PDA

View Full Version : Bucket weight...



nudemetalz
8th May 2008, 22:52
Okay,.. time for the dumb Bucket thread.

I weighed Lady Penelope tonight. She's 88kg's full of fluids and a few litres of fuel.

How heavy is your bucket?
(no tonnage figures please Sully.. :clap: )

quallman1234
8th May 2008, 23:24
Heavy!

The RS50 frame is seriously heavy! Ask Andrew or Trudes needed 3 people to lift it a decent height.

Grub
9th May 2008, 00:46
I weighed Lady Penelope tonight. She's 88kg's full of fluids.

Oh dear Nudez ... there's two things about a lady you don't talk about ... 1> Her age and 2. Her weight.

mummble tut ... what is the youf of today coming to ...

Hmmmm ... must go and weigh Parker and Brains ... All irrelevant anyway. It's not the weight of the bike I have to worry about, I have to stop eating pies!

TygerTung
9th May 2008, 01:46
CG125 has about 55kg on the back wheel and 25 on the front if I remember correctly, doesn't sound very balenced does it? Might be more sounds a bit light. Can weigh it tommorow. It's too cold and dark to go out to the garage now.

My super special honda has about 45 on each I think.

Trudes
9th May 2008, 08:55
Have no idea how heavy Pammy is, she seems quite light, I can lift her rear end, but she is a little top heavy....;)

Str8 Jacket
9th May 2008, 09:21
Have no idea how heavy Pammy is, she seems quite light, I can lift her rear end, but she is a little top heavy....;)

BOOBIES!!!!

Im not sure how much me lil Sambo weighs..... Its not much though. He's lighter than the A100 and Malcolms pit bike. I can actually lift him! Im sure Dave will be along soon to tell me how much he weighs!

fi5hy
9th May 2008, 09:50
The old black KawasakiLoncinAprilia ZXRRSVR145

50 Kg Front
52 KG Rear
102 Total
180 with rider

Big Black Fatty

bungbung
9th May 2008, 10:48
Sambo was weighed a few months ago at 80kg wet
My TZR145 was 85kg wet on the same scales

Str8 Jacket
9th May 2008, 10:49
Sambo was weighed a few months ago at 80kg wet


Cheers dude! That means he weighs 140kg with me on it, not too bad at all! :D

F5 Dave
9th May 2008, 11:55
That number rings a bell for the H. My 50 barely grazes 60kg with an empty tank so maybe 65 with as much gas as I'd ever run. People think my 50 is super powerful, it's not, but it is light. Bigger engines have heavier cranks etc, never get a 100 that light using road based engines. Was 0.5kg lighter when it was in the RG50 frame, the RS is heavier. Problem is I'm almost 80kg these days.

Think my road legal RG50 was 83kg with a full tank.

nudemetalz
9th May 2008, 12:15
And here I was thinking I did a good job lightening the whole machine, considering standard they're around 115kg's.
I gotta lose some weight too by the looks :wacko:

F5 Dave
9th May 2008, 12:19
What are you on about? 4 strokes are heavy so it's not too bad. That's why you get 150cc to play with. Careful not to lose too much weight where the vibes could cause issues.

nudemetalz
9th May 2008, 14:54
True, but lighter weight equals less horsepower necessary.
I don't think 88 kg is featherweight to the point of vibration issues.

Str8 Jacket
9th May 2008, 14:56
Im pickin up good vibrations
Shes giving me excitations
Im pickin up good vibrations
(oom bop bop good vibrations)
Shes giving me excitations
(oom bop bop excitations)
Good good good good vibrations
(oom bop bop)
Shes giving me excitations
(oom bop bop excitations)
Good good good good vibrations
(oom bop bop)
Shes giving me excitations
(oom bop bop excitations

Skunk
9th May 2008, 15:48
Im pickin up good vibrations
Shes giving me excitations
Im pickin up good vibrations... ...(oom bop bop excitations
Ferkin post counter...

Anyway, my AX1R is 45kg dry. Really.

Sketchy_Racer
9th May 2008, 15:49
jesus thats light!

bungbung
9th May 2008, 15:52
They'll be weight watchers scales then?

Skunk
9th May 2008, 16:03
They'll be weight watchers scales then?
Nah. Weightliars brand.

quallman1234
9th May 2008, 16:16
Ferkin post counter...

