Log in

View Full Version : World summit



Ocean1
30th June 2007, 00:06
At the opening plenary session of the WSSD in Johannesburg yesterday,
delegations were asked: "Would you please give your honest opinion about
solutions to the food shortage in the rest of the world?"

The subsequent debate was a complete FIASCO and ended in deadlock.

The Africans did not know what "food" meant.
The Western Europeans did not know what "shortage" meant.
The Eastern Europeans did not know what "opinion" meant.
Delegates from the Middle East did not know what "solution" meant.
The South Americans did not know what "please" meant.
The Asians did not know what "honest" meant.
And the United States did not know what "the rest of the world" meant.




Anybody left unoffended?

Waylander
30th June 2007, 00:12
Aussies were to busy playing rugby and New Zealand was too broke to do anything.

sAsLEX
30th June 2007, 00:33
Aussies were to busy playing rugby and New Zealand was too broke to do anything.

Rugby aint all that popular in Australia actually...... aussie rules or league

Waylander
30th June 2007, 09:51
Rugby aint all that popular in Australia actually...... aussie rules or league
Like I can tell the difference?:dodge:

janno
30th June 2007, 10:07
Like I can tell the difference?:dodge:

Oh, it's easy.

One of them you kick a ball and run. The other game you kick a ball and run. And in the third game you kick a ball and run.

But the rules players have nice tight shorts and loooong legs . . . :innocent:

MSTRS
30th June 2007, 12:10
Like I can tell the difference?:dodge:

It's easier than cricket - where you are in until you are out, and out until you are in.