This vehicle has a fuel consumption of 21.4L per 100km, an annual fuel cost of $5,540

[orangeback]

This vehicle has a fuel consumption of 21.4L per 100km, an annual fuel cost of $5,540 and a fuel economy rating of 0.5 out of 6. (Source: Fuelsaver)
:Pokey::2thumbsup:Pokey::baby::buggerd:


http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Motors/Cars/Other/auction-150432138.htm?key=1302700

[The Stranger]

Suck on that Hitcher.
That advert proves you don't need good engrish to make it in this world.

[Mully]

Who cares how much fuel it uses.....

That site (Fuel Saver) is up the shit anyway. Says my V6 Commy uses 15 odd litres, which is never has. Saw an XR8 with a rating of 14.1l.

Typical govt site, rushed into service and full of bugs.

[marty]

a 'typical NZ driver' does 14000kms/year? my 'typical NZ family' has done 30000kms in 2 cars and 15000kms on a motorbike in 12 months

[Madness]

I can't see any cupholders. Besides, the Aerial Atom is quicker and leaves a few hundy-k to spend on bikes.

[Meekey_Mouse]

Who cares how much fuel THAT uses :love::drool:

[jrandom]

the Aerial Atom is quicker...

Pretty much any open-wheeler will be quicker for a tenth of the cost. Git yerself a Westfield, a Caterham or even an 'umble NZ-made Fraser and with a bit of driving practice you'd be embarrassing the hell out of the Lambo pilots around any racetrack you please.

For that matter, you'd probably be embarrassing the hell out of 95% of the knee-down heroes on this forum, too.

;)

[onearmedbandit]

Still, I know what car I'd be driving.

[skidMark]

Wtf...it's a bike with the cornering fun taken out, the only reason i have cars is due to taking a whole heap of non biker mates around, lugging around big items...ie my next cage is going to be a van both for commuting and a race transporter until i can afford another bike.

a fast car with no storage, no doubt they are nice cars. but give me a brand new thou for every day of the month instead please.

In saying this i must be nice to a point as i do inherit daddys lamborghini countach someday :love:

[onearmedbandit]

OMG, you, in a Lambo Countach. Oh dear.

[EJK]

0.5/6? Now thats shit... lol
I heard Bugatti Veyron drinks even more :whistle:

[scumdog]

This vehicle has a fuel consumption of 21.4L per 100km, an annual fuel cost of $5,540 and a fuel economy rating of 0.5 out of 6. (Source: Fuelsaver)
:Pokey::2thumbsup:Pokey::baby::buggerd:

BFD, my '66 Thunderbird doesn't even get that much 'economy' while driving around town:woohoo: :shutup:.

[Finn]

Oh dear, looks like a local property developer is cashing up.

Impressive car but I've never really liked the Lambo style, especially a gayardo. It's a woman's car in developed countries.

[Finn]

BFD, my '66 Thunderbird doesn't even get that much 'economy' while driving around town:woohoo: :shutup:.

Considering it only takes 3.6 seconds to cross your town, I would imagine it's quite fuel efficient. :shifty:

[scumdog]

Considering it only takes 3.6 seconds to cross your town, I would imagine it's quite fuel efficient. :shifty:

Aw c'mon, my SECTION takes longer than that to drive past!!:devil2:

(OK, maybe 3.6 MINUTES will get you through town - if you get grid-locked in the centre part on the way)

[onearmedbandit]

Oh dear, looks like a local property developer is cashing up.

Impressive car but I've never really liked the Lambo style, especially a gayardo. It's a woman's car in developed countries.

Agreed. But the Murcielago is a fine looking car.