Log in

View Full Version : Get a Flem up ya!



GR81
29th April 2006, 09:42
wow, check out the BlackCaps last night...
after the SA commentators attacked the quality of NZs first class competitions based on Franklin making a double hundred for Wellington.... him and Flem put on a massive partnership. (256)
Franklin 93* and Fleming just out for 262
535/8 at stumps!
http://nz.cricinfo.com/db/NEW/LIVE/frames/NZ_RSA_T2_27APR-01MAY2006.html

its amazing... you get rid of marshall and mills and we do well... now what does that tell you? ;)

Qkkid
29th April 2006, 09:44
wow, check out the BlackCaps last night...
after the SA commentators attacked the quality of NZs first class competitions based on Franklin making a double hundred for Wellington.... him and Flem put on a massive partnership. (256)
Franklin 93* and Fleming just out for 262
535/8 at stumps!
http://nz.cricinfo.com/db/NEW/LIVE/frames/NZ_RSA_T2_27APR-01MAY2006.html

its amazing... you get rid of marshall and mills and we do well... now what does that tell you? ;)
oi!!!!!! this is a motorbike forum please throws this thread in pointless drivel:nya:

GR81
29th April 2006, 09:45
Rant or Rave
Talk about any non-motorbike stuff here.
:nya: hehe

k14
29th April 2006, 09:48
fuckin oath, what a legend. how about franklin too. must have been a long long day in the field, no wickets for what must have been about 80 overs. iirc he's the first nzer to make 3 double hundreds. wonder if we've batted too long to get a result. will have to wait and see. is franklin going to have to take one for the team and leave his highest score out there at 93*

gav
29th April 2006, 09:50
oi!!!!!! this is a motorbike forum please throws this thread in pointless drivel:nya:
Can't you read? Its posted in "Off topic" - "Rant or Rave" :yes:
Yeah, good stuff, sat up and watched it to about 2am last night, shame Fleming got out last ball. Hope Franklin can get a ton, be good to see the boys score 600!!

GR81
29th April 2006, 09:56
i would imagine they will let Franklin get his maiden test century then declare.
newlands is always a batting wicket (even tho smith elected to bowl) so a result was never really on the cards from the beginning.

Maha
29th April 2006, 10:02
i would imagine they will let Franklin get his maiden test century then declare.
newlands is always a batting wicket (even tho smith elected to bowl) so a result was never really on the cards from the beginning.
I know what you mean... Paul Stanley said the same thing about the Star Ship Enterprise....................:scratch: :zzzz:

Qkkid
29th April 2006, 10:02
hey gr81 its amazing how some people take a joke so serious aye by sending ya red rep :nya: i say :nono: see it for what it is and get a life

GR81
29th April 2006, 10:05
i wouldnt know where the red rep button is lol

Qkkid
29th April 2006, 10:13
i wouldnt know where the red rep button is lol
nevermind i have found it :nono: red rep been sent to that prattttttt:bye:

metric
29th April 2006, 13:20
well done Fleming... first NZ batsman to score three double centuries

Big Dave
29th April 2006, 13:39
Good knock - I turned it off 2 minutes before he got out.
The Pink Flowers couldn't catch a cold.

I reckon Australia would declare. Be interesting to see if they let franklin get it - if he gets it.

oldrider
29th April 2006, 14:23
Good knock - . I reckon Australia would declare. Be interesting to see if they let franklin get it - if he gets it.
A big improvement but it's never over till it's over and they are there to get a "result". IE: WIN.
Australia would have gone for the result first, because they are "professionals" where as our players are just "highly paid players" .
Big difference! All will be revealed in the end.:zzzz:

gav
29th April 2006, 17:00
Good knock - I turned it off 2 minutes before he got out.
The Pink Flowers couldn't catch a cold.

I reckon Australia would declare. Be interesting to see if they let franklin get it - if he gets it.
Australia? Werent they struggling to beat Bangladesh??? :innocent:

Qkchk
29th April 2006, 22:38
Can't you read? Its posted in "Off topic" - "Rant or Rave" :yes:
Yeah, good stuff, sat up and watched it to about 2am last night, shame Fleming got out last ball. Hope Franklin can get a ton, be good to see the boys score 600!!
Its about time ya got a decent bike and stop wanking over cricket. Go out and ride like a girl.

gav
30th April 2006, 00:33
Its about time ya got a decent bike and stop wanking over cricket. Go out and ride like a girl.
:finger: So much for mellow yellow, huh? :nono:

Big Dave
30th April 2006, 01:40
Australia? Werent they struggling to beat Bangladesh??? :innocent:

Well....No.
The banglas played well for a day and a half - but apart from that it was all seriously one way traffic.