Anyway, my AX1R is 45kg dry. Really.

Sounds like the weight of the engine?

Skunk
9th May 2008, 16:20
Nah. It's lighter than that.

speedpro
9th May 2008, 16:47
Old #6 was 70Kg with a few litres of gas. New #6 is 80Kg with a few easy Kgs to lose.

Sully60
9th May 2008, 16:50
88 kg is pretty good dude.

Remember your not using light weight wheels, suspension components and bodywork etc and like Dave says there's some metal in them thar four stroke engines.

Skunk, 45kg for the AX-1R? I think you should have to carry a CB125T engine around as ballast!:bleh:

Skunk
9th May 2008, 18:53
I think you should have to carry a CB125T engine around as ballast!:bleh:
ZX1R does that. I have no idea what the AX1R weighs. Haven't got any scales (that I can use) either but I'd love to know...

Citroenjunkie
9th May 2008, 21:11
Henry is definately the lightest

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30042814&id=1159851044

:clap:

TygerTung
9th May 2008, 22:40
Use general bathroom scales, just weigh one wheel at a time.

Stands to reason than weight of front wheel+weight of back wheel= weight of bike. If you know what I mean.

Skunk
10th May 2008, 13:09
OK, got some scales... 85kgs for the AX and 145kgs for the ZX

Str8 Jacket
10th May 2008, 13:11
OK, got some scales... 85kgs for the AX and 145kgs for the ZX

HAHA! Fatties!!!!! :girlfight:

Skunk
10th May 2008, 15:05
Sob! :cry: Meanie...

diesel pig
10th May 2008, 18:57
My H100 in a RS frame weights 70kg with one liter of petrol in her.
My ex water cooled(RG400 barrel and head) GP100 in a 1987 TZR250 frame(shortened) was 84kg with water and no gas.

nudemetalz
10th May 2008, 19:07
Dang, those are light, D-pig !!!

speedpro
10th May 2008, 19:45
OK, got some scales... 85kgs for the AX and 145kgs for the ZX

HOW did you manage to make the ZX sooooo heavy??

Skunk
10th May 2008, 20:17
Just what my scales say. 65kgs of the front, 80kgs on the rear. Total 145kgs.

Is there a flaw in that?

The ZX is missing as much as possible and I was surprised at the weight of both. I expected the AX to be around 70-75kgs.

Trudes
10th May 2008, 22:02
Ok, nobody jump down my throat, but are we sure this weighing method really works??
Seems to me that it would be a bit like standing on a scale with one foot on the floor, going, " ok I weight 50 kgs" then standing on the scale with the other foot on the floor and it weighing 50 kgs and then adding them and coming to the conclusion you weigh 100kgs.... just asking...

Str8 Jacket
10th May 2008, 22:09
FFS Trudy, you're a fucken idiot! :rolleyes:

Trudes
10th May 2008, 22:27
Explain it to me then... I don't get it. Remember now, there are no stupid questions, just stupid answers.

nudemetalz
11th May 2008, 00:17
It does actually work, Trudes.

I weighed my bike's ends independently, then I got a stand and put that on the scales.
Zeroed the scales to allow for the weight of the stand and then balanced the bike on top of it.
Came to the same weight as before.

With weighing yourself by your legs independently, you can easily transfer your weight more or less on one foot to give different readings, whereas it's not possible on a bike (unless your adding or taking off weight as your weighing it).
That make sense?

Skunk
11th May 2008, 00:25
Ok, nobody jump down my throat, but are we sure this weighing method really works??
Seems to me that it would be a bit like standing on a scale with one foot on the floor, going, " ok I weight 50 kgs" then standing on the scale with the other foot on the floor and it weighing 50 kgs and then adding them and coming to the conclusion you weigh 100kgs.... just asking...

The weight each wheel puts on the ground is constant (when the bikes not moving). (Human bodies don't do that very well but something stiff like a bike does.) Well, there would be a slight discrepancy due to the suspension but not much.
It's quite valid.

nudemetalz
11th May 2008, 00:46
The weight each wheel puts on the ground is constant (when the bikes not moving). (Human bodies don't do that very well but something stiff like a bike does.) Well, there would be a slight discrepancy due to the suspension but not much.
It's quite valid.

errr...wasn't that what I just said, Mr Skunk ?? :whistle:
Sheez,..I dunno, these Kawasaki riders.....

