalcy


I actually work 65-70 hours a week.
And no this is not a joke - I wish it was.
I am on well above the average NZ salary with work vehicle etc however It is still hard for me to purchase a house.

I'm willing to bet, that you don't live like most of the previous generation lived when buying their first home - Both sets of Parents state that when they bought their house, they were pretty much living off Bread and Milk initially, every penny went into their Mortgage. After a couple of years and a couple of pay rises, they started to live more comfortably.

In fact, they remarked that the first house I bought (in Gulf Harbour) was practically a mansion compared to their first house which was a 1 bedroom flat.


My current house cost my landlord $120,000 in the 80’s. It is now valued at 1.2million (well above local inflation rates).
I need to make a deposit of $240,000, I am 27yrs old.
It’s not impossible but it is more challenging than what boomers encountered.

So, Move - here: Much more affordable, $60K deposit, 4 bedrooms (https://www.realestate.co.nz/3719146/residential/sale/3-totara-street-waipukurauand-surrounds?gclid=CjwKCAjwiOv7BRBREiwAXHbv3BDTvM0KrM q6qKFiQveqPX2vRFrBG-odlpeZV3vPQZd0SPIWprg7RhoCeZkQAvD_BwE&hsa_acc=1844364653&hsa_ad=355691115822&hsa_cam=2036245429&hsa_grp=67300679490&hsa_kw=waipukurau%20houses%20for%20sale&hsa_mt=p&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-770135048781&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=waipukurau%20houses%20for%20sale)

'But I work in the city, so I have to be in the city' - You pays your money, you takes your choice. If you want a house (very much like I did), you have to decide on your priorities, for me it was Home Ownership, so I moved from the North Shore out to Gulf Harbour, I had a 1 hour bike commute to Penrose daily, but that was what it took to own a house, as time went on, the house started to appreciate, which eased the financial burden.

It's easy to look at the numbers today and conclude that it's so much harder today - to that I call absolute bullshit, Owning a home has always been difficult, there are a myriad of tools and options available to you today to help you get into a first home that didn't exist 30 years ago, Finance is waaaaaaaay easier to obtain than it was 30 years ago.

So, as one who is not much older than you (but owns a house) - Quit yer bitchin', It is what it is, each generation had their struggles, now it's up to you to think your way around them.

Dean
6th October 2020, 13:18
So, you choose to live somewhere you can't afford to live and then expect sympathy.

I live in Christchurch, where did I ever overtly state I live in Auckland?

"Asking for sympathy" is purely subjective - that's your personal opinion.



Methinks you are substituting the national average and then comparing it to the Auckland Average - Tsk Tsk.

Cant be bothered looking much further into it - I simply don't have the time, here's your task for today if you would be so kind:

Go and find for me the average Auckland Salary for Q3/Q4 2020 so we can compare apples with apples please.
Although I am confident the data will show a large disparity between Auckland income and Auckland house prices.

Also a friendly reminder regarding your inconsistent capitalization - is it "average" or "Average"?



Plus, you are only using a single income, whereas realistically (for both my parents and my In-Laws) they bought a house with a joint income, which changes the calculations somewhat.


Right so because your parents bought a house with a joint income in a different generation - that is reflective of the current Millennial demographic? Tsk Tsk.



Referencing back to my In-Laws, they nearly lost their house when the Interest rates went through the roof, 20% interest on a Mortgage was crippling. Many had to sell their houses, many had to pay off negative equity. There wasn't much mitigation except for 'doing without' and preying for the interest rates to return to normalcy

That's very unfortunate.

Another friendly reminder: "praying".



'But I work in the city, so I have to be in the city' - You pays your money, you takes your choice. If you want a house (very much like I did), you have to decide on your priorities, for me it was Home Ownership, so I moved from the North Shore out to Gulf Harbour, I had a 1 hour bike commute to Penrose daily, but that was what it took to own a house, as time went on, the house started to appreciate, which eased the financial burden.

It's easy to look at the numbers today and conclude that it's so much harder today - to that I call absolute bullshit, Owning a home has always been difficult, there are a myriad of tools and options available to you today to help you get into a first home that didn't exist 30 years ago, Finance is waaaaaaaay easier to obtain than it was 30 years ago.

