View Full Version : Ohlins rear shock set-up?
Rupe
29th October 2007, 19:25
I've been told that I should set the rear shock to 100mm sag under the bikes own weight (not with rider on etc).
Does this sound right, is so mines way off:shit:
Drew
29th October 2007, 19:35
I've been told that I should set the rear shock to 100mm sag under the bikes own weight (not with rider on etc).
Does this sound right, is so mines way off:shit:
NO, perhaps ten. Get somebody to help and set it right with you on it.
My limited knowledge says 25 to 30mm static sag with rider on board, but a service tech is the right person to confirm or deny.
dammad1
29th October 2007, 20:36
It varys a little between bikes but as a guide the free sag (i.e the difference between the bike being up on a stand and then sitting on the ground under its own weight should be 25-35mm.With the rider then sitting on it, it should sag a further 70mm for a combined total of around 100mm.
Small changes will make quite a big difference to the handling of the bike so you should try to find out exactly what your paticular bike should be.
Maybe find someone with a manual or perhaps Danger has had some experience with the gas gasers.
Rupe
29th October 2007, 20:41
It varys a little between bikes but as a guide the free sag (i.e the difference between the bike being up on a stand and then sitting on the ground under its own weight should be 25-35mm.With the rider then sitting on it, it should sag a further 70mm for a combined total of around 100mm.
Small changes will make quite a big difference to the handling of the bike so you should try to find out exactly what your paticular bike should be.
Maybe find someone with a manual or perhaps Danger has had some experience with the gas gasers.
I know this sounds strange, but it was Linton from DAS (who really knows his stuff). Apparently as the system is so progressive on the gasgas that he doesn't set the bikes to riders weight, he just sets it to 100mm under the bikes own weight.
Just wondered what people thought of this?
dammad1
29th October 2007, 20:44
That doesn't sound right.
Rupe
29th October 2007, 20:48
That doesn't sound right.
Thats what I thought, but I'll wait to see if anyone has had any experience with the gasgas shocks
Drew
29th October 2007, 21:16
Disregard my comments, (I'm sure you already did), I wasn't smart enough to realsie you were talking dirt bikes, just saw the post pop up in the spy thingy, and leapt in boots'n'all before pausing the required time it takes for my brain to switch on.
My bad:pinch:
Quicker_with_age
29th October 2007, 21:27
It will be 100mm of sag with you on the bike :)
Rupe
29th October 2007, 21:37
It will be 100mm of sag with you on the bike :)
Thats how I set the bike when I got it. But when I mentioned this the other day while speaking to linton, he told me to set it 100mm under bikes weight.
I'll call him tomorrow as everyone seems to find this as strange as I did.
scott411
29th October 2007, 21:40
100mm free sag (bikes on weight) is way to much, we normally use 25-35mm free sag and 100-110mm rider sag (rider and bike weight)
Reckless
29th October 2007, 21:41
There are two types of sag Static sag (the bikes weight) 25-35mm and race sag (with rider & gear). 90-105mm. Its is a combination of both that determine if you have the correct rear spring.
You need a t least two people!!
Race sag.
Get your bike up of the ground suspension fully extended, like in the air over a jump, put a marker mark on the rear of the number plate or some fixed point (bolt) above the axle.
Measure the length from the axle to the marked/fixed point.
Now get all your gear on (this can make 5-8kilo difference), Stand on the bike in race position upright and balanced as if your riding.
Measure the length from the axle to the same fixed point.
Subtract one from the other. ie 520mm extended - 420mm with rider & gear = 100mm sag
This is rider sag.
Adjust to the compression of the spring to get the required amount required. I use 95mm approx for mx tracks with jumps ie Ardmore and Harrisville. And 105mm- 110mm for X-Country on the CR250. 100mm is generally accepted as standard. You will get to know your bike , Two full turns on the adjuster is about 10mm rider sag on the CR. I have mine marked with a felt pen mark. This adjustment makes heaps of difference to the handling for different disaplines.
Static sag or free sag - no rider.
Get your bike up of the ground, put a marker mark on the rear of the number plate or some fixed point above the axle. Should be the same as per previous measurement above.
Take it off the stand and than measure the bike standing under its own free weight. You might want to push down, release, take a measurement then pull up, release, take a measurement and split the difference. This is difference called suspension Stiction.
If this measurement is not in the required range ie 20-35mm it means you have a spring in that is either to soft or to hard for your weight.
ie If free sag is only say 5mm it means you are compressing a to soft spring, to much, to get the rider sag of 100mm. And your bike will be harsh with to little travel on the spring and the shock.
I've only been riding MX a year so I hope I've got it correct!
The measurements could be heaps different for your KTM but the above are generally accepted for Hondas, yammys and suzis etc
Ruecopp do a google seach its to hard to explain properly here.
Danger
29th October 2007, 22:37
Set sag (you on board) to 105 to 108mm. Your preferences may dictate a variation from this.
Spring preload (spring free length minus set length) should fall between 10 to 15mm. This is a good place to start from and fine tune from there. The rear sag can be used along with fork tube height and other variables (HS adjuster for example and spring rates) to fine tune the handling characteristics. With more rear sag, say 115mm the rear sits lower and rakes out the front end (slower steering, more stability).
With less rear sag, say 95mm the rear will ride higher and allow it to steer quicker but will give up stability.
All these measurements can effect trail and front tyre grip, but thats probably a bit advanced to go into for the purposes of this conversation.
Combine all of this and throw in the position of the rear axle in the swingarm and you have a lot of variables to fine tune or totally goof up you bike for your specific needs. I like to think that there is not any right or wrong numbers, only guidelines. Its up to you to take notes and try making changes to get the result thats right for you.
