PDA

View Full Version : tv3 banned from parliament



WINJA
28th August 2006, 18:32
Tv3 Has Been Banned From The Debating Chamber For 3 Days For Broadcasting The Image Of Ron Mark Doing The Fingers To Another Member, I Think The Banning Of Media For Just Reporting What The Witnessed Is Very Fucken Wrong , For A Start We Need To See What The People Who We Elected And Pay Very Well Are Doing With The Time We Have Purchased Off Them , I Also Dont Trust Tvnz Or Any State Owned Broadcaster , When The Gov Controls The Finances They Also Control The News Just Look At Chris Carter From News Talk Zb

onearmedbandit
28th August 2006, 18:49
Agreed, when you see the shit get up to in Parliament it makes you cringe. Bad example for children! I see TV3 have negotiated to buy footage from TVNZ.

Indiana_Jones
28th August 2006, 19:01
fucking LABOUR! :p

-Indy

Sketchy_Racer
28th August 2006, 20:47
Fuck them man.

If they want to act like a bunch of gay arse bandits,

Then we need to see so we can tell them to fuck off.

If they dont act like cunts, there will be no way of showing them to be cunts

Swoop
28th August 2006, 20:50
Hope they ban 3 days worth of "survivor" as punishment. Or even better would be Continuation Street....

Cun*s.
They had to ban TV3 cause tvnz is their puppet mouthpiece.....

Winston001
28th August 2006, 23:04
Tv3 Has Been Banned From The Debating Chamber For 3 Days For Broadcasting The Image Of Ron Mark Doing The Fingers To Another Member, I Think The Banning Of Media For Just Reporting What The Witnessed Is Very Fucken Wrong , For A Start We Need To See What The People Who We Elected And Pay Very Well Are Doing With The Time We Have Purchased Off Them , I Also Dont Trust Tvnz Or Any State Owned Broadcaster , When The Gov Controls The Finances They Also Control The News Just Look At Chris Carter From News Talk Zb

Your CAPS LOCK has a stutter today. :innocent:

StoneChucker
28th August 2006, 23:45
Tv3 Has Been Banned From The Debating Chamber For 3 Days For Broadcasting The Image Of Ron Mark Doing The Fingers To Another Member, I Think The Banning Of Media For Just Reporting What The Witnessed Is Very Fucken Wrong , For A Start We Need To See What The People Who We Elected And Pay Very Well Are Doing With The Time We Have Purchased Off Them , I Also Dont Trust Tvnz Or Any State Owned Broadcaster , When The Gov Controls The Finances They Also Control The News Just Look At Chris Carter From News Talk Zb
I wholeheartedly agree with you, I think it is f*%@#ing communist and oppressive for the government to start telling the media what they can and can't show. Next thing we know, we will be breaking our commonwealth ties with England and hooking up with our new chums N. Korea. They are very good and controlling what the "media" shows, maybe they can give us some pointers...:shit:

I think if our politicians want to sleep, flip members off (they can do that literally now) and fight like the cliche'd schoolground kids they are sometimes, then we should be able to hear about it (or see...). Why the hell do they think they are so bloody special, what do you think would happen if we argued incessantly with our coworkers, showed abusive language and behaviour towards them AND slept on the job? Do you think we could say "Piss off, you aren't allowed to watch me boss" while flipping them off? I don't bloody think so.


Your CAPS LOCK has a stutter today. :innocent: I actually found the initial post really hard to read with every word having a capital letter!:mellow:

The_Dover
29th August 2006, 09:03
If they want to act like a bunch of gay arse bandits,

NEWSFLASH: They are a bunch of gay arse bandits and rug munchers.

SPman
29th August 2006, 13:36
I reckon we should pay them more - as long as they have a televised punch up at least once a week. Or the party leaders jelly wrestling!

John Banks
29th August 2006, 15:48
What we really need is a communist state. Then we won't have to worry about this sort of thing happening. TV3 wouldn't be banned, they'd just be shot.

The Stranger
29th August 2006, 15:50
Or the party leaders jelly wrestling!

