View Full Version : You just never know
Firefight
1st September 2004, 14:37
.
Went for a quick blat Hamilton today to meet up with Quazzie, as always I went down 22. About 3 kms from Ngaruwhia still on 22, what do I find as I come around the corner, the old bozze :Police: :Police: bus and about 3 or 4 patrol cars.
While stopped I struck up a bit of a converstaion with Mr :Police: I asked how many drunks they had caught, none at that stage, so thats good to hear
but they had made a bit of dosh $$$$$$$$$$$$$ out of WOFs and regos, this is the third time I have come across the revenue team on this road, last two times it was further north...
F/F :crazy:
Andrew
1st September 2004, 14:43
.
Went for a quick blat Hamilton today to meet up with Quazzie, as always I went down 22. About 3 kms from Ngaruwhia still on 22, what do I find as I come around the corner, the old bozze :Police: :Police: bus and about 3 or 4 patrol cars.
While stopped I struck up a bit of a converstaion with Mr :Police: I asked how many drunks they had caught, none at that stage, so thats good to hear
but they had made a bit of dosh $$$$$$$$$$$$$ out of WOFs and regos, this is the third time I have come across the revenue team on this road, last two times it was further north...
F/F :crazy:
Good news for me, another good excuse NOT to go down that dirty ol' 22. :lol:
Deano
1st September 2004, 14:44
On motorway patrol last night, a young 'lady' was pulled over and found to be driving a vehicle that had previously been pink stickered (4 times I think).
Instead of getting the vehicle up to standard, she would simply re-register the vehicle with different plates.
The cops said that this amounted to fraud (using a document for pecuniary purposes or something like that), she was totally unremorseful and is likely to do it again, yet the cops only ticketed her for no wof or rego. I can't understand why she wasn't done for fraud ? The cops were laughing away about it as they left....big joke eh.
vifferman
1st September 2004, 14:49
The cops said that this amounted to fraud (using a document for pecuniary purposes or something like that), she was totally unremorseful and is likely to do it again, yet the cops only ticketed her for no wof or rego. I can't understand why she wasn't done for fraud ? The cops were laughing away about it as they left....big joke eh.Yeah, I wondered about that. On this programme, they've tended to give tickets for the worst offences and just warn on the others. Yet the fraud thing carried a possible prison sentence and big fine. Maybe they wanted to look 'nice'?:spudwhat:
Beats me, but ticketing her for that as well was possibly the only way to get her to stop being a naughty girlie.
jrandom
1st September 2004, 14:59
Beats me, but ticketing her for that as well was possibly the only way to get her to stop being a naughty girlie.
The cop who handed out those tickets was being quite friendly to the offender. Perhaps he just didn't want the extra paperwork of a prosecution for the fraud offense.
On a related note, did anyone else notice the knockers on that chick who was pulled over on the motorway in the unregistered and unwarranted hatchback?
Wearing a top like that, you'd think she almost *expected* to have to convince a police officer not to give her a ticket...
Devil
1st September 2004, 15:16
The cop who handed out those tickets was being quite friendly to the offender. Perhaps he just didn't want the extra paperwork of a prosecution for the fraud offense.
On a related note, did anyone else notice the knockers on that chick who was pulled over on the motorway in the unregistered and unwarranted hatchback?
Wearing a top like that, you'd think she almost *expected* to have to convince a police officer not to give her a ticket...
Heh yeah, she looked like a complete slapper, but hey, id hit it.
k14
1st September 2004, 15:20
Hell yes jrandon, she was hot as. If I was that cop I definately wouldn't have given her a ticket. What kind of a reason is that stupid fluffy thing to pull someone over, what a joke. Although she did pass the cop car. If I was driving an unregistered and unwarranted car I would stay as far away from a cop as possible.
As for those other dumbasses, they deserved all they got. Those two dumb giggling school girls trying to be cool in their ford laser should have been shot. What a stupid bitch. As for mr "Hellos tos all yous single ladies of new zealand" what a plonker. Doing 170 on the motorway drunk, how dumb can you get. Should have done us all a favour and crashed into one of the median barriers killing himself but no one else.
As for the asian "dog abuser" what a crack up, lol. She didn't seem too impressed with his behaviour, lol.
Deano
1st September 2004, 15:25
Heh yeah, she looked like a complete slapper, but hey, id hit it.
:killingme
I bet the cop had a good laugh with the boys back at the station over those 'pair'.
gav
1st September 2004, 15:25
Yeah, wonder how the cop may have reacted if no camera with him when he stopped that chick with the large hooters, must have worked for her in the past, she "adjusted" her top once she saw she was being booked. Good work spotting that bitch who stole the black Mitsy, but what did she get 40 hours community service ? Throw her in jail for god sakes...........
jrandom
1st September 2004, 15:27
Hell yes jrandon, she was hot as. If I was that cop I definately wouldn't have given her a ticket. What kind of a reason is that stupid fluffy thing to pull someone over, what a joke.
He warned her about the fluffy thing because it was near the end of the day, they'd probably just had a couple of boring hours in the patrol car with no contacts, and he wanted to pull someone over so that he could be on TV. Understandable.
And it's fair enough to ticket someone for rego and WOF several months overdue.
Did you notice her adjusting her bra [Edit: *was* there one?] for the camera? :killingme
As for the asian "dog abuser" what a crack up, lol. She didn't seem too impressed with his behaviour, lol.
"This my dinner, I just slapping around to tenderise."
FROSTY
1st September 2004, 15:29
um about the "rereg" thing. The girl didn't actually do anything fraudulent.
Under the current law you can take in your plates and pay $19.00 and get replacements.
