LynxJet mostesses [Archive] - Kiwi Biker forums

SpankMe

10th January 2006, 14:30

Saw LynxJet (http://www.lynxjet.com) mostesses walking down Broadway, Newmarket today. :bleh: Being NZ models they weren't as nice as the ones on the ad, but still worth a perve.

The womens male emasculation movement is of course up in arms (http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=74897) about the ad. Oh dear, how sad, never mind. :rolleyes:

bugjuice

10th January 2006, 14:34

hell yeah :yeah:

Colapop

10th January 2006, 14:36

Don't care what they're selling - I want some!

ManDownUnder

10th January 2006, 14:38

Dr Sarah Maddison needs to relax a little more - she might find she's able to indulge in a more pleasurable activity that way...

SimJen

10th January 2006, 14:41

Its all good, whats up with them skanky lesbos not liking it.....without sex and hot women and sexual innuendo there would be no human race, they'd like all women to be virgins.
Bring on the Mostesses :)

boomer

10th January 2006, 15:29

Inga & Saskia could show me the way.. i'd show them the money :yeah:

Lou Girardin

10th January 2006, 16:22

I tried to book Lynx Air, no-one seemed to have heard of them.

hXc

10th January 2006, 16:34

I tried to book Lynx Air, no-one seemed to have heard of them.

I've havn't lol'd so much in a long time

marty

10th January 2006, 16:53

Gremlin

10th January 2006, 17:51

...Being NZ models they weren't as nice as the ones on the ad, but still worth a perve.
bit selfish not adding some piccies eh?? I mean, there ain't enough piccies on the lynxjet site...

I thought you were a legend at this :lol:

Couldn't give a stuff about those weirdos complaining, they're jealous.

jazbug5

10th January 2006, 18:00

Interesting.

So you guys all still really think that feminists are 'feminazi', lesbian skanks? Surely if they were lesbian they'd be perving along with you?

Personally, I think there are wittier adverts out there using similar imagery; I think it's a pretty crap campaign, but mainly because it lacks wit and imagination. And I'm a bit bored of this mainstreamisation of pqrn, meself... but possibly more bored of the dissenters being called names like 'lesbian skank'.

*swithers over whether to bother pressing send*

Meh.

Deviant Esq

10th January 2006, 18:08

The womens male emasculation movement is of course up in arms (http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=74897) about the ad. Oh dear, how sad, never mind.

Damned right. :rockon:

:chase:

I would point out I've never classed feminists as "lesbian skanks", but that doesn't mean I like 'em any more than the next guy here. The pendulum has swung too far. You'll find, if you look vaguely in the direction of the television when the ads are on, that there is an abundance of discrimiation against men now in advertising. Many ads portray a hapless male getting himself into a stupid situation whilst a female sits there smugly, or points out his stupidity. And females get up in arms the instant something portrays them in a light other than they'd like.

How many men's only clubs in this country? Give up? Count them on one hand. One. Two. Three. Yes, there are only 3 mens only clubs. Almost all of the men's clubs that originally did not permit female members have now been forced to admit them. How many women's only clubs? Still counting? Thought so. Over 2200.

I'm not saying one is deserved of better treatment, nor am I endorsing actions of men in the past forbidding women equality. But that damn word is the sticking point. Equality. There is too much gender based discrimination, because feminists feel it is their duty to humble men about what's happened in the past.

Sniper

10th January 2006, 19:07

I want to fly with them

Pillick

10th January 2006, 19:13

Hmm, the only problem I have with lynx ads are all the empty promises. Its completely false advertising. I mean, I used the stuff for years and not once did I get groped in an elevator, or any of the other stuff that happens in the ads.

This ad is even worse. I saw it and thought "sweet, an airline designed for me!" And now they tell me Lynx Air and the Mostesses dont really exist? The bastards, Its like uncovering the santa clause myth all over again... :angry:

Indiana_Jones

10th January 2006, 19:17

pffffft you think that's hot? check out some of my early modeling work...

<img src="http://usera.imagecave.com/Zapruder/inmypants.jpg" align="centre" vspace="10" hspace="10">

For the ladies, we have Indiana sporting a lovely pair of checkered pants..