Skunk
11th May 2008, 09:44
Well, I was typing my reply while you were posting your's so I didn't see your reply till after.

Sheez,..I dunno, these Guzzi riders.....

speedpro
11th May 2008, 10:56
Must be something in the water in Norf Welly

Trudes
11th May 2008, 10:56
Thanks Nudez and Skunk! Yes, makes sense to me now, and makes me feel better that you have tested it also by weighing the bike on the centre stand, which is a great idea. Cheers:niceone:

FROSTY
11th May 2008, 11:06
I thought you had to have the "other" wheel resting on a surface the same height as the scales for it to be semi accurate

Sully60
11th May 2008, 11:37
I thought you had to have the "other" wheel resting on a surface the same height as the scales for it to be semi accurate

Yeah I think you've got a point there Fosted one.

The other way of looking at it is the contact point of the tyre across the width of the scale would have to be consistent eveytime you did it.

With the one wheel on the ground the ground technique you are effectively measuring the force generated by the mass of the bike through a 2nd class lever. The fulcrum is the axle of the wheel on the ground , the bike is the load and the effort/force is what the number on the scales. If you move the wheel that sits on the scales the force will change as the relationship between the fulcrum and the effort point changes slightly. Frosty's idea alters the height of the fulcrum which can also affect the result.

In saying all this it's splitting hairs really as the width of a set of bathroom scales are relatively small as is the weight and length of the bike, so any inconsistencies are going to be even smaller.

So, as you were...

nudemetalz
11th May 2008, 11:51
Yes, I know what you guys are saying, but the difference is miniscule IMO.

However, I decided to test the theory. (yup, Mythbusters NZ-style:2thumbsup ).

46kg's on the front wheel with rear wheel on the deck.
45kg's on the front wheel with the rear wheel level with the front.
(I assume the rear would do the same)

Not a lot of difference unless you're a MotoGP team.

(Oh and apologies Skunk)

FROSTY
11th May 2008, 12:34
Yes, I know what you guys are saying, but the difference is miniscule IMO.

However, I decided to test the theory. (yup, Mythbusters NZ-style:2thumbsup ).

46kg's on the front wheel with rear wheel on the deck.
45kg's on the front wheel with the rear wheel level with the front.
(I assume the rear would do the same)

Not a lot of difference unless you're a MotoGP team.

(Oh and apologies Skunk)
Just to humour an old man --could ya repeat the exersize for the back wheel.

nudemetalz
11th May 2008, 13:09
Just to humour an old man --could ya repeat the exersize for the back wheel.

Alrighties, since you asked nicely...I did it

The rear was 42 kgs bike level and 43 kgs rear up.
I thought well that makes sense with more weight to the rear than if the rear was up, so I had got the front around the wrong way....:argh:
The correct weight for the front is 45kgs up and 46 kgs level.
Hence 88kgs both measurements.

Did I humour the old man ?? :clap: ;)

quallman1234
11th May 2008, 15:22
145kg, doesn't seem right!

Surely not.

Try this maybe?

Get a piece of wood long enough to put your bike on.

Measure the weight of the wood, then put the wood on the scales and put the bike on top of it, balancing it with you hand (should be minimal extra weight doing that).

Then minus the weight of the wood off the total weight of the two?

Something like that would be a bit more accurate i would imagine, oh and make sure the scales are close to the middle.

Or if you have a stand, just balance it on the stand on the scale.
we did that with the dirt bikes and it seems accuratish.

Sully60
11th May 2008, 15:41
HOW did you manage to make the ZX sooooo heavy??




145kg, doesn't seem right!

Surely not.



Yeah, considering the C model roadbike only weighed 141kg dry.

The 125T engine is bloody heavy but not 4kgs more than the ZXR engine, headlight, bodywork and all the associated roadbike guff that we rip off.

Get off the bike next time you measure it Skunk!

quallman1234
11th May 2008, 16:08
Ohhhhhhh its the ZX my bad, thought it was the AX.

Honestly is the dry weights ever accurate.
Ive heard they take everything possible out, etc fork oil, oil, fliuds.