You, sir are a sick sick man.

onearmedbandit
29th August 2006, 15:51
I reckon we should pay them more - as long as they have a televised punch up at least once a week. Or the party leaders jelly wrestling!


Considering the choice of current party leaders, you are a sick man.

John Banks
29th August 2006, 15:54
I reckon we should pay them more - as long as they have a televised punch up at least once a week. Or the party leaders jelly wrestling!

Well, that's ONE way to ensure no one watches TV3 ever again...

The_Dover
29th August 2006, 15:56
I agree with OAB.

Sick.

Imagine putting a poor defenceless Brash in with a rabid, vicious rug muncher like Heilen.

At least give the bloke a sporting chance and let him take Brownlee for protection.

Lou Girardin
29th August 2006, 16:17
They're only protecting themselves according to the 11th commandment.
Thou shalt not get caught.

Ixion
29th August 2006, 16:26
What we really need is a communist state. Then we won't have to worry about this sort of thing happening. TV3 wouldn't be banned, they'd just be shot.

I like your thinking!:yes: But to be on the safe side we'd shoot the MPs as well as TV3

John Banks
29th August 2006, 16:32
I like your thinking!:yes: But to be on the safe side we'd shoot the MPs as well as TV3

MPs are bottom feeding scum with no place in a communist state if it's not in the mines. Work them to death, I say, they're not good enough for bullets.

Dafe
29th August 2006, 16:51
What we really need is a communist state. Then we won't have to worry about this sort of thing happening. TV3 wouldn't be banned, they'd just be shot.


Interesting comment, because if you really followed John Banks, you'd see that he publicly believes we already have a communist government.

National overspent in the election campaign, not much, but they paid every cent back to the taxpayers.
Labour overspent heavily in the election campaign, which was unfair to the other parties, yet Labour has no intention of repaying a single cent of our taxpayers money. Labour does as they please, regardless of the workers and without consideration.
Thats a communist governments behaviour.

Ixion
29th August 2006, 17:22
Interesting comment, because if you really followed John Banks, you'd see that he publicly believes we already have a communist government.

National overspent in the election campaign, not much, but they paid every cent back to the taxpayers.
Labour overspent heavily in the election campaign, which was unfair to the other parties, yet Labour has no intention of repaying a single cent of our taxpayers money. Labour does as they please, regardless of the workers and without consideration.
Thats a communist governments behaviour.

Uh no, I can assure you that a Communist government would have no problems at all about election spending. No expenditure at all. Nada. Zip

(No elections, is why)

yungatart
29th August 2006, 17:42
I have seen better behaviour from bottom stream year 10 classes (4th form)..and anyone who's involved in education knows that is THE worst year group for poor behaviour! As responsible adults we need to start withdrawing their privileges.. not hide their sins under the carpet.
Mind you, from the pollies point of view, I can understand the ban, would you want the whole country to see you acting like a silly little twat!

SPman
29th August 2006, 17:56
I still like the "winner takes all", jelly wrestling idea, meself.

Oakie
29th August 2006, 18:14
I'd be quite happy if all the TV broadcasters banned parliament from TV in retribution.

WINJA
29th August 2006, 18:16
I still like the "winner takes all", jelly wrestling idea, meself.

UNCLE HELEN IN A 2 PIECE , NO THANKS ID RATHER TAKE MY OWN COCK OFF WITH A BROKEN MILK BOTTLE

Crazy Steve
29th August 2006, 18:24
UNCLE HELEN IN A 2 PIECE , NO THANKS ID RATHER TAKE MY OWN COCK OFF WITH A BROKEN MILK BOTTLE

What cock!!!

Im sure you dont have one....nor any BALLS!!!!!!

Crazy Steve..

Indiana_Jones
29th August 2006, 18:38
I heard they're not allowed to show wide shots of the parliment showing all the empty seats, cause they're busy running their other money interests and just getting the $120,000 on the side :p

-Indy

John Banks
29th August 2006, 18:40
Interesting comment, because if you really followed John Banks, you'd see that he publicly believes we already have a communist government.

Communist government? Bullshit, this is a pansy excuse for a REAL communist government.

I don't follow John Banks, but all politicians deserve to be mocked. All of them.