-Indy

Magua

10th January 2006, 19:20

Lovely, the hat complements it nicely. :D

Pillick

10th January 2006, 19:21

wtf? ok, you get the bong vote from me... :doobey:

jazbug5

11th January 2006, 10:19

jazbug5

11th January 2006, 10:53

Boo Hoo hoo:weep: :weep: Woe is you.

:rofl:

Ooo, snappy. Well, as you've cut me down with your rapier-like wit and reasoned and unassailable position, I'll just get back in my box. Which is lovely and pink, and quite comfy...

Colapop

11th January 2006, 10:59

SM cam you spel P M S?

jazbug5

11th January 2006, 11:04

How about T I N Y C O C K ?

Colapop

11th January 2006, 11:05

Hisssss MEEOW!!

MisterD

11th January 2006, 11:15

Ah, the good ol' "This-PC-thing-has-gone-too-far-and-ruined-everything" chestnut!
I think the most offensive thing in general is how easily we are swayed by moronic cliches and allow ourselves to occupy nonsensical 'polar positions'. Intelligent debate is missing from the media these days.

Anyway, come back to me with that chestnut (I quite like chestnuts) the day that the boys on MTV are showing as much skin as the girls, wiggling their bits at the camera as much, and there's a 'Calvin Klein Posing Pouch Modelling Show' on the telly.

PS: Oh, and the day you have to work that extra bit harder in order to be taken seriously because you are a male; whichever is sooner, really...

Cut and paste from feministrants.com I presume?

Some day you lot will just have to accept that us blokes are designed to respond to visual stimuli and Women are pretty effectively designed to provide it. It's fine for individual women to use it to get what they want, but not for advertisers to push the same buttons? No hang on, I get it, the problem is that we've learnt just to eat the scooby snack and not do the trick!

SpankMe

11th January 2006, 11:36

Boring pointles debate. Men will never change as we're born this way. Without our desire, the human race would die out.

Back to the subject at hand. Lusty, busty girlies. :bleh: :niceone:

Sniper

11th January 2006, 11:38

This is the reason Spank is great, thanks :niceone:

jazbug5

11th January 2006, 11:47

Well spotted. I always have a look at feministrants.com when I'm due on- or stringthemupbytheirnastysweatyballs.com if feeling really hormonal.

Look, as I said; I have more of an issue with lazy advertising, and its ugly twin, lazy thinking.
Yes, men respond to the sight of naked women. Is this bad? Well, the human race would be in trouble if they didn't!
'Individual women using it to get what they want'? Well, to be honest, that's a wee bit sad of them I suppose..? Sorry if this leaves some of you feeling manipulated and in need of a cuddle, but don't tar us all with the same brush, please.
As to 'women being designed to provide [visual stimulae]', (and I know I'm kind of co-opting your meaning here), it's funny how pissed off some guys can get when women are less effective at this, our main function. I mean, if I had a dollar for every time Helen Clark got sh*t for not looking all pretty and feminine I think I'd be able to afford a half decent bike..!

Anyway, just because feminism (like many 'isms') became a bit of an entrenched cliche does not invalidate everything they ever had to say. And I hate to burst your bubble, folks, but I'm not actually anti-pqrn. Some of my best friends are pqrnographers, strippers and prossies. Most of us do like a little sauce- but do you want it on everything..?

Pixie

11th January 2006, 11:47

Boring pointles debate. Men will never change as we're born this way. Without our desire, the human race would die out.

Back to the subject at hand. Lusty, busty girlies. :bleh: :niceone:
I think the ones in pic #4 are trying to get thrown out of the cricket.

ManDownUnder

11th January 2006, 11:55

LOL welcome back Jazbug... let me take your issues one at a time...

Ah, the good ol' "This-PC-thing-has-gone-too-far-and-ruined-everything" chestnut!

I think the most offensive thing in general is how easily we are swayed by moronic cliches and allow ourselves to occupy nonsensical 'polar positions'. Intelligent debate is missing from the media these days.