But still 145kg is on the heavy side. At least it looks good.

koba
11th May 2008, 16:33
hehe gunna nick some scales to weigh the pitty...

Slingshot
11th May 2008, 19:01
Just weighted Frankie, she's roughly 77Kgs.

fi5hy
12th May 2008, 07:52
Yeah, considering the C model roadbike only weighed 141kg dry.

The 125T engine is bloody heavy but not 4kgs more than the ZXR engine, headlight, bodywork and all the associated roadbike guff that we rip off.

Get off the bike next time you measure it Skunk!


Come on sully 147 twin ?????kgs Yours that is

Sully60
12th May 2008, 16:43
Come on sully 147 twin ?????kgs Yours that is

I've never weighed it, I already know it's bloody heavy.

I don't call it the Leadsled for nothing!

I shall purloin some scales and weigh the thing, maybe I could get the coppers to meet me at the weigh station on Hutt Road on the way to work tomorrow, that should handle it eh?

koba
15th May 2008, 15:38
I've never weighed it, I already know it's bloody heavy.

I don't call it the Leadsled for nothing!

I shall purloin some scales and weigh the thing, maybe I could get the coppers to meet me at the weigh station on Hutt Road on the way to work tomorrow, that should handle it eh?

I got the beachbuggy weighed at silverstream tip, it was $5 for a printout.
The beach buggy was 660kg sopping we fully loaded or 450kg dry.
The scales should be able to handle measuring the leadsled as they do big trucks up there. :lol:

koba
21st May 2008, 19:54
Ok, finally got some scales.
Will weigh the pitty when it aint so cold outside.
I was having a play with the old racebike I wanna turn into a bucket.
With the 600 motor in it the weight on the front wheel was 64.9kg.
Bummed out by not being able to wiegh the back without help :angry2: Damn fussy digital scales!

Will try to get the weight of the rear so I can see how the narrower wheels and smaller engine effect it.

I dunno if the bucket motor I have in mind will be any lighter tho...

nudemetalz
21st May 2008, 21:41
Does the pitbike register the scales at all ? ;)

koba
22nd May 2008, 10:26
Does the pitbike register the scales at all ? ;)

:lol: It may not!
Going to check tonight.
I Am really keen as to get the back of the old racebike done too, it may be lighter than skunks bucket with a 600 in it!!!

Sully60
26th May 2008, 19:41
Come on sully 147 twin ?????kgs Yours that is

Well after much procrastination and subsequent harranging I have finally weighed the sled.

With a couple of litres of fuel, oil and the twin exhaust system it weighs 109kg.

That's lot of kg's!

I'm not saying what the all up weight of bike and rider is:nono:

nudemetalz
26th May 2008, 20:03
Sheez, Sully !!! :blink:

Your rider/bucket combination may need a plimsoll line....:msn-wink::bleh::lol:

Skunk
26th May 2008, 21:27
Fuckin lightweight... :mellow:

koba
27th May 2008, 15:06
FINALLY!

I weighed the pitbike.

56.4 kg all up :banana:

Lighter than me...

Skunk
27th May 2008, 16:52
I reweighed the ZX1R: 155kgs.
The AX1R: 92kgs.

I blame the pies...

nudemetalz
27th May 2008, 17:18
sheeezus....155kg !!!!!!!:eek:
You gonna have to get 50hp out of the ZX1R now you know !!!

speedpro
27th May 2008, 17:24
I reweighed the ZX1R: 155kgs.
The AX1R: 92kgs.

I blame the pies...

155Kgs - bloody hell!!

My McIntosh "only" weighs 200Kg and I was thinking that was heavy.

155Ks is close to double my FZR/MB. Have you tried heating the frame to melt the lead and let it run out???

Skunk
27th May 2008, 18:39
Fuck. That was too easy...

gav
27th May 2008, 19:37
:laugh: You're a stirring bastard! Keep up the good work!

TZ350
27th May 2008, 20:05
Suzuki GP125, 97Kg. rider 95Kg. Bike 18Hp @ 9,500 RPM.

Buddha#81
27th May 2008, 20:15
FINALLY!

I weighed the pitbike.

56.4 kg all up :banana:

Lighter than me...