So, as one who is not much older than you (but owns a house) - Quit yer bitchin', It is what it is, each generation had their struggles, now it's up to you to think your way around them.

For a man that supposedly works with analyzing data you seem to gloss past the elephant in the room - the massive income/house price disparity which is greater than in your in-laws time. You need to acknowledge what that data is telling us.

Serious question - how are the house prices in Gulf Harbour? I have heard they have greatly depreciated over the last 10-15 years?
Id be willing to bet you purchased your home out there under 650k sale price (which is not reflective of the Auckland average).
I have some friends out there - aren't those villa apartments going cheap?
Seem's to be the cheapest place to buy in Auckland?

I'm also not stating that I wont or cant buy a house - I'm just saying that it needs to be acknowledged that the Millennial generation face greater challenges.

Thanks for your input.

TheDemonLord
6th October 2020, 13:51
I live in Christchurch, where did I ever overtly state I live in Auckland?

"Asking for sympathy" is purely subjective - that's your personal opinion.

The constant reference to Auckland and Auckland prices generally....


Cant be bothered looking much further into it - I simply don't have the time, here's your task for today if you would be so kind:

Go and find for me the average Auckland Salary for Q3/Q4 2020 so we can compare apples with apples please.
Although I am confident the data will show a large disparity between Auckland income and Auckland house prices.

Also a friendly reminder regarding your inconsistent capitalization - is it "average" or "Average"?

Why? You are the one making the point, onus is on you to provide the correct data, I'm simply pointing out you are mixing your measures subjectively and therefore any conclusion you draw is invalid.


Right so because your parents bought a house with a joint income in a different generation - that is reflective of the current Millennial demographic? Tsk Tsk.

Whilst I'll acknowledge a time difference - Each group has the same fundamental choices.

One overwhelming choose to get Married, Buy a crappy house, and do it up.
The other chooses differently.

At the end of the day, there are choices and they have consequences. Don't like the Consequences? Make better choices. Demanding everyone else must make your life easier, when part of the struggles are entirely self-inflicted just makes you look like a whining entitled Child.


That's very unfortunate.

Another friendly reminder: "praying".

Ah, so when something bad happens to one generation, it's very unfortunate.
When it happens to your generation it's "more challenging than what boomers encountered."

Get over yourself.


For a man that supposedly works with analyzing data you seem to gloss past the elephant in the room - the massive income/house price disparity which is greater than in your in-laws time. You need to acknowledge what that data is telling us.

Or maybe I'm factoring in other things - such as the ease of access to Finance, ease of mobility, remote working options etc.


Serious question - how are the house prices in Gulf Harbour? I have heard they have greatly depreciated over the last 10-15 years?
Id be willing to bet you purchased your home out there under 650k sale price (which is not reflective of the Auckland average).
I have some friends out there - aren't those villa apartments going cheap?
Seem's to be the cheapest place to buy in Auckland?

I think you mean it's greatly appreciated over the last 10-15 years, I made just under 50% increase on my house when I sold it last year.

Either way, Auckland Averages or not, the fact remains there are options, if you are willing to make the sacrifices.

But even then - let's take you at your word:

Buy a cheap villa apartment - spend a couple of years paying into the mortgage and developing some equity, as opposed to paying off your landlords mortgage. Sell it and then move into a bigger/nicer/closer home - it's what the previous generation did - seems to have worked for them.


I'm also not stating that I wont or cant buy a house - I'm just saying that it needs to be acknowledged that the Millennial generation face greater challenges.

If you (both you specifically and Millennials generally) spent as much time working on obtaining a house as they did bitching about how 'hard' and 'greater challenges' etc. Then they'd look like the Winning player in a game of Monopoly.

Excluding Auckland and Wellington as outliers - there are plenty of locations all throughout NZ with very affordable houses, especially ones that could do with a little bit of elbow-grease to make them nice.... That thing that the previous generation did - investing time and effort to make something nice, instead of complaining that they should be entitled to something nice by dint of their mere existence.

And for the record - I bought my first house at 26.

Dean
6th October 2020, 14:27
The constant reference to Auckland and Auckland prices generally....

You need to read the fine print next time please.



