Log in

View Full Version : How does Helen Clark survive....



Mully
23rd November 2007, 08:53
....on only $375000 per year. With no kids. And taxpayer funded vehicles.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4284755a10.html

Poor Helen. I'm glad it's payrise got backdated to July. It was barely scraping by.

I hope all families struggling to make ends meet (I'm not part of one, cos I have no kids, but several friends are. We are skint enough some months) remember this at election time.

KATWYN
23rd November 2007, 09:06
....on only $375000 per year. With no kids. And taxpayer funded vehicles.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4284755a10.html

Poor Helen. I'm glad it's payrise got backdated to July. It was barely scraping by.

I hope all families struggling to make ends meet (I'm not part of one, cos I have no kids, but several friends are. We are skint enough some months) remember this at election time.

She is on duty 24/7, including putting in her appearance at seemly "trivial" social functions. She probably doesn't get a chance to spend any of it. She has made the sacrifice of not having children to do the things she does for her country (a woman who has missed the bus on that one will probably not share how they feel)

How often do we see her playing golf, regulary engaging in various hobbies of her own, going on extravagent holidays etc (if she IS overseas shes usually on duty)

MSTRS
23rd November 2007, 09:12
Katwyn - you are assuming that s/he was even capable of having children. Or the bearded non-entity could father one....
And it's a misnomer to think that pollies have no personal time.

Krayy
23rd November 2007, 09:13
....on only $375000 per year. With no kids. And taxpayer funded vehicles.
You'd think she'd be able to afford to get her teeth fixed :sick:

ElCoyote
23rd November 2007, 09:14
She is on duty 24/7, including putting in her appearance at seemly "trivial" social functions. She probably doesn't get a chance to spend any of it. She has made the sacrifice of not having children to do the things she does for her country (a woman who has missed the bus on that one will probably not share how they feel)

How often do we see her playing golf, regulary engaging in various hobbies of her own, going on extravagent holidays etc (if she IS overseas shes usually on duty)

And let's not forget the people she stabbed in the back in order to get the job

:devil2:

vifferman
23rd November 2007, 09:17
....on only $375000 per year. With no kids. And taxpayer funded vehicles.
And unlimited free travel, courtesy of Air NZ, for life.

But to be fair, none of this is determined by the Gummint; the Higher Salaries Commission determines what these jokers get paid, and are very busy ensuring the salaries don't get out of step with private enterprise.
Kinda weird, given that the 'public sector' doesn't have comparable positions...

MSTRS
23rd November 2007, 09:22
You'd think she'd be able to afford to get her teeth fixed :sick:

You what? Haven't you seen the election posters?

Taz
23rd November 2007, 09:23
I dont begrudge her for getting that salary. If you want the same money get elected and work your way up. Simple really. Quit worrying about what other people have, work to better your own situation.

enigma51
23rd November 2007, 09:25
I dont begrudge her for getting that salary. If you want the same money get elected and work your way up. Simple really. Quit worrying about what other people have, work to better your own situation.

Okay helen we all know its you! :apint:

Flatcap
23rd November 2007, 09:34
I dont begrudge her for getting that salary. If you want the same money get elected and work your way up. Simple really. Quit worrying about what other people have, work to better your own situation.

Quite right - I would be happy to pay Helen more to piss off and never come back...

...that would better my situation

Taz
23rd November 2007, 09:36
Okay helen we all know its you! :apint:

Na I make more than that anyway.

Krayy
23rd November 2007, 09:47
You what? Haven't you seen the election posters?
I heard that was a special case and now she cannot stand the taste of Twink.

Polyfilla on the other hand.....

marioc
23rd November 2007, 09:47
deserves every penny,who the hell would want the job

Kittyhawk
23rd November 2007, 09:57
Shesh to that salary I say...well she has put the time and effort into working up the political ladder...its a shame shes not appreciated by the public while being at the top...

If we dislike her that much...who the hell votes for her?! must be someone around here.....:jerry:

Dave-
23rd November 2007, 09:59
what is this a trick question?

consumption of food and breathing oxygen im sure contribute to mrs clarks survival.