I can do a poo heavier than that!

koba
27th May 2008, 20:36
I can do a poo heavier than that!

:lol::rofl:

Skunk
28th May 2008, 10:13
Fuck. That was too easy...
I'll have to weigh them both on the weekend. For real this time. No, really.

k14
2nd June 2008, 21:28
Weighed in old red today, 104kg with full fluids and about 3l of petrol. Bit less than I was expecting although manual says 125kg and its still fairly stock, bar removal of all road gear and 17" wheels.

gav
2nd June 2008, 21:57
"fairly stock" :msn-wink: Tui's anyone? :apint:

Buddha#81
2nd June 2008, 22:40
Weighed in old red today, 104kg with full fluids and about 3l of petrol. Bit less than I was expecting although manual says 125kg and its still fairly stock, bar removal of all road gear and 17" wheels.

The smaller L/h carb would have saved some weight.

k14
3rd June 2008, 10:16
"fairly stock" :msn-wink: Tui's anyone? :apint:
As I said, apart from 17"s it is pretty damn close. Different seat and no road equipment is about all thats done, oh and no starter motor and rewired electrics.

The smaller L/h carb would have saved some weight.
Nah I managed to find another carb to match the right one, she's gonna be flying thats for sure :yes: :scooter:

gav
3rd June 2008, 18:32
1983 CB130T ....... :blink: stock? :whistle:

k14
4th June 2008, 06:10
1983 CB130T ....... :blink: stock? :whistle:
Oh right, that 1mm less of engine bore must be worth 20kg???

Kickaha
4th June 2008, 06:40
Oh right, that 1mm less of engine bore must be worth 20kg???

If it was, Gav would only have to overbore 3mm to get competitive:msn-wink:

gav
4th June 2008, 20:01
Seems to have worked for Buddha? :cool:

SHELRACING
5th June 2008, 12:58
Guys we have scales down at the kart track and our CB Twin was 105kg, loaded with fuel.
Not sure what the FXR/Loncin 150 is, but will see if we can weigh it at the next meeting.

Buddha#81
5th June 2008, 15:09
Seems to have worked for Buddha? :cool:

Terminal velosity.........:shit:

koba
13th August 2008, 13:07
had the scales out today.

RG150 frame = 14.5 kg. ( with a few extra coats of paint)
RG150 Swingarm = 5.5kg

KLR600 engine with carb = 48.6kg

NSR250 MC18 frame and swingarm together = 12.7kg (this has a seperate subframe unlike the rg)
My subframe (could be lightened for a bucket) = 5.8kg

quallman1234
13th August 2008, 13:08
had the scales out today.

RG150 frame = 14.5 kg. ( with a few extra coats of paint)
RG150 Swingarm = 5.5kg


I swear its heavier!

koba
13th August 2008, 15:22
I swear its heavier!

Yeah, I was surprised there isn't more difference.
I may try that one again just to make sure I got it right.

speedpro
13th August 2008, 18:41
RG150 Swingarm = 5.5kg


How do you make a swingarm that heavy?? Or does that include suspension link and shock??

koba
13th August 2008, 19:48
How do you make a swingarm that heavy?? Or does that include suspension link and shock??

Nope, it may have had the bearings in it but nothing more.

They are all steel and Beefy, Bannana kinda bit on the right side and MASSIVE link bit between the two sides.
I think in trying to make it look like a sporty alloy one they wern't to worried about weight.
Mine may have had some water in if from sitting outside but it has been stored with almost 6 months to dry out...

quallman1234
14th August 2008, 10:23
How heavy's the RG's engine? 15-25? its not that heavy

koba
14th August 2008, 10:31
How heavy's the RG's engine? 15-25? its not that heavy

Pretty sure it would be over 20, maybe more like 30.
That is still pretty light.
I will check next time I have a complete one out.

SHELRACING
15th August 2008, 13:21
My next project is a FXR150 Motor in a FZ Deltabox frame.

Frame, Rear shock and Swingarm 20kg, balanced on the bathroom scales.
( must remember to put those back before she gets home, aye :innocent: )


The Fx150 motor was 27kg, but the cams and piston are out cos the motor is all blowed up.