Why? You are the one making the point, onus is on you to provide the correct data, I'm simply pointing out you are mixing your measures subjectively and therefore any conclusion you draw is invalid.

I made a statement, you decided to challenge it, I explained that I am too busy to respond. However since you have the time to challenge my statement in the pursuit of truth then it seems logical that you also have the time to find this data to satisfy your pursuit. Fair enough?



Whilst I'll acknowledge a time difference

Thanks mate.



Or maybe I'm factoring in other things - such as the ease of access to Finance, ease of mobility, remote working options etc.


You're focusing on the 20%.
I am focusing on the 80%.
Try to think big picture.
It doesn't come easy to some.



I think you mean it's greatly appreciated over the last 10-15 years, I made just under 50% increase on my house when I sold it last year.

Nice! I was not aware the Gulf Harbour housing market had appreciated.




If you (both you specifically and Millennials generally) spent as much time working on obtaining a house as they did bitching about how 'hard' and 'greater challenges' etc. Then they'd look like the Winning player in a game of Monopoly.

Who is to say I am not working hard on obtaining a house in the background?
You mentioned "you specifically".
What makes you assume this?



And for the record - I bought my first house at 26.

Well done!

TheDemonLord
6th October 2020, 14:44
I made a statement, you decided to challenge it, I explained that I am too busy to respond. However since you have the time to challenge my statement in the pursuit of truth then it seems logical that you also have the time to find this data to satisfy your pursuit. Fair enough?

I've fulfilled my obligations as to point out the flaws in your argument, anything further is on you.


You're focusing on the 20%.
I am focusing on the 80%.
Try to think big picture.
It doesn't come easy to some.

Except I bought a house, so maybe the 20% that you think I'm focusing on, is more like the 80% that you should be focusing on.


Who is to say I am not working hard on obtaining a house in the background?
You mentioned "you specifically".
What makes you assume this?

Because I have friends (I know, it's a surprise to some, even myself) who I have heard repeat the same lines and arguments you have posted over the course of the last 5 or so years.

Most of whom, had they made different choices, would be homeowners.

But instead, they choose to live in nicer and nicer flats (for example a Flat with a value of 1.2 Million), with more expensive rents, they choose to not commit to a relationship, they choose to go on holidays/overseas trips/partying on the Weekend etc. When I bought my first house, my Mortgage was I think a 30-40% increase on what my Rent was, that was a lifestyle shock....

Now, I don't know every specific detail about your life, but I do know that you opted to have Children before you bought a house - That is a Choice that you made, that has consequences which I'd conjecture leads you to be looking for a minimum number of Bedrooms and with a minimum acceptable level of quality?

The final straw that irks me is when people have the Gall to claim they have it harder than the previous generation, which I find to be both absurd, massively ungrateful and entitled. Just like your comments about "Very Unfortunate".

Dean
6th October 2020, 15:34
Except I bought a house, so maybe the 20% that you think I'm focusing on, is more like the 80% that you should be focusing on.


People make different sacrifices, you decided to enter into debt at a young age for a low value house in a logistically challenging area (you had to travel 1hr to work everyday)
But If you would like my praise for coming up with an 80,000 deposit of which you would have split with your Kiwisaver, wife, in-laws, daddy and mummy - well done! Good on you!

I am in the market for around 1-1.2million as I am looking at buying in Mt Eden (average house price in Mt Eden is around or a little higher than this Mark). Need to move there due to several reasons (work and personal). But no daddy or mummy to help me out, just my "big picture mentality" salary. Each to their own mate.



Because I have friends (I know, it's a surprise to some, even myself) who I have heard repeat the same lines and arguments you have posted over the course of the last 5 or so years.

So you're assuming your friends are the same as me?
Same background?
Same motives?

"Assuming is the root of all disappointments"



Most of whom, had they made different choices, would be homeowners.


"Most" - would you like it if your bike started 'most' of the time?



Now, I don't know every specific detail about your life, but I do know that you opted to have Children before you bought a house - That is a Choice that you made, that has consequences which I'd conjecture leads you to be looking for a minimum number of Bedrooms and with a minimum acceptable level of quality?

Having children was never a setback or challenge that I raised in regards to buying a home, so these are your words not mine, houses are expensive whether they be 1 or 4 bedrooms.