MSTRS
23rd November 2007, 10:08
Shesh to that salary I say...well she has put the time and effort into working up the political ladder...its a shame shes not appreciated by the public while being at the top...

If we dislike her that much...who the hell votes for her?! must be someone around here.....:jerry:

....list....

Mully
23rd November 2007, 10:11
Quit worrying about what other people have, work to better your own situation.

I'd love to - and I am. But it'd be bit quicker if I wasn't being taxed at damn near 40c in the dollar. Plus GST on every damn thing. Plus rates (that's local govt, I know, but while I'm spitting the dummy......). Plus Levies.

The reality is, she would be incapable of commanding that salary in the real (corporate) world. She has no life skills, and has never held a real job.

My personal theory is that the quickest way to increase the standard of living in NZ is to pay policitians the national average wage, reviewed every year. That'd drive the average wage up pretty smartly.

NighthawkNZ
23rd November 2007, 10:27
I'd love to - and I am. But it'd be bit quicker if I wasn't being taxed at damn near 40c in the dollar. Plus GST on every damn thing. Plus rates (that's local govt, I know, but while I'm spitting the dummy......). Plus Levies.


Then the price of living + ACC + REGO+ Warrent + Petrol (which is double taxed pretaxed and then GST) + Rates, (or rent, mortgage) + food, + power + Phone + repairs + clothing + + + + + + + +

And the end of the week theres not much left over for any kind entertainment let alone saving on the average wage these days...

BIGBOSSMAN
23rd November 2007, 10:31
She needs all that money and more so she can have the thick gorilla-like hairs waxed off her back and putrid muff daily.
And have her claws clipped.

Can't be cheap transporting her coffin around the country, either...

judecatmad
23rd November 2007, 11:25
....on only $375000 per year. With no kids. And taxpayer funded vehicles.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4284755a10.html

Poor Helen. I'm glad it's payrise got backdated to July. It was barely scraping by.

I hope all families struggling to make ends meet (I'm not part of one, cos I have no kids, but several friends are. We are skint enough some months) remember this at election time.

Also....how come the politicians get huge payrises, but those working for govt services (like the Armed Forces) are struggling to retain staff cos their pay rates are so low and keep getting told there's nothing in the coffers to allow pay rises to be given...????

judecatmad
23rd November 2007, 11:29
You what? Haven't you seen the election posters?

That's a point - most of her salary must go towards paying some very highly skilled airbrushers to work on her photos - it's a busy year coming up so more photos = LOTS more money needed :rofl:

crashe
23rd November 2007, 11:40
Gee I guess that some of you lot aren't thinking.....

Cos should you vote in John Keys ooops 'donkey' in as PM..... then he too will be getting that money as his salary........ will you all moan and groan then. I guess not.....

why cos he has children, he has straight teeth....... but remember the man thinks that he is in the labour party..... he even stated that in a speech.
He will most likely send us to war..... get rid of nuke free within NZ..... Remember he thinks along the same lines as Rob Muldoon...... and just look what Muldoon did to our country.


As Katwyn stated she is earning every damn cent working 24/7 365 days a year. Helen Clark choose NOT to have children as have many other women in NZ.

Mully
23rd November 2007, 11:52
Cos should you vote in John Keys ooops 'donkey' in as PM..... then he too will be getting that money as his salary........ will you all moan and groan then. I guess not.....



What?? Quick, there goes the point. Too late, you missed it.

John Key is worth around about $40 million dollars. Do you seriously think he needs the PM's salary??

Anyway, the point is many normal families struggle to pay the bills, and this person gets an enormous salary, plus perks FOR LIFE.

They can't get enough cops, nurses, doctors or teachers and we have 3rd world hospital waiting lists. How many resources could be bought using the horrendous inflated salary the PM gets?

And when I do get a pay rise, it's not backdated five fucking months.

jrandom
23rd November 2007, 11:52
If you don't like Ms Clark's performance in the job, you get to fire her at the next election. Works for me.

Why does everyone see a $375K per annum salary as some sort of enormous mind-numbing wealth?

It's less than most senior partners in large law firms take home every year, certainly less than one can make running a residential construction company, and about an average wage for the CEO of a mid-level NZ company with, say, less than $50m annual turnover.