Anyone interested in a thread on the build of the FZ/FXR bucket. Input from some of you fellas would be most helpful. :2thumbsup

F5 Dave
15th August 2008, 15:54
um, ok here's an idea. Why not put the fixed FXR engine back in the FXR? They seem to handle just fine & fairly light.

speedpro
15th August 2008, 22:15
FZR has lots better running gear, 3LNs anyway though the earlier 2KRs are OK

dangerous
16th August 2008, 19:47
Okay,.. time for the dumb Bucket thread.

I weighed Lady Penelope tonight. She's 88kg's full of fluids and a few litres of fuel.

How heavy is your bucket?
(no tonnage figures please Sully.. :clap: )

The MT replica MB is 79kg and the 125T is 99kg + me at 90kg :banana:

SHELRACING
18th August 2008, 15:36
um, ok here's an idea. Why not put the fixed FXR engine back in the FXR? They seem to handle just fine & fairly light.

Reasonable question.

FXR motor came in bits in a box, rooted, repairs not vaiable
FXR frame was modified (slightly to take the Loncin Motor)
We want a second F4 bike.
Looked at Speedpro's 3ln based machine. Which impressed
Got the frame, and a lot of the running gear.
Need a new project so I don't drive the misses up the wall.

Be an interesting bike don't ya think ??

F5 Dave
18th August 2008, 15:51
Erm, no I'm still confused.


So you have a frame etc & an engine but it is:
"FXR motor came in bits in a box, rooted, repairs not vaiable"

So you are going to fix a non-Viable engine?

Or have to buy another FXR to scoop the engine out of? If you do I have a mate who wants FXR rolling chassis.

Skunk
18th August 2008, 16:02
I understand it as he has a Loncin motor and FXR frame, and a broken FXR motor... :confused: But that don't make sense either.


My next project is a FXR150 Motor in a FZ Deltabox frame.

speedpro
18th August 2008, 16:10
The FZR chassis is light and way better than the FXR. Standard wheel and brake setups are better as well though the front(and rear) calipers are heavier than needed on a bucket. The FZR though 20 odd years old was built as a sport bike rather than a budget commuter and is still better even 20 years later.

gav
18th August 2008, 19:13
Reasonable question.

FXR motor came in bits in a box, rooted, repairs not vaiable
FXR frame was modified (slightly to take the Loncin Motor)
We want a second F4 bike.
Looked at Speedpro's 3ln based machine. Which impressed
Got the frame, and a lot of the running gear.
Need a new project so I don't drive the misses up the wall.

Be an interesting bike don't ya think ??
Define rooted? Is the head OK? Interested in selling it if its OK?

SHELRACING
18th August 2008, 20:04
Erm, no I'm still confused.

So you have a frame etc & an engine but it is:
"FXR motor came in bits in a box, rooted, repairs not vaiable"

So you are going to fix a non-Viable engine?

Or have to buy another FXR to scoop the engine out of? If you do I have a mate who wants FXR rolling chassis.

I bought the FXR150 with a motor removed and dissassembled for $200

So I had a good rolling chassis, and put a new loncin motor in it.

The FXR motor was taken apart by kid. all the components were thrown in a box. The crank and bearings are shot. All the major engine components are there. But on the face of a quick reassembly. Minor ( i mean minor ) components may be missing, but a hassle to replace.

The motor is good for parts Barrel, head, cams etc, and is not for sale

So I have a good reliable 'B' grade bucket. FXR Chassis running a Loncin motor.

MY next project is to build another bike. I am looking at but not committed to an FXR150 engine in a FZ Deltabox frame. I have an almost complete rolling chassis, and would need to buy a S/H FXR motor. If I can buy a motor (when finances allow) for $500-600, the blown motor is not viable to repair.
A motor from a wrecker $750 which is a bit steep

When the project bike is built
I get a new bike
My misses gets the FXR/Loncin. She loves it a great bike for her and she doesn't mind spending money on the project bike.

Nuff Said

Skunk
18th August 2008, 21:49
You sound like me. Bits of half projects waiting for Lotto or the next 'Great Deal' :laugh:

koba
20th August 2008, 10:44
You sound like me. Bits of half projects waiting for Lotto or the next 'Great Deal' :laugh:

...........