I do however spend a lot of time with my little one especially when she is sick - and not on KB.
The "acceptable level of quality" isn't always in the house - rather in "priorities" and how much quality time I spend with her.



The final straw that irks me is when people have the Gall to claim they have it harder than the previous generation, which I find to be both absurd, massively ungrateful and entitled. Just like your comments about "Very Unfortunate".

That's very unfortunate to hear.

Anyways I appreciate your input and unfortunately I have got to go.
Daddy duties.

Cheers,

MaxPenguin
6th October 2020, 17:41
Is being a millennial a disability or an excuse?

In 1989 I was mostly drunk.

JATZ
6th October 2020, 18:01
Is being a millennial a disability or an excuse?

In 1989 I was mostly drunk.
I think it's an excuse :scratch:

I was mostly stoned, occasionally drunk. Enjoying the last of my teenage years.

george formby
6th October 2020, 19:13
I was watching old British comedy.


https://youtu.be/ue7wM0QC5LE

Laava
6th October 2020, 20:55
The banks now generally require 20% deposit whereas it was only 10% in 1989.
You should do some research on this. Certainly wasn't my experience. And while you are there, have a look and see what the interest rates were.

TheDemonLord
6th October 2020, 22:53
Firstly let’s talk deposits.


I need to make a deposit of $240,000


acknowledged that the Millennial generation face greater challenges.



I am in the market for around 1-1.2million

So, according to RealEstate NZ - in Christchurch, there's ~1,300 homes listed.

If I set a Max price of $900K, there's ~1,100 homes listed.

My entire point has been about Choices and Consequences.

You are looking at the cost of a First Home that is more expensive than 85% of the houses on the market. You are complaining about the size of the Deposit and various factors, when you, yourself and your choices, are the biggest factor, by far.

Now, if you want a really nice first house, more power to you, may fortune and hard work reward thee.

But don't you dare try and play the 'Poor Me, Woe is me, We Millenials have it so much worse' card when it is entirely self-inflicted.

Grumph
7th October 2020, 04:56
My reading of it is that a lot of millennials haven't got the balls to commit. if you don't buy something - anything - to get on the property ladder, you'll never work your way up to a nice place.

We went through five properties before our current one. Start small, add value and work up. But it requires commitment - and sacrifice. No toys. No overseas trips.

Sold our first place at a market peak. Rented for 18 months - saving like fuck - and bought at the bottom of the next trough.

To put it in a motorcycling context, i see a shitload of guys with very nice gear for trackdays - but they'll never commit enough to come out and race.

swarfie
7th October 2020, 06:11
My reading of it is that a lot of millennials haven't got the balls to commit. if you don't buy something - anything - to get on the property ladder, you'll never work your way up to a nice place.

We went through five properties before our current one. Start small, add value and work up. But it requires commitment - and sacrifice. No toys. No overseas trips.






But don't you dare try and play the 'Poor Me, Woe is me, We Millenials have it so much worse' card when it is entirely self-inflicted.

My point EXACTLY. "Millenials" in my opinion, want to start out with it all. It's all about priorities. If you want it bad enough you'll learn to do without for a bit. It pays off in the end. I've had those trips overseas now, and have my toys as well.

Swoop
9th October 2020, 15:21
The Millenials are facing difficulties, no question, but things aren't looking too flash for the Gen Zs as they leave school and try to join the workforce.

Then there's a pandemic to further complicate things for everybody.
With the government borrowing happening now, they don't know what is waiting around the economic corner, waiting to hit them...

My reading of it is that a lot of millennials haven't got the balls to commit. if you don't buy something - anything - to get on the property ladder, you'll never work your way up to a nice place.

We went through five properties before our current one. Start small, add value and work up. But it requires commitment - and sacrifice. No toys. No overseas trips.
The apartment route is open and affordabe to get onto the property ladder.
Just that the mentality of "property" means a 1/4 acre section with large house, is still entrenched. Sadly state housing suffers from this still.

