PDA

View Full Version : Trail braking?



McDuck
12th March 2008, 22:01
Yo. I have seen a few times the term 'trail braking' used. What is it? Any info would be good.
Thanks

xwhatsit
12th March 2008, 22:20
There's two senses of the phrase, but the one I use (and practise a lot) is where you drag the rear brake through the corner. Seems to steady things a bit and tighten up the line where needed. I mostly only carry it to the apex, then start winding on the throttle.

Others with the sprotsbikes talk about front brakes and compressing the forks. Dunno what that's all about -- suppose it's a modern thing wot depends on forks that actually... fork.

Ixion
12th March 2008, 22:27
Trail braking as I have always used the term (and it is an old one) refers to the practice of lightly applying the rear brake through a corner, until the acceleration out of the apex.

It was a very common practice in the old days when bikes had hinged frames . The application of the brake tended to steady the bike, reduce the frame movement and help the bike turn in . Or at any rate things didn't seem quite so scarey.

I've never heard it used to apply to the use of the front brake to compress the forks. However, I do do that on the XT. Because it has a 21" front wheel it is not keen to turn in. The firm use of the front brake whilst initating the turn compresses the forks, reducing trail etc and making the bike more tender. So I suppose that practice is analogous to the classic trail braking.

Today, with more sophisticated suspension , the practice is probably obsolete.

McDuck
12th March 2008, 22:37
Could be worth a go me thinks.

Motu
12th March 2008, 22:54
Judging by the state of my rear brake I do it a lot....and don't really know why,I've never analyzed it,just done it.I guess it goes back to gravel roads and old drum brakes - engine braking and trail braking together would reduce rear wheel chatter....keeping that rear wheel loaded all the time so it doesn't get a mind of it's own.

GSVR
13th March 2008, 07:59
Trailing the front brake into a corner..

When riders talk about trail braking on the track its about braking after your've turned into the the corner and remaining on the brakes (not hard) to continue to scrub off speed and also to keep the front suspension slightly loaded to prevent the bike pitching as much up to the point when your on the gas again.

It takes a good feel for whats the fronts up to and squeezing the brakes too hard while leaned over will result in the front end letting go...

Never thought of it applying to the rear brake as I only seem to use the rear on gravel or in the wet but I can't see why the same definition can't apply to the rear as well ie. Trailing the rear into a corner. This sounds like an even more dangerous practice but if you get good at it its probably called backing it in. (Jay Lawrence)

Usarka
13th March 2008, 08:06
i agree with wikipedia on this one so will quote rather than typing my own gibberish..





Trail braking is a motorcycle riding and driving technique where the brakes are used beyond the entrance to a turn and are gradually released up to the point of apex.

In applying this technique, motorcycle riders approach turns applying both front and rear brakes to reduce speed. As they enter the turn, they partially release the brakes, as to keep only partial brakes throughout the turn. This will give more traction as the front tire is forced into the pavement.

This technique is commonly used when racing, but can enhance control and add more evasive options for street riders making it very worthwhile to learn or at least understand.

Be aware though that excessive trail braking can result in a loss of grip as the tire's adhesion is split between braking and cornering forces. It will also noticeably affect the motorcycle behaviour (as in handling). Should the surface traction be unexpectedly impaired, possibly by oil or fuel spills, a crash is utterly unavoidable.

GSVR
13th March 2008, 08:41
i agree with wikipedia on this one so will quote rather than typing my own gibberish..

"Should the surface traction be unexpectedly impaired, possibly by oil or fuel spills, a crash is utterly unavoidable."

Well I certainly don't agree with wikipedia here... When you slip on some unexpected shit and save the slide your've just avoided "a crash" that according to wikipedia is "unavoidable".

F5 Dave
13th March 2008, 10:47
Just to throw a bit of goo around. Most learners (most riders?) tend to be over-anxious on the brakes. Braking too late into the corner & the like is unsettling to the bike.

To corner safely you need to have a stable platform so it is better that all the braking is done before you apex. Many riders will hold onto the brakes too long (makes them feel safe) thus forcing the tyre to cope with braking force as well as cornering force.

Racing can tend to smear the line a little where you are pushing the envelope in a controlled surface you have ridden that same corner every 2 min for several laps. Quite different from the road.

I'd suggest first getting used to getting the brake done with before the corner so the bike has time to settle (let it off smoothly though) else you will have an excuse to always hold onto the safety blanket of the brake. Only then (can take years) should one start to delve further.

Ixion
13th March 2008, 10:55
Reading this, I think the definition has morphed over the years.

Back in the day, most everybody did it. Not to get through the corner quicker (as now seems to be the rationale), but because it helped reduce the 'orrible' things that happened mid corner, with the suspensions of the day (interestingly I don't recall anyone, including me, doing it on rigid frames ?). It was light braking , just enough to keep the drive line loaded up and (hopefully) encourage the various frame elements into some sort of vague alignment.

Now the meaning has morphed to what we used to call deep braking - holding the braking well into the corner.