Or just bring your bike around and I will set the sag up for you. No charge of course.
Reckless
30th October 2007, 00:59
Shit if Danger hasn't corrected me I must have got it right! lol
And just to add to what Danger said the firmer 95mm sag at sprint tracks also helps with the big jumps where you want a firmer spring setting for the landings so you don't bounce. The quicker steering helps too I think?
Most of it learned from Danger and what little experiance I have. I quite like the tech side of setup.
Take Danger up on his offer to set your sag you'll learn heaps he's a magician.
Danger
30th October 2007, 07:24
Kind of but not entirely correct Reckless. Preload sets the ride height and the initial bump impact. It will have little effect on the big jumps but can make smaller bumps more compliant. Control any bounce (movement or velocity) with damping. Spring controls position, damping controls velocity. The reason your back end bounces on the big jumps could be because you have your compression backed off too far trying to get small (high speed) bump compliance and your shock is moving too far into the stroke too quickly and that stored energy in the spring needs to be released via rebound and your high speed rebound is too quick for you. The front end has these issues taken care off which can make the rear worse in some respects because it is out of balance with the front. Because you increase preload at Ardmore you maybe decreasing damping for the small bumps, then paying for it on the bigger jumps. Your robing Peter to pay Paul so a catch 22.
The jumps at ardmore are more of a low speed impact so increaseing preload will help to some extent because the demands are not great and if you slow the begining of the stroke you will get less stored energy and less bounce. But on bigger impacts the added preload is quickly overcome.
Think of low speed and high speed in terms of suspension speed, not bike speed.
I would think that a 100-105mm range would be adequate if you required any adjustment between disciplines. 95-110 seems a little extreme. I pretty much use 103mm rider sag on the RM for all disciplines. A change at the HS adjuster can have an effect on rear end ride height and turning.
Sorry Rupecopp if we have got a bit of topic and made this anymore confusing. 105-108 should be good for you and your bike and the riding you are doing. But don't be afraid to experiment from there.
scott411
30th October 2007, 10:37
i agree with danger, i run 105mm on most my bikes, it is a good base setting,
Ktmboy
30th October 2007, 10:56
These settings are all good for adult riders but, are they different for youths and smaller bikes? My son Logan has a KX 85 big wheel and weighs 40KG. What settings should I set them to. Bearing in mind most of his riding is GNCC, Tarawera 50, and X Countrys with the odd day at tracks like Ken Fells.
Danger
30th October 2007, 11:31
Your boy might be over sprung but try 80-85mm rider sag.
Rupe
30th October 2007, 17:22
Ok phoned Linton today, and surprise surprise 100mm was wrong. Don't know where I got that from, and have been wondering about it. So I thought I'd ask here if you lot thought it was weird, and you did so I rechecked.
He has told me that due to the sus being so progresive that he sets the sag to the bikes own weight at 30mm sag, and doesn't worry about the riders weight. But this is only a guide/starting point.
So i'll prob leave it as it is for the time being, and next time I'm heading out west if it's ok with you Danger I'll pop in and see you.
Thanks for everyones help.
FROSTY
30th October 2007, 20:15
Could I suggest you take the bike for a ride first.
Sounds to me that the man has set the shock up for "mr average"
Younever know youmight very well be EXACTLY "mr average"
Then take the bike to the experrts with your feedback as to how it feels
Quicker_with_age
30th October 2007, 21:31
Aparently this is the correct method, Dont quote me on this one :)
"Ideally, your sag should be 33% of available wheel travel. Find out how much rear wheel travel you have and multiply by .33 and you have how much sag you need. Subject to minor personal adjustments. For example a 2006 YZ450F is 12.4" X 25.4 = 315mm x .33 = 104mm rider sag. I suggest 103-106mm. Front forks should be 25% of available travel in rider sag. The YZ450F has 11.8" of travel X 25.4 = 300mm X .25 = 75mm rider sag. I suggest 75-80mm"
fiddler
3rd December 2007, 17:12
Since the original question appear to be for a GG.
On the Gasgas forum, go to forum
http://www.gasgasrider.org/index.html
There is a thread about how to set up the rear shock.
Apparently lots of people have had a very good ride from the setup which is slightly different from the normal way of setting up the rear.
Will try myself when my ohlins is back from service.
K
Wellyman
7th December 2007, 06:00
Hey rupecopp . What did you think of my suspension settings when you rode mine? If you want I can give them to you, I think I have the settings written down in my manual, or its easy enought to back them off and find what they were.
WM
CaMo
7th December 2007, 12:00
excuse my dumbness here but I'm still mucking around with mine.
What exactly are you adjusting to set the sag of the bike?? The BIG rotating thingies that move above the rear spring or are you adjusting the rebound/compression clicker settings?? :mellow:
Haven't really been playing with the rear, only the front.
Rupe
7th December 2007, 14:05
Hey rupecopp . What did you think of my suspension settings when you rode mine? If you want I can give them to you, I think I have the settings written down in my manual, or its easy enought to back them off and find what they were.
WM
It felt similar to mine, but when you do get a chance let me know what you've set yours at so I can see if there is a difference.
The main thing that confused me was setting it up as it's ment to be and not knowing if that was right for me. But after playing around with the set up a couple of weeks ago I have a better idea what feels good and not.
I'm happy with the fork set up, but think I might soften the rear. I think the whole bike could be set a bit better for tree roots (high speed compression)etc, but that is prob a job for Danger in the future!
CaMo I set my rear shock sag with the rings above the spring, which I think is right. There is some good stuff here if you want to know more http://www.mxboards.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=6&sid=ace0cd7442ffbe6b82577dda9e2f5f94
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.