PDA

View Full Version : Iceland defies world ban with return to whaling



Swoop
18th October 2006, 08:58
9.30am Wednesday October 18, 2006
By Michael McCarthy


Iceland has decided to resume commercial whaling, in defiance of the 20-year-old international whaling moratorium. The country joins Norway in openly hunting the great whales for profit.

In recent years it has been killing a small number of animals annually but saying it was hunting them for "scientific" reasons, as does Japan.

Iceland's current permits include 200 minke whales from 2003-07, of which 161 have been caught, leaving 39 for 2007. It will now allow whalers to harpoon a commercial quota of 30 minke whales and nine fin whales in the year to the end of August 2007.

The huge fin whale, second in size only to the blue whale, the world's largest animal, dropped in numbers catastrophically during the 20th century because of hunting. It is listed as an endangered species by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature.

But the Icelanders took a robust view of their decision yesterday.

"The Icelandic economy is overwhelmingly dependent on the utilisation of living marine resources in the ocean around the country," the Icelandic Fisheries Ministry said in a statement.

"We are ready to start hunts immediately," said Kristjan Loftsson, head of the Icelandic whaling company that received the hunt permit.

The pro-whaling countries argue that stocks have recovered since the International Whaling Commission imposed the moratorium on hunts in 1986.

Iceland contends there are about 70,000 minke whales and 25,800 fin whales in the central North Atlantic region.

However, environmentalists are strongly opposed to the move.

"We strongly urge Iceland to abandon its plans to resume commercial whaling. It's cruel, there's no money in whaling, hardly anyone in Iceland eats whale meat and now they want to expand their whaling to include an endangered species - it's crazy," said Robbie Marsland, UK director of the International Fund for Animal Welfare.

He went on: "Iceland has been struggling to sell whale meat obtained since 2003 through its so-called scientific whaling programme. As well as no scientific findings of value being released from this, Iceland has tried and failed to find markets for its whale meat.

"Recent polling by Gallup in Iceland revealed that only 1.1 per cent of Icelanders eat whale meat once a week or more, while 82.4 per cent of 16- to 24-year-olds never eat whale meat ... IFAW urges Iceland to protect its booming whale watching industry, which attracts thousands of tourists to Iceland every year.

"Tourism groups and whale watching organisations in Iceland have voiced their concerns over the effects of scientific whaling on their economy. To pursue commercial whaling, and to add endangered fin whales to the list, will risk serious damage to Iceland's tourism industry, as well as its international reputation."

Greenpeace made the same point last night.

"Iceland has no market for whale meat, but they do have a huge and far more valuable market for whale watching," said campaigner Sarah Duthie.

Greenpeace has collected 87,000 signatures from foreigners who say they might visit the country if Reykjavik abandoned whale hunts.

While Norway and Japan have taken whales since 1986, the Norwegians commercially and the Japanese under the guise of science, the Icelanders have had an on-off relationship with hunting.

The Norwegians allowed a quota of 1,052 minke whales in 2006, while Japan caught 850 minke whales and 10 fin whales in Antarctic waters last season.

xwhatsit
18th October 2006, 10:51
I don't see anything wrong with it, as long as they can make it sustainable (they say whale stocks are up, I don't see any reason to disbelieve them). Whales, at the end of the day, are no more than any other mammal. They're just cows in the sea.

Besides, whale meat doesn't actually taste too bad, provided it's cooked right.

Steam
18th October 2006, 10:51
Whatever your view on whether whales are tasty or not, this is interesting stuff;

Here's the last paragraph from an account written by a couple of direct-action hippies, who successfully sank two whalers;

"I walked to a news agent and picked up a copy of the morning paper. A story on the front page said only, "SABOTUERS SINK WHALERS, photo page six..."
Flipping to the page, I saw one of the most beautiful sights in the world. There was Hvalur 5 and 6 resting gently on the bottom of Reykjavik harbor, only their skeletal superstructure peeking above the waves."

You can read the whole story here http://www.nocompromise.org/issues/28sinkingwhalers.html

And there's another extreme group who have sunk 10 whaling ships, called the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, http://www.seashepherd.org/fleet/fleet.html
they have their own ships and are well funded (we're talking millions and millions of dollars of funding from rich environmentalists)

Since 1979, Sea Shepherd crew and agents have sent ten illegal whaling ships to the bottom:

1979 - The pirate whaler “Sierra” rammed and sunk in Portugal. 1980 - The outlaw whalers “Isba I” and “Isba II” sunk in Vigo, Spain.

1980 - The pirate whalers “Susan” and “Theresa” sunk in South Africa. 1981 - The illegal whaling ships “Hvalur 6” and “Hvalur 7” sunk in Iceland.

