View Full Version : 1895.9 bhp
Postie
21st December 2006, 11:36
I know I know, its a bike site, just got sent this pictures and I though I would share for anyone who is interested in some crazy engineering
sAsLEX
21st December 2006, 11:40
All well and good but thats a ute aint it?
They have enough trouble getting power to ground without a load in them due to there being no weight over the rear
ManDownUnder
21st December 2006, 11:42
It took me a second... I looks and thought 189.5hp??? SO? My bike 110...
*click*
:gob:
Karma
21st December 2006, 11:42
Just wait till some dick tries to park next to it and fucks it up... that'd be funny.
marty
21st December 2006, 11:46
1800 to 3000hp. all day. will run for 15000hrs before needing an overhaul.
pffft on your piston engine
placidfemme
21st December 2006, 11:48
Ok... this may be a stupid question... but
Thats a lot of HP... but what would that equate to in terms of top speed?
marty
21st December 2006, 11:49
about 550km/h in the right circumstances
placidfemme
21st December 2006, 11:51
about 550km/h in the right circumstances
Thanks...
thats just crazy...
Karma
21st December 2006, 11:53
about 550km/h in the right circumstances
Theoretically I'd imagine... think about the structural damage at that speed, especially considering half the engine is outside the bonnet, which itself has three bloody great holes in it.
Would be fun to try though :D
avgas
21st December 2006, 12:06
seagull eater
Fatjim
21st December 2006, 12:20
1800 to 3000hp. all day. will run for 15000hrs before needing an overhaul.
pffft on your piston engine
shit, all that, from such a tiny thumbnail as well.
I.e. WTF is it.
sAsLEX
21st December 2006, 12:23
shit, all that, from such a tiny thumbnail as well.
I.e. WTF is it.
a gas turbine
Romeo
21st December 2006, 12:24
Cool, a $100k+ road car that'll get shat on by a $10k bike in almost any situation. That said it's pretty damn mean, it looks like it's smiling from the front ;D.
TLDV8
21st December 2006, 12:31
Total engine weight: 2300 tons (The crankshaft alone weighs 300 tons.)
Length: 89 feet
Height: 44 feet
Maximum power: 108,920 hp at 102 rpm
Maximum torque: 5,608,312 lb/ft at 102rpm
http://people.bath.ac.uk/ccsshb/12cyl/
terbang
21st December 2006, 14:08
Engines
Number Two Pratt and Whitney Canada Corp. PW150A
Normal Takeoff Power 4,580 shp (each)
Max.Power 5,071 shp (each)
Max. Cruise Power 3,947 shp (each)
There are some horses out there..
Coyote
21st December 2006, 14:21
http://www.minimoto.co.nz/index.php?id=17
Cor blimey mate
marty
21st December 2006, 14:25
There are some horses out there..
hell yeah :) I love it at 3 am on the runway cranking 1300hp out of the beech (just a baby i know) making a HEAP of noise!!!!!
Edbear
21st December 2006, 14:32
I love the take-off in a Jumbo! :yes: 16,000shp and 50,000lbs of thrust per engine!:gob:
HAving said that, my bike's quite exciting at full throttle too....!:innocent:
RantyDave
21st December 2006, 16:08
Holy motherfucker, imagine doing an oil change on that bastard.
And I quote "steps down into the crank case".
Steps! Sheeat, two simming pools of 10w-40 and a packet of crisps, please.
Dave
Toaster
21st December 2006, 16:52
about 550km/h in the right circumstances
circumstances OTHER than instant death I assume???!!!
Toaster
21st December 2006, 16:53
I love the take-off in a Jumbo! :yes: 16,000shp and 50,000lbs of thrust per engine!:gob:
HAving said that, my bike's quite exciting at full throttle too....!:innocent:
In Rodney district??!!... and you still have your licence??!!
Toaster
21st December 2006, 16:54
jumbo engine on bike, now thats the retro fit of the century.....
Finn
21st December 2006, 17:06
All that work for a Holden. It's like Helen Clark getting breast implants.
marty
21st December 2006, 17:27
circumstances OTHER than instant death I assume???!!!
once you've got the flaps and undercarriage up.....
sAsLEX
21st December 2006, 17:57
jumbo engine on bike, now thats the retro fit of the century.....
They put them in ships!
R6_kid
21st December 2006, 20:00
hmm... gotta love turbine engines, but only for certain applications.
You could drive that car around as a commuter if you like, would guzzle the gas but could still be done.
Running a gas turbine in your car would just be stupid because they dont like having their RPM changed all the time so its shit for stop-start use like on the road. Also was reading an article on turbines and it said that a 10% increase in running temp equates to a 50% loss in engine life (if you want exact words i'll quote it later)... this of course is why the air force's turbines seem to be 'unreliable' compared to civilian used ones because the air force has to abuse them substantially more in 'military' flying.
oh yeh, and the car is a fucking beast!
sAsLEX
21st December 2006, 20:04
hmm... gotta love turbine engines, but only for certain applications.
You could drive that car around as a commuter if you like, would guzzle the gas but could still be done.
Running a gas turbine in your car would just be stupid because they dont like having their RPM changed all the time so its shit for stop-start use like on the road. Also was reading an article on turbines and it said that a 10% increase in running temp equates to a 50% loss in engine life (if you want exact words i'll quote it later)... this of course is why the air force's turbines seem to be 'unreliable' compared to civilian used ones because the air force has to abuse them substantially more in 'military' flying.
oh yeh, and the car is a fucking beast!
Why not run it at a constant most efficient RPM and have a smarter gear box? CVT styles?
or running a Gen and have in wheel electric motors?
Stop thinking of problems and of solutions.
There are buses in Auckland CBD running GTs
Edbear
22nd December 2006, 05:58
In Rodney district??!!... and you still have your licence??!!
Oh, I'm fairly careful as to "where and when" I engage the afterburners and apply full thrust... :innocent: It's the "rotation" bit I still have a little trouble with.:yes:
Storm
22nd December 2006, 08:53
Well some bugger did go and bung one in a bike(Y2K Superbike) .
I notice one of those figures was in shp. Whats the "s" bit stand for?
(all you plane gurus stop laughing please):D
marty
22nd December 2006, 11:05
s = shaft
10fc....
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.