WINJA
30th April 2006, 10:27
fucken cricket , i hate it as much as i hate rugby and rugby league , i hate being bombarded with cricket and rugby shit in this country , cricket is people just standing around , and rugby is just plain old boring to watch , id rather be painting my roof

GR81
30th April 2006, 11:15
fucken cricket , i hate it as much as i hate rugby and rugby league , i hate being bombarded with cricket and rugby shit in this country , cricket is people just standing around , and rugby is just plain old boring to watch , id rather be painting my roof
what sports do you prefer then?
apart from womans beach volleyball no doubt ;)

WINJA
30th April 2006, 12:08
what sports do you prefer then?
apart from womans beach volleyball no doubt ;)
I LIKE WOMANS HOCKEY AND JUST YESTERDAY I STOPPED TO WATCH SCHOOL GIRL SOCCER

Patrick
30th April 2006, 12:22
I LIKE WOMANS HOCKEY AND JUST YESTERDAY I STOPPED TO WATCH SCHOOL GIRL SOCCER


Figures... "Womens" hockey and soccer, sure...

School girls? Dodgy... Stay away from those 5 year olds!

Hitcher
30th April 2006, 15:30
Women's beach volleyball is the only Olympic sport where dribbling is allowed...

Swoop
30th April 2006, 16:10
Yawn!!!

cricket.... another one-ball-sport.....

Hitcher
30th April 2006, 18:31
cricket.... another one-ball-sport.....
Name a two-ball sport.

And a three...

WINJA
30th April 2006, 19:06
Name a two-ball sport.

And a three...
SNOOKER,BOWLS AND POOL

Hitcher
30th April 2006, 21:03
SNOOKER,BOWLS AND POOL
Snooker is a 23-ball game
Bowls requires four per player
Pool is a 16-ball game

I'm still waiting for examples of a two-ball and three-ball game...

Patrick
30th April 2006, 21:10
Most bedroom games would be a two ball game... :innocent:

Three ball has me stumped too...unless pawnbrokers are sports? I doubt it...

k14
30th April 2006, 21:29
I'm still waiting for examples of a two-ball and three-ball game...
Billiards is three.

Can't think of a 2. Maybe odi cricket back in the days when they used to use a ball from each end to stop it wearing out???

Swoop
1st May 2006, 09:01
Billiards is three.

Can't think of a 2. Maybe odi cricket back in the days when they used to use a ball from each end to stop it wearing out???
Skydiving requires two balls.
Extreme skiing perhaps?
Maybe... motorcycling?

Hitcher
1st May 2006, 09:07
Anyway, back to the Cape Town test. A draw. Pah!

I know it's not "cricket", but I'd like to see a test -- say Australia v Bangaldesh -- where Australia wins the toss and bats for five days. Score something like 1,745 for 8. For a draw.

GR81
1st May 2006, 09:33
Anyway, back to the Cape Town test. A draw. Pah!
still 1 day to go... anything could happen... NOT!

oldrider
1st May 2006, 20:12
A big improvement but it's never over till it's over and they are there to get a "result". IE: WIN.
Australia would have gone for the result first, because they are "professionals" where as our players are just "highly paid players" .
Big difference! All will be revealed in the end.:zzzz:

What do you know-----"A DRAW"!!!! Bunch of overpaid show ponies!! They went there to "WIN" Shall we do a haka now?:sick: John.

Colapop
1st May 2006, 20:16
This "test" is another reason why cricket should be a full contact sport. I mean the batsmen wear pads already so why not add a coupls of blockers halfway down the pitch?

GR81
1st May 2006, 20:38
This "test" is another reason why cricket should be a full contact sport. I mean the batsmen wear pads already so why not add a coupls of blockers halfway down the pitch?
maybe even a couple of running backs and tightends?

Colapop
1st May 2006, 20:41
And special teams and 30 coaches and cheerleaders... Nah it'd never catch on.

Hitcher
1st May 2006, 20:53
Dig a moat through the pitch at the halfway point. And an oak tree at cover. And half a dozen fox terriers loose.

Colapop
1st May 2006, 21:01
So you've played cricket for Lancashire? Now that's cricket! None o' tha' sissy girly whaat paants roun' 'ere lad.

GR81
2nd May 2006, 07:32
And special teams and 30 coaches and cheerleaders... Nah it'd never catch on.
the great white hype! ;)