Gravel roads are another matter again.

vifferman
13th March 2008, 11:10
S'funny (or perhaps not...)
When I was communtering this morning, I was braking quite hardly in a couple of corners (to avoid slower vehicles), and thought, "Hmmmm... I'm braking quite hardly here... wunner what them X-spurts at KiwiBiker would have to say about it?"
Of course, it was a very bad thing to do, and I crashed and died, the bike exploded into flames, and I died all over again.
Man, I *hate* it when that happens! :crazy:

roogazza
13th March 2008, 11:20
I'm old , so trail braking means dragging the rear and I do heaps of it. In fact I use a much stronger spring on the rear brake to counter this and keep me aware of it.
Yes I know some talk of trail braking the front but it isn't a big issue for me.
It all seems to depend on the style (if you can put it that way ?) and method you use when riding. Gaz.

vifferman
13th March 2008, 11:32
It all seems to depend on the style and method you use when riding. Gaz.
And your brakes.
On the VTR, I used to brake with the rear going into the corner (to settle the bike / transfer the weight), then transfer braking entirely to the front, then no brakes once I'd apexed. I also used the rear brake as a rudder when doing slow-speed manouevres. The back brake was useless for anything else, so engine-braking was more betterer.
I had to relearn all that when I got the VFR, with DCBS. For a start, there's less brake-induced weight transfer / attitude shifting. Also, now I can use the back brake hard in situations where doing the same on another bike would have you on your ear. However, the back brake's not so good as a rudder.
Engine braking's still good though, so I can use throttle control instead of the brakes a lot more.

Swoop
13th March 2008, 11:39
It is not this (http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=89042&d=1205318323).

vifferman
13th March 2008, 11:49
It is not this (http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=89042&d=1205318323).
Oh, I dunno. That's obviously the road-going version of the sea anchor, so why not? :spudwhat:
Seems an eminently sensible form of trail-braking to me. :yes:
Plus it would give you a bit of breathing space if anyone was following too close. :niceone:

Motu
13th March 2008, 17:14
(interestingly I don't recall anyone, including me, doing it on rigid frames ?).

Agree with the meaning changed,I rear wheel steer...front brake is off as I tip in.

Rigids were great,specially with a sprung seat....the bike just floated underneath you.Sprung weight....unsprung weight? Who cares,but the rear wheel was really planted - like you get on no other bike I've ever ridden.

MacD
13th March 2008, 18:15
Reading this, I think the definition has morphed over the years.

I agree. I certainly think of it as carefully modulated rear braking into a corner, and I also do it quite a lot. I guess it's a habit learnt from riding older, less rigid bikes. On the other hand it still seems to work perfectly well with newer bikes. It is all about learning and knowing how your bike/brakes behave. I tend to read the "I never use my back brake" posts with a touch of bemusement.

crash99
13th March 2008, 22:16
I agree. I certainly think of it as carefully modulated rear braking into a corner, and I also do it quite a lot. I guess it's a habit learnt from riding older, less rigid bikes. On the other hand it still seems to work perfectly well with newer bikes. It is all about learning and knowing how your bike/brakes behave. I tend to read the "I never use my back brake" posts with a touch of bemusement.

Yeah agree with most of wots been said. Old habits die hard as I found I had to keep all brakes working as late as possible on the old CB750 I had years ago as the brakes were so bad you usually found yourself going in far too fast anyway . . .

Agree that leaving some braking on front brakes can be useful as it helps steady things too by keeping front forks compressed slightly - gives a more stable feel which is needed on a standard 900 Hornet with crappy front forks (yes, Robert (Taylor) - I know, you told me how to fix it and I have yet to take your advice and do something about it :soon: :2thumbsup)

And like MacD's comment about people who reckon they "never" use their back brakes (duh) equally there are people who say that they ONLY ever use their back brake . . .:gob:

Oh well, each to their own.

F5 Dave
14th March 2008, 13:34
Early on in racing I had noticed that there were times that I was at the limit of traction, cranked over, tyres protesting. - Only to be passed by someone around the outside seemingly still easily in control. How did he do this? (a couple of championships under the belt helped). But I knew I was on the limit, if I pushed harder I fell off. What was he doing differently?

Quite a bit it appeared. He wasn't still holding onto the brake like I had been doing as I progressively entered the corner faster & so ended up having to brake harder & later if keeping my original game plan. Took me years to learn this.

To me it debunked the 'adds stability' argument. That's just 'safety blanket' talk.

When the front is compressed it is less able to cope with the suspension demands a real road throws at it. Traction has to be compromised. That's why racers open the throttle to take the weight off the front.


As far as just using the front brake only, on the racebike I only tend to use the rear in the wet & around real tight hairpins to try & stop drifting out. However I recently found that the lever on my rear brake had been bottoming out, worked ok on the stand, but as soon as moving was completely ineffectual. So maybe even the touches I had thought I was giving was just for scaredy-cat feel good.

On the touring bike with a bunch more rear weight (esp with my petite pillion) I use the rear brake. On the dirtbike I use it a lot, I'd even like a thumb operated for controlling wheel-spin exiting slippery corners.

Racey Rider
14th September 2008, 09:39
Just bumping this thread so more people read, that this term means different things to different people.