:niceone: - I couldn't agree more

Anyway, come back to me with that chestnut (I quite like chestnuts) the day that the boys on MTV are showing as much skin as the girls, wiggling their bits at the camera as much, and there's a 'Calvin Klein Posing Pouch Modelling Show' on the telly.

I'd say that's balanced off by the stereotyping of men as dumb (See Homer in the Simpsons, the lead male figure in most sitcoms, many of the ads involving products "otherwise requiring a professional" with the implied "see, even my husband can do this - it MUST be easy).

Phoebe on Friends is the only female lead with a dumb role, and has a conterpoint in Joey so it's all balanced off.

A particular favourite pastime I have is to swap roles in ads and see how acceptable they'd be. My favourite example is a Rashuns Ad from a while vback. Car load of cute late teen girls driving down a country road - past a guy eating Rashuns. They look, stop, back up and take everything off him except his boxers, take his Rashuns, and drive off laughing leaving him looking bewildered.

A carload of guys stripping a single girl down to her briefs on a country road then driving off laughing would cause an uproar.

... and... just to state my case - I quit like the ad. It's improper, and cheeky and one could get offended by it... but I just like it for what it is.

PS: Oh, and the day you have to work that extra bit harder in order to be taken seriously because you are a male; whichever is sooner, really...

Remind me to pop by the Ministry of Men's affairs and raise that - I'll see what I can do for ya

ManDownUnder

11th January 2006, 11:56

How about this - we turn the telly to another channel if we don't like what's on it?

ManDownUnder

11th January 2006, 11:58

Most of us do like a little sauce- but do you want it on everything..?

Elegantly put - and THAT I agree with 100%

MisterD

11th January 2006, 12:47

I mean, if I had a dollar for every time Helen Clark got sh*t for not looking all pretty and feminine I think I'd be able to afford a half decent bike..!

Ok running off at a tangent I know, but for me that's more to do with a) the whole airbrushing malarky b) her appalling lack of style and grooming and c)the fact she looks totally f-ing lost at any international do.

I mean Maggie Thatcher was no oil painting, but she knew how to wear a well tailored suit and look like she was in charge wherever she was....sheesh she made her handbag into an icon in it's own right. Is it too much to ask that our political representatives look at least as presentable as our sales representatives?

SpankMe

12th January 2006, 10:56

I notice that they cut the spanking scene from the NZ version of the ad. Fucking censorship. :angry2:

Lias

12th January 2006, 12:54

What I want to know, is who unchained all the whiny bitches from the kitchen?

ManDownUnder

12th January 2006, 12:56

I notice that they cut the spanking scene from the NZ version of the ad. Fucking censorship. :angry2:

I saw it in the ad the other night - There are 2 versions of the ad (they ran them almost back to back the other night)

SpankMe

12th January 2006, 13:09

Queen St now has a GIANT poster of Bambi (http://www.adverbox.com/media/campaigns/2006/10/lynx1.jpg) and a rather suggestive cactus.

<img src="http://www.adverbox.com/media/campaigns/2006/10/lynx_1.jpg">

Damon

12th January 2006, 13:35

Mmmmm Bambi is hot!!

I want to know where all the exploitation groups are when Carlos is walking around in his underpants advertising biscuits or when Dan Carter is in his underwear,

i went to one of our stores recently to install a server and a girl there had a screen saver that was looking down on Dan doing situps in lycra boxers :shit: I asked the manager what if he had a chick in her panties doing the same thing and he said "I know! but they just gang up on me when i ask them to remove it", where's your fucking equality there??

And now they complain about some FULLY CLOTHED women throwin pillows at each other

This equality bullshit is all one way traffic if you ask me :bs:

Deviant Esq

12th January 2006, 15:35

Boring pointles debate. Men will never change as we're born this way. Without our desire, the human race would die out.

Back to the subject at hand. Lusty, busty girlies. :bleh: :niceone:

Aha! There is now a point to this thread. Yus! :hug:

:chase:

Mort

22nd May 2008, 21:21

homer

22nd May 2008, 21:25

yeah , was a dud flight my last trip