Log in

View Full Version : Now this one is for Hitcher


Mrs Busa Pete
3rd August 2007, 13:58
Hope you have fun with this one.
dasser
3rd August 2007, 16:07
fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too. Cna yuo raed tihs?
Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at
Cma
brigde
Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are,
the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the
rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it
whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey
lteter
by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas
tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs forwrad it.



( Now who can and can not read this, just wanted to see if the 55 out of 100 is right ?? thanks .
PS. I Can ..... dasser )
Stickchick
3rd August 2007, 16:09
I had no troubles reading it...Also I think that this is a repost too
Krusti
3rd August 2007, 16:14
Yeah i've seen that story about the priest, the goat and the nun before. Read it no problem...:lol:
ManDownUnder
3rd August 2007, 16:18
Read it easy... and may I say the spelling's better than 1/2 them here on KB
yungatart
3rd August 2007, 16:20
Read it easy... and may I say the spelling's better than 1/2 them here on KB

+1
At least it has the right letters in it!
phoenixgtr
3rd August 2007, 16:22
Easy 101010
vifferman
3rd August 2007, 16:22
Read what? :confused:
Trudes
3rd August 2007, 16:32
no probs :yes:
babyblade250rr
3rd August 2007, 16:33
fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too. Cna yuo raed tihs?
Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg.
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at
Cma
brigde
Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are,
the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the
rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it
whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey
lteter
by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas
tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs forwrad it.



( Now who can and can not read this, just wanted to see if the 55 out of 100 is right ?? thanks .
PS. I Can ..... dasser )

yeah i could read this just like it was normal!! hmm scary isn't it:gob:
tide
3rd August 2007, 16:35
no problem... :yes:
007XX
3rd August 2007, 16:35
No trouble...repost though, sorry (from Busa Pete's post about 2 hours ago)...

never mind...
johnnyflash
3rd August 2007, 16:39
yeah ive seen this a long time ago and EVERYONE i asked abiout it could read it fine, so im beggared if I know hwere the 55% comes from LOL
deanohit
3rd August 2007, 17:09
Yep read it fine. Got tripped up once, but read it at almost normal speed. Suprised Hitcher hasnt commented yet.
Maha
3rd August 2007, 17:10
Couldn't see any spelling mistakes...looks all good to me...:yes:
BMW
3rd August 2007, 17:13
I did not find a problem reading it!
Storm
3rd August 2007, 17:24
No problems reading it here. Shows how typos get into print really dunnit?
HDTboy
3rd August 2007, 18:12
Read it a few times now. It's even made an appearance in the Herald's Sideswipe column.
Scorpygirl
3rd August 2007, 18:16
Yip I could read it no problem at all ....then again I work for a literacy organisation!!! :dodge:
dasser
3rd August 2007, 20:08
Wow, as at 8 pm 19 comments and its been viewed 155 times.
So is that only 12 % can read it ???
LOL.
:dodge:
MyGSXF
3rd August 2007, 20:22
Lols.. no problem!

Ogialirnlyy saw it aobut 2 1/2 yaers ago, on the wlal at the Tienstg Sattoin in Mot, wilhe the wof on my bkie was bineg dnoe. Pesisd mslyef lhiaungg wehn I fhsinied rdneiag it, & had rleesiad waht had been dnoe to the lterets!! :lol:
Storm
3rd August 2007, 20:29
Oddly, I find yours harder to read MyGSXF. Must be something to do with the order of the letter - they have changed the "shape" of the word further from its original form is my guess. Anyone else find that?
Laava
3rd August 2007, 22:43
Sori! Dislonsic.
Subike
16th October 2008, 20:11
"Cna yuo raed tihs??? Olny 55% of plepoe can. I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! fi yuo cna raed tihs, tehn you hvae slpeling slikls "
Maha
16th October 2008, 20:14
That is really amazing... tehn aaign, msot of my psots aer like taht aynawy..
The only word I had trouble with was....tghuhot....but I got it after a few seconds.
98tls
16th October 2008, 20:14
You spelt Hardly right at least.:2thumbsup
Usarka
16th October 2008, 20:29
Ksis my asre. :whistle:
rscole
17th October 2008, 10:08
No problems here at all.... looks like that 55% is complete BS. Anyone know the figure of how many people cannot read/speak english? Im sure it aint as high as 55%....
avgas
17th October 2008, 10:17
arya skottish?
SPman
17th October 2008, 17:48
..
( Now who can and can not read this, just wanted to see if the 55 out of 100 is right ?? thanks .
PS. I Can ..... dasser )
No problems - a iepce fo sips
James Deuce
17th October 2008, 17:52
Clueless Dolts.