For sure her purpose in doing so was to slip under the poilce radar but changing plates in itself isnt against the law. :headbang: :headbang:
Cajun
1st September 2004, 15:35
um about the "rereg" thing. The girl didn't actually do anything fraudulent.
Under the current law you can take in your plates and pay $19.00 and get replacements.
For sure her purpose in doing so was to slip under the poilce radar but changing plates in itself isnt against the law. :headbang: :headbang:
they siad on the tv that it was illegal to do it.
jrandom
1st September 2004, 15:36
they siad on the tv that it was illegal to do it.
Yeah, but that was a cop. What would she know, eh? And blonde, even.
marty
1st September 2004, 15:41
.
Went for a quick blat Hamilton today to meet up with Quazzie, as always I went down 22. About 3 kms from Ngaruwhia still on 22, what do I find as I come around the corner, the old bozze :Police: :Police: bus and about 3 or 4 patrol cars.
While stopped I struck up a bit of a converstaion with Mr :Police: I asked how many drunks they had caught, none at that stage, so thats good to hear
but they had made a bit of dosh $$$$$$$$$$$$$ out of WOFs and regos, this is the third time I have come across the revenue team on this road, last two times it was further north...
F/F :crazy:
that stretch between Nga and Hly on 22 is rich pickings for burglars, disqualy drivers and people with warrant to arrests, breaching their bail etc, and the occasional drunk - it's just a rat run from one POS place to another - we often parked there mid week and would pick up 1/2 dozen impounds and a couple of lock ups. the wof's etc are really just rats and mice stuff to help pass the time. it is unbeleivable how many people try to u-turn at this location. some of the bigger ones i can remember from there:
- the best EBA was 1800 mcgms at 11am on a wednesday morning.
- a stolen nissan patrol from a home invasion/attempted murder in auckland
ramming (climbing over) a patrol car and nearly killing the cop inside - they
just never expected to see a checkpoint at that location
- 6 cars travelling in procession from a 48 hour 'hoot nanny' - each driver
disqualified, lowest EBA level 850mcgms.
- impounding a (well known) politicians car cause he was suspended due to
demerits - he tried to u-turn and do a runner too!
in the booze bus guys defence - they do 2 weeks of night shift, 1 week of day shift. they don't really enjoy day shift as it is predominantley catch up and paper work, and the most fun is on night shift, so on day shift they try to do the most 'productive' locations.
Devil
1st September 2004, 15:43
Yeah it wasn't the changing of plates, it was the driving of a pink stickered car multiple times.
But changing the plates for that reason was the fraudulent part.
Dr Bob
1st September 2004, 16:28
they siad on the tv that it was illegal to do it.
Find the law in the legislation and you'd be doing well.. I'll think you'll find that there isn't one for fraud in this case. Even codified law is subject to interpretation. However, the original statutory regulation is still in force and the removal of the pink sticker is an offence - see attached.
marty
1st September 2004, 16:46
it is a 'using a document' offence, as she gains a pecuniary advantage or valuable consideration from the plate swapping, however the original LT act offence is the most appropriate - a hang over from the MOT days when they couldn't arrest for crimes act offences.
i know of a large company that was printing their own RUC slips - they got charged with false pretences, and i know of a few boy racers that have been charged with fraud for scanning and making their own licence labels/wof labels.
she could (should?) have been locked up for failing to comply with a direction of an officer that a vehicle not be operated', or if the car is a 'danger' to other road users, and she has been told at least 3 times that it is, why not lock her up for 'dangerous driving'?
the test here is that it is no offence to get another rego plate for her car, but what is her intention when she does it? is it to deceive or gain something that she is not otherwise entitled to? her intention forms the more serious fraud offence.
spudchucka
1st September 2004, 18:27
On motorway patrol last night, a young 'lady' was pulled over and found to be driving a vehicle that had previously been pink stickered (4 times I think).
Instead of getting the vehicle up to standard, she would simply re-register the vehicle with different plates.
The cops said that this amounted to fraud (using a document for pecuniary purposes or something like that), she was totally unremorseful and is likely to do it again, yet the cops only ticketed her for no wof or rego. I can't understand why she wasn't done for fraud ? The cops were laughing away about it as they left....big joke eh.
I can't think of the actual cases but I have heard that its been tried in the court before and didn't stand up??
Mongoose
1st September 2004, 18:40
I can't think of the actual cases but I have heard that its been tried in the court before and didn't stand up??
Did you check under the "Fish and Chip Act" Spud?
NC
1st September 2004, 18:47
Remind me NEVER to go riding with you, your a bloody COP magnet!
*Crosses fingers an Hisses*
:p
FROSTY
1st September 2004, 19:04
it is a 'using a document' offence, as she gains a pecuniary advantage or valuable consideration from the plate swapping, however the original LT act offence is the most appropriate - a hang over from the MOT days when they couldn't arrest for crimes act offences.
she could (should?) have been locked up for failing to comply with a direction of an officer that a vehicle not be operated', or if the car is a 'danger' to other road users, and she has been told at least 3 times that it is, why not lock her up for 'dangerous driving'?
the test here is that it is no offence to get another rego plate for her car, but what is her intention when she does it? is it to deceive or gain something that she is not otherwise entitled to? her intention forms the more serious fraud offence.
I wonder if it would stand up in court?
-hey dont get me wrong -she shouldn't be on the road -plain and simple
But would doing something that isn't against the law be turned into something she could be prosecuted for?
Personally I thing its simple-Bang impounded-do not pass go do not collect $100.
spudchucka
1st September 2004, 19:28
Did you check under the "Fish and Chip Act" Spud?
Its a good one all right but I aint going to court on it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.