Viewed in context with the enormity of the potential fuckups and potential successes that can be generated by a Prime Minister, $375K per annum is almost paltry.

But I suppose a lack of imagination is one reason why all the moaners are going to spend the rest of their lives patting themselves on the back every time they convince someone to pay them $25/hour.

jrandom
23rd November 2007, 11:53
... when I do get a pay rise, it's not backdated five fucking months.

The last pay rise I got in a salaried position was backdated eight months.

Sometimes the 'private sector' is inefficient too...

crashe
23rd November 2007, 12:00
What?? Quick, there goes the point. Too late, you missed it.

John Key is worth around about $40 million dollars. Do you seriously think he needs the PM's salary??

Anyway, the point is many normal families struggle to pay the bills, and this person gets an enormous salary, plus perks FOR LIFE.

They can't get enough cops, nurses, doctors or teachers and we have 3rd world hospital waiting lists. How many resources could be bought using the horrendous inflated salary the PM gets?

And when I do get a pay rise, it's not backdated five fucking months.


Ok what about the CEO's of huge companies that earn way more than what Helen Clark gets..... and they work way less hours than her......

Bitch and moan about them as well.

There is always going to be people earning a lot more money than the poor or middle earner.

Those that cant even manage on $100,000 - $150,000 and moan that they are poor, need to learn to budget.

Hell some of us in NZ get well under $20,000 per year and can budget real well.

If you are lucky enough to get high wages/salary, then put it aside for your retirement...

Helen will be on a high tax bracket and a lot of her wages will be also put into a super account upon her retirement.

MSTRS
23rd November 2007, 12:10
..... and they work way less hours than her......Says who? And these CEOs are (usually) skilled in the art of business for the good of their shareholders. Your precious Heilen is only skilled in the art of staying where she is



Helen will be on a high tax bracket and a lot of her wages will be also put into a super account upon her retirement.I think you will find that there is little difference here too...CEOs are often 'paid' in stock options etc

jrandom
23rd November 2007, 12:13
If you are lucky enough to get high wages/salary...

Sorry, crashe, but people who use the word 'luck' when it comes to personal income and wealth make my blood boil.

Lucky?

Pig's fucking arse.

Hard work and brain cells is what gets the cash.

KATWYN
23rd November 2007, 12:16
375k isn't a heck of a lot.

I'm dammed if 375k would be worth it for me to be constantly made fun of, hassled about my appearance, my family hasseled and insulted....and to still attend functions with professionalism and no bitterness.

Hell, I was at a function that Helen was at. and we had a guy at our table making smarmy comments and generally being disrespectful about our PM as she was giving a speech......until at the end of the function she came to our table held out her hand out to him introduced herself etc, and chatted away with him -he acted like a star struck schoolboy. He also looked like a right hypocritical twat to the rest of the group looking on.

Talk about egg on his face.

When she finished he was rather subdued and quiet - oh and had nice things to say about her after that.

Funny that

Coyote
23rd November 2007, 12:32
Earns?







You'd think she'd be able to afford to get her teeth fixed :sick:
You'd think so:

"Miss Clark, who gets a $19,000 allowance, is also allowed to spend it on clothes and grooming."

John Key is worth around about $40 million dollars. Do you seriously think he needs the PM's salary??

Anyway, the point is many normal families struggle to pay the bills, and this person gets an enormous salary, plus perks FOR LIFE.

They can't get enough cops, nurses, doctors or teachers and we have 3rd world hospital waiting lists. How many resources could be bought using the horrendous inflated salary the PM gets?
It's not about having wealth, but accumulating more. And being in power, funnily enough, gives him (and the National party) the power to run everything. Tax cuts to the businesses he has shares in, lower minimum wage so those businesses don't have to pay what they consider exorbitant amounts to their untrained 16 year olds (been there, done that), sell off the government owned utilities to private companies he can buy shares in, etc.

Agree with everything else though.

Usarka
23rd November 2007, 12:40
Helen is good at being PM. She's just got the wrong long term strategy. I wouldnt do her job for $375k.



Sorry, crashe, but people who use the word 'luck' when it comes to personal income and wealth make my blood boil.

Lucky?

