View Full Version : Biker awarded A$212k for hitting horse
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21654205-421,00.html
Gotta love the defendant's reasons for trying to wheedle out of it: "slipping, falling or snake bite":laugh:
RantyDave
2nd May 2007, 09:44
Gotta love the defendant's reasons for trying to wheedle out of it
If you look closely, that's a "nominal defendant" - meaning that the actual culprit could not be found and he was actually suing a government fund. Still ... $212k for hitting something left in the middle of the road? I have a suspicion that if it had happened here you'd get the finger, and little else.
Dave
I know, but that was the argument that was put up.
Mr. Peanut
2nd May 2007, 09:57
I've heard about looking a gift horse in the mouth, but this is ridiculous!
scracha
10th May 2007, 00:09
If you look closely, that's a "nominal defendant" - meaning that the actual culprit could not be found and he was actually suing a government fund. Still ... $212k for hitting something left in the middle of the road? I have a suspicion that if it had happened here you'd get the finger, and little else.
Dave
There was a case here (or was it OZ?) a couple of years back where a young lad died after hitting a horse in the middle of the road. Basically the family got feck all and the horse owner got a $5000 fine.
xwhatsit
10th May 2007, 00:59
If you look closely, that's a "nominal defendant" - meaning that the actual culprit could not be found and he was actually suing a government fund. Still ... $212k for hitting something left in the middle of the road? I have a suspicion that if it had happened here you'd get the finger, and little else.
Dave
Yep... you'd probably get the finger, but you'd also get ACC. No ACC in Australia.
Big Dog
10th May 2007, 01:50
Talk about flogging a dead horse.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.