Films, Videos, and Publications Act

[scracha]

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4366814a6579.html?source=RSSwaikatotimes/localnews_20080121

So is having 30,000 pornographic images on your PC a crime? If so, a fair percentage of my customers should be locked up :first:

The court was told how police raided the married man's home on February 26 last year and discovered more than 30,000 pornographic images, mainly downloaded off the internet and printed or copied to video or compact disc. Computers and printers were also found in the house.

Fancy that...shocker.

Most of the images depicted female genitalia.
This story just gets more unbelievable.

Some of the files feature sexual activity involving young boys.
So shouldn't the title have been "Raid nets X amount of young boy images of paedo scum's hard drive"?

The man was remanded on bail to reappear in court next month. His bail conditions included a residency clause, an order to surrender his passport, and an order not to associate with any children under 16, unless at church

??? It's ok for him to be near kiddies in a church ?


Can someone clarify this Films, Videos, and Publications Act? http://www.censorship.govt.nz/thelaw-occasional-objectionable-computerfiles.html

Does this mean that his divine Spankness' Asian Girlies thread could put him in clinky?:Police:

[Mully]

I think it was young kids, though.

From the Police Prosecutor:

"(He said) he had heard it was an offence to have pornography relating to young girls, but regarded the nude body not to be pornographic unless it was in the form of a sexual act."

[Mully]

and this:

"Some of the files feature sexual activity involving young boys."

But yeah, the Church thing is fucked up

[Coyote]

Does this mean that his divine Spankness' Asian Girlies thread could put him in clinky?:Police:
Blackmail :devil2:

So he got done in for having porn on his computer, or for specifically having child porn? Titles are really just for grabbing attention aren't they...

[Mully]

So he got done in for having porn on his computer, or for specifically having child porn? Titles are really just for grabbing attention aren't they...

He got done for objectionable material.

Objectionable can be involving:
Kids, animals, snuff films etc.

[Steam]

Anything with Poo or Peeing is also illegal. All of those who have watched 2Girls1cup broke the law.

[jrandom]

Anything with Poo or Peeing is also illegal.

So is bestiality.

MRHANDS ftw!

Edit: I guess it counts as a snuff movie, too. Bonus!

[scracha]

Anything with Poo or Peeing is also illegal. All of those who have watched 2Girls1cup broke the law.

What about animals pooing? I'd best turn off my DVR security system then.

[Steam]

What about animals pooing?
Only if they are pooing on someone hot and naked, or they use the animal pooing as part of a human sexual act.

[scracha]

Only if they are pooing on someone hot and naked, or they use the animal pooing as part of a human sexual act.
Well I do live in the Waikato

[Usarka]

The man was remanded on bail to reappear in court next month. His bail conditions included a residency clause, an order to surrender his passport, and an order not to associate with any children under 16, unless at church

??? It's ok for him to be near kiddies in a church ?


A catholic church must surely be the safest place for a child to be without the fear of being fiddled.