Pig's fucking arse.

Hard work and brain cells is what gets the cash.

But youre so lucky earning that money, having gone to uni, worked 60 hour weeks for the last 15 years and sacrificed a lot of your personal life! Most of us dont get the chance.

Wolf
23rd November 2007, 12:48
John Key is worth around about $40 million dollars. Do you seriously think he needs the PM's salary??.
Or that he'll say "Oh, no, I already am worth 40 mil, don't bother paying me the PM's wage, I'll get by on my own."

All the PMs have been independantly wealthy and they've still accepted the PM's salary and then upped it at the first opportunity.

Usarka
23rd November 2007, 13:00
Cos should you vote in John Keys ooops 'donkey' in as PM..... then he too will be getting that money as his salary........ will you all moan and groan then. I guess not.....

why cos he has children, he has straight teeth....... but remember the man thinks that he is in the labour party..... he even stated that in a speech.
He will most likely send us to war..... get rid of nuke free within NZ..... Remember he thinks along the same lines as Rob Muldoon...... and just look what Muldoon did to our country.
.
John key is rich (which is why a lot of kiwis dont like him, how dare he be). He doesnt need this job for the money. so why is he doing it?

helen clarke = worked in academia and politics all her life, PM is just part of her career progression

john key = whether you agree with his policies or not he wants to be PM to make a difference to the country

Mully
23rd November 2007, 13:14
Ok what about the CEO's of huge companies that earn way more than what Helen Clark gets..... and they work way less hours than her......

Blah Blah, pissmoan, snip.

Helen will be on a high tax bracket and a lot of her wages will be also put into a super account upon her retirement.

OK, two points.

A) Private Enterprise, verses public purse. CEOs and GMs I have met who are paid a lot are professionals who have been slogging it out (in the real world) for upwards of 20 years. Unlike Helen who has never held a real job. If she turned up to, say, Telecom, tomorrow looking for a $375K job, they would laugh her out of the building.

B) Helen's super fund is also subsidised - to the tune of $2.50 for every dollar of contributions she makes.

rainman
23rd November 2007, 20:25
They can't get enough cops, nurses, doctors or teachers and we have 3rd world hospital waiting lists. How many resources could be bought using the horrendous inflated salary the PM gets?

As a public service to the hard of thinking, I'll work this out for you. Let's see, how about..... um..... about 10. At the cost of not having a PM. Yeah, that'd work well.


Why does everyone see a $375K per annum salary as some sort of enormous mind-numbing wealth?

It's less than most senior partners in large law firms take home every year, certainly less than one can make running a residential construction company, and about an average wage for the CEO of a mid-level NZ company with, say, less than $50m annual turnover.

Viewed in context with the enormity of the potential fuckups and potential successes that can be generated by a Prime Minister, $375K per annum is almost paltry.

Good question. A few jobs (and years) ago the CEO of the co I worked for was earning a base of AU$515k plus options allowances and assorted other gobs of money, and he was a useless tit too, who seemed to go out of his way to destroy the company.


Says who? And these CEOs are (usually) skilled in the art of business for the good of their shareholders. Your precious Heilen is only skilled in the art of staying where she is

As is the nature of all politicians of all political persuasions. What do you really expect pols to do? And how many CEOs do you know who hang about a few years, collect the big cash, do an at best indifferent job of running their companies, then float off to another cushy gig?


You'd think she'd be able to afford to get her teeth fixed :sick:

Praps she don't wanna? Maybe she's quite happy with her looks and teeth, or sees them as irrelevant.


OK, two points.

A) Private Enterprise, verses public purse. CEOs and GMs I have met who are paid a lot are professionals who have been slogging it out (in the real world) for upwards of 20 years. Unlike Helen who has never held a real job.

I say bollocks. I could count the number of highly paid, talented, professional and capable CEOs that I have met on one hand, after I'd chopped most of the fingers off. On the other hand, I can give you a long list of useless bastards who have stuffed up one thing after the next and still either been given a pile of cash to piss off or given a pile of cash and gone to find another nest to crap in.

Government is a) hard to do right (why so many stuff it up), and b) there's a relatively limited number of job openings for PMs. Like one.