SHELRACING
21st August 2008, 09:56
You sound like me. Bits of half projects waiting for Lotto or the next 'Great Deal' :laugh:

That would be about right, although I don't think a lotto win would be enough to finnish all my projects :lol:

SHELRACING
21st August 2008, 10:03
Going back to the issue of weighing your bike While I was up in Auck I put the FXR/Loncin on the Kart track scales.

The scales are big enough to take the whole bike. Results as follows

Whole bike 103.5 KG
Front wheel footpegs Level with platform 50kg
Rear Wheel footpegs Level with platform 52.5kg

The front wheel / rear wheel method works, with only kg difference. Surprised me how close the readings were.

koba
21st August 2008, 10:17
Going back to the issue of weighing your bike While I was up in Auck I put the FXR/Loncin on the Kart track scales.

The scales are big enough to take the whole bike. Results as follows

Whole bike 103.5 KG
Front wheel footpegs Level with platform 50kg
Rear Wheel footpegs Level with platform 52.5kg

The front wheel / rear wheel method works, with only kg difference. Surprised me how close the readings were.

Nice, that shows I'm not too far off with the NSR frame either.

Skunk
21st August 2008, 11:38
ZX1R 146kgs
AX1R 98kgs


Must weigh them sometime.

koba
21st August 2008, 15:33
ZX1R 146kgs
AX1R 98kgs


Must weigh them sometime.

Skunks book of lies 23kgs

Skunk
21st August 2008, 15:55
Skunks book of lies 23kgs
Just for that I might weigh one tonight. Which I now have. The AX1R is 82kgs fully wet (38kg front/44kg rear). Plus me at a hefty 69kgs.

85kgs for the AX and 145kgs for the ZXWasn't a bad guess (being complete bullshit) after all.

quallman1234
23rd September 2008, 20:41
Weighed the beast.

40ish each end, quite well balanced believe it or not. Probably why it feels so light generally.

Rick 52
23rd September 2008, 22:02
Weighed the beast.

40ish each end, quite well balanced believe it or not. Probably why it feels so light generally.

My FXR 150 was also under 104kg wet with gas not to bad

Buddha#81
24th September 2008, 19:25
MotoFXR150 41.5kg on the front and 51.5kg rear, 93kg......not too bad for a fairly standard fxr with a tailpiece. The rear would drop more if I took the GSXR wheel out and put the slightly lighter FXR one back in.

dangerous
24th September 2008, 19:47
MotoFXR150 93kg......not too bad for a fairly standard fxr with a tailpiece.
bloody good man, what you lot winge about my CB is 100kg

Buddha#81
24th September 2008, 20:12
bloody good man, what you lot winge about my CB is 100kg

.....which in itself aint too bad considering it has 2 of most things!

Rick 52
25th September 2008, 20:57
MotoFXR150 41.5kg on the front and 51.5kg rear, 93kg......not too bad for a fairly standard fxr with a tailpiece. The rear would drop more if I took the GSXR wheel out and put the slightly lighter FXR one back in.
Shit that is 10kg light than mine cool I better get the grinder out again

Buddha#81
25th September 2008, 22:07
Shit that is 10kg light than mine cool I better get the grinder out again

Yeah but the poor thing has to dribble around with my 105kg fat arse on it. Don't get too hung up on the weight (unless you're battling for the lead), you could knock 10kg off it and a young fulla on the same bike weighing 55kg may kick ya arse. 10kg's a tank of gas.

Trudes
15th March 2009, 18:15
We weighed "Rangi the super mega cool eh bro" bucket at the track today on the REAL scales, he had about 3 litres of fuel and a litre of oil and came to......
80.4kg Yahhhh Rangi!!! (well, Yahhhh Speedpro for making everything possible hollow and light;) )

b1kerb0b
16th March 2009, 07:03
Those scales at Kaitoke were awesome!
The Sachs came in at 95kg fully loaded with gas.

nudemetalz
16th March 2009, 07:30
Just don't scare yaself and stand on them.
Winter coat doesn't come into effect yet, I'm afraid.......:laugh:

fi5hy
16th March 2009, 07:41
My little fatty came in at 104 kg

Masterchop
16th March 2009, 08:07
Sounds like mine needs a weight loss programme.