My point EXACTLY. "Millenials" in my opinion, want to start out with it all.
A relevant comment.
Lady I know in real estate is saying exactly that. The powderpuffs want 3bdrm, en-suite, everything top-end... NOW!
The twats do not want to work up the propety ladder, just have the massive house (and a massive mortgage) immediately.

ellipsis
9th October 2020, 18:26
...the Roman Empire lasted only as long as the hard men fought and won a life...soft cock, inheritors of the empire lost it...it took a while...nothing lasts forever...even diamonds, I would hazard a guess...

husaberg
9th October 2020, 18:42
With the government borrowing happening now, they don't know what is waiting around the economic corner, waiting to hit them...

.

yeah borrowing huge amounts of money is clearly financial mismanagement aye:msn-wink:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIbPBnrV4AAVLX0.jpg

scumdog
9th October 2020, 20:17
yeah borrowing huge amounts of money is clearly financial mismanagement aye:msn-wink:


And since then??
2016 is a long time ago...

husaberg
9th October 2020, 21:24
And since then??
2016 is a long time ago...

https://www.ceicdata.com/datapage/charts/ipc_new-zealand_external-debt--of-nominal-gdp/?type=area&period=5y&lang=en


https://figure.nz/chart/FfzTlACePvCPAS1I/download


Looking instead at the average real per capita spending over the terms of the two governments, the VUW/NZIER data indicates a decline of 11.7% between Labour and National.
The declining trend in core Crown expenditure since the 2011 peak, both in real per capita terms and as a share of GDP.
Toby Moore at Victoria University of Wellington and Derek Gill at the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research



2020
National recognises that during an economic crisis, when we are losing thousands of jobs and businesses are struggling, increased government spending and higher levels of debt are required here and now,”
We only had low levels of debt, following the Global Financial Crisis and Canterbury earthquakes, because of that combination of disciplined spending and the focus on growth delivered by the previous national government,”

The second part is national party horseshit.

National’s Finance Spokesperson Paul Goldsmith also said

“Stopping payments to the Super Fund,
Yeah that's smart, they did that in the late 1970s and got rid of the best user fund in the world.


Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones says today’s capital investment announcements show the Coalition Government is the Government of Infrastructure.
$7 billion in projects have been announced as part of the Government’s $12 billion New Zealand Upgrade Programme, which will see capital spending at its highest rate in more than 20 years, Jones said. Further significant investment in regional New Zealand will be announced in coming weeks.

TheDemonLord
9th October 2020, 21:32
yeah borrowing huge amounts of money is clearly financial mismanagement aye:msn-wink:

Especially when the previous government 'saved' money by not investing in any infrastructure, touting the 'surplus' (which was just smoke and mirrors) and then you have to deal with the 2008 GFC.

Edit: Your second graph seems to show just how well managed the finances under the John Key National government were, compared to Ireland at least.

Seems like Key did only what was absolutely necessary, unlike Taxinda who seems to think Money grows on the Middle-class..

sugilite
11th October 2020, 12:45
In 1989, I was doing this - it was fun :yes:

https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=156870&d=1210861231

Swoop
11th October 2020, 19:24
And since then??
2016 is a long time ago...
It lacks the relevant data (2020).
When taxcinda arrived, NZ had about 40B debt. We are now over 120B.
https://www.debtclock.nz/

Liarbour winning this election will end up with them holding the massive economic turd they have laid.

husaberg
11th October 2020, 19:40
It lacks the relevant data (2020).
When taxcinda arrived, NZ had about 40B debt. We are now over 120B.
https://www.debtclock.nz/

Liarbour winning this election will end up with them holding the massive economic turd they have laid.

Odd the figures tell a different story about the debt that was inherited
https://www.ceicdata.com/datapage/charts/ipc_new-zealand_national-government-debt/?type=area&from=2017-06-01&to=2020-03-01&lang=en
when you say 40B do you mean 64B
because the last government increased it from about 7 billion to over 64B.
Where it sits now is the exact same place it would be if National was in power collins has said so herself.

New Zealand, let me be straight with you. Communities, livelihoods, futures are at stake.
“Yes, it requires historic debt,
the only difference is we are better off as national would have borrowed even more to pay for tax cuts.
it was a 900% increase if your figures are right we have only less than doubled Nationsals last debt rather than a 700% increase.
As you can see from the graph and the one above labour pays off Nationals debt, not the other way around.