1992 - The outlaw whaler “Nybraena” sunk in Norway. 1994 - The pirate whaler “Senet” sunk in Norway.

1998 - The pirate whaler “Morild” sunk in Norway.

Pixie
18th October 2006, 11:12
good on them.
The Icelanders got agro in the cod wars,maybe they'll sink some greenies.
Sea Shepherd would be a good start

ManDownUnder
18th October 2006, 11:20
Those bastards - at least they could do it under fictitious excuse... like like like... research or something

Speaking of research - why don't greenpeace simply poinson the whales as they go up the gally onto a ship? A decent syringe full of cyanide (or somethin'?) shot into the whale ought to validate any theories of scientific research.

You can't eat it, but a post mortem is still entirley possible...

R6_kid
18th October 2006, 12:00
hmmm, im against whaling but i love pork crackling - whales have thick blubber/fat and im sure that if cooked correctly, i could get a substantial amount of pre-salted crackling.

SPman
18th October 2006, 13:17
Thats it!
I'm not listening to Bjork again!

The Pastor
18th October 2006, 15:56
I don't think waling is a good idea, but I think terrorsim is way way worse

terbang
18th October 2006, 16:26
Yup I dislike the whaling as well. There is a lot of illegal stuff happening and some of it on our doorstep. When I was flying maritime patrol a while back I was on a crew that caught some japs red handed slaughtering whales not far from here. A sickening sight that we gathered lots of appropriate evidence of. Enough to normally lock someoe in jail for a long time if he had been an Indon shark fisher. And yet still nothing happened. Japs must have some political clout I guess.

The_Dover
18th October 2006, 16:29
don't worry.

NZ has condemned them, Chris Carter says that they are very naughty and should leave the friendly whales alone and he is going to make his "strong" feelings clear to the Icelandic government.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=1&ObjectID=10406486

big scary poof that he is.

Jeremy
18th October 2006, 16:39
Interesting article. However it says some important stuff:

1.1% of the Iceland population has whale meat at least once a week. And I'd expect that those who eat it less regularly would be far more common. How many NZers eat Steak at least once a week?
~18% of those ages 16-24 year olds there eat whale meat.

Also there's other uses for whale's other than meat.

And finally the tourism industry benefits if there are LESS whales. Unless they're rare why would you bother going to Iceland to see them? It's not like you can charge people to see sparrows.

Finn
18th October 2006, 16:42
Here's an idea. Why don't we offer Iceland free range on some of NZ's whales? You know, the big fat ones that sit around all day on benefits. Their blubber content would match any ocean going variety and they'd be doing us a favour.

Harpoon the bitches!

Scouse
18th October 2006, 16:57
Here's an idea. Why don't we offer Iceland free range on some of NZ's whales? You know, the big fat ones that sit around all day on benefits. Their blubber content would match any ocean going variety and they'd be doing us a favour.

Harpoon the bitches!You mean like horakura parameia

Grahameeboy
18th October 2006, 17:07
I think we have to put things in perspective....NZ kills the poor possum which we do not eat............is it just me!!

Steam
18th October 2006, 18:11
I don't think waling is a good idea, but I think terrorsim is way way worse

But ya see, the direct action of sinking the ships is not terrorism because it's not designed to cause terror or fear. It's designed to stop the whalers whaling. Ain't got nothing to do with terror, and in all those cases the activists have been careful to make sure there's nobody on the ships.
It looks like terrorism but it's actually subtly different.

WINJA
18th October 2006, 18:20
I Like It When 2 Problems Fix Eachother , I Think Ive Found George W Bush's Next War

The_Dover
18th October 2006, 18:26
fuckin stinking hippies.

food is food.

paturoa
18th October 2006, 18:29
food is food.

hanibal and that German dude rekon so too

Scouse
18th October 2006, 18:36
Its time we Brits go do some more gunboat diplomacy in the north Atlantic

paturoa
18th October 2006, 18:39
Its time we Brits go do some more gunboat diplomacy in the north Atlantic

spose britz still got some since we stopped buying "hand me downs"

Swoop
18th October 2006, 20:59
Here's an idea. Why don't we offer Iceland free range on some of NZ's whales? You know, the big fat ones that sit around all day on benefits. Their blubber content would match any ocean going variety and they'd be doing us a favour.

Harpoon the bitches!
They would taste like KFC though...

Lias
19th October 2006, 07:52
Someone should really shoot those bastards.. and I'm not talking about the whalers!

The only whaling activity I forwn on is Japan whaling in southern waters, but if a nation wants to whale near its own landmass then I have no problem with it.

As long as the animals are not in danger of extincition, I see no reason not to hunt ANY species, for food or for fun.