107kg

bungbung
16th March 2009, 08:10
Mine was 104kg, so was I

Skunk
16th March 2009, 08:29
79.5kg for my AX1R. The secret diet is going well. It's got to get under the riders weight...

bungbung
16th March 2009, 08:34
Mine was 104kg, so was I

d'oh, my bucket was 94kg, I wasn't :weep:

Korea
16th March 2009, 08:42
Weighed the RG/RX125 - 101kgs with 1/3 of a tank of go-juice. Surely should be some weight savings to be had yet though... :yes:

b1kerb0b
16th March 2009, 09:27
Wow, this makes me feel WAY better. Now to shave a few more kg's... from the bike ;-)

dangerous
16th March 2009, 16:53
Mine was 104kg, so was I
LOL a combined weight of 208kg then huh?

as I have already posted my MT rep mb100 weighed in at 79kg... the CB125T at 99kg... well I just weighed the MOTO FXR150RR in and it disapointed me with a wopping 112kg... me well thats another disapointment LOL, 92kg :2thumbsup

timg
16th March 2009, 18:19
me well thats another disapointment LOL, 92kg :2thumbsup No wonder yer FXR quit having to lug that lump of lard around :lol:

Yow Ling
16th March 2009, 18:38
LOL a combined weight of 208kg then huh?

as I have already posted my MT rep mb100 weighed in at 79kg... the CB125T at 99kg... well I just weighed the MOTO FXR150RR in and it disapointed me with a wopping 112kg... me well thats another disapointment LOL, 92kg :2thumbsup

Must be all the extra paint and polish, just weighed my MotoFXR 45kg rear 46.7 front total 91.7kg, there is another easy 2 kg to come off if I can be arsed

Checked my new 2 stroke I was a bit disapointed 42.4 rear 44.4 front 86.8 total,

dangerous
16th March 2009, 18:46
my MotoFXR 45kg rear 46.7 front total 91.7kg 56 frount and 56 rear, weird aye :rolleyes:

I think that farker that builds my engines added lead in the bottom of the casings...

Bren_chch
16th March 2009, 18:50
its all that paint you used on ya bike! go polish some off! :Pokey:

bungbung
16th March 2009, 18:55
LOL a combined weight of 208kg then huh?

as I have already posted my MT rep mb100 weighed in at 79kg... the CB125T at 99kg... well I just weighed the MOTO FXR150RR in and it disapointed me with a wopping 112kg... me well thats another disapointment LOL, 92kg :2thumbsup

That was a typo. The TZR loncin weighed 94kg wet, maybe 3 or 4l of gas on board. I still weigh 104kg in leathers though

Trudes
16th March 2009, 19:22
I still weigh 104kg in leathers though

You have an excuse though, you're really tall.... and your leathers are really tight!!!:niceone:

Skunk
16th March 2009, 19:24
You have an excuse though, you're really tall.... and your leathers are really tight!!!:niceone:
Thanks for the reminder Trudes... :pinch:

Trudes
16th March 2009, 19:25
Thanks for the reminder Trudes... :pinch:

An image permanently burned in eh!!:shifty::laugh:

Rick 52
17th March 2009, 16:57
Must be all the extra paint and polish, just weighed my MotoFXR 45kg rear 46.7 front total 91.7kg, there is another easy 2 kg to come off if I can be arsed

Checked my new 2 stroke I was a bit disapointed 42.4 rear 44.4 front 86.8 total,

Thats good for a fxr I have hacked most of the unwanted of mine and got it down to 103kg wet .Are you still running the standard swinging arm ? What was the biggest saving you found cheers Rick

dangerous
17th March 2009, 17:28
What was the biggest saving you found cheers Rick unwanted shit in the engine... balance shaft, starter gears, kick shaft, its amazing the weight off all that shit and dont forget the hp used to rotate it for no reason.






having a TZR frame helps tho

Yow Ling
17th March 2009, 18:13
Thats good for a fxr I have hacked most of the unwanted of mine and got it down to 103kg wet .Are you still running the standard swinging arm ? What was the biggest saving you found cheers Rick

Getting rid of the FXR frame didnt hurt, fxr swingarm is about 6 kg by itself

Probably gained a bit of weight inthe wheels dept

Rick 52
19th March 2009, 19:44
Cheers guys I have lots of work to do then .
The delta looks great nice work