Shadows
23rd November 2007, 20:50
She is on duty 24/7, including putting in her appearance at seemly "trivial" social functions. She probably doesn't get a chance to spend any of it. She has made the sacrifice of not having children to do the things she does for her country (a woman who has missed the bus on that one will probably not share how they feel)

How often do we see her playing golf, regulary engaging in various hobbies of her own, going on extravagent holidays etc (if she IS overseas shes usually on duty)


Shesh to that salary I say...well she has put the time and effort into working up the political ladder...its a shame shes not appreciated by the public while being at the top...

If we dislike her that much...who the hell votes for her?! must be someone around here.....:jerry:


Gee I guess that some of you lot aren't thinking.....

Cos should you vote in John Keys ooops 'donkey' in as PM..... then he too will be getting that money as his salary........ will you all moan and groan then. I guess not.....

why cos he has children, he has straight teeth....... but remember the man thinks that he is in the labour party..... he even stated that in a speech.
He will most likely send us to war..... get rid of nuke free within NZ..... Remember he thinks along the same lines as Rob Muldoon...... and just look what Muldoon did to our country.


As Katwyn stated she is earning every damn cent working 24/7 365 days a year. Helen Clark choose NOT to have children as have many other women in NZ.

Damn I wish Kate Sheppard was never born.

McJim
23rd November 2007, 21:00
It's not that much - I knew dudes that earned 5 times that in London and they weren't considered particularly high flyers...just good at their jobs.

Sanx
23rd November 2007, 21:45
why cos he has children, he has straight teeth....... but remember the man thinks that he is in the labour party..... he even stated that in a speech.

And I'm sure you've never mixed up a preposition, either ...



He will most likely send us to war..... get rid of nuke free within NZ..... Remember he thinks along the same lines as Rob Muldoon...... and just look what Muldoon did to our country.

Oh what utter tripe. "He will most likely send us to war." Where the hell are you getting that from, other than the rather large booklet entitled "How Great Labour Are, and other fairy stories"?
As for the nuclear-free issue, unless Key's continually lying through his teeth about such matters, he has stated that he will not change the nuclear free status of New Zealand. Some evidence here (http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=9591). He also declared it rather publicly on Cambell Live during an interview. No doubt the response will be "But he can say what he likes now - what he does in power will be the important thing", or some other trite phrase indicating he'll perform an abrupt U-turn the day after the election. Well, that's a possibility. But, unlike a certain party that's in power, Key doesn't have a track record of U-turns.
Labour, on the other hand, promise lots of things before elections, and then promptly reverse them at the next convenient opportunity. This is not hyperbole - it's documented fact. For proof, go read Hansard on the day of the 2005 budget and then for the day of the 2006 budget.
As for the Muldoon comment ... he was before my time. But last I heard, some of the great economic fuck-ups were carried by a Labour government; the names David Lange and Roger Douglas spring to mind. 76,000 manufacturing jobs lost in five years, plus such other policies designed to help the 'working man' including introduction of GST, removing farming subsidies, removing controls on foreign exchange, abolishing or removing import tariffs and incorporating state owned enterprises. Oh, and they also drafted possibly the biggest fuck-up of all, the Treaty of Waitangi Amendment Act 1985.


As Katwyn stated she is earning every damn cent working 24/7 365 days a year. Helen Clark choose NOT to have children as have many other women in NZ.

Wow - what a woman. Works while she sleeps. Or doesn't she sleep at all? And yes, Helen Clark can choose not to have kids. It is her inalienable right. But she never chooses to exercise another of her inalienable rights, that of silence, when it comes to telling other how they should raise their children. Isn't it kind of her, the gracious dear leader, to share her complete lack of experience.

Mully
23rd November 2007, 22:01
As a public service to the hard of thinking, I'll work this out for you. Let's see, how about..... um..... about 10. At the cost of not having a PM. Yeah, that'd work well.


Plus the $2.50 of contributions for every dollar we top up her super.
Plus the unlimited international travel FOR LIFE for her and her wife Peter
Plus the 2 free cars (my understanding is they get one at home and one in Wellington??), replaced every, what 3 years??
Plus the expenses to pay for "grooming" and the like (most people have to take that out of their salary)

Even if we ignore Helen's salary in particular, the article I linked to shows backbenchers get $126,200 plus benefits. I bet most people couldn't pick a lot of the backbenchers out of a Police line up.

I don't want to turn this into another political (Labour v National) thread (I can't stand for III to ruin another perfectly servicable thread) my point was simply the amount politicians in general get paid compared to the "average" wage in NZ.

This in particular annoyed me:
"MPs' allowances have also been given a 2 per cent boost in line with inflation; they now get $14,280 to entertain, pay for memberships, sponsors, fees and koha; cover the costs of raffle tickets, donations and flowers; and pay for passport photos, briefcases and meals."

MisterD
24th November 2007, 04:35
Or that he'll say "Oh, no, I already am worth 40 mil, don't bother paying me the PM's wage, I'll get by on my own."

All the PMs have been independantly wealthy and they've still accepted the PM's salary and then upped it at the first opportunity.

Well he already gets $200-and-odd grand for being leader of the opposition, same as a cabinet minister and he already donates that salary to charity every year...

James Deuce
24th November 2007, 05:42
As for the Muldoon comment ... he was before my time. But last I heard, some of the great economic fuck-ups were carried by a Labour government; the names David Lange and Roger Douglas spring to mind. 76,000 manufacturing jobs lost in five years, plus such other policies designed to help the 'working man' including introduction of GST, removing farming subsidies, removing controls on foreign exchange, abolishing or removing import tariffs and incorporating state owned enterprises.



Be careful arguing the Muldoon vs Lange economic debate. When Lange came to power in '84 there was about 6 weeks worth of cash reserve left in the NZ economy. Interest payments on overseas debt were made with Diplomatic Credit Cards. The Economic reforms undertaken by Labour in the '80s weren't done for fun, and if National had won that election, they would have been in the same boat. At the time Muldoon wouldn't have handled it as well as Lange/Douglas because his MO was borrow 'til you drop. No one was lending to NZ in '84. Manufacturing had been sustained on protective tariffs and subsidy, and primary produce had been protected to the extent that when they had to account for their own production and finance a lot of them (mostly sheep farmers) just sold up. NZ businesses weren't required to compete, just to exist to maintain positive economic indicators.

KATWYN
24th November 2007, 05:47
Damn I wish Kate Sheppard was never born.

How have you managed to survive in the real world with that attitude :laugh:

James Deuce
24th November 2007, 05:48
He's alright and probably knows more about Kate Shepard than your average 19 year kiwi chick.

KATWYN
24th November 2007, 05:52
Wow - what a woman. Works while she sleeps. Or doesn't she sleep at all?

I spose you would say the same thing about our Ambos, Dr's & fire people when they are hauled outa bed in the middle of the night to be on duty ....being on alert and needing to jump into action at any time comes under the catagory of working 24/7 IMHO

rainman
24th November 2007, 07:46
Even if we ignore Helen's salary in particular, the article I linked to shows backbenchers get $126,200 plus benefits. I bet most people couldn't pick a lot of the backbenchers out of a Police line up.


Agreed without question on the backbenchers. We could do with less than half of them and still run the place quite fine. In fact it'd probably be better!

Didn't we have a referendum a few years back on whether to reduce the size of parliament, and the results were a yes, but ignored? Wonder if National would actually reduce the number? I'd seriously think about voting for them then.

pritch
24th November 2007, 08:49
unless Key's continually lying through his teeth about such matters,

Basically I assume all politicians to be lying all of the time.

There may be times when that is unjust, but most of the time it will be perfectly appropriate.

Grahameeboy
24th November 2007, 08:54
John key is rich (which is why a lot of kiwis dont like him, how dare he be). He doesnt need this job for the money. so why is he doing it?

helen clarke = worked in academia and politics all her life, PM is just part of her career progression

john key = whether you agree with his policies or not he wants to be PM to make a difference to the country

I agree..................:shit:

What?
24th November 2007, 10:37
Be careful arguing the Muldoon vs Lange economic debate. When Lange came to power in '84 there was about 6 weeks worth of cash reserve left in the NZ economy. Interest payments on overseas debt were made with Diplomatic Credit Cards. The Economic reforms undertaken by Labour in the '80s weren't done for fun, and if National had won that election, they would have been in the same boat. At the time Muldoon wouldn't have handled it as well as Lange/Douglas because his MO was borrow 'til you drop. No one was lending to NZ in '84. Manufacturing had been sustained on protective tariffs and subsidy, and primary produce had been protected to the extent that when they had to account for their own production and finance a lot of them (mostly sheep farmers) just sold up. NZ businesses weren't required to compete, just to exist to maintain positive economic indicators.

Indeed, Muldoon created the dire situation that existed in '84 wtih his policies of Borrow and Devalue. Not to mention disestablishing the National Provident Fund because he considered the principle to be socialist, therefore evil. Before Muldoon came to power, NZ had one of the highest standards of living in the world. By the time he was ousted, things had certainly changed! Rogernomics, though seriously flawed, was a painful, but necessary episode in our nation's recovery; a continuation of Muldoonism would have seen us poorer than <<inset your choice of seriously poor African country here>> well before the '87 elections, and we wouldn't have the luxury of sitting here now debating politics on the internet.

kro
24th November 2007, 11:13
Most of the CEO's for the companies I have worked for have received more than that, and have had 1/1000th of the responsibility she carries.

I don't particularly like the way she governs NZ, but considering that the private sector would pay her twice as much, and then some, for running a large corp, perhaps the money is fair.

geoffm
24th November 2007, 19:20
Most of the CEO's for the companies I have worked for have received more than that, and have had 1/1000th of the responsibility she carries.

I don't particularly like the way she governs NZ, but considering that the private sector would pay her twice as much, and then some, for running a large corp, perhaps the money is fair.

I doubt that the private sector would pay twice as much as she gets now. There is not much market for unionists and academics with no commercial experience, or in fact, no business experience at all. W\ith her skills at dodging responsibility for the actions of her stafd, she could run Telecom though...

Wolf
24th November 2007, 19:26
W\ith her skills at dodging responsibility for the actions of her stafd, she could run Telecom though...
We'd never know the difference - it'd be just like Theresa was back in the chair. Perfect substitution, they're both ugly trolls.

MarkyMark
24th November 2007, 23:30
Money saved by lowering politician's salaries would soon be lost in the inefficiency and corruption of the bribes they'd be that much more motivated to take. Pay 'em a packet, and we don't have to worry about them selling favours, small price to pay I reckon.

Robert Taylor
25th November 2007, 08:42
Shesh to that salary I say...well she has put the time and effort into working up the political ladder...its a shame shes not appreciated by the public while being at the top...

If we dislike her that much...who the hell votes for her?! must be someone around here.....:jerry:

Well certainly not me, ever. Did you realise that she grew her ''husband'' in her hydroponics garden.....theres no way that the humourless calendar girl for perfect dentures would be able to score one by conventional means.

I see the dingos over the ditch have also just lost their marbles after 11 and a half years of very capable Government. I betcha the cost of living goes up enormously over there, just as it has here.

Qkkid
25th November 2007, 08:54
She looks gorgeous:msn-wink:

Mully
26th November 2007, 07:48
Money saved by lowering politician's salaries would soon be lost in the inefficiency and corruption of the bribes they'd be that much more motivated to take. Pay 'em a packet, and we don't have to worry about them selling favours, small price to pay I reckon.

Like Phillip Field?

Oops, sorry.

Sanx
26th November 2007, 08:43
Like Phillip Field?

Oops, sorry.

Taito Phillip Field. Please give him his proper official title 'cos other wise you reduce his honour and respect. That fact that he's a corrupt self-serving prick and his 'title' means he's nothing more than the honourary chief of some village in Samoa is neither here nor there...

Mully
26th November 2007, 10:01
Taito Phillip Field. Please give him his proper official title 'cos other wise you reduce his honour and respect. That fact that he's a corrupt self-serving prick and his 'title' means he's nothing more than the honourary chief of some village in Samoa is neither here nor there...

Is that what Taito means?? I thought it was another word for Koha.

Incidentally, I think I heard on the radio this morning that he has 9 houses. I'm